Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Catherine L. Webb is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Catherine L. Webb.


Nature Genetics | 2005

A syndrome of altered cardiovascular, craniofacial, neurocognitive and skeletal development caused by mutations in TGFBR1 or TGFBR2

Bart Loeys; Junji Chen; Enid Neptune; Daniel P. Judge; Megan Podowski; Tammy Holm; Jennifer Meyers; Carmen C. Leitch; Nicholas Katsanis; Neda Sharifi; F. Lauren Xu; Loretha Myers; Philip J. Spevak; Duke E. Cameron; Julie De Backer; Jan Hellemans; Yan Chen; Elaine C. Davis; Catherine L. Webb; Wolfram Kress; Paul Coucke; Daniel B. Rifkin; Anne De Paepe; Harry C. Dietz

We report heterozygous mutations in the genes encoding either type I or type II transforming growth factor β receptor in ten families with a newly described human phenotype that includes widespread perturbations in cardiovascular, craniofacial, neurocognitive and skeletal development. Despite evidence that receptors derived from selected mutated alleles cannot support TGFβ signal propagation, cells derived from individuals heterozygous with respect to these mutations did not show altered kinetics of the acute phase response to administered ligand. Furthermore, tissues derived from affected individuals showed increased expression of both collagen and connective tissue growth factor, as well as nuclear enrichment of phosphorylated Smad2, indicative of increased TGFβ signaling. These data definitively implicate perturbation of TGFβ signaling in many common human phenotypes, including craniosynostosis, cleft palate, arterial aneurysms, congenital heart disease and mental retardation, and suggest that comprehensive mechanistic insight will require consideration of both primary and compensatory events.


Circulation | 2007

Genetic Basis for Congenital Heart Defects: Current Knowledge A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association Congenital Cardiac Defects Committee, Council on Cardiovascular Disease in the Young: Endorsed by the American Academy of Pediatrics

Mary Ella Pierpont; Craig T. Basson; D. Woodrow Benson; Bruce D. Gelb; Therese M. Giglia; Elizabeth Goldmuntz; Glenn McGee; Craig Sable; Deepak Srivastava; Catherine L. Webb

The intent of this review is to provide the clinician with a summary of what is currently known about the contribution of genetics to the origin of congenital heart disease. Techniques are discussed to evaluate children with heart disease for genetic alterations. Many of these techniques are now available on a clinical basis. Information on the genetic and clinical evaluation of children with cardiac disease is presented, and several tables have been constructed to aid the clinician in the assessment of children with different types of heart disease. Genetic algorithms for cardiac defects have been constructed and are available in an appendix. It is anticipated that this summary will update a wide range of medical personnel, including pediatric cardiologists and pediatricians, adult cardiologists, internists, obstetricians, nurses, and thoracic surgeons, about the genetic aspects of congenital heart disease and will encourage an interdisciplinary approach to the child and adult with congenital heart disease.


Circulation | 2007

Noninherited Risk Factors and Congenital Cardiovascular Defects: Current Knowledge A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association Council on Cardiovascular Disease in the Young: Endorsed by the American Academy of Pediatrics

Kathy J. Jenkins; Adolfo Correa; Jeffrey A. Feinstein; Lorenzo D. Botto; Amy E. Britt; Stephen R. Daniels; Marsha Elixson; Carole A. Warnes; Catherine L. Webb

Prevention of congenital cardiovascular defects has been hampered by a lack of information about modifiable risk factors for abnormalities in cardiac development. Over the past decade, there have been major breakthroughs in the understanding of inherited causes of congenital heart disease, including the identification of specific genetic abnormalities for some types of malformations. Although relatively less information has been available on noninherited modifiable factors that may have an adverse effect on the fetal heart, there is a growing body of epidemiological literature on this topic. This statement summarizes the currently available literature on potential fetal exposures that might alter risk for cardiovascular defects. Information is summarized for periconceptional multivitamin or folic acid intake, which may reduce the risk of cardiac disease in the fetus, and for additional types of potential exposures that may increase the risk, including maternal illnesses, maternal therapeutic and nontherapeutic drug exposures, environmental exposures, and paternal exposures. Information is highlighted regarding definitive risk factors such as maternal rubella; phenylketonuria; pregestational diabetes; exposure to thalidomide, vitamin A cogeners, or retinoids; and indomethacin tocolysis. Caveats regarding interpretation of possible exposure-outcome relationships from case-control studies are given because this type of study has provided most of the available information. Guidelines for prospective parents that could reduce the likelihood that their child will have a major cardiac malformation are given. Issues related to pregnancy monitoring are discussed. Knowledge gaps and future sources of new information on risk factors are described.


Circulation | 2008

Cardiovascular Monitoring of Children and Adolescents With Heart Disease Receiving Medications for Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association Council on Cardiovascular Disease in the Young Congenital Cardiac Defects Committee and the Council on Cardiovascular Nursing

Victoria L. Vetter; Josephine Elia; Christopher C. Erickson; Stuart Berger; Nathan J. Blum; Karen Uzark; Catherine L. Webb

Over the past decade, concerns have been raised regarding the safety of a variety of psychotropic medications in children and adolescents, the appropriate selection of patients for therapy, and the indications for cardiovascular monitoring. In 1999, concerns over potential cardiovascular effects of psychotropic drugs, especially tricyclic antidepressants1,2 but including stimulants, prompted the American Heart Association (AHA) scientific statement “Cardiovascular Monitoring of Children and Adolescents Receiving Psychotropic Drugs.”3 At that time, no specific cardiovascular monitoring was recommended for the use of stimulant medications. Since that time, a constellation of circumstances have come together, necessitating a second look at this complicated issue. These circumstances include an increased awareness of the presence of attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in the general population and in children with preexisting cardiac conditions; public concerns about the side effects and toxicities of medications, especially psychotropic medications in children; and regulatory factors and warnings issued by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and by the pharmaceutical industry in response to the FDA. This writing group was convened in response to FDA concerns with regard to the safety of the ADHD drugs and with regard to the identification of children with underlying cardiovascular abnormalities. At a time when there is much discussion of the side effects of drugs and of the use of psychotropic drugs in children in the media and lay literature, it is particularly important for the medical profession to play a significant role in critically evaluating the use of stimulant medication in children, including those who may have undiagnosed heart disease and those who are known to have heart disease. The writing group for “Cardiovascular Monitoring of Children and Adolescents With Heart Disease Receiving Medications for Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder” reviewed the literature relevant to this topic since the last publication of the AHA scientific …


Circulation | 2013

Prevention and Treatment of Thrombosis in Pediatric and Congenital Heart Disease A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association

Therese M. Giglia; M. Patricia Massicotte; James S. Tweddell; Robyn J. Barst; Mary Bauman; Christopher C. Erickson; Timothy F. Feltes; Elyse Foster; Kathleen Hinoki; Rebecca Ichord; Jacqueline Kreutzer; Brian W. McCrindle; Jane W. Newburger; Sarah Tabbutt; Jane L. Todd; Catherine L. Webb

Thrombosis has long been recognized as a potentially life-threatening complication in children with congenital heart disease (CHD), children with acquired heart disease, and in adults with CHD. High-risk groups include patients with shunt- dependent single ventricles (shunt thrombosis, 8%–12%; 4%


Cardiology in The Young | 2008

Databases for assessing the outcomes of the treatment of patients with congenital and paediatric cardiac disease - the perspective of cardiology

Kathy J. Jenkins; Robert H. Beekman; Lisa Bergersen; Allen D. Everett; Thomas Forbes; Rodney Franklin; Thomas S. Klitzner; Otto N. Krogman; Gerard R. Martin; Catherine L. Webb

This review includes a brief discussion, from the perspective of cardiac surgeons, of the rationale for creation and maintenance of multi-institutional databases of outcomes of congenital heart surgery, together with a history of the evolution of such databases, a description of the current state of the art, and a discussion of areas for improvement and future expansion of the concept. Five fundamental areas are reviewed: nomenclature, mechanism of data collection and storage, mechanisms for the evaluation and comparison of the complexity of operations and stratification of risk, mechanisms to ensure the completeness and accuracy of the data, and mechanisms for expansion of the current capabilities of databases to include comparison and sharing of data between medical subspecialties. This review briefly describes several European and North American initiatives related to databases for pediatric and congenital cardiac surgery the Congenital Database of The European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, the Congenital Database of The Society of Thoracic Surgeons, the Pediatric Cardiac Care Consortium, and the Central Cardiac Audit Database in the United Kingdom. Potential means of approaching the ultimate goal of acquisition of long-term follow-up data, and input of this data over the life of the patient, are also considered.


Circulation | 2002

Collaborative Care for Adults With Congenital Heart Disease

Catherine L. Webb; Kathy J. Jenkins; Peter P. Karpawich; Richard M. Donner; Hugh D. Allen; Robyn J. Barst

The number of adults who have survived with congenital heart disease is increasing rapidly. Although prevalence studies have not been performed, estimates of expected numbers of people reaching adulthood with congenital heart disease (CHD) can now be made because birth prevalence has been studied and mortality rates have begun to stabilize. Birth prevalence for all forms of congenital heart disease detected in the first year of life is estimated at 8.1 per thousand live births on the basis of data from the Centers for Disease Control1; estimates for disease of sufficient severity to result in a catheterization, surgery, or death in the first year of life are 2.3 per thousand, using population-based data derived from the Pediatric Cardiac Care Consortium.2 In 1990, the National Center for Health Statistics reported the number of US live births to be 4 158 212.3 Age-specific mortality data were obtained from the complete life table for the US population4 and from population-based death rates during hospital admission using data from 6 states in 1992. Estimates of numbers of individuals reaching adulthood born in 1990 with congenital heart disease of sufficient severity to be diagnosed or treated during the first year of life are shown in the Figure. Disregarding all patients born before 1990 and those not diagnosed in the first year and assuming stable mortality in early adulthood, by 2020, nearly 760 000 individuals will have CHD, with 200 000 in the more severe subgroup. Number of children born after 1990 with congenital heart disease estimated to reach adulthood. □ indicates diagnosed in the first year of life; ⋄, undergoing catheterization or surgery in the first year of life. This striking increase in the estimated number of patients with congenital heart disease who will require competent care within the …


Circulation | 2008

Cardiovascular Monitoring of Children and Adolescents With Heart Disease Receiving Stimulant Drugs. A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association Council on Cardiovascular Disease in the Young Congenital Cardiac Defects Committee and the Council on Cardiovascular Nursing

Victoria L. Vetter; Josephine Elia; Christopher C. Erickson; Stuart Berger; Nathan J. Blum; Karen Uzark; Catherine L. Webb

Over the past decade, concerns have been raised regarding the safety of a variety of psychotropic medications in children and adolescents, the appropriate selection of patients for therapy, and the indications for cardiovascular monitoring. In 1999, concerns over potential cardiovascular effects of psychotropic drugs, especially tricyclic antidepressants1,2 but including stimulants, prompted the American Heart Association (AHA) scientific statement “Cardiovascular Monitoring of Children and Adolescents Receiving Psychotropic Drugs.”3 At that time, no specific cardiovascular monitoring was recommended for the use of stimulant medications. Since that time, a constellation of circumstances have come together, necessitating a second look at this complicated issue. These circumstances include an increased awareness of the presence of attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in the general population and in children with preexisting cardiac conditions; public concerns about the side effects and toxicities of medications, especially psychotropic medications in children; and regulatory factors and warnings issued by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and by the pharmaceutical industry in response to the FDA. This writing group was convened in response to FDA concerns with regard to the safety of the ADHD drugs and with regard to the identification of children with underlying cardiovascular abnormalities. At a time when there is much discussion of the side effects of drugs and of the use of psychotropic drugs in children in the media and lay literature, it is particularly important for the medical profession to play a significant role in critically evaluating the use of stimulant medication in children, including those who may have undiagnosed heart disease and those who are known to have heart disease. The writing group for “Cardiovascular Monitoring of Children and Adolescents With Heart Disease Receiving Medications for Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder” reviewed the literature relevant to this topic since the last publication of the AHA scientific …


Circulation | 2008

Cardiovascular monitoring of children and adolescents with heart disease receiving medications for attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder [corrected]: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Council on Cardiovascular Disease in the Young Congenital Cardiac Defects Committee and the Council on Cardiovascular Nursing.

Victoria L. Vetter; Josephine Elia; Christopher C. Erickson; Stuart Berger; Nathan J. Blum; Karen Uzark; Catherine L. Webb

Over the past decade, concerns have been raised regarding the safety of a variety of psychotropic medications in children and adolescents, the appropriate selection of patients for therapy, and the indications for cardiovascular monitoring. In 1999, concerns over potential cardiovascular effects of psychotropic drugs, especially tricyclic antidepressants1,2 but including stimulants, prompted the American Heart Association (AHA) scientific statement “Cardiovascular Monitoring of Children and Adolescents Receiving Psychotropic Drugs.”3 At that time, no specific cardiovascular monitoring was recommended for the use of stimulant medications. Since that time, a constellation of circumstances have come together, necessitating a second look at this complicated issue. These circumstances include an increased awareness of the presence of attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in the general population and in children with preexisting cardiac conditions; public concerns about the side effects and toxicities of medications, especially psychotropic medications in children; and regulatory factors and warnings issued by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and by the pharmaceutical industry in response to the FDA. This writing group was convened in response to FDA concerns with regard to the safety of the ADHD drugs and with regard to the identification of children with underlying cardiovascular abnormalities. At a time when there is much discussion of the side effects of drugs and of the use of psychotropic drugs in children in the media and lay literature, it is particularly important for the medical profession to play a significant role in critically evaluating the use of stimulant medication in children, including those who may have undiagnosed heart disease and those who are known to have heart disease. The writing group for “Cardiovascular Monitoring of Children and Adolescents With Heart Disease Receiving Medications for Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder” reviewed the literature relevant to this topic since the last publication of the AHA scientific …


Circulation | 2007

Noninherited Risk Factors and Congenital Cardiovascular Defects: Current Knowledge A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association Council on Cardiovascular Disease in the Young

Kathy J. Jenkins; Adolfo Correa; Jeffrey A. Feinstein; Lorenzo D. Botto; Amy E. Britt; Stephen R. Daniels; Marsha Elixson; Carole A. Warnes; Catherine L. Webb

Prevention of congenital cardiovascular defects has been hampered by a lack of information about modifiable risk factors for abnormalities in cardiac development. Over the past decade, there have been major breakthroughs in the understanding of inherited causes of congenital heart disease, including the identification of specific genetic abnormalities for some types of malformations. Although relatively less information has been available on noninherited modifiable factors that may have an adverse effect on the fetal heart, there is a growing body of epidemiological literature on this topic. This statement summarizes the currently available literature on potential fetal exposures that might alter risk for cardiovascular defects. Information is summarized for periconceptional multivitamin or folic acid intake, which may reduce the risk of cardiac disease in the fetus, and for additional types of potential exposures that may increase the risk, including maternal illnesses, maternal therapeutic and nontherapeutic drug exposures, environmental exposures, and paternal exposures. Information is highlighted regarding definitive risk factors such as maternal rubella; phenylketonuria; pregestational diabetes; exposure to thalidomide, vitamin A cogeners, or retinoids; and indomethacin tocolysis. Caveats regarding interpretation of possible exposure-outcome relationships from case-control studies are given because this type of study has provided most of the available information. Guidelines for prospective parents that could reduce the likelihood that their child will have a major cardiac malformation are given. Issues related to pregnancy monitoring are discussed. Knowledge gaps and future sources of new information on risk factors are described.

Collaboration


Dive into the Catherine L. Webb's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Craig Sable

Children's National Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Frederick J. Schoen

Brigham and Women's Hospital

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Christopher C. Erickson

University of Nebraska Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Andrea Beaton

Children's National Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

D. Woodrow Benson

Children's Hospital of Wisconsin

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Karen Uzark

University of Michigan

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Therese M. Giglia

University of Pennsylvania

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Josephine Elia

University of Pennsylvania

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge