Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Cécile Tannier is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Cécile Tannier.


Computers, Environment and Urban Systems | 2013

Defining and characterizing urban boundaries: a fractal analysis of theoretical cities and Belgian cities

Cécile Tannier; Isabelle Thomas

In this paper we extract the morphological boundaries of urban agglomerations and characterize boundary shapes using eight fractal and nonfractal spatial indexes. Analyses were first performed on six archetypal theoretical cities, and then on Belgiums 18 largest towns. The results show that: (1) the relationship between the shape of the urban boundary (fractal dimension, proportion of buildings close to the urban boundary) is not straightforward; (2) each city is a unique combination of the morphological characteristics considered here; (3) due to their different morphological characteristics, the planning potential of Flemish and Walloon cities seems to be very different.


Computers, Environment and Urban Systems | 2018

An integrated multifractal modelling to urban and regional planning

Pierre Frankhauser; Cécile Tannier; Gilles Vuidel; Hélène Houot

In this paper, we propose a conceptual framework for the design of multifractal urban or regional development plans that adhere to five planning principles: hierarchical polycentric urban development; transit-oriented development; locally dense residential development; penetration of green areas into built-up areas across several nested scales; preservation of interconnected networks of natural and green areas having various sizes. This conceptual planning framework is based on multifractal spatial modelling, which is intrinsically multiscalar. The GIS-based software application Fractalopolis (current version 1.0) is used to apply this conceptual framework to real-world case studies. Fractalopolis helps to define where to create new housing units and new facilities in accordance with the planning principles set out above. We use Fractalopolis to create a multifractal development plan for a medium-sized French metropolitan area, namely Besancon, for the year 2026. This plan allows a realistic “soft” transformation the Besancon metropolitan area in keeping with the five planning principles set out above and makes the region more multifractal.


Post-Print | 2016

Spatial Decision-Making: Between Individual Choices and Collective References

Cécile Tannier; Myriam Morer; Dominique Ansel

Our individual spatial behaviours are all guided by collective references, whether for a choice of routes (by road, on foot, etc.), places frequented (choice among various shopping centres, etc.), or residential choices (choice of moving to another part of town or another locality). The ideas conveyed by our entourage (family, friends) or by some wider social group (e.g. via national surveys or the media) influence us. However, our individual spatial behaviours are not guided by collective references alone; individual determinants also come into play such as the means of transport we have for our daily commutes, the number of children in our household, or personal past experience (especially during our childhood).


Archive | 2016

Determinism, Probability, and Imprecision in Decision-Making

Bernadette Nicot; Pierre Frankhauser; Cécile Tannier

This chapter looks into the decision to move house and the way in which the decision can be formalized by integrating the reflections from the previous chapters. The fact is that the decision-making process is seldom considered in the context of mathematical modelling of residential mobility. The modelling approaches set out in chapter 9 rest essentially on the concept of preferences and investigate the way in which individuals set about classifying criteria or alternatives with respect to residential choice.


Archive | 2016

Preferences, Utility, Choice, and Attractiveness

Arnaud Piombini; Cécile Tannier; Pierre Frankhauser; Bernadette Nicot; Dominique Ansel

The purpose of this chapter is to specify what is meant by preferences, utility, choice, and attractiveness in the context of daily and residential mobility. These notions will be addressed from the angles of economics, geography, and psychology. We are interested in the process of choice leading to a decision and action with spatial consequences, primarily in terms of residential mobility even if factors pertaining to local daily mobility such as modal choice and route choice are evoked.


L’Espace géographique | 2003

Trois modèles pour mieux comprendre la localisation des commerces de détail en milieu urbain

Cécile Tannier

La dynamique des localisations commerciales de detail en milieu urbain est etudiee a travers la realisation successive de trois modeles. Chacun d’eux correspond a une etape d’une demarche, dont la presentation est au cœur de cet article. Le premier modele decrit les processus generaux a l’origine de la dynamique des localisations commerciales en milieu urbain. Le deuxieme modele consiste en l’identification de regles d’implantation des etablissements commerciaux. Il permet de definir la structure du troisieme modele. Formellement le plus abouti, de par sa nature mathematique, tandis que les deux premiers sont conceptuels et graphiques, ce dernier modele permet la simulation.


Landscape and Urban Planning | 2012

Assessing the capacity of different urban forms to preserve the connectivity of ecological habitats

Cécile Tannier; Jean-Christophe Foltête; Xavier Girardet


Land Use Policy | 2016

Impact of urban developments on the functional connectivity of forested habitats: a joint contribution of advanced urban models and landscape graphs

Cécile Tannier; Marc Bourgeois; Hélène Houot; Jean-Christophe Foltête


Cybergeo: European Journal of Geography | 2008

Is there a link between fractal dimension and residential environment at a regional level

Isabelle Thomas; Cécile Tannier; Pierre Frankhauser


Archive | 2010

Modéliser la ville

Jean-Philippe Antoni; Catherine Morency; Aurore Cambien; Gilles Vuidel; Dany Nguyen-Luong; Jean-Pierre Nicolas; Vincent Piron; Jean Delons; Alain Bonnafous; Yves Crozet; Aurélie Mercier; Nicolas Ovtracht; Pierre-Yves Péguy; Florence Puech; Arnaud Banos; Anabelle Boffet-Mas; Sonia Chardonnel; Christophe Lang; Marilleau Nicolas; Thomas Thévenin; Jean-Louis Routhier; Florence Toilier; Joanne Hirtzel; Pauline Joannès; Pierre Frankhauser; Cécile Tannier; Hélène Houot; Rémi Lemoy; Charles Raux; Pablo Jensen

Collaboration


Dive into the Cécile Tannier's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Hélène Houot

Centre national de la recherche scientifique

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Gilles Vuidel

University of Franche-Comté

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Pierre Frankhauser

Centre national de la recherche scientifique

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Pierre Frankhauser

Centre national de la recherche scientifique

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Joanne Hirtzel

University of Franche-Comté

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Isabelle Thomas

Université catholique de Louvain

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jean-Philippe Antoni

University of Franche-Comté

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Dominique Ansel

University of Franche-Comté

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

François Sémécurbe

Centre national de la recherche scientifique

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge