Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Catherine H. Fowler is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Catherine H. Fowler.


Career Development for Exceptional Individuals | 2009

Evidence-Based Secondary Transition Predictors for Improving Postschool Outcomes for Students With Disabilities:

David W. Test; Valerie L. Mazzotti; April L. Mustian; Catherine H. Fowler; Larry J. Kortering; Paula D. Kohler

The purpose of this study was to conduct a systematic review of the secondary transition correlational literature to identify in-school predictors of improved postschool outcomes in the areas of education, employment, and/or independent living for students with disabilities. Based on results of this review, 16 evidence-based, in-school predictors of postschool outcomes were identified. Of the 16 predictors, 4 (25%) predicted improved outcomes in all three postschool outcome areas, 7 (43.8%) predicted improved outcomes for only postschool education and employment, and 5 (31.3%) predicted improved outcomes for employment only. Limitations and implications for future research and practice are discussed.


Career Development for Exceptional Individuals | 2009

Evidence-Based Practices in Secondary Transition:

David W. Test; Catherine H. Fowler; Sharon Richter; James Robert White; Valerie L. Mazzotti; Allison R. Walker; Paula D. Kohler; Larry J. Kortering

A literature review was conducted to identify evidence-based practices in secondary transition using quality indicator checklists for experimental research. Practices were categorized by the Taxonomy for Transition Programming. Overall, 32 secondary transition evidence-based practices were identified. Two practices had a strong level of evidence, 28 had a moderate level of evidence, and 2 had a potential level of evidence. The majority of practices represented instruction of skills within the category of Student Development. No evidence-based practices were identified in the category of Interagency Collaboration. Findings provide practitioners with a set of evidence-based practices for improving transition services and researchers with an agenda for conducting future research.


Remedial and Special Education | 2005

A Conceptual Framework of Self-Advocacy for Students with Disabilities

David W. Test; Catherine H. Fowler; Wendy M. Wood; Denise M. Brewer; Steven Eddy

Based on a review of the literature and input from stakeholders, we developed a conceptual framework of self-advocacy involving four components: knowledge of self, knowledge of rights, communication, and leadership. This article summarizes the definitions and components of self-advocacy found in the literature that were used to develop this conceptual framework. The resulting framework of self-advocacy is designed to serve as a guide for instructional planning, curricular design, and assessment of self-advocacy for students with and without disabilities.


Exceptional Children | 2005

A Content and Methodological Review of Self-Advocacy Intervention Studies.

David W. Test; Catherine H. Fowler; Denise M. Brewer; Wendy M. Wood

A content and methodological review of the literature of 25 self-advocacy intervention studies was conducted. First, each article was analyzed in terms of purpose, participants, design, dependent variable(s), independent variable(s), and results. Second, each manuscript was reviewed in terms of the quality indicators for single subject (n = 11), group experimental (n = 11), or qualitative (n = 3) studies. Our findings (a) provide preliminary evidence that individuals of varying ages and disabilities can learn self-advocacy skills using both researcher-developed interventions and published curricula, and (b) indicate the need for increasing methodological rigor in implementing and reporting self-advocacy intervention studies. Results are discussed in terms of implications for research and instruction.


The Journal of The Association for Persons With Severe Handicaps | 2005

A Review of Self-Determination Interventions with Individuals with Severe Disabilities

Wendy M. Wood; Catherine H. Fowler; Nicole M. Uphold; David W. Test

A comprehensive review was conducted of intervention studies designed to teach component skills of self-determination to individuals with severe disabilities. Twenty-one articles were analyzed regarding content and methodology. Results (a) support previous research on the efficacy of teaching choice making; (b) increase awareness of teaching self-management, problem solving, goal setting, decision making, and self-advocacy; (c) indicate the need for increased methodological rigor in future research; and (d) expand the research body traditionally associated with self-determination interventions for this population.


Teaching Exceptional Children | 2009

Linking Transition Assessment and Postsecondary Goals: Key Elements in the Secondary Transition Planning Process

Valerie L. Mazzotti; Dawn A. Rowe; Kelly R. Kelley; David W. Test; Catherine H. Fowler; Paula D. Kohler; Larry J. Kortering

(IEPs) for students with disabilities ages 16 and older must include a transition component. It is important for educators to understand the role transition assessment plays in developing a thorough transition component that includes measurable postsecondary goals, annual IEP goals, transition services, and a course of study. Multidisciplinary teams should consider questions such as: How can educators use information about a student’s strengths, needs, and preferences to develop an effective transition plan? What role does transition assessment play in developing measurable postsecondary goals, annual IEP goals, and transition services for students with disabilities? What is the best way to link a student’s annual IEP goals to postsecondary goals?


Exceptionality | 2009

Evidence-Based Secondary Transition Practices for Enhancing School Completion.

David W. Test; Catherine H. Fowler; James Robert White; Sharon Richter; Allison R. Walker

Approximately 28% of students with disabilities do not complete high school (National Longitudinal Transition Study-2, 2005). This increases the likelihood that these students will experience low wages, high rates of incarceration, and limited access to postsecondary education. This article reviews evidence-based secondary transition practices that show promise for enhancing school completion of students with disabilities. For conceptual purposes, the article uses and describes evidence using the Taxonomy for Transition Programming (Kohler, 1996) which includes (a) student focused-planning, (b) student development, (c) interagency collaboration, (d) family involvement, and (e) program structures. Suggestions for practice and future research are provided.


Review of Educational Research | 2016

What Works, When, for Whom, and With Whom A Meta-Analytic Review of Predictors of Postsecondary Success for Students With Disabilities

Mason G. Haber; Valerie L. Mazzotti; April L. Mustian; Dawn A. Rowe; Audrey Bartholomew; David W. Test; Catherine H. Fowler

Students with disabilities experience poorer post-school outcomes compared with their peers without disabilities. Existing experimental literature on “what works” for improving these outcomes is rare; however, a rapidly growing body of research investigates correlational relationships between experiences in school and post-school outcomes. A meta-analytic review provides means for assessing which experiences show the strongest relationships with long-term outcomes and variability in these relationships by outcome, research design, and population. This article presents a meta-analysis of in-school predictors of postsecondary employment, education, and independent living of youth with disabilities, examining 35 sources and 27 samples (N = 16,957) published from January of 1984 through May of 2010. Predictors showed differing relationships with education versus employment. Some of the least studied predictors, especially those involving multistakeholder collaboration, had larger effects than predictors more typically the focus of correlational research. Implications for future research and practice are considered.


Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals | 2015

A Delphi Study to Operationalize Evidence-Based Predictors in Secondary Transition

Dawn A. Rowe; Charlotte Y. Alverson; Deanne Unruh; Catherine H. Fowler; Ryan O. Kellems; David W. Test

Although there are many activities (e.g., transition services), derived from correlational research, that occur while students are in school that increase the likelihood of positive post-school outcomes, many teachers continue to provide services shown to have little to no effect on outcomes of students with disabilities. The purpose of this study was to operationally define the predictors of post-school success for educators to understand what is necessary to develop, implement, and evaluate secondary transition programs based on predictor research. Results conclude experts in the field reached consensus on an operational definition and set of essential program characteristics for each predictor of post-school success to aid practitioners in implementing these practices.


Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals | 2017

A College and Career Readiness Framework for Secondary Students With Disabilities

Mary E. Morningstar; Allison Lombardi; Catherine H. Fowler; David W. Test

In this qualitative study, a proposed organizing framework of college and career readiness for secondary students with disabilities was developed based on a synthesis of extant research articulating student success. The original proposed framework included six domains representing academic and nonacademic skills associated with college and career readiness: academic engagement, academic mind-sets, learning processes, critical thinking, social skills, and transition knowledge. Focus groups were conducted to examine perspectives among state-level stakeholders with knowledge and expertise regarding college and career readiness, drop-out prevention, and secondary transition. Through an iterative process, the focus group data were analyzed and the framework was refined based on findings. Implications for practice and suggestions for future research are discussed.

Collaboration


Dive into the Catherine H. Fowler's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

David W. Test

University of North Carolina at Charlotte

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Wendy M. Wood

University of North Carolina at Charlotte

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Allison R. Walker

University of North Carolina at Charlotte

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Larry J. Kortering

Appalachian State University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

April L. Mustian

University of North Carolina at Charlotte

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Charles L. Wood

University of North Carolina at Charlotte

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Denise M. Brewer

University of North Carolina at Charlotte

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge