Cecil H. Rorabeck

Efficacy of periarticular multimodal drug injection in total knee arthroplasty. A randomized trial.

BACKGROUNDnPostoperative analgesia with the use of parenteral opioids or epidural analgesia can be associated with troublesome side effects. Good perioperative analgesia facilitates rehabilitation, improves patient satisfaction, and may reduce the hospital stay. We investigated the analgesic effect of locally injected drugs around a total knee prosthesis.nnnMETHODSnSixty-four patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty were randomized either to receive a periarticular intraoperative injection containing ropivacaine, ketorolac, epimorphine, and epinephrine or to receive no injection. The perioperative analgesic regimen was standardized. All patients in both groups received patient-controlled analgesia for twenty-four hours after the surgery, and this was followed by standard analgesia. Visual analog scores for pain, during activity and at rest, and for patient satisfaction were recorded preoperatively and postoperatively and at the six-week follow-up examination. The consumption of patient-controlled analgesia at specific postoperative time-points and the overall analgesic requirement were measured.nnnRESULTSnThe patients who had received the injection used significantly less patient-controlled analgesia at six hours, at twelve hours, and over the first twenty-four hours after the surgery. In addition, they had higher visual analog scores for patient satisfaction and lower visual analog scores for pain during activity in the post-anesthetic-care unit and four hours after the operation. No cardiac or central nervous system toxicity was observed.nnnCONCLUSIONSnIntraoperative periarticular injection with multimodal drugs can significantly reduce the requirements for patient-controlled analgesia and improve patient satisfaction, with no apparent risks, following total knee arthroplasty.

Tibial post wear in posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty. An unrecognized source of polyethylene debris.

Background: With extensive use of posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty implants, it is increasingly important to assess the mechanical performance of this design alternative. The purpose of this study was to examine the wear patterns at the femoral cam-tibial post interface in a series of posterior stabilized prostheses retrieved at revision arthroplasty. Methods: Qualitative and quantitative wear analysis was performed over the surface of the stabilizing posts from twenty-three retrieved total knee components that had been implanted for a mean of 35.6 months (range, 2.3 to 107.2 months). The implants were designs from four different manufacturers. Digital images of the anterior, posterior, medial, and lateral surfaces of the tibial post were made for quantitative analysis and determination of a post wear score. Wear was characterized with a grading system that isolates adhesive, abrasive, and fatigue wear, inferring a weighted score from an estimation of generated polyethylene debris. Results: Evidence of wear or damage was observed on all twenty-three of the stabilizing posts, including those revised because of infection. On the average, 39.9% (range, 18.5% to 60%) of the post surface demonstrated some form of deformation, with adhesive wear, or burnishing, being the predominant wear mechanism. Seven posts (30%) exhibited severe damage with gross loss of polyethylene. The wear caused premature failure and early revision of two components: one of these failures was related to isolated post wear and the other, to severe post wear and subsequent fracture. Overall, wear was primarily posterior, but wear over the anterior, medial, and lateral surfaces was also notable. Conclusions: The cam-post articulation in posterior stabilized implants can be an additional source of polyethylene wear debris. The variability in wear patterns observed among designs may be due to differences in cam-post mechanics, post location, and post geometry. The surgeon should be aware that the cam-post interface is not an innocuous articulation, and manufacturers should be motivated to produce implants that maintain the function of the post while limiting wear and surface damage.

Soft-tissue balancing of the hip: the role of femoral offset restoration.

Inadequate soft-tissue balancing is a major yet often underemphasized cause of failure for primary and revision total hip arthroplasty. Accordingly, contemporary cemented and cementless hip prostheses have been designed with consideration of this issue, and this has substantially increased the long-term survival of total hip replacements. Therefore, it is important for orthopaedic surgeons to be familiar with the rationale, biomechanical principles, and clinical implications associated with soft-tissue balancing of the hip as well as strategies to avoid inadequate soft-tissue balancing and systematic techniques to restore adequate soft-tissue tensioning during total hip arthroplasty.

Wear rate of highly cross-linked polyethylene in total hip arthroplasty. A randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUNDnHighly cross-linked polyethylene was introduced for clinical use in total hip arthroplasty with the expectation that it would exhibit less wear when compared with conventional polyethylene. The purpose of this study was to report the clinical and radiographic results, after a minimum of five years of follow-up, of a randomized, blinded, controlled trial comparing a conventional polyethylene with a first-generation highly cross-linked polyethylene.nnnMETHODSnOne hundred patients were enrolled in a prospective, randomized controlled study comparing highly cross-linked and conventional polyethylene acetabular liners in total hip arthroplasty. Fifty patients were in each group. At the time of follow-up, clinical outcomes were assessed and steady-state femoral head penetration rates (after bedding-in) for each patient were calculated with use of a validated radiographic technique. In addition, a statistical comparison of polyethylene wear between groups was performed with use of generalized estimating equations.nnnRESULTSnAt a mean of 6.8 years postoperatively, there were no differences between the two polyethylene groups with regard to the Harris hip score, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), or Short Form-12 (SF-12) score. The mean femoral head penetration rate in the first through fifth years was found to be significantly lower in the group treated with the highly cross-linked polyethylene (0.003 mm/yr [95% confidence interval, +/-0.027]) than it was in the group treated with conventional polyethylene (0.051 mm/yr [95% confidence interval, +/-0.022]) (p=0.006). Men treated with a conventional polyethylene liner had a significantly higher (p<or=0.012) femoral head penetration rate (0.081 mm/yr [95% confidence interval, +/-0.065]) than both men and women with a highly cross-linked liner (-0.013 mm/yr [95% confidence interval, +/-0.074] and 0.009 mm/yr [95% confidence interval, +/-0.028], respectively). The general estimating equations demonstrated that the group with a highly cross-linked polyethylene liner had a significantly lower femoral head penetration rate than the group with a conventional polyethylene liner (p=0.025), and a significantly higher femoral head penetration rate was demonstrated in men with a conventional polyethylene liner when compared with both men and women with a highly cross-linked liner (p=0.003).nnnCONCLUSIONSnAt a minimum of five years postoperatively, the steady-state femoral head penetration rate associated with this first-generation highly cross-linked polyethylene liner was significantly lower than that associated with a conventional polyethylene liner. Long-term follow-up is required to demonstrate the clinical benefit of this new material.

Validation of two and three-dimensional radiographic techniques for measuring polyethylene wear after total hip arthroplasty.

Background: Three-dimensional radiographic techniques have been developed to estimate in vivo polyethylene wear of total hip replacements. We are not aware of any published study examining the accuracy of these in vivo methods. Our objective was to validate two radiographic techniques by comparing their results with those obtained directly from retrieved specimens. Methods: A coordinate measuring machine was used to probe the interior bearing surface of seventeen acetabular liners that had been retrieved at revision surgery. Solid models were created to determine volumetric polyethylene loss and linear depth and direction of wear. Two in vivo radiographic techniques (PolyWare and the Martell Hip Analysis Suite) were used to calculate two-dimensional linear, three-dimensional linear, and volumetric wear. The radiographic analysis was done independently, and the results were compared with the known values of polyethylene wear derived with use of the coordinate measuring machine. Results: Correlation coefficients comparing the values for two-dimensional and three-dimensional linear wear and volumetric wear derived with the PolyWare radiographic technique with the values derived with the coordinate measuring machine were r 2 = 0.78, r 2 = 0.75, and r 2 = 0.91, respectively (all p < 0.001), and the correlation coefficients comparing the values derived with the Martell Hip Analysis Suite radiographic technique with those derived with the coordinate measuring machine were r 2 = 0.80, r 2 = 0.84, and r 2 = 0.91, respectively (p < 0.001). The average absolute difference between the radiographic estimates and the results derived with the coordinate measuring machine was approximately 19% (range, 13% to 24%). Conclusions: There was good agreement between the wear estimates made with both in vivo techniques and the measurements of the retrieved polyethylene liners made with the coordinate measuring machine. Two-dimensional wear analysis (based on anteroposterior radiographs) accounted for most of the polyethylene wear, while one technique of three-dimensional wear analysis (PolyWare) demonstrated some additional wear in the lateral plane. Clinical Relevance: The use of two-dimensional measurements, based solely on an anteroposterior radiograph, may suffice in the clinical setting. In this series, these techniques detected relatively large changes in femoral head penetration.

Thigh pain after cementless hip arthroplasty. Annoyance or ill omen.

A retrospective review of 148 consecutive porous-coated hip arthroplasties (PCA) showed an incidence of thigh pain of 13% one year after surgery, and 22% at two years. Positive correlations were made with femoral stem subsidence (greater than 2 mm) and with distal periosteal and endosteal bone formation. No positive correlations were made with parameters of bone quality or component fit. Resolution of pain occurred in one-third and an anti-inflammatory agent produced partial relief in two-thirds of the patients. We conclude that thigh pain is secondary to stem instability with distal stress transfer in the absence of stable proximal fixation.

The John Insall Award: Gender-specific Total Knee Replacement: Prospectively Collected Clinical Outcomes

AbstractGender-specific total knee replacement design is a recent and debated topic. We determined the survivorship and clinical outcomes of a large primary total knee arthroplasty cohort, specifically assessing any differences between gender groups. A consecutive cohort of 3817 patients with 5279 primary total knee replacements (3100 female, 2179 male) with a minimum of 2 years followup were evaluated. Preoperative, latest, and change in clinical outcome scores (WOMAC, SF-12, KSCRS) were compared. While men had higher raw scores preoperatively, women had greater improvement in all WOMAC domains including pain (29.87 versus 27.3), joint stiffness (26.78 versus 24.26), function (27.21 versus 23.09), and total scores (28.35 versus 25.09). There were no gender differences in improvements of the SF-12 physical scores. Men had greater improvement in Knee Society function (22.1 versus 18.63) and total scores (70.01 versus 65.42), but not the Knee Society knee score (47.83 versus 46.64). Revision rates were 10.2% for men and 8% for women. Women demonstrated greater implant survivorship, greater improvement in WOMAC scores, equal improvements in SF-12 scores, and less improvement in only the Knee Society function and total scores. The data refute the hypothesis of inferior clinical outcome for women following total knee arthroplasty when using standard components.n Level of Evidence: Level II, prognostic study. See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

The Impact of Morbid Obesity on Patient Outcomes After Total Knee Arthroplasty

Five hundred fifty patients who underwent primary total knee arthroplasty between 1987 and 2004 with a primary diagnosis of osteoarthritis and 1-year outcome data (Western Ontario and McMaster Osteoarthritis Index [WOMAC]) were evaluated. Patients were stratified into body mass index categories based on the World Health Organization classification of obesity. Patients were dichotomized into a class III morbidly obese group and a non-morbidly obese group. Independent t test and multivariable linear regression were used to determine if a difference existed in the 1-year WOMAC outcome between morbidly obese patients and all other patients. Although 1-year outcomes were worse for morbidly obese patients (P < .05), they showed greater improvement in function compared with non-morbidly obese patients. Morbid obesity does not affect 1-year outcomes in patients who have had a total knee arthroplasty.

Comparison of Total Hip Arthroplasty Performed with and without Cement: A Randomized Trial

Total hip arthroplasty has been associated with excellent implant survival rates, but debate remains concerning the best fixation method for the components. A randomized controlled trial, which included 250 patients (mean age, sixty-four years) with osteoarthritis who were managed with total hip arthroplasty between October 1987 and January 1992, was conducted to compare the results of fixation with and without cement. Patients were followed for a mean of twenty years (range, seventeen to twenty-one years). Kaplan-Meier survivorship analysis at twenty years revealed significantly lower survival rates for cemented implants as compared with cementless implants. The cementless tapered stem had an extremely good survival rate of 99%. Radiographs showed evidence of mild stress-shielding around 95% of the cemented stems and 88% of the cementless stems; stress-shielding of grade 3 or greater was seen around the remaining 12% of the cementless stems.

Intra-Articular Injection of Bupivacaine in Knee-Replacement Operations. Results of Use for Analgesia and for Preemptive Blockade *

The effectiveness of an intra-articular injection of bupivacaine, administered before the incision or after closure of the wound, was studied in an effort to decrease the need for postoperative narcotics and to improve analgesia for patients who have elective knee replacement. Eighty-two patients received two intra-articular injections in a random, double-blind fashion. Twenty-eight of them received thirty milliliters of 0.5 per cent bupivacaine and 1:200,000 epinephrine in saline solution before the incision and an injection of thirty milliliters of plain saline solution after closure of the wound (Group 1). Twenty-seven patients received an injection of thirty milliliters of plain saline solution before the incision and thirty milliliters of 0.5 per cent bupivacaine and 1:200,000 epinephrine in saline solution after closure of the wound (Group 2). Twenty-seven patients were given thirty milliliters of plain saline solution (a placebo) for both injections (Group 3). The patients who had received bupivacaine after closure of the wound (Group 2) used less morphine from the patient-controlled analgesia pumps than the patients who had received bupivacaine before the incision (Group 1) and the patients who had received the placebo (Group 3). In the first twenty-four hours after the operation, the administration of morphine (mean and standard deviation) was 59 ± 27 milligrams for Group 2 compared with 68 ± 30 milligrams for Group 1 (p = 0.26) and 81 ± 30 milligrams for Group 3 (p = 0.006). At the time of discharge from the hospital, the patients in Group 2 also had a significantly greater mean range of motion (85.2 ± 8.0 degrees) compared with that of the patients in Groups 1 (80.6 ± 6.8 degrees, p = 0.02) and 3 (80.1 ± 6.2 degrees, p = 0.009). However, there was no difference among the groups with respect to the effectiveness of the analgesia, as measured with use of either the visual-analog or the verbal pain-rating scale, or in the prevalence of side effects, including somnolence, urinary retention, nausea and vomiting, or pruritus. Serum concentrations of bupivacaine were well below toxic levels. It was our conclusion that that an intra-articular injection of thirty milliliters of 0.5 per cent bupivacaine and 1:200,000 epinephrine in saline solution after closure of the wound decreases the need for narcotics and increases the range of motion after an elective knee replacement. The clinical importance of the amount of increased motion is questionable and needs longer-term monitoring.