Catherine Fagard

High rate of virologic suppression with raltegravir plus etravirine and darunavir/ritonavir among treatment-experienced patients infected with multidrug-resistant HIV: results of the ANRS 139 TRIO trial.

BACKGROUND The introduction of 2 or 3 fully active drugs in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients receiving failing antiretroviral therapy is a key determinant of subsequent treatment efficacy. The aim of this study was to assess the safety and efficacy of a regimen containing raltegravir, etravirine, and darunavir/ritonavir for treatment-experienced patients infected with multidrug-resistant HIV. METHODS Patients enrolled in this phase II, noncomparative, multicenter trial were naive to the investigational drugs and had plasma HIV RNA levels >1000 copies/mL, a history of virologic failure while receiving nonnucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTI), > or =3 primary protease inhibitor and nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI) mutations, and < or =3 darunavir and NNRTI mutations. The primary end point was the proportion of patients with plasma HIV RNA levels <50 copies/mL at 24 weeks. RESULTS A total of 103 patients enrolled in the study. At baseline, genotypic resistance profiles showed a median of 4 primary protease inhibitor mutations, 1 NNRTI mutation, and 6 NRTI mutations. In addition to the investigational drugs, 90 patients (87%) received optimized background therapy that included NRTIs (86 patients) or enfuvirtide (12 patients). At week 24, 90% of patients (95% confidence interval, 85%-96%) had an HIV RNA level <50 copies/mL. At week 48, 86% (95% confidence interval, 80%-93%) had an HIV RNA level <50 copies/mL. The median CD4 cell count increase was 108 cells/mm(3). Grade 3 or 4 clinical adverse events were reported in 15 patients (14.6%). Only 1 patient discontinued the investigational antiretroviral regimen, because of an adverse event. CONCLUSION In patients infected with multidrug-resistant virus who have few remaining treatment options, the combination of raltegravir, etravirine, and darunavir/ritonavir is well tolerated and is associated with a rate of virologic suppression similar to that expected in treatment-naive patients.

Raltegravir for the treatment of patients co-infected with HIV and tuberculosis (ANRS 12 180 Reflate TB): a multicentre, phase 2, non-comparative, open-label, randomised trial

BACKGROUND Concurrent treatment of HIV and tuberculosis is complicated by drug interactions. We explored the safety and efficacy of raltegravir as an alternative to efavirenz for patients co-infected with HIV and tuberculosis. METHODS We did a multicentre, phase 2, non-comparative, open-label, randomised trial at eight sites in Brazil and France. Using a computer-generated randomisation sequence, we randomly allocated antiretroviral-naive adult patients with HIV-1 and tuberculosis (aged ≥18 years with a plasma HIV RNA concentration of >1000 copies per mL) to receive raltegravir 400 mg twice a day, raltegravir 800 mg twice daily, or efavirenz 600 mg once daily plus tenofovir and lamivudine (1:1:1; stratified by country). Patients began study treatment after the start of tuberculosis treatment. The primary endpoint was virological suppression at 24 weeks (HIV RNA <50 copies per mL) in all patients who received at least one dose of study drug (modified intention-to-treat analysis). We recorded death, study drug discontinuation, and loss to follow-up as failures to achieve the primary endpoint. We assessed safety in all patients who received study drugs. This study is registered in ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00822315. FINDINGS Between July 3, 2009, and June 6, 2011, we enrolled and randomly assigned treatment to 155 individuals; 153 (51 in each group) received at least one dose of the study drug and were included in the primary analysis. 133 patients (87%) completed follow-up at week 48. At week 24, virological suppression was achieved in 39 patients (76%, 95% CI 65-88) in the raltegravir 400 mg group, 40 patients (78%, 67-90) in the raltegravir 800 mg group, and 32 patients (63%, 49-76) in the efavirenz group. The adverse-event profile was much the same across the three groups. Three (6%) patients allocated to efavirenz and three (6%) patients allocated to raltegravir 800 mg twice daily discontinued the study drugs due to adverse events. Seven patients died during the study (one in the raltegravir 400 mg group, four in the raltegravir 800 mg group, and two in the efavirenz group): none of the deaths was deemed related to study treatment. INTERPRETATION Raltegravir 400 mg twice daily might be an alternative to efavirenz for the treatment of patients co-infected with HIV and tuberculosis. FUNDING French National Agency for Research on AIDS and Viral Hepatitis (ANRS), Brazilian National STD/AIDS Program-Ministry of Health.

Long-term efficacy and safety of raltegravir, etravirine, and darunavir/ritonavir in treatment-experienced patients: week 96 results from the ANRS 139 TRIO trial.

Abstract:Among 103 patients with multidrug-resistant HIV who initiated raltegravir, etravirine, and darunavir/ritonavir-containing regimen in the ANRS 139 TRIO trial, 100 participated in extended follow-up and continued study treatment until week 96. Among them, 87 (87%) received an optimized background therapy including either nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors or enfuvirtide, they were 78 (78%) at week 96. At week 96, 88% achieved durable virologic response (<50 copies/mL). CD4 response was maintained (median change of +150 cells/mm3). No major toxicity was reported. This triple drug combination showed sustained efficacy and thus should be strongly considered for patients with multiclass-resistant virus.

Virological and immunological response in HIV-1-infected patients with multiple treatment failures receiving raltegravir and optimized background therapy, ANRS CO3 Aquitaine Cohort§

BACKGROUND The efficacy of raltegravir plus optimized background therapy (OBT) has been demonstrated for antiretroviral (ARV)-experienced HIV-1-infected patients in randomized clinical trials. We studied viro-immunological response, pharmacokinetic parameters and genotypic test results in an observational cohort of multiple ARV class-experienced patients starting a raltegravir-based regimen. METHODS Already enrolled ANRS CO3 Aquitaine Cohort patients with virological failure were included in this study after starting a raltegravir-based regimen (400 mg twice a day, week 0). Virological success was defined by the plasma HIV-1 RNA level [viral load (VL)] <2.7 log(10) copies/mL at week 12 and <1.7 log(10) copies/mL at week 24. One patient was excluded from further analysis (no follow-up after week 4). RESULTS Fifty-one patients [male/female = 43/8, median age = 48 (interquartile range = 43, 55) years] were included. At week 0, median CD4 count was 244 (110; 310)/mm(3) and median VL was 4.2 (3.6, 4.7) log(10) copies/mL. At week 24, 39 (78%) patients experienced virological success: 4 (44%), 14 (82%) and 21 (87%) patients with a genotypic sensitivity score <1, > or =1 and <2 and > or =2 (P = 0.02), respectively. Raltegravir-related mutations emerged in 9 of 11 failing patients (82%): Q148H/R (n = 5), N155S/H (n = 3) and S230N (n = 1). Median CD4 increases from week 0 to week 4 and week 24 were 28 (-4, 85) and 57 (0, 156) cells/mm(3), respectively. A poor immune response was independently associated with a lower VL decline (week 0 to week 12) [odds ratio (OR): 3.5, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.4, 8.4, for 1 log(10) less] and CD4+% at baseline (OR: 2.6, 95% CI: 0.97, 8.3, for 10% lower). CONCLUSIONS Raltegravir plus OBT provided a good virological success rate in highly pre-treated patients under clinical routine conditions.

Pharmacokinetics of etravirine, raltegravir and darunavir/ritonavir in treatment experienced patients.

Etravirine is an enzyme inducer and could lower the concentration of combined drugs. Ten HIV-1-infected patients with multiple treatment failure received raltegravir (400 mg, twice daily) and darunavir/ritonavir (600/100 mg, twice daily). Addition of etravirine (200 mg, twice daily) leads to a significant increase in raltegravir and darunavir trough concentrations (405 vs. 118 and 3837 vs. 2241 ng/ml) and darunavir area under the curve (AUC12h) (50 083 vs. 36 277 ng h/ml). All pharmacokinetic parameters appeared to be highly variable regardless to the addition of etravirine.

Highly frequent HIV-1 minority resistant variants at baseline of the ANRS 139 TRIO trial had a limited impact on virological response

OBJECTIVES To assess the prevalence of minority resistant variants (MRVs) at baseline and their impact on the virological response. The ANRS 139 TRIO trial evaluated the combination of raltegravir, etravirine and darunavir, plus an optimized background therapy, in 87% of cases. Patients were highly experienced and harboured multiresistant viruses, but were naive to the three drugs, and showed a high level of virological suppression. METHODS Ultra-deep sequencing of reverse transcriptase, protease and integrase regions was performed at the trial baseline, and sequences were interpreted according to the ANRS algorithm. MRVs were assessed using MiSeq and 454 technologies (limit of detection 1%). RESULTS At baseline, minority variants with at least one NRTI, one NNRTI, one PI, one major PI or an integrase inhibitor resistance-associated mutation were present in 46%, 45%, 68%, 24% and 13% of patients, respectively. When minority variants are taken into account, the prevalence of resistance to etravirine, darunavir and raltegravir at baseline was 29%, 40% and 9%, respectively. No difference was observed in the prevalence of MRVs between patients with virological failure and those with virological success, except a trend for patients exhibiting baseline etravirine MRVs (50% versus 26%, P = 0.09). CONCLUSIONS We have shown a high level of MRVs at baseline in highly pre-treated patients harbouring multiresistant viruses. However, these MRVs were not associated with an increased risk of virological failure, except for a trend for etravirine MRVs.

Resistance analyses in highly experienced patients failing raltegravir, etravirine and darunavir/ritonavir regimen.

Objectives:ANRS 139 TRIO trial was a phase II noncomparative trial that evaluated in highly experienced patients, a combination of raltegravir, etravirine and darunavir boosted with ritonavir. We analyzed emergence of resistant viruses at the time of virological failure and investigated the impact of baseline integrase polymorphisms on virological failure occurrence. Methods:Bulk sequencing of protease, reverse transcriptase and integrase genes was performed for 103 patients at baseline and 14 patients at the time of virological failure. Additionally, integrase clonal analyses were performed at baseline and at virological failure in patients with successful integrase gene amplification. Impact of baseline integrase polymorphisms on virological failure occurrence was analyzed using Fisher exact and Wilcoxon tests. Results:In the 14 failing patients median viral load at virological failure was 90 copies/ml (interquartile range = 60–783). Emergence of darunavir and etravirine resistance mutations was observed at virological failure in only one and three patients, respectively. Raltegravir resistance mutations were found neither at baseline nor at the time of virologic failure. Integrase clonal analyses showed neither the presence nor the selection of minority variants carrying raltegravir resistance mutations at baseline or at virological failure. No impact of baseline integrase polymorphisms was observed on virological failure either at week 24 or at week 48. Conclusion:Virological failure occurred in a small proportion of patients with low viral load. No raltegravir resistance mutations were observed using bulk sequencing or clonal analyses, and darunavir and etravirine resistance-associated mutations were detected in only one and three patients, respectively at virological failure. No impact of baseline integrase polymorphism was observed on virological failure occurrence.

Intensification of antiretroviral therapy through addition of enfuvirtide in naive HIV-1-infected patients with severe immunosuppression does not improve immunological response: results of a randomized multicenter trial (ANRS 130 Apollo).

ABSTRACT We studied whether addition of enfuvirtide (ENF) to a background combination antiretroviral therapy (cART) would improve the CD4 cell count response at week 24 in naive patients with advanced HIV disease. ANRS 130 Apollo is a randomized study, conducted in naive HIV-1-infected patients, either asymptomatic with CD4 counts of <100/mm3 or stage B/C disease with CD4 counts of <200/mm3. Patients received tenofovir-emtricitabine with lopinavir-ritonavir (LPV/r) or efavirenz and were randomized to receive ENF for 24 weeks (ENF arm) or not (control arm). The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with CD4 counts of ≥200/mm3 at week 24. A total of 195 patients were randomized: 73% had stage C disease, 78% were male, the mean age was 44 years, the median CD4 count was 30/mm3, and the median HIV-1 RNA load was 5.4 log10 copies/ml. Eighty-one percent of patients received LPV/r. One patient was lost to follow-up, and eight discontinued the study (four in each arm). The proportions of patients with CD4 counts of ≥200/mm3 at week 24 were 34% and 38% in the ENF and control arms, respectively (P = 0.53). The proportions of patients with HIV-1 RNA loads of <50 copies/ml were 74% and 58% at week 24 in the ENF and control arms, respectively (P < 0.02), and the proportion reached 79% in both arms at week 48. Twenty (20%) and 12 patients (13%) in the ENF and control arms, respectively, experienced at least one AIDS event during follow-up (P = 0.17). Although inducing a more rapid virological response, addition of ENF to a standard cART does not improve the immunological outcome in naive HIV-infected patients with severe immunosuppression.

Higher HIV-1 DNA associated with lower gains in CD4 cell count among patients with advanced therapeutic failure receiving optimized treatment (ANRS 123—ETOILE)

OBJECTIVE To describe HIV-1 DNA levels from baseline (W0) to week 52 (W52) among patients receiving either interleukin-2 (IL-2) + optimized background therapy (OBT) or OBT as salvage treatment. METHODS This was evaluated in a substudy of the ETOILE Agence Nationale de Recherches sur le SIDA et les hépatites virales (ANRS) 123 trial (patients with CD4 ≤ 200/mm(3), HIV RNA>4 log(10) copies/mL and a genotypic score showing two or fewer active drugs). OBT included enfuvirtide whenever possible. HIV DNA was quantified with the ANRS assay. RESULTS Blood samples were available for 21 patients in the IL-2 + OBT arm and 23 in the OBT alone arm at baseline, and for 10 and 17 patients, respectively, at W52. Median baseline CD4 count was 47 cells/mm(3) and 68 cells/mm(3), respectively; median HIV RNA was 5.1 and 4.9 log(10) copies/mL. Baseline median HIV DNA load was 3.44 log(10) copies/10(6) peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) (interquartile range 3.31-4.08) and 3.51 (3.18-3.82) log(10) copies/10(6) PBMCs, respectively. At W52, it was 3.18 log(10) copies/10(6) PBMCs (2.75-3.52) and 3.48 log(10) copies/10(6) PBMCs (3.10-3.67), respectively. Cells were available at both W0 and W52 for 7 patients in the IL-2 + OBT arm and 14 in the OBT arm. Change in HIV DNA load was not associated with IL-2 use, but decreased among the seven patients receiving enfuvirtide (-0.22 log(10) copies/mL) as compared with the other 14 patients (+0.20 log(10); P=0.046). A steeper decrease in HIV DNA was observed among patients who had a larger increase in CD4 count (Pearson coefficient ρ=0.659, P=0.001). Adjusted for enfuvirtide use, there was a trend for an association between upper baseline HIV DNA level and a less frequent CD4 gain ≥ 50 cells/mm(3) at W52 (odds ratio=0.17, P=0.075). CONCLUSIONS HIV DNA levels were high in patients with advanced therapeutic failure. A larger viral reservoir may be associated with lower gains in CD4 count among patients receiving OBT. HIV DNA level could be a useful tool for the case management of patients in the late stages of disease.

Drug resistance and tropism as markers of the dynamics of HIV-1 DNA quasispecies in blood cells of heavily pretreated patients who achieved sustained virological suppression

OBJECTIVES The objective of this study was to address the dynamics of archived resistant quasispecies in cell-associated HIV-1 DNA over time in heavily ART-experienced patients with currently suppressed plasma HIV-1 RNA. METHODS Longitudinal ultra-deep sequencing (UDS) analysis of reverse transcriptase, protease and V3 Env regions was performed on blood-cell-associated HIV-1 DNA samples. Drug-resistance-associated mutations (DRAMs) and tropism were interpreted using the ANRS and Geno2Pheno algorithms. We analysed frozen blood cells from patients enrolled in the INNOVE and ANRS 123 ETOILE studies who achieved sustained viral suppression after salvage optimized ART (SOT). RESULTS Samples were available at baseline and 6 and ≥12 months after SOT initiation in 10 patients. V3 loop sequences displayed wide intra-individual dynamics over time. Viral variants harbouring DRAMs exhibited three non-exclusive scenarios. First, when SOT exerted the same selective pressure as previous failing regimens, some viral quasispecies still harboured the same DRAMs at the same level as at the time of virological failure. Thus, as DRAMs were mostly associated with the same viral variant, variants with a complete resistance pattern remained archived. Second, some viral variants harbouring DRAMs were no longer detected over time when SOT consisted of new antiretroviral classes or had resistance profiles distinct from those of previous failing regimens. Third, variants with new DRAMs associated with SOT emerged in blood cells during follow-up despite sustained virological control. CONCLUSIONS Using longitudinal UDS analysis and focusing on DRAMs and tropism as markers, we demonstrated that, despite sustained virological control, archived HIV-1 DNA quasispecies continued to evolve.