Cátia Arieira

ORBIT score: an useful predictor of small bowel rebleeding in patients under chronic anticoagulation

Abstract Background and study aims: Available scoring systems to assess the risk for major bleeding in patients on chronic anticoagulation seem inadequate in predicting higher diagnostic yields of small bowel capsule endoscopy (SBCE) or higher rebleeding rates in patients with suspected small bowel bleeding. The aim of this study was to evaluate the ability of the new ORBIT score in predicting positive findings of SBCE or higher rebleeding rates in chronically anticoagulated patients with suspected small bowel bleeding. Patients and methods: Retrospective analysis of 570 patients who consecutively underwent SBCE for the study of suspected small bowel bleeding. For each of the 67 patients who were on chronic anticoagulation, ORBIT score (Older age, Reduced hemoglobin/hematocrit, Bleeding history, Insufficient kidney function and Treatment with antiplatelets) was calculated. Patients were classified as high-risk (ORBIT score ≥4) or low/intermediate-risk (ORBIT score <4). Data on SBCE findings, diagnostic yield and rebleeding were compared between groups. Results: When ORBIT score was calculated, 41 and 26 patients were classified as low/intermediate-risk and high-risk, respectively. When low/intermediate-risk and high-risk groups were compared, no differences were found in the diagnostic yield of SBCE (39.0% vs. 23.1%; p = .176). However, in high-risk patients, rebleeding was significantly more common than in low/intermediate-risk patients (80.0% vs. 36.6%; p = .003). Conclusions: In patients presenting with suspected small bowel bleeding and on chronic anticoagulation, the new ORBIT score seems promising in identifying those with a higher risk of rebleeding, in whom a closer follow-up and a more aggressive diagnostic and therapeutic strategy is advisable.

Clinical course in Crohn’s disease: factors associated with behaviour change and surgery

Abstract Background: Crohn’s disease (CD) is a chronic and progressive disease that changes its behaviour over time. Transmural inflammation in CD leads to stricturing and/or penetrating complications. Aim: To evaluate the frequency of long-term progression of CD phenotypes, the need of abdominal surgery, and the main factors associated with these outcomes. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted with a prospective follow-up. Montreal classification was assessed at the moment of the diagnosis and at the end of the follow-up period. Results: Two hundred and ninety patients were included, with mean follow-up duration of nine years. A change in behaviour was observed in 46 patients (15.9%). Ileocolic location (60.9% vs. 45.1%; p = .049), age at diagnosis <16 years (8.7% vs. 2.0%; p = .017), the use of steroids at diagnosis (43.2% vs. 27.0%; p = .031) and shorter exposure time to biological therapy (15.9 months vs 41.3 months; p < .001) were identified as risk factors for phenotype change. Regarding surgery, 70 patients (24.1%) were submitted to abdominal surgery. Smoking habits (41.3% vs. 26.9%; p = .048), stricturing behaviour (50% vs. 18.4%; p < .001), penetrating behaviour 34.8% vs. 7.8%; p < .001), hospitalisations in the first year of diagnosis (52.3% vs. 12.4%; p < .001), and use of steroids at diagnosis (61.4% vs. 23.6%; p < .001) were more frequently seen in patients subjected to surgery. Patients subjected to surgery were less frequently treated with biological therapy (8.7% vs. 23.4%; p < .025). Conclusions: A behaviour progression was observed in about one-sixth of the patients. Progression to a stricturing pattern was the most frequent change in behaviour. Stricturing and penetrating behaviour, higher number of hospitalisations in the first year of diagnosis, use of steroids at diagnosis, smoking status, age at diagnosis <16 years and ileocolic disease location were associated with an unfavourable clinical evolution.

Common Variable Immunodeficiency-Associated Inflammatory Enteropathy: The New Era of Biological Therapy

Common variable immunodeficiency (CVID) is the most frequent form of immunodeficiency in adults. Clinical manifestations are heterogeneous with an increased susceptibility to infections and inflammatory conditions, namely autoimmune diseases, such as inflammatory bowel disease. We present the clinical case of a Caucasian female patient, 21 years old, with a past medical history of CVID, with multiple visits to the emergency department due to abdominal pain in the lower quadrants and diarrhea. Her biochemical analysis showed elevated inflammatory parameters. Stool cultures and parasitological examination of feces were negative. Ileocolonoscopy revealed lymphoid nodular hyperplasia of the terminal ileum, and the small bowel capsule endoscopy demonstrated edema and multiple pleomorphic ulcers (Lewis score = 1,104). CVID-associated inflammatory enteropathy was suspected. Budesonide 9 mg/day was started, but no positive clinical response was observed. It was decided to initiate biological therapy with infliximab. The patient’s condition is currently clinically improved with no complications due to biological therapy.

Can we rely on inflammatory biomarkers for the diagnosis and monitoring Crohn's disease activity?

BACKGROUND Small bowel capsule endoscopy (SBCE) is a very important tool in the diagnosis and monitoring of Crohns disease (CD). The Lewis score (LS) and Capsule Endoscopy Crohns Disease Activity Index (CECDAI) are used to quantify and standardize inflammatory activity observed in the SBCE. AIM To evaluate the correlation between the LS and CECDAI scores and inflammation biomarkers (C-reactive protein [CRP] and erythrocyte sedimentation rate [ESR]). A secondary goal was to define thresholds for CECDAI based on thresholds already established for LS. METHODS This was a retrospective study of 110 patients with suspect or known CD, with involvement of small bowel. Linear regression was used to calculate thresholds of CECDAI corresponding to the thresholds already established for LS. A Pearson correlation (r) was used to calculate the correlation between the LS and CECDAI scores and biomarker levels. Only patients with exclusive involvement of the small bowel were selected (n = 78). RESULTS A moderate correlation was found between the endoscopic scores (r = 0.59, p < 0.001). CECDAI scores of 5.57 and 7.53 corresponded to scores of 135 and 790 in LS, respectively. There was a statistically significant correlation between CRP and the LS (r = 0.28, p = 0.014) and CECDAI (r = 0.29, p = 0.009). There was also a significant correlation between ESR and CECDAI (r = 0.29, p = 0.019), but not with LS. CONCLUSION There is a moderate correlation between the two scores. This study allowed the calculation of thresholds for CECDAI based on those defined for LS. We found a weak correlation between SBCE endoscopic activity and inflammatory biomarkers.