Cecelia Perkins
Stanford University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Cecelia Perkins.
Leukemia & Lymphoma | 2018
Kamal Menghrajani; Philip S. Boonstra; Jessica Mercer; Cecelia Perkins; Krisstina L. Gowin; Alissa Weber; Ruben A. Mesa; Jason Gotlib; Lixia Wang; Jack W. Singer; Moshe Talpaz
Abstract JAK inhibitors for myelofibrosis (MF) reduce spleen size, control constitutional symptoms, and may improve survival. We studied the clinical characteristics of 548 MF patients treated with JAK inhibitors from 2008 to 2016 to better understand predictors of splenic response. Response was defined as a 50% decrease in spleen size at early (3–4 months on therapy) and late (5–12 months) timepoints after therapy initiation. Early response positively correlated with higher doses of JAK inhibitor, baseline spleen size 5–10 cm, and hemoglobin. Early response negatively correlated with baseline spleen size >20 cm and high WBC. The strongest predictor of late response was whether a patient had a response at the earlier timepoint (OR 8.88). Our response models suggest that clinical factors can be used to predict which patients are more likely to respond to JAK inhibitors, and those who do not achieve an early response, i.e. within 3–4 months, should consider alternative treatments.
Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma & Leukemia | 2018
Vincent Ma; Philip S. Boonstra; Kamal Menghrajani; Cecelia Perkins; Krisstina L. Gowin; Ruben A. Mesa; Jason Gotlib; Moshe Talpaz
Micro‐Abstract In the era before Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors, cytogenetic information was used to predict survival in myelofibrosis patients. However, the prognostic value of cytogenetics in the setting of JAK inhibitor therapy remains unknown. Our analyses suggest that initiation of JAK inhibitors nullifies the negative prognostic implication of unfavorable cytogenetics established in the pre–JAK inhibitor therapy era. Introduction In the era before Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors, cytogenetic information was used to predict survival in myelofibrosis patients. However, the prognostic value of cytogenetics in the setting of JAK inhibitor therapy remains unknown. Patients and Methods We performed a retrospective analysis of 180 patients with bone marrow biopsy–proven myelofibrosis from 3 US academic medical centers. We fit Cox proportional hazards models for overall survival and transformation‐free survival on the bases of 3 factors: JAK inhibitor therapy as a time‐dependent covariate, dichotomized cytogenetic status (favorable vs. unfavorable), and statistical interaction between the two. The median follow‐up time was 37.1 months. Results Among patients treated with best available therapy, unfavorable cytogenetic status was associated with decreased survival (hazard ratio = 2.31; P = .025). At initiation of JAK inhibitor therapy, unfavorable cytogenetics was (nonsignificantly) associated with increased survival compared to favorable cytogenetics (hazard ratio = 0.292; P = .172). The ratio of hazard ratios was 0.126 (P = .034). These findings were similar after adjusting for standard clinical prognostic factors as well as when measured against transformation‐free survival. Conclusion The initiation of JAK inhibitor therapy appears to change the association between cytogenetics and overall survival. There was little difference in survival between treatment types in patients with favorable cytogenetics. However, the use of JAK inhibitor therapy among patients with unfavorable cytogenetics was not associated with worse survival compared to favorable cytogenetics. Our analyses suggest that initiation of JAK inhibitor therapy nullifies the negative prognostic implication of unfavorable cytogenetics established in the pre–JAK inhibitor therapy era.
Blood | 2012
Huong (Marie) Nguyen; Anh Pham; Cecelia Perkins; Andrea Linder; Lenn Fechter; Jason Gotlib
Blood | 2016
Wolfgang R. Sperr; Michael Kundi; Hanneke Oude Elberink; Bjorn van Anrooij; Karoline V. Gleixner; Emir Hadzijusufovic; Aleksandra Górska; Magdalena Lange; Anja Rabenhorst; Serena Merante; Chiara Elena; Anna Belloni Fortina; Elena Fontana; Juliana Schwaab; Mohamad Jawhar; Roberta Zanotti; Patrizia Bonadonna; Massimo Triggiani; Cecelia Perkins; Jason Gotlib; Michael Doubek; Khalid Shoumaryeh; David Fuchs; Vito Sabato; Knut Brockow; Agnes Bretterklieber; Nadja Jaekel; Andreas Reiter; Karin Hartmann; Marek Niedoszytko
Blood | 2014
Menghrajani Kamal; Philip S. Boonstra; Alissa Weber; Cecelia Perkins; Krisstina L. Gowin; Huong (Marie) Nguyen; Ruben A. Mesa; Jason Gotlib; Moshe Talpaz
Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma & Leukemia | 2017
Vincent Ma; Philip S. Boonstra; Kamal Menghrajani; Cecelia Perkins; Krisstina L. Gowin; Moshe Talpaz
Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma & Leukemia | 2017
Kamal Menghrajani; Philip S. Boonstra; Cecelia Perkins; Krisstina L. Gowin; Alissa Weber; Ruben A. Mesa; Jason Gotlib; Lixia Wang; Jack W. Singer; Moshe Talpaz
Blood | 2017
Chiara Elena; Serena Merante; Virginia Valeria Ferretti; Lambertus Cm Span; Aleksandra Górska; Massimiliano Bonifacio; Cecelia Perkins; Olivier Hermine; Anja Illerhaus; Sabine Mueller; Roberta Parente; Mohamad Jawhar; Elena Fontana; Alexander Zink; Alex Kilbertus; Michael Doubek; Hans Hägglund; Jens Panse; Vito Sabato; Haifa Al Ali; Elisabeth Aberer; Marie Morren; Magdalena Lange; David Fuchs; Knut Brockow; Anna Belloni Fortina; Andreas Reiter; Massimo Triggiani; Nikolas von Bubnoff; Karin Hartmann
Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma & Leukemia | 2016
Kamal Menghrajani; Philip S. Boonstra; Alissa Weber; Cecelia Perkins; Krisstina L. Gowin; Huong (Marie) Nguyen; Ruben A. Mesa; Jason Gotlib; Moshe Talpaz
Blood | 2016
Kamal Menghrajani; Philip S. Boonstra; Cecelia Perkins; Krisstina L. Gowin; Ruben A. Mesa; Jason Gotlib; Moshe Talpaz