Cecília M. Arraiano

The exosome contains domains with specific endoribonuclease, exoribonuclease and cytoplasmic mRNA decay activities

The eukaryotic exosome is a ten-subunit 3′ exoribonucleolytic complex responsible for many RNA-processing and RNA-degradation reactions. How the exosome accomplishes this is unknown. Rrp44 (also known as Dis3), a member of the RNase II family of enzymes, is the catalytic subunit of the exosome. We show that the PIN domain of Rrp44 has endoribonucleolytic activity. The PIN domain is preferentially active toward RNA with a 5′ phosphate, suggesting coordination of 5′ and 3′ processing. We also show that the endonuclease activity is important in vivo. Furthermore, the essential exosome subunit Csl4 does not contain any domains that are required for viability, but its zinc-ribbon domain is required for exosome-mediated mRNA decay. These results suggest that specific exosome domains contribute to specific functions, and that different RNAs probably interact with the exosome differently. The combination of an endoRNase and an exoRNase activity seems to be a widespread feature of RNA-degrading machines.

Degradation of mRNA in bacteria: emergence of ubiquitous features.

The amount of a messenger RNA available for protein synthesis depends on the efficiency of its transcription and stability. The mechanisms of degradation that determine the stability of mRNAs in bacteria have been investigated extensively during the last decade and have begun to be better understood. Several endo‐ and exoribonucleases involved in the mRNA metabolism have been characterized as well as structural features of’mRNA which account for its stability have been determined. The most important recent developments have been the discovery that the degradosome—a multiprotein complex containing an endoribonuclease (RNase E), an exoribonuclease (polynucleotide phosphorylase), and a DEAD box helicase (RhlB)—has a central role in mRNA degradation and that oligo(A) tails synthesized by poly(A) polymerase facilitate the degradation of mRNAs and RNA fragments. Moreover, the phosphorylation status and the base pairing of 5′ extremities, together with 3′ secondary structures of transcriptional terminators, contribute to the stability of primary transcripts. Degradation of mRNAs can follow several independent pathways. Interestingly, poly(A) tails and multienzyme complexes also control the stability and the degradation of eukaryotic mRNAs. These discoveries have led to the development of refined models of mRNA degradation. BioEssays 22:235–244, 2000.

The critical role of RNA processing and degradation in the control of gene expression

The continuous degradation and synthesis of prokaryotic mRNAs not only give rise to the metabolic changes that are required as cells grow and divide but also rapid adaptation to new environmental conditions. In bacteria, RNAs can be degraded by mechanisms that act independently, but in parallel, and that target different sites with different efficiencies. The accessibility of sites for degradation depends on several factors, including RNA higher-order structure, protection by translating ribosomes and polyadenylation status. Furthermore, RNA degradation mechanisms have shown to be determinant for the post-transcriptional control of gene expression. RNases mediate the processing, decay and quality control of RNA. RNases can be divided into endonucleases that cleave the RNA internally or exonucleases that cleave the RNA from one of the extremities. Just in Escherichia coli there are >20 different RNases. RNase E is a single-strand-specific endonuclease critical for mRNA decay in E. coli. The enzyme interacts with the exonuclease polynucleotide phosphorylase (PNPase), enolase and RNA helicase B (RhlB) to form the degradosome. However, in Bacillus subtilis, this enzyme is absent, but it has other main endonucleases such as RNase J1 and RNase III. RNase III cleaves double-stranded RNA and family members are involved in RNA interference in eukaryotes. RNase II family members are ubiquitous exonucleases, and in eukaryotes, they can act as the catalytic subunit of the exosome. RNases act in different pathways to execute the maturation of rRNAs and tRNAs, and intervene in the decay of many different mRNAs and small noncoding RNAs. In general, RNases act as a global regulatory network extremely important for the regulation of RNA levels.

Unravelling the dynamics of RNA degradation by ribonuclease II and its RNA-bound complex

RNA degradation is a determining factor in the control of gene expression. The maturation, turnover and quality control of RNA is performed by many different classes of ribonucleases. Ribonuclease II (RNase II) is a major exoribonuclease that intervenes in all of these fundamental processes; it can act independently or as a component of the exosome, an essential RNA-degrading multiprotein complex. RNase II-like enzymes are found in all three kingdoms of life, but there are no structural data for any of the proteins of this family. Here we report the X-ray crystallographic structures of both the ligand-free (at 2.44 Å resolution) and RNA-bound (at 2.74 Å resolution) forms of Escherichia coli RNase II. In contrast to sequence predictions, the structures show that RNase II is organized into four domains: two cold-shock domains, one RNB catalytic domain, which has an unprecedented αβ-fold, and one S1 domain. The enzyme establishes contacts with RNA in two distinct regions, the ‘anchor’ and the ‘catalytic’ regions, which act synergistically to provide catalysis. The active site is buried within the RNB catalytic domain, in a pocket formed by four conserved sequence motifs. The structure shows that the catalytic pocket is only accessible to single-stranded RNA, and explains the specificity for RNA versus DNA cleavage. It also explains the dynamic mechanism of RNA degradation by providing the structural basis for RNA translocation and enzyme processivity. We propose a reaction mechanism for exonucleolytic RNA degradation involving key conserved residues. Our three-dimensional model corroborates all existing biochemical data for RNase II, and elucidates the general basis for RNA degradation. Moreover, it reveals important structural features that can be extrapolated to other members of this family.

Cold shock induction of RNase R and its role in the maturation of the quality control mediator SsrA/tmRNA

In this paper we show that RNase R is a cold shock protein that is induced seven‐ to eightfold by cold shock and that its expression is tightly regulated by temperature. Transcriptional studies reveal that the rnr gene is co‐transcribed with flanking genes as an operon induced under cold shock. The induction of RNase R levels is mainly a result of the stabilization of the rnr transcripts. The transient stability of the rnr transcripts is shown to be regulated by PNPase at the end of the acclimation phase. Studies with an rnr mutant revealed a cold‐shock phenotype showing that RNase R contributes to growth at low temperatures. We have shown that RNase R can be involved in the maturation of SsrA/tmRNA, an important small stable RNA involved in protein tagging and ribosome rescue. The wide biological significance of RNase R regarding adaptation to cold shock and its involvement in RNA surveillance, protein quality control and pathogenesis is discussed.

The exoribonuclease Dis3L2 defines a novel eukaryotic RNA degradation pathway

The final step of cytoplasmic mRNA degradation proceeds in either a 5′‐3′ direction catalysed by Xrn1 or in a 3′‐5′ direction catalysed by the exosome. Dis3/Rrp44, an RNase II family protein, is the catalytic subunit of the exosome. In humans, there are three paralogues of this enzyme: DIS3, DIS3L, and DIS3L2. In this work, we identified a novel Schizosaccharomyces pombe exonuclease belonging to the conserved family of human DIS3L2 and plant SOV. Dis3L2 does not interact with the exosome components and localizes in the cytoplasm and in cytoplasmic foci, which are docked to P‐bodies. Deletion of dis3l2+ is synthetically lethal with xrn1Δ, while deletion of dis3l2+ in an lsm1Δ background results in the accumulation of transcripts and slower mRNA degradation rates. Accumulated transcripts show enhanced uridylation and in vitro Dis3L2 displays a preference for uridylated substrates. Altogether, our results suggest that in S. pombe, and possibly in most other eukaryotes, Dis3L2 is an important factor in mRNA degradation. Therefore, this novel 3′‐5′ RNA decay pathway represents an alternative to degradation by Xrn1 and the exosome.

The stationary-phase morphogene bolA from Escherichia coli is induced by stress during early stages of growth.

The Escherichia coli morphogene bolA causes round morphology when overexpressed. The expression of bolA is mainly regulated by a σs‐dependent gearbox promoter bolA1p. Such regulation results in increased relative levels of expression at slow growth rates, as seen with those attained at the onset of stationary phase. We demonstrate that bolA1p is also induced during early logarithmic growth in response to several forms of stress, and that this induction can be partially σs independent. Sudden carbon starvation results in a 17‐fold increase in mRNA levels derived from bolA1p 1 h after stress imposition. Increased osmolarity results in a more than 20‐fold increase after the same period. Considerable increases in bolA1p mRNA levels were also detected as a result of heat shock, acidic stress and oxidative stress, which has been shown to inhibit σs translation. The orders of magnitude of bolA1p induction in log phase due to sudden starvation, osmotic shock and oxidative stress surpass the levels reached in stationary phase. Under sudden carbon starvation and osmotic shock, the cells changed their morphology, resembling those cells in which bolA is overexpressed in stationary phase. Increased expression and morphological changes due to sudden carbon starvation and osmotic shock still occur when σS is not present in a rpoS− background. The results show that expression of bolA is not confined to stationary phase, but it can also play an important role in general stress response. We propose that bolA1p stress induction overrides the normal regulation imposed by growth rate, which is strictly the result of σS‐directed transcription.

The gene bolA regulates dacA (PBP5), dacC (PBP6) and ampC (AmpC), promoting normal morphology in Escherichia coli

The gene bolA has been shown to trigger the formation of osmotically stable round cells when overexpressed in stationary phase. We show that in poor growth conditions bolA is essential for normal cell morphology in stationary phase and under conditions of starvation. During exponential growth bolA promotes round morphology through a mechanism that is strictly dependent on the two main Escherichia colid,d‐carboxypeptidases, PBP5 and PBP6. The results show that bolA controls the levels of transcription of dacA (PBP5), dacC (PBP6) and ampC (AmpC), a class C β‐lactamase, thus connecting for the first time penicillin binding proteins (PBPs) and β‐lactamases at the level of gene regulation. Furthermore, PBP5 and PBP6 are shown to be independently regulated and to have distinct effects on the peptidoglycan layer. The evidence presented demonstrates that bolA is a regulator of cell wall biosynthetic enzymes with different roles in cell morphology and cell division.

Bacterial adaptation to cold.

Micro-organisms react to a rapid temperature downshift by triggering a physiological response to ensure survival in unfavourable conditions. Adaptation includes changes in membrane composition and in the translation and transcription machineries. The cold shock response leads to a growth block and overall repression of translation; however, there is the induction of a set of specific proteins that help to tune cell metabolism and readjust it to the new conditions. For a mesophile like E. coli, the adaptation process takes about 4 h. Although the bacterial cold shock response was discovered over two decades ago we are still far from understanding this process. In this review, we aim to describe current knowledge, focusing on the functions of RNA-interacting proteins and RNases involved in cold shock adaptation.

PNPase is a key player in the regulation of small RNAs that control the expression of outer membrane proteins.

In this report, we demonstrate that exonucleolytic turnover is much more important in the regulation of sRNA levels than was previously recognized. For the first time, PNPase is introduced as a major regulatory feature controlling the levels of the small noncoding RNAs MicA and RybB, which are required for the accurate expression of outer membrane proteins (OMPs). In the absence of PNPase, the pattern of OMPs is changed. In stationary phase, MicA RNA levels are increased in the PNPase mutant, leading to a decrease in the levels of its target ompA mRNA and the respective protein. This growth phase regulation represents a novel pathway of control. We have evaluated other ribonucleases in the control of MicA RNA, and we showed that degradation by PNPase surpasses the effect of endonucleolytic cleavages by RNase E. RybB was also destabilized by PNPase. This work highlights a new role for PNPase in the degradation of small noncoding RNAs and opens the way to evaluate striking similarities between bacteria and eukaryotes.