Cecile P.M. Janus

Second Cancer Risk Up to 40 Years after Treatment for Hodgkin’s Lymphoma

BACKGROUND Survivors of Hodgkins lymphoma are at increased risk for treatment-related subsequent malignant neoplasms. The effect of less toxic treatments, introduced in the late 1980s, on the long-term risk of a second cancer remains unknown. METHODS We enrolled 3905 persons in the Netherlands who had survived for at least 5 years after the initiation of treatment for Hodgkins lymphoma. Patients had received treatment between 1965 and 2000, when they were 15 to 50 years of age. We compared the risk of a second cancer among these patients with the risk that was expected on the basis of cancer incidence in the general population. Treatment-specific risks were compared within the cohort. RESULTS With a median follow-up of 19.1 years, 1055 second cancers were diagnosed in 908 patients, resulting in a standardized incidence ratio (SIR) of 4.6 (95% confidence interval [CI], 4.3 to 4.9) in the study cohort as compared with the general population. The risk was still elevated 35 years or more after treatment (SIR, 3.9; 95% CI, 2.8 to 5.4), and the cumulative incidence of a second cancer in the study cohort at 40 years was 48.5% (95% CI, 45.4 to 51.5). The cumulative incidence of second solid cancers did not differ according to study period (1965-1976, 1977-1988, or 1989-2000) (P=0.71 for heterogeneity). Although the risk of breast cancer was lower among patients who were treated with supradiaphragmatic-field radiotherapy not including the axilla than among those who were exposed to mantle-field irradiation (hazard ratio, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.19 to 0.72), the risk of breast cancer was not lower among patients treated in the 1989-2000 study period than among those treated in the two earlier periods. A cumulative procarbazine dose of 4.3 g or more per square meter of body-surface area (which has been associated with premature menopause) was associated with a significantly lower risk of breast cancer (hazard ratio for the comparison with no chemotherapy, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.39 to 0.84) but a higher risk of gastrointestinal cancer (hazard ratio, 2.70; 95% CI, 1.69 to 4.30). CONCLUSIONS The risk of second solid cancers did not appear to be lower among patients treated in the most recent calendar period studied (1989-2000) than among those treated in earlier periods. The awareness of an increased risk of second cancer remains crucial for survivors of Hodgkins lymphoma. (Funded by the Dutch Cancer Society.).

Cardiovascular Disease After Hodgkin Lymphoma Treatment: 40-Year Disease Risk

IMPORTANCE Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) survivors are at increased risk of cardiovascular diseases. It is unclear, however, how long the increased risk persists and what the risk factors are for various cardiovascular diseases. OBJECTIVES To examine relative and absolute excess risk up to 40 years since HL treatment compared with cardiovascular disease incidence in the general population and to study treatment-related risk factors for different cardiovascular diseases. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This retrospective cohort study included 2524 Dutch patients diagnosed as having HL at younger than 51 years (median age, 27.3 years) who had been treated from January 1, 1965, through December 31, 1995, and had survived for 5 years since their diagnosis. EXPOSURES Treatment for HL, including prescribed mediastinal radiotherapy dose and anthracycline dose. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Data were collected from medical records and general practitioners. Cardiovascular events, including coronary heart disease (CHD), valvular heart disease (VHD), and cardiomyopathy and congestive heart failure (HF), were graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 4.0. RESULTS After a median follow-up of 20 years, we identified 1713 cardiovascular events in 797 patients. After 35 years or more, patients still had a 4- to 6-fold increased standardized incidence ratio of CHD or HF compared with the general population, corresponding to 857 excess events per 10,000 person-years. Highest relative risks were seen in patients treated before 25 years of age, but substantial absolute excess risks were also observed for patients treated at older ages. Within the cohort, the 40-year cumulative incidence of cardiovascular diseases was 50% (95% CI, 47%-52%). Fifty-one percent of patients with a cardiovascular disease developed multiple events. For patients treated before 25 years of age, cumulative incidences at 60 years or older were 20%, 31%, and 11% for CHD, VHD, and HF as first events, respectively. Mediastinal radiotherapy increased the risks of CHD (hazard ratio [HR], 2.7; 95% CI, 2.0-3.7), VHD (HR, 6.6; 95% CI, 4.0-10.8), and HF (HR, 2.7; 95% CI, 1.6-4.8), and anthracycline-containing chemotherapy increased the risks of VHD (HR, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.1-2.1) and HF (HR, 3.0; 95% CI, 1.9-4.7) as first events compared with patients not treated with mediastinal radiotherapy or anthracyclines, respectively. Joint effects of mediastinal radiotherapy, anthracyclines, and smoking appeared to be additive. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Throughout their lives, HL survivors treated at adolescence or adulthood are at high risk for various cardiovascular diseases. Physicians and patients should be aware of this persistently increased risk.

Risk for Valvular Heart Disease After Treatment for Hodgkin Lymphoma

Background: Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) survivors are at increased risk for developing valvular heart disease (VHD). We evaluated the determinants of the risk and the radiation dose-response. Methods: A case-control study was nested in a cohort of 1852 five-year HL survivors diagnosed at ages 15 to 41 years and treated between 1965 and 1995. Case patients had VHD of at least moderate severity as their first cardiovascular diagnosis following HL treatment. Control patients were matched to case patients for age, gender, and HL diagnosis date. Treatment and follow-up data were abstracted from medical records. Radiation doses to heart valves were estimated by reconstruction of individual treatments on representative computed tomography datasets. All statistical tests were two-sided. Results: Eighty-nine case patients with VHD were identified (66 severe or life-threatening) and 200 control patients. Aortic (n = 63) and mitral valves (n = 42) were most frequently affected. Risks increased more than linearly with radiation dose. For doses to the affected valve(s) of less than or equal to 30, 31–35, 36–40, and more than 40 Gy, VHD rates increased by factors of 1.4, 3.1, 5.4, and 11.8, respectively (P trend < .001). Approximate 30-year cumulative risks were 3.0%, 6.4%, 9.3%, and 12.4% for the same dose categories. VHD rate increased with splenectomy by a factor of 2.3 (P = .02). Conclusions: Radiation dose to the heart valves can increase the risk for clinically significant VHD, especially at doses above 30 Gy. However, for patients with mediastinal involvement treated today with 20 or 30 Gy, the 30-year risk will be increased by only about 1.4%. These findings may be useful for patients and doctors both before treatment and during follow-up.

Risk of Diabetes Mellitus in Long-Term Survivors of Hodgkin Lymphoma

PURPOSE Recently, an increased risk of diabetes mellitus (DM) was observed after abdominal irradiation for childhood cancer. Because many Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) survivors have also been treated with infradiaphragmatic radiotherapy, we evaluated the association between HL treatment and DM risk. PATIENTS AND METHODS Our study cohort comprised 2,264 5-year HL survivors, diagnosed before age 51 years and treated between 1965 and 1995. Treatment and follow-up information was collected from medical records and general practitioners. Radiation dosimetry was performed to estimate radiation dose to the pancreas. Cumulative incidence of DM was estimated, and risk factors for DM were evaluated by using Cox regression. RESULTS After a median follow-up of 21.5 years, 157 patients developed DM. Overall cumulative incidence of DM after 30 years was 8.3% (95% CI, 6.9% to 9.8%). After para-aortic radiation with ≥ 36 Gy, the 30-year cumulative incidence of DM was 14.2% (95% CI, 10.7% to 18.3%). Irradiation with ≥ 36 Gy to the para-aortic lymph nodes and spleen was associated with a 2.30-fold increased risk of DM (95% CI, 1.54- to 3.44-fold) whereas para-aortic radiation alone with ≥ 36 Gy was associated with a 1.82-fold increased risk (95% CI, 1.02- to 3.25-fold). Lower doses (10 to 35 Gy) did not significantly increase risk of DM. The risk of DM significantly increased with higher mean radiation doses to the pancreatic tail (P < .001). CONCLUSION Radiation to the para-aortic lymph nodes increases the risk of developing DM in 5-year HL survivors. Screening for DM should be considered in follow-up guidelines for HL survivors, and treating physicians should be alert to this increased risk.

FGFR2 genotype and risk of radiation-associated breast cancer in Hodgkin lymphoma

Women treated at young ages with supradiaphragmatic radiotherapy for Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) have a highly increased risk of breast cancer. For personalized advice and follow-up regimens for patients, information is needed on how the radiotherapy-related risk is affected by other breast cancer risk factors. Genome-wide association studies have identified 14 independently replicated common single nucleotide polymorphisms that influence breast cancer risk. To examine whether these variants contribute to risk of radiation-associated breast cancer in HL, we analyzed 2 independent case-control series, from the United Kingdom and The Netherlands, totaling 693 HL patients, 232 with breast cancer and 461 without. rs1219648, which annotates the FGFR2 gene, was associated with risk in both series (combined per-allele odds ratio = 1.59, 95% confidence interval: 1.26-2.02; P = .000111). These data provide evidence that genetic variation in FGFR2 influences radiation-induced breast cancer risk.

Risk of heart failure in survivors of Hodgkin lymphoma: effects of cardiac exposure to radiation and anthracyclines.

Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) survivors treated with radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy are known to have increased risks of heart failure (HF), but a radiation dose-response relationship has not previously been derived. A case-control study, nested in a cohort of 2617 five-year survivors of HL diagnosed before age 51 years during 1965 to 1995, was conducted. Cases (n = 91) had moderate or severe HF as their first cardiovascular diagnosis. Controls (n = 278) were matched to cases on age, sex, and HL diagnosis date. Treatment and follow-up information were abstracted from medical records. Mean heart doses and mean left ventricular doses (MLVD) were estimated by reconstruction of individual treatments on representative computed tomography datasets. Average MLVD was 16.7 Gy for cases and 13.8 Gy for controls (Pdifference = .003). HF rate increased with MLVD: relative to 0 Gy, HF rates following MVLD of 1-15, 16-20, 21-25, and ≥26 Gy were 1.27, 1.65, 3.84, and 4.39, respectively (Ptrend < .001). Anthracycline-containing chemotherapy increased HF rate by a factor of 2.83 (95% CI: 1.43-5.59), and there was no significant interaction with MLVD (Pinteraction = .09). Twenty-five-year cumulative risks of HF following MLVDs of 0-15 Gy, 16-20 Gy, and ≥21 Gy were 4.4%, 6.2%, and 13.3%, respectively, in patients treated without anthracycline-containing chemotherapy, and 11.2%, 15.9%, and 32.9%, respectively, in patients treated with anthracyclines. We have derived quantitative estimates of HF risk in patients treated for HL following radiotherapy with or without anthracycline-containing chemotherapy. Our results enable estimation of HF risk for patients before treatment, during radiotherapy planning, and during follow-up.

Simple Method to Estimate Mean Heart Dose From Hodgkin Lymphoma Radiation Therapy According to Simulation X-Rays

PURPOSE To describe a new method to estimate the mean heart dose for Hodgkin lymphoma patients treated several decades ago, using delineation of the heart on radiation therapy simulation X-rays. Mean heart dose is an important predictor for late cardiovascular complications after Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) treatment. For patients treated before the era of computed tomography (CT)-based radiotherapy planning, retrospective estimation of radiation dose to the heart can be labor intensive. METHODS AND MATERIALS Patients for whom cardiac radiation doses had previously been estimated by reconstruction of individual treatments on representative CT data sets were selected at random from a case-control study of 5-year Hodgkin lymphoma survivors (n=289). For 42 patients, cardiac contours were outlined on each patients simulation X-ray by 4 different raters, and the mean heart dose was estimated as the percentage of the cardiac contour within the radiation field multiplied by the prescribed mediastinal dose and divided by a correction factor obtained by comparison with individual CT-based dosimetry. RESULTS According to the simulation X-ray method, the medians of the mean heart doses obtained from the cardiac contours outlined by the 4 raters were 30 Gy, 30 Gy, 31 Gy, and 31 Gy, respectively, following prescribed mediastinal doses of 25-42 Gy. The absolute-agreement intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.93 (95% confidence interval 0.85-0.97), indicating excellent agreement. Mean heart dose was 30.4 Gy with the simulation X-ray method, versus 30.2 Gy with the representative CT-based dosimetry, and the between-method absolute-agreement intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.87 (95% confidence interval 0.80-0.95), indicating good agreement between the two methods. CONCLUSION Estimating mean heart dose from radiation therapy simulation X-rays is reproducible and fast, takes individual anatomy into account, and yields results comparable to the labor-intensive representative CT-based method. This simpler method may produce a meaningful measure of mean heart dose for use in studies of late cardiac complications.

The evaluation of innovation in radiation oncology – what can we do and what should we do?

Due to multiple factors including population ageing and generalization of cancer screening, the incidence of cancer is rising in both developed and emerging countries [1]. More patients mean more health care spending, and in a context of economic stagnation this creates serious fi nancial pressure for the society and the individuals. New technologies are almost invariably more expensive than older ones, because of development cost and also incentive cost related to their adoption [2]. However, since the introduction in the 1990s of computed tomography (CT) planning and multileaf collimation leading to intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), the pace of innovation in radiation oncology has accelerated and the adoption of new technology is rarely based on level 1 clinical evidences [3,4]. Currently two new technologies, namely, the MR-Linac and intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) [5,6], are being introduced, inducing major changes in the radiation oncology practice and may also lead to ballooning costs especially for the later one. There have been repeated press releases questioning the need for expensive techniques like proton therapy, pointing out at the limited amount of evidences to justify their implementation, and recommending abandoning their development [7]. In this commentary we review three different strategies to demonstrate measurable, reproducible and meaningful patient benefi ts for new technologies to better justify their adoption and to be able to produce cost effectiveness measures.

Infradiaphragmatic irradiation and high procarbazine doses increase colorectal cancer risk in Hodgkin lymphoma survivors

Background:Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) survivors are at increased risk of second malignancies, but few studies have assessed colorectal cancer (CRC) risk after HL treatment. We assessed long-term, subsite-specific CRC risk associated with specific radiation fields and chemotherapy regimens.Methods:In a Dutch cohort of 3121 5-year HL survivors treated between 1965 and 1995, subsite-specific CRC incidence was compared with general population rates. Treatment effects were quantified by Cox regression analyses.Results:After a median follow-up of 22.9 years, 55 patients developed CRC. The standardized incidence ratios (SIR) was 2.4-fold increased (95% confidence interval (95%CI) 1.8–3.2), leading to 5.7 excess cases per 10 000 patient-years. Risk was still increased 30 years after HL treatment (SIR: 2.8; 95%CI: 1.6–4.6). The highest (SIR: 6.5, 95%CI: 3.3–11.3) was seen for transverse colon cancer (15.0 (95%CI: 4.3–40.8) after inverted-Y irradiation). A prescribed cumulative procarbazine dose >4.2 g m−2 was associated with a 3.3-fold higher CRC risk (95%CI: 1.8–6.1) compared to treatment without procarbazine. Patients receiving >4.2 g m−2 procarbazine and infradiaphragmatic radiotherapy had a hazard ratio of 6.8 (95%CI: 3.0–15.6) compared with patients receiving neither treatment, which is significantly higher than an additive joint effect (Padditivity=0.004).Conclusions:Colorectal cancer surveillance should be considered for HL survivors who received Infradiaphragmatic radiotherapy and a high cumulative procarbazine dose.

OVERALL AND DISEASE-SPECIFIC SURVIVAL OF PATIENTS WHO SURVIVED HODGKIN LYMPHOMA AND DEVELOPED GASTROINTESTINAL CANCER

cohort 2 were treated using deep inspiration breath hold (DIBH) to maximally spare heart and lung. Planning target volumes (PTV) for all 4 plans as well as medians and ranges for their relevant dosimetric parameters are listed in Table 1. Reducing the prescribed ISRT dose from 30.6 Gy to 20 Gy resulted in a 24% reduction in mean heart dose (MHD) and a 32% reduction in mean lung dose (MLD). The median theoretical CVRT PTV for cohort 2 patients was 58% smaller than the delivered ISRT PTV. Reducing the irradiated volume alone to minimal CVRT fields without reducing the dose decreased the MHD by 30% and the total lung V20 by 57%. However, compared to the ISRT 20 Gy plan, the CVRT 30.6 Gy plan only reduced the MHD and MLD by 8% and 11%, respectively. Reducing both the volume irradiated and the prescribed dose (CVRT 20 Gy) achieved the lowest possible heart and lung doses. Conclusions: Significant reductions in RT exposure to heart and lungs can be achieved using reduced‐dose ISRT to 20 Gy in early stage, HL patients with bulky disease who are PET‐negative after 4 cycles of Bv and AVD. Additional reductions in volume using CVRT along with reduced dose to 20 Gy may be able to further minimize RT dose to heart and lung. The disease control with this approach requires longer follow‐up in larger groups of patients.