Catherine T. Frenette

Interferon-free therapy for genotype 1 hepatitis C in liver transplant recipients: Real-world experience from the hepatitis C therapeutic registry and research network.

Recurrent infection with the hepatitis C virus (HCV) after liver transplantation (LT) is associated with decreased graft and patient survival. Achieving sustained virological response (SVR) with antiviral therapy improves survival. Because interferon (IFN)‐based therapy has limited efficacy and is poorly tolerated, there has been rapid transition to IFN‐free direct‐acting antiviral (DAA) regimens. This article describes the experience with DAAs in the treatment of posttransplant genotype (GT) 1 HCV from a consortium of community and academic centers (Hepatitis C Therapeutic Registry and Research Network [HCV‐TARGET]). Twenty‐one of the 54 centers contributing to the HCV‐TARGET consortium participated in this study. Enrollment criteria included positive posttransplant HCV RNA before treatment, HCV GT 1, and documentation of use of a simeprevir (SMV)/sofosbuvir (SOF) containing DAA regimen. Safety and efficacy were assessed. SVR was defined as undetectable HCV RNA 64 days or later after cessation of treatment. A total of 162 patients enrolled in HCV‐TARGET started treatment with SMV+SOF with or without ribavirin (RBV) following LT. The study population included 151 patients treated with these regimens for whom outcomes and safety data were available. The majority of the 151 patients were treated with SOF and SMV alone (n = 119; 79%) or with RBV (n = 32; 21%), The duration of therapy was 12 weeks for most patients, although 15 patients received 24 weeks of treatment. Of all patients receiving SOF/SMV with or without RBV, 133/151 (88%) achieved sustained virological response at 12 weeks after therapy and 11 relapsed (7%). One patient had virological breakthrough (n = 1), and 6 patients were lost to posttreatment follow‐up. Serious adverse events occurred in 11.9%; 3 patients (all cirrhotic) died due to aspiration pneumonia, suicide, and multiorgan failure. One experienced LT rejection. IFN‐free DAA treatment represents a major improvement over prior IFN‐based therapy. Broader application of these and other emerging DAA regimens in the treatment of posttransplant hepatitis C is warranted. Liver Transpl 22:24‐33, 2016.

Interferon‐free Therapy for Genotype 1 Hepatitis C in Liver Transplant Recipients: Real World Experience from HCV‐TARGET

Recurrent infection with the hepatitis C virus (HCV) after liver transplantation (LT) is associated with decreased graft and patient survival. Achieving sustained virological response (SVR) with antiviral therapy improves survival. Because interferon (IFN)‐based therapy has limited efficacy and is poorly tolerated, there has been rapid transition to IFN‐free direct‐acting antiviral (DAA) regimens. This article describes the experience with DAAs in the treatment of posttransplant genotype (GT) 1 HCV from a consortium of community and academic centers (Hepatitis C Therapeutic Registry and Research Network [HCV‐TARGET]). Twenty‐one of the 54 centers contributing to the HCV‐TARGET consortium participated in this study. Enrollment criteria included positive posttransplant HCV RNA before treatment, HCV GT 1, and documentation of use of a simeprevir (SMV)/sofosbuvir (SOF) containing DAA regimen. Safety and efficacy were assessed. SVR was defined as undetectable HCV RNA 64 days or later after cessation of treatment. A total of 162 patients enrolled in HCV‐TARGET started treatment with SMV+SOF with or without ribavirin (RBV) following LT. The study population included 151 patients treated with these regimens for whom outcomes and safety data were available. The majority of the 151 patients were treated with SOF and SMV alone (n = 119; 79%) or with RBV (n = 32; 21%), The duration of therapy was 12 weeks for most patients, although 15 patients received 24 weeks of treatment. Of all patients receiving SOF/SMV with or without RBV, 133/151 (88%) achieved sustained virological response at 12 weeks after therapy and 11 relapsed (7%). One patient had virological breakthrough (n = 1), and 6 patients were lost to posttreatment follow‐up. Serious adverse events occurred in 11.9%; 3 patients (all cirrhotic) died due to aspiration pneumonia, suicide, and multiorgan failure. One experienced LT rejection. IFN‐free DAA treatment represents a major improvement over prior IFN‐based therapy. Broader application of these and other emerging DAA regimens in the treatment of posttransplant hepatitis C is warranted. Liver Transpl 22:24‐33, 2016.

Management of Sorafenib-Related Adverse Events: A Clinician’s Perspective

Sorafenib, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor, is approved for the treatment of patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC). It is being evaluated in phase II and III clinical trials, which include treatment as a single agent (locally advanced/metastatic radioactive iodine-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer [DTC]), as part of multimodality care (HCC), and in combination with chemotherapeutic agents (metastatic breast cancer). Sorafenib-related adverse events (AEs) that commonly occur across these tumor types include hand-foot skin reaction (HSFR), rash, upper and lower gastrointestinal (GI) distress (ie, diarrhea), fatigue, and hypertension. These commonly range from grade 1 to 3, per the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), and often occur early in treatment. The goal for the management of these AEs is to prevent, treat, and/or minimize their effects, thereby enabling patients to remain on treatment and improve their quality of life. Proactive management, along with ongoing patient education (before and during sorafenib treatment), can help to effectively manage symptoms, often without the need for sorafenib dose modification or drug holidays. Effective management techniques for common sorafenib-related AEs, as well other important disease sequelae not directly related to treatment, are presented. Recommendations and observations are based on physician/author experience and recommendations from published literature.

Targeted systemic therapies for hepatocellular carcinoma: Clinical perspectives, challenges and implications

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a lethal disease in most patients, due to its aggressive course and a lack of effective systemic therapies for advanced disease. Surgical resection and liver transplantation remain the only curative options for a small subset of patients. Few patients with HCC are diagnosed early enough to be eligible for curative treatment. Angiogenesis inhibition is a natural therapeutic target for all solid tumors, but particularly for the highly vascularized HCC tumors. With the approval of the targeted agent sorafenib, there are now additional options for patients with HCC. Although sorafenib does produce some improvement in survival in HCC patients, the responses are not durable. In addition, there are significant dermatologic, gastrointestinal, and metabolic toxicities, and, as importantly, there is still limited knowledge of its usefulness in special subpopulations with HCC. Other angiogenesis inhibitors are in development to treat HCC both in the first-line setting and for use following sorafenib failure; the furthest in development is brivanib, a dual fibroblast growth factor pathway and vascular endothelial growth factor receptor inhibitor. Additional agents with antiangiogenic properties also in phase II and III development for the treatment of patients with HCC include bevacizumab, ramucirumab, ABT-869, everolimus and ARQ 197.

To " Be " or not to " Be " : That Is the Question

Treatment guidelines currently consider hepatitis B early antigen (HBeAg) seroconversion to be the end point of treatment with oral antivirals for HBeAg-positive patients. However, it is clear that with the high HBeAg relapse rate (both natural and after treatment) along with the high rate of mixed infection and the prevalence of HBeAg-negative disease, HBeAg status can no longer be considered the most useful end point of treatment or the signal to initiate therapy. Hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) loss or seroconversion is associated with a favorable prognosis in both HBeAg-positive and HBeAg-negative disease and should be considered the test result that, combined with undetectable HBV DNA, will trigger treatment cessation.

The impact of race/ethnicity on the clinical epidemiology of autoimmune hepatitis.

Goals: To evaluate race/ethnicity-specific variations in autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) with a focus on Asians and Hispanics, the fastest growing populations in the United States. Background: AIH is a chronic inflammatory disease in which race/ethnicity-specific variations in clinical epidemiology have been reported. However, earlier studies were small or did not include a comprehensive analysis of Asians and Hispanics, the 2 fastest growing population cohorts in the United States. Study: A retrospective study analyzing patient data from 1999 to 2010 in a large tertiary-care community hospital to assess AIH epidemiology among a racially diverse population. Results: One hundred eighty-three patients with AIH were included in the study with 81 patients having “definite” AIH by International Autoimmune Hepatitis Group criteria and 63 were diagnosed with overlap syndromes. Women and whites were the largest cohorts. The average age of diagnosis was similar among all groups. Biopsy-confirmed cirrhosis was present in 34% of AIH patients with Hispanics demonstrating the highest prevalence of cirrhosis (55%). When compared with whites, Asians had higher international normalized ratio (INR) (1.4 U vs. 1.1 U, P<0.01), and Hispanics had lower serum albumin (3.3 g/dL vs. 3.7 g/dL, P<0.001) and platelets (123.8 thousand/mcL vs. 187.5 thousand/mcL, P<0.001) and higher international normalized ratio (1.5 U vs. 1.1 U, P=0.05). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis demonstrated a trend toward worse outcomes among Asians. Conclusions: Among AIH patients, Hispanics had the highest prevalence of cirrhosis, and Asians had poorer survival outcomes. Race/ethnicity-specific disparities in AIH epidemiology may reflect underlying genetic differences, contributing to variations in disease severity, response to therapy, and overall mortality.

Pre-transplant utilization of sorafenib is not associated with increased complications after liver transplantation

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is increasing in incidence, resulting in approximately 35% of orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) performed each year. Sorafenib (SOR) is a multi‐kinase inhibitor that is approved for the treatment of unresectable HCC. Concerns have been raised regarding the safety of SOR in patients undergoing major surgery. We retrospectively reviewed 79 consecutive patients with HCC receiving OLT. Patient data were compared for those who received SOR pre‐OLT with those who did not. SOR was continued until time of transplant. During this time period, 15 patients received SOR pre‐OLT and 64 did not. The two groups were similar with regards to demographic and clinical data. SOR patients were more likely to have larger tumors, more tumor nodules, and be outside of Milan criteria. The rate of recurrence of HCC was not different between the groups (13% in SOR group, 11% in no‐SOR group). Surgical complications were not increased in patients receiving SOR prior to OLT. Survival rate was also similar between the two groups (median follow‐up 19.7 months). In this small cohort of patients, use of SOR prior to liver transplantation does not confer an increased risk of surgical complications, even when continued until the day of surgery.

Conventional TACE and drug-eluting bead TACE as locoregional therapy before orthotopic liver transplantation: comparison of explant pathologic response.

Background Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is responsible for significant morbidity and mortality worldwide. Despite its increasing incidence, significant progress has been made in the clinical management of HCC. Transarterial chemoembolization (cTACE) has been shown to improve survival in patients with unresectable HCC; it has also been successfully used as bridging therapy before orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) in efforts to delay tumor growth or to downstage HCC. TACE with drug-eluting beads (DEB-TACE), a novel drug delivery system that produces a slow and sustained release of chemotherapeutic agent, has recently been shown to have similar efficacy to conventional TACE (cTACE); it also exhibits fewer adverse effects resulting from reduced systemic drug concentrations. To date, the pathologic response rate to cTACE compared with DEB-TACE in patients undergoing OLT has not been well described. Methods A total of 111 consecutive patients with HCC who underwent cTACE (n=76) or DEB-TACE (n=35) before OLT at a single center between January 2005 and December 2010 were evaluated. Results Complete necrosis was achieved in 50.9% and 57.1% of cTACE and DEB-TACE patients, respectively; at least 50% necrosis was evident in approximately three fourths of patients in both groups. Rates of necrosis and tumor recurrence did not differ between groups. Dropout from the transplant list was equal in both groups. Conclusions Either modality is an acceptable treatment to achieve tumor control for patients awaiting OLT and can be expected to result in excellent necrosis rates in the majority of patients.

Radioembolization with Yttrium-90 microspheres for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma.

BACKGROUND Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is aggressive primary malignancy of the liver that most commonly presents late in the disease course. As a result, the majority of patients are not candidates for curative therapies. Locoregional therapies including Yttrium-90 (Y-90) radioembolization play an important role in management of the vast majority of patients with HCC. METHODS Patients with unnresectable HCC (n=17) treated with Y-90 radioembolization from 2005 to 2014 were evaluated retrospectively. Data was abstracted from medical records including patient charts, laboratory data, and imaging. Toxicities were recorded using Common Terminology Criteria 3.0. Response was recorded according to modified RECIST (mRECIST) criteria. RESULTS Seventeen patients received 33 treatments with Y-90 radioembolization. A majority (65%) received TheraSphere with a minority (35%) receiving SIR-Spheres. The median treatment activity delivered was 1.725 gBq (range, 1.4-2.5 gBq). The median treatment dose delivered was 100 Gy (range, 90-120 Gy). The median lung shunt fraction was 2.02% (range, 1.5-4.1%). The most common clinical toxicity among all patients was nausea and vomiting (59%), primarily grade 1 and 2. Other post-treatment findings included abdominal pain (29%), fatigue (53%), and weight loss (18%). One patient developed a grade 5 gastric ulcer after the treatment. A clinical benefit, defined as patients achieving complete response (CR), partial response (PR) or stable disease (SD), was seen in 48% of patients. PR was seen in 24% of cases; progressive disease (PD) was noted in 35%. Patients survived for a median of 8.4 months (range, 1.3 to 21.1 months) after the first radioembolization treatment. Median survival after Y-90 treatment was 8.4 months among patients treated TheraSphere as compared with 7.8 months in patients treated with SIR-Spheres. The mean overall survival from the time of diagnosis was 11.7 months (range, 3.4 to 43.2 months). CONCLUSIONS For patients with unresectable HCC, Y-90 radioembolization is a safe and well-tolerated procedure. Our experience suggests that a significant percentage of patients achieve clinical benefit including many with PR. Survival after treatment from this single-center, transplant center is in line with prior reports. Prospective, randomized data is required to compare radioembolization with other therapies including chemoembolization and systemic therapy with sorafenib.

A Clinical Assessment of Wilson Disease in Patients With Concurrent Liver Disease

Goals To investigate variations in clinical epidemiology of Wilson disease in patients with concurrent liver disease and the effect of coexisting disease on current diagnostic algorithms. Background Wilson disease is a rare disorder and few studies exist on diagnosis and natural history. Currently available tools have limited efficacy in complex patients, and the presence of coexisting diseases may further limit their use. More in-depth analyses of Wilson disease among complex patients with concurrent diseases will help improve algorithms for earlier diagnosis and treatment. Study A retrospective cohort study using data from a large tertiary-care center to carry out a clinical assessment of Wilson disease among patients with coexisting liver disease. Results Forty-two Wilson disease patients were identified; 9 had comorbid liver diseases. The average age of diagnosis was significantly older in patients with concurrent liver disease compared with those without underlying disease (49.1 y vs. 26.8 y, P<0.0001). Patients with concurrent liver disease had more evidence of cirrhosis at presentation (9/9, 100% vs. 15/33, 45.5%), and showed greater mortality (4/8, 50% vs. 4/29, 13.8%, P=0.0222). Without mutation analysis data, a definitive diagnosis of Wilson disease using Leipzig criteria was made in 44% of patients with concurrent liver diseases. Conclusions Patients with concurrent liver diseases were diagnosed with Wilson disease at significantly older ages, presented with more liver cirrhosis, and showed greater mortality. Mutation analysis is crucial for definitive diagnosis among complex cohorts and those with intermediate Leipzig scores.