Catherine Francis
University of Melbourne
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Catherine Francis.
Journal of Health Communication | 2006
Jane Pirkis; R. Warwick Blood; Catherine Francis; Kerry McCallum
This article reviews the published literature on the extent, nature, and impacts of portrayal of mental illness in fictional films and television programs. The literature suggests that on-screen portrayals are frequent and generally negative, and have a cumulative effect on the publics perception of people with mental illness and on the likelihood of people with mental illness seeking appropriate help. The article concludes that there is a need for the mental health sector and the film and television industries to collaborate to counter negative portrayals of mental illness, and to explore the potential for positive portrayals to educate and inform, as well as to entertain.
Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry | 2002
Jane Pirkis; Catherine Francis; Richard Warwick Blood; Phhilip Burgess; Belinda Morley; Andrew Stewart; Peter Putnis
Objective: The media monitoring project aimed to establish a baseline picture of the extent, nature and quality of reporting of suicide by the Australian media, with a view to informing future strategies intended to optimize reporting of suicide. Method: Newspaper, television and radio items on suicide were retrieved over 12 months. Identifying and descriptive information were extracted for each item. Approximately 10% of items were rated for quality, using a rating scale based on criteria from Achieving the Balance, a kit designed to promote awareness among media professionals of issues relating to suicide. The scale ranged from 0 (poor quality) to 100 (good quality). Results: Reporting of suicide was extensive (with 4813 items retrieved). The nature of reporting was variable. Items tended to be about completed suicide (rather than attempted suicide or suicidal ideation), and most commonly involved content related to an individuals experiences, policy/programme initiatives and/or suicide statistics, although there were differences across media types. Items showed variability across dimensions of quality. The majority of suicide items did not have examples of inappropriate language, were not inappropriately located, did not use the word ‘suicide’ in the headline, and did not use explicit photographs/diagrams or footage. However, around half of the suicide items provided a detailed discussion of the method of self-harm and portrayed suicide as merely a social phenomenon. Where items concerned the suicide of a celebrity, reference was commonly made to that persons celebrity status. Most items failed to provide information on help services. The median total quality score was 57.1%. Conclusions: The reporting of suicide is extensive across all media types, and varies in nature and quality. In general, good items outnumber poorer items. However, there are still opportunities for improving media reporting of suicide.
Australia and New Zealand Health Policy | 2005
Jane Pirkis; Alan Headey; Philip Burgess; Harvey Whiteford; Josh P White; Catherine Francis
BackgroundOn 1 November 2000, a series of new item numbers was added to the Medicare Benefits Schedule, which allowed for case conferences between physicians (including psychiatrists) and other multidisciplinary providers. On 1 November 2002, an additional set of numbers was added, designed especially for use by psychiatrists. This paper reports the findings of an evaluation of these item numbers.ResultsThe uptake of the item numbers in the three years post their introduction was low to moderate at best. Eighty nine psychiatrists rendered 479 case conferences at a cost to the Health Insurance Commission of
Social Science & Medicine | 2006
Jane Pirkis; Philip Burgess; Catherine Francis; R. Warwick Blood; Damien Jolley
70,584. Psychiatrists who have used the item numbers are generally positive about them, as are consumers. Psychiatrists who have not used them have generally not done so because of a lack of knowledge, rather than direct opposition. The use of the item numbers is increasing over time, perhaps as psychiatrists become more aware of their existence and of their utility in maximising quality of care.ConclusionThe case conferencing item numbers have potential, but as yet this potential is not being realised. Some small changes to the conditions associated with the use of the item numbers could assist their uptake.
Suicide and Life Threatening Behavior | 2007
Jane Pirkis; Philip Burgess; R. Warwick Blood; Catherine Francis
Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry | 2004
Catherine Francis; Jane Pirkis; R. Warwick Blood; David Dunt; Philip Burgess; Belinda Morley; Andrew Stewart; Peter Putnis
Archive | 2002
Jane Pirkis; R. Warwick Blood; Catherine Francis; Peter Putnis; Philip Burgess; Belinda Morley; Andrew Stewart; Trish Payne
Journal of Community Psychology | 2005
Catherine Francis; Jane Pirkis; R. Warwick Blood; David Dunt; Philip Burgess; Belinda Morley; Andrew Stewart
The Medical Journal of Australia | 1947
Catherine Francis
Agenda: a journal of policy analysis and reform | 2004
R. Warwick Blood; Jane Pirkis; Catherine Francis