Cécile Vigneau

Existe-t-il un âge limite pour le don d’organes ?

Nowadays organ transplantations suffer from a lack of donors. Thus the waiting list of patients is constantly growing. Several ways to increase organ procurement are being evaluated. About 50% of cerebral deaths are related to vascular cerebral in patients older than 60 years. For the last few years, organs have been harvested from these patients despite their age. As the quality of the grafts is reduced, transplantation of one kidney may be insufficient whilst transplantation of the two kidneys to the same recipient is technically possible. We report here a case of a 44-year-old patient who was transplanted with two kidneys in September 2000. The donor was 85-year-old patient who died after prolonged cardiac arrest. Kidney biopsy showed a 16% rate of sclerotic glomeruli and mild interstitial fibrosis. The creatinine clearance estimated by the Cockcroft formula was 50 mL.min-1. The double kidney transplantation was successful, without any surgical or anaesthetic complication. Restoration of urine production was immediate. Three months after the transplantation, creatinine clearance was 80 mL.min-1. This observation gives the opportunity to discuss the criteria for organ harvesting in patients with cerebral death. Donor age should not remain anymore a systematic contra indication for kidney or liver donation. Renal function, macroscopic examination and histological findings seem more important for making a decision in taking the graft. Double transplantation, here the second case in France, has been performed for several years in other countries, and has permitted to expand the pool of donors, thus increasing the number of transplanted patients.

Deleterious effects of dialysis emergency start, insights from the French REIN registry

BackgroundEmergency start (ES) of dialysis has been associated with worse outcome, but remains poorly documented. This study aims to compare the profile and outcome of a large cohort of patients starting dialysis as an emergency or as a planned step in France.MethodsData on all patients aged 18 years or older who started dialysis in mainland France in 2012 or in 2006 were collected from the Renal Epidemiology and Information Network and compared, depending on the dialysis initiation condition: ES or Planned Start (PS). ES was defined as a first dialysis within 24 h after a nephrology visit due to a life-threatening event. Three-year survival were compared, and a multivariate model was performed after multiple imputation of missing data, to determine the parameters independently associated with three-year survival.ResultsIn 2012, 30.3% of all included patients (n = 8839) had ES. Comorbidities were more frequent in the ES than PS group (≥ 2 cardiovascular diseases: 39.2% vs 28.8%, p < 0.001). ES was independently associated with worse three-year survival (57% vs. 68.2%, p = 0.029, HR 1.10, 95% CI 1.01–1.19) in multivariate analysis. Among ES group, a large part had a consistent previous follow-up: 36.4% of them had ≥3 nephrology consultations in the previous year. This subgroup of patients had a particularly high comorbidity burden. ES rate was stable between 2006 and 2012, but some proactive regions succeeded in reducing markedly the ES rate.ConclusionES remains frequent and is independently associated with worse three-year survival, demonstrating that ES deleterious impact is never overcome. This study shows that a large part of patients with ES had a previous follow-up, but high comorbidity burden that could favor acute decompensation with life-threatening conditions before uremic symptoms appearance. This suggests the need of closer end-stage renal disease follow-up or early dialysis initiation in these high-risk patients.

Categorical state sequence analysis and regression tree to identify determinants of care trajectory in chronic disease: Example of end-stage renal disease

Background Patients with chronic diseases, like patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD), have long history of care driven by multiple determinants (medical, social, economic, etc.). Although in most epidemiological studies, analyses of health care determinants are computed on single health care events using classical multivariate statistical regression methods. Only few studies have integrated the concept of treatment trajectories as a whole and studied their determinants. Methods All 18- to 80-year-old incident ESRD patients who started dialysis in Ile-de-France or Bretagne between 2006 and 2009 and could be followed for a period of 48 months after initiation of a renal replacement therapy were included (nu2009=u20095568). Their care trajectories were defined as categorical state sequences. Associations between patients’ characteristics and care trajectories were assessed using a regression tree model together with a discrepancy analysis. Results On average, each patient experienced 1.56 different renal replacement therapies (minu2009=u20091; maxu2009=u20095) during the 48 months of follow-up. About 55% of patients never changed treatment and only 1% tried three or more renal replacement therapy modalities. Twelve homogeneous care trajectory groups were identified. Covariates explained 12% of the discrepancy between groups, particularly age, regions and initiation of hemodialysis with a catheter. Conclusions Regression tree analysis of categorical state sequence highlighted geographical disparities in the care trajectory of French patients with ESRD that cannot be observed when focusing on a single outcome, such as survival. This method is an original tool to visualize and characterize care trajectories, notably in the context of chronic condition like ESRD.

Correction to: Deleterious effects of dialysis emergency start, insights from the French REIN registry

Following publication of the original article [1], the authors reported that all of the authors’ names were processed incorrectly so that their given and family names were interchanged.