Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Catherine Slota is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Catherine Slota.


Pediatrics | 2012

Communication During Pediatric Asthma Visits and Self-Reported Asthma Medication Adherence

Betsy Sleath; Delesha M. Carpenter; Catherine Slota; Dennis M. Williams; Gail Tudor; Karin Yeatts; Stephanie D. Davis; Guadalupe X. Ayala

OBJECTIVE: Our objectives were to examine how certain aspects of provider-patient communication recommended by national asthma guidelines (ie, provider asking for child and caregiver input into the asthma treatment plan) were associated with child asthma medication adherence 1 month after an audio-taped medical visit. METHODS: Children ages 8 through 16 with mild, moderate, or severe persistent asthma and their caregivers were recruited at 5 pediatric practices in nonurban areas of North Carolina. All medical visits were audio-tape recorded. Children were interviewed 1 month after their medical visits, and both children and caregivers reported the child’s control medication adherence. Generalized estimating equations were used to determine if communication during the medical visit was associated with medication adherence 1 month later. RESULTS: Children (n = 259) completed a home visit interview ∼1 month after their audio-taped visit, and 216 of these children were taking an asthma control medication at the time of the home visit. Children reported an average control medication adherence for the past week of 72%, whereas caregivers reported the child’s average control medication adherence for the past week was 85%. Child asthma management self-efficacy was significantly associated with both child- and caregiver-reported control medication adherence. When providers asked for caregiver input into the asthma treatment plan, caregivers reported significantly higher child medication adherence 1 month later. CONCLUSIONS: Providers should ask for caregiver input into their child’s asthma treatment plan because it may lead to better control medication adherence.


Annals of Pharmacotherapy | 2014

Determinants of Self-Reported Barriers to Glaucoma Medicine Administration and Adherence A Multisite Study

Betsy Sleath; Susan J. Blalock; Kelly W. Muir; Delesha M. Carpenter; Scott D. Lawrence; Annette L. Giangiacomo; Jason A. Goldsmith; Mary Elizabeth Hartnett; Catherine Slota; Alan L. Robin

Background: Many factors influence glaucoma medication adherence. A better understanding of the relationships between health literacy, depressive symptoms, and patient-reported problems in using glaucoma medications may reveal opportunities for intervention that could improve patients’ clinical outcomes. Objective: To examine the relationship between patient characteristics (demographics, health literacy, and depressive symptoms) and patient-reported problems in using glaucoma medications and to assess factors related to patients’ self-reported adherence to glaucoma medications. Methods: Patients diagnosed with primary open-angle glaucoma (n = 228) currently taking intraocular pressure–lowering medications were recruited at 6 ophthalmology clinics. Patients were interviewed to identify problems using glaucoma medications, and self-reported medication adherence was determined using a Visual Analog Scale. Questionnaires were administered to assess health literacy, depressive symptoms, outcome expectations, and medication self-efficacy. Results: Younger patients (P = 0.03), patients with depressive symptoms (P = 0.02), and patients who reported more medication problems (P = 0.005) were significantly less adherent to their glaucoma medications. Patients with higher glaucoma medication self-efficacy adherence scores (P = 0.003) and higher outcome expectations (P = 0.03) were significantly more adherent. Conclusions: Providers should consider using tools to screen glaucoma patients for depressive symptoms and for problems in using medications to identify patients who are at higher risk of nonadherence to treatment and who might benefit from follow-up with primary care providers.


Journal of Child Health Care | 2014

An evaluation of physicians’ engagement of children with asthma in treatment-related discussions

Delesha M. Carpenter; Angela M. Stover; Catherine Slota; Guadalupe X. Ayala; Karen Yeatts; Gail Tudor; Stephanie D. Davis; Dennis M. Williams; Betsy Sleath

Our objectives were to examine whether providers engage children with asthma in treatment-related discussions at the level children prefer (engagement concordance) and to determine whether engagement concordance is related to child, caregiver, and provider characteristics. Children with asthma (n = 296) aged 8–16 years were recruited at five pediatric practices in North Carolina. Using audiotaped medical visit transcripts, we documented the number of treatment-related questions the providers asked the children. Children reported their preferred level of provider engagement. A logistic generalized estimating equation was used to determine which variables predicted engagement concordance. Most children (96.6%) wanted to be involved in treatment-related discussions. One-third of the providers did not ask children any treatment-related questions. Only 36.1% of provider–child dyads were concordant. Most discordant dyads were under-engaged (83.1%). Better engagement concordance was observed among older children (odds ratio (OR) = 1.19, 95% confidence interval (CI) (1.07, 1.33)), male children (OR = 1.67, 95% CI (1.03, 2.70)), and among providers with fewer years in practice (OR = .97, 95% CI (.94, .99)). Providers engaged in treatment-related discussions with younger children and females less frequently than these children preferred. Providers should ask children how much they want to be involved in treatment-related discussions and then attempt to engage children at the level they prefer.


Arthritis Care and Research | 2014

Patient-rheumatologist communication concerning prescription medications: Getting to the gist

Susan J. Blalock; Catherine Slota; Brenda M. DeVellis; Robert F. DeVellis; Betty Chewning; Beth Jonas; Betsy Sleath

Fuzzy trace theory was used to develop a coding scheme that captures the gist that patients extract from information about medication risks and benefits and to explore the extent to which different patients extract different gist representations from the same information.


Optometry and Vision Science | 2015

Glaucoma patient expression of medication problems and nonadherence.

Catherine Slota; Robyn Sayner; Michelle Vitko; Delesha M. Carpenter; Susan J. Blalock; Alan L. Robin; Kelly W. Muir; Mary Elizabeth Hartnett; Betsy Sleath

Purpose The purpose of this study was to examine if patient demographic factors influenced self-reporting of medication side effects, difficulty with drop instillation, and nonadherence to glaucoma therapy. Methods English-speaking adult glaucoma patients (n = 279) from six ophthalmology clinics were enrolled. Patients’ medical visits were videotaped and patients were interviewed immediately afterward by research assistants. The videotapes were transcribed verbatim and coded to identify patients who expressed problems with medication side effects, eye drop administration, and nonadherence during the glaucoma office visits. Generalized estimating equations were performed to identify whether patient characteristics were associated with expression of problems with glaucoma medication and medication nonadherence during the office visit. Results Patients with lower health literacy were significantly less likely to express problems with side effects (odds ratio [OR], 0.47; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.25 to 0.88) and eye drop administration (OR, 0.26; 95% CI, 0.11 to 0.63) during the visit. Patients who reported eye drop administration and side effect problems during the interview were significantly more likely to express these problems to their ophthalmologist (OR, 3.13; 95% CI, 1.82 to 5.37 and OR, 1.86; 95% CI, 1.12 to 3.08, respectively). Patients who expressed a problem with eye drop administration and with side effects were significantly more likely to express medication nonadherence to their ophthalmologist (OR, 2.89; 95% CI, 1.44 to 5.80 and OR, 2.03; 95% CI, 1.16 to 3.54, respectively). Patients who reported greater than 80% medication adherence during the interview were significantly less likely to express nonadherence to their ophthalmologist (OR, 0.22; 95% CI, 0.12 to 0.40). Conclusions Eye care providers should be aware that glaucoma patients with lower health literacy are less likely to express problems with side effects and eye drop administration. Providers should work with patients to assess medication-related problems to mitigate potential barriers to medication adherence because patients who expressed medication problems were also more likely to express nonadherence.


Optometry and Vision Science | 2014

Provider use of collaborative goal setting with glaucoma patients

Betsy Sleath; Catherine Slota; Susan J. Blalock; Robyn Sayner; Delesha M. Carpenter; Kelly W. Muir; Mary Elizabeth Hartnett; Alan L. Robin

Purpose The purpose of this preliminary study was to describe the extent to which providers used collaborative goal setting and individualized assessment with patients who were newly prescribed glaucoma medications. Methods English-speaking glaucoma suspect patients from six ophthalmology clinics who were newly prescribed glaucoma medications had their medical visits videotaped and were interviewed after the visits. The videotapes were transcribed and coded to examine provider use of collaborative goal setting and individualized assessment. Results Fifty-one patients seeing 12 ophthalmologists participated. Providers gave patients glaucoma treatment options during 37% of the visits; only five providers gave patients treatment options Providers asked for patient treatment preferences in less than 20% of the visits; only two providers asked for patient treatment preferences. Providers were significantly more likely to ask African American patients for their preferences or ideas concerning treatment than non–African American patients (Pearson &;2 = 4.1, p = 0.04). Providers were also significantly more likely to ask African American patients about their confidence in using glaucoma medication regularly than non–African American patients (Pearson &khgr;2 = 8.2, p = 0.004). Providers asked about patient views about glaucoma in less than 20% of the visits; five providers asked patients their views on glaucoma and its treatment. Providers were significantly more likely to ask African American patients about their views on glaucoma than non–African American patients (Pearson &khgr;2 = 5.62, p = 0.02). Conclusions Eye care providers often did not use collaborative goal setting or conduct individualized assessments of patient views on glaucoma when prescribing treatment for the first time.


Optometry and Vision Science | 2017

Patient-physician Communication on Medication Cost during Glaucoma Visits

Catherine Slota; Scott A. Davis; Susan J. Blalock; Delesha M. Carpenter; Kelly W. Muir; Alan L. Robin; Betsy Sleath

SIGNIFICANCE This article is the first to investigate the nature of medication cost discussions between ophthalmologists and glaucoma patients. Only 87 of the 275 office visits analyzed had a discussion of medication cost. Providers should consider discussing medication cost with patients to identify potential cost-related barriers to medication use. PURPOSE Glaucoma is an incurable chronic eye disease affecting a growing portion of the aging population. Some of the most commonly utilized treatments require lifelong use, requiring high patient adherence to ensure effectiveness. There are numerous barriers to glaucoma treatment adherence in the literature, including cost. The aim of this secondary analysis was to describe the frequency and nature of patient-physician communication regarding medication cost during glaucoma office visits. METHODS This was a mixed-methods secondary analysis of video-recorded participant office visits (n = 275) from a larger observational study of glaucoma communication. We analyzed medical information, demographic characteristics, and interviewer-administrated questionnaires, as well as verbatim transcripts of interviews. RESULTS Only 87 participants discussed medication cost during their glaucoma office visit. The majority of the subjects who discussed cost had mild disease severity (51%), took one glaucoma medication (63%), and had Medicare (49%) as well as a form of prescription insurance (78%). The majority of glaucoma office visits did not discuss medication cost, and providers often did not ask about cost problems. Of the few conversations related to cost, most focused on providers offering potential solutions (n = 50), medical and prescription service coverage (n = 41), and brand or generic medication choices (n = 41). CONCLUSIONS Our findings are similar to previous studies showing few patients have conversations with providers about the cost of glaucoma medications. Providers should consider bringing up medication cost during glaucoma office visits to prompt a discussion of potential cost-related barriers to medication use.


Ophthalmology | 2015

Ophthalmologist-patient communication, self-efficacy, and glaucoma medication adherence.

Betsy Sleath; Susan J. Blalock; Delesha M. Carpenter; Robyn Sayner; Kelly W. Muir; Catherine Slota; Scott D. Lawrence; Annette L. Giangiacomo; Mary Elizabeth Hartnett; Gail Tudor; Jason A. Goldsmith; Alan L. Robin


Health Education Research | 2015

Applying the resources and supports in self-management framework to examine ophthalmologist-patient communication and glaucoma medication adherence

Betsy Sleath; Delesha M. Carpenter; Susan J. Blalock; Robyn Sayner; Kelly W. Muir; Catherine Slota; Annette L. Giangiacomo; Mary Elizabeth Hartnett; Gail Tudor; Alan L. Robin


Community Mental Health Journal | 2014

Communication About ADHD and Its Treatment During Pediatric Asthma Visits

Betsy Sleath; Sandra H. Sulzer; Delesha M. Carpenter; Catherine Slota; Christopher Gillette; Robyn Sayner; Stephanie D. Davis; Adrian Sandler

Collaboration


Dive into the Catherine Slota's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Betsy Sleath

University of North Carolina at Asheville

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Delesha M. Carpenter

University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Susan J. Blalock

University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Alan L. Robin

Johns Hopkins University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Robyn Sayner

University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge