Cedric Francois

HAND TRANSPLANTATION: COMPARISONS AND OBSERVATIONS OF THE FIRST FOUR CLINICAL CASES

Twenty, 15, and 8 months after the first four successful human hand transplant procedures were performed in Lyon (France), Louisville (U.S.), and Guangzhou (China), the transplant teams convened in Louisville, Kentucky, to share their experiences at the Second International Symposium on Composite Tissue Allotransplantation. This article presents reconstructive and immunological data from these landmark procedures in tabular format, in an attempt to answer some key questions about early outcomes of clinical hand transplantation. On the basis of these data, the initial outcomes of the first four hand transplants are encouraging and warrant proceeding with additional hand transplantations.

On the Ethics of Facial Transplantation Research

Transplantation continues to push the frontiers of medicine into domains that summon forth troublesome ethical questions. Looming on the frontier today is human facial transplantation. We develop criteria that, we maintain, must be satisfied in order to ethically undertake this as-yet-untried transplant procedure. We draw on the criteria advanced by Dr. Francis Moore in the late 1980s for introducing innovative procedures in transplant surgery. In addition to these we also insist that human face transplantation must meet all the ethical requirements usually applied to health care research. We summarize the achievements of transplant surgery to date, focusing in particular on the safety and efficacy of immunosuppressive medications. We also emphasize the importance of risk/benefit assessments that take into account the physical, aesthetic, psychological, and social dimensions of facial disfiguration, reconstruction, and transplantation. Finally, we maintain that the time has come to move facial transplantation research into the clinical phase.

Investigation of risk acceptance in facial transplantation.

Background: The surgical techniques necessary to transplant a human face are well established, and the early success of human hand transplants suggests that the immunological hurdles of transplanting human facial tissues have largely been overcome. Therefore, it is the ethical barriers that pose the greatest challenge to performing facial transplantation. At the center of the ethical debate is the question, “Do the risks posed by the life-long immunosuppression that a recipient would have to take justify the benefits of receiving a face transplant?” In this study, the authors answer this question by assessing the degree of risk individuals would be willing to accept to receive a face transplant. Methods: To quantitatively assess risks versus benefits in facial transplantation, the authors developed the Louisville Instrument for Transplantation, or LIFT, which contains 237 standardized questions. Respondents in three study populations (healthy individuals, n = 150; organ transplant recipients, n = 42; and individuals with facial disfigurement, n = 34) were questioned about the extent to which they would trade off specific numbers of life-years, or sustain other costs, in exchange for receiving seven different transplant procedures. Results: The authors found that the three populations would accept differing degrees of risk for the seven transplant procedures. Organ transplant recipients were the most risk-tolerant group, while facially disfigured individuals were the least risk tolerant. All groups questioned would accept the highest degree of risk to receive a face transplant compared with the six other procedures. Conclusions: This study presents an empirical basis for assessing risk versus benefit in facial transplantation. In doing so, it provides a more solid foundation upon which to introduce this exciting new reconstructive modality into the clinical arena.

Composite tissue allotransplantation in chimeric hosts: part I. Prevention of graft-versus-host disease.

Background. Mixed allogeneic chimerism (MAC) has been shown to induce tolerance to composite tissue allografts (CTA). However, transplantation of unmanipulated donor-specific limbs results in severe graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). This suggests that nontolerant mature donor-derived cells in the CTA may affect the stability of chimerism, potentially resulting in GVHD. The aim of this study was to develop an approach to study and prevent GVHD in a mixed chimeric-rat hind-limb transplantation model. Methods. [ACI→WF] chimeras received a limb from Wistar Furth (WF) (syngeneic), Fisher (third-party), or ACI (irradiated [1,050 cGy] or nonirradiated) rats. In vitro tolerance was assessed using mixed lymphocyte reactivity (MLR) assays at the time the animals were killed. Results. [ACI→WF] chimeras with greater than 85% chimerism exhibited rejection-free survival of donor-specific hind limbs. However, 100% of these animals developed lethal GVHD 22.4±2.8 days after limb transplantation. [ACI→WF] chimeras that underwent transplantation with irradiated ACI or syngeneic WF limbs showed no signs of rejection or GVHD at 5 months. Nonchimeric and third-party controls rejected limbs within 10 days. Conclusions. Conditioning of the host WF rats with 950 cGy of irradiation (sublethal, myeloablative) led to high levels of MAC without GVHD. The mature T-cell content of nonirradiated donor (ACI) limbs was sufficient to induce lethal GVHD in 100% of tolerant mixed chimeric [ACI→WF] hosts. Irradiation of donor limbs before transplantation resulted in long-term donor-specific tolerance and prevented GVHD. These data demonstrate that (1) established chimeras could be susceptible to GVHD caused by immunocompetent donor cells transferred with the hind limb, and (2) inactivating these cells with irradiation prevents GVHD and destabilization of chimerism, and permits rejection-free graft acceptance.

Composite tissue allotransplantation in chimeric hosts part II. A clinically relevant protocol to induce tolerance in a rat model

Background. We and others have shown that mixed allogeneic chimerism induces donor-specific tolerance to composite tissue allografts across major histocompatibility complex barriers without the need for immunosuppression. However, a delay period between bone marrow transplantation and limb allotransplantation is required, making such protocols impractical for clinical application. This study eliminates this delay period in a rat hind limb allotransplantation model by performing mixed allogeneic chimerism induction and transplantation “simultaneously.” Methods. Group 1 included controls in which naïve Wistar Furth (WF) hosts received ACI hind limbs. Group 2 included (ACI→WF) chimeras that received limbs from third-party donors (Fisher), and group 3 included chimeras that received irradiated (1,050 cGy) ACI limbs. In group 4, WF hosts conditioned with 950 cGy received irradiated (1,050 cGy) ACI limbs followed by infusion of 100×106 ACI T-cell–depleted bone marrow cells and immunotherapy (tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil) for 28 days. Group 5 animals received the same treatment as group 4 animals without immunotherapy. Results. The rats in groups 1 and 2 rejected their limbs within 10 days. Only one rat in group 4 survived to the end of the study. Groups 3 and 5 demonstrated long-term limb survival without rejection or graft-versus-host disease. High levels of donor chimerism (>80%) were achieved and maintained throughout the study. Mixed lymphocyte reaction assays in both groups revealed donor-specific hyporesponsiveness with vigorous third-party reactivity. Conclusions. This study demonstrated that infusion of donor bone marrow cells into conditioned hosts immediately after limb transplantation results in stable mixed chimerism, robust tolerance, and reliable limb allograft survival.

Neuroregeneration in composite tissue allografts: effect of low-dose FK506 and mycophenolate mofetil immunotherapy.

Background: The immunosuppressant FK506 has been reported to increase the rate of peripheral nerve regeneration in nerve crush injury and nerve allograft models. The purpose of this study was to determine whether low doses of FK506 and mycophenolate mofetil had a neuroregenerative effect in revascularized peripheral nerve allografts in a rat hind limb transplantation model. Methods: Wistar Furth rat recipients received limbs from syngeneic Wistar Furth donors (group 1, n = 4) or from allogeneic August X Copenhagen Irish rat donors (group 2, n = 6). Wistar Furth recipients received limbs from August X Copenhagen Irish donors and were treated with FK506/mycophenolate mofetil for 5 months (group 3, n = 7). At the end of the follow-up period, histomorphometric analysis of sciatic and tibial nerves from transplanted and intact hind limbs was conducted. Sciatic and tibial nerves were examined at the level of coaptation and near the neuromuscular junction, respectively. Results: Transplanted limbs in groups 1 and 3 completed the study without rejection, while the limbs in group 2 were rejected within a few days. Sciatic and tibial nerve analysis in groups 1 and 3 limbs showed myelinated axons of various diameters but in significantly fewer numbers than in nontransplanted contralateral nerves. The number and size of myelinated axons of transplanted nerves at corresponding levels were not significantly different between syngeneic and allogeneic (FK506/mycophenolate mofetil–treated) transplants. Conclusions: The authors conclude that long-term neuroregeneration of revascularized peripheral nerves using low-dose FK506/mycophenolate mofetil was similar to that of syngeneic transplants. The occurrence of acute rejection episodes with low-dose FK506/mycophenolate mofetil did not appear to benefit nor impair neuroregeneration.

Bone quality in swine composite tissue allografts: effects of combination immunotherapy.

Background. Tacrolimus (FK506)/mycophenolate mofetil (MMF)/prednisone combination immunosuppression therapy has been found to effectively prevent composite tissue allograft (CTA) rejection with minimal toxicity in a preclinical porcine model. These findings have been reproduced in 24 human hands transplanted in 18 patients. In CTAs containing bone, adequate bone quality and healing are essential for long-term functional success. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect FK506/MMF/prednisone immunotherapy has on bone quality and healing. Methods. Forelimb CTA-flaps were transplanted in nine pigs. Recipient animals received FK506/MMF/prednisone therapy for 3 months. Bone quality was studied pre- and posttransplant by measuring acoustic velocity and density and by calculating elastic coefficients. Additional bone quality analyses were performed on unoperated limbs, and in bone grafts from two pigs that had autograft procedures performed. Bone healing was assessed using radiographic analysis. Results. Three animals were lost to immunosuppression-related complications before the endpoint of the study. The bone component of all six CTA-flaps showed normal healing. Although results of the bone density measurements were not significantly different when comparing pre- to posttransplant values, acoustic velocity and elastic coefficient measurements showed a significant decrease posttransplant indicating a decrease in bone quality. Conclusions. FK506/MMF/prednisone combination therapy prevented rejection, did not adversely affect bone quality, and showed normal bone healing. The transplant procedure itself decreased bone quality more than the immunosuppression regimen did over the observation period in this study. Based on these findings, we conclude to prevent CTA failure it is important to monitor bone quality posttransplant.

Vascularized lymph node transplantation induces graft-versus-host disease in chimeric hosts

Background. The role of lymph nodes (LNs) in adaptive immune responses has been the subject of extensive research. In previous studies, the surgical removal of lymph nodes from rat hind limbs prevented the development of lethal graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) after allogeneic hind limb transplantation to chimeric recipient rats. The purpose of this study was to establish the role of the cellular fraction versus the microenvironment of LNs in the development of GVHD in this model. Methods. A rat model for vascularized LN transplantation was developed and graft-versus-host responses were compared after: 1) naive ACI LN cells were infused into Wistar-Furth (WF) rats as chimeric recipients (e.g. [ACI→WF]); 2) vascularized WF lymph nodes were transplanted to syngeneic WF recipients; 3) nonvascularized ACI lymph nodes were transplanted to [ACI→WF] chimeric recipients; 4) vascularized ACI lymph nodes were transplanted to [ACI→WF] chimeric recipients. Results. Transplantation of vascularized ACI lymph nodes to [ACI→WF] chimeric recipient rats resulted in severe and sometimes lethal GVHD. In contrast, neither the infusion of purified ACI LN cells nor the transplantation of nonvascularized LNs led to GVHD in chimeric recipients. Conclusions. When introducing allogeneic cells into chimeric recipients, concomitant transplantation of the vascularized LN microenvironment makes a manifest difference between induction and absence of GVHD. This illustrates the important role of the LN microenvironment in adaptive immune responses.

New Approaches to Antibody Therapy

The past years have seen the emergence of a new field in plastic surgery: composite tissue allotransplantation (CTA). While it has been used differently depending on context, CTA generally applies to the allotransplantation of vascularized tissues for the purpose of tissue reconstruction. While CTA has been performed for a few decades now (vascularized tendon and bone allotransplants were performed in select experimental settings as early as the 1980s and 1990s), the holy grail of CTA – the transplantation of vascularized tissues that contain a skin component – was achieved only recently (September 23, 1998) with the first human hand transplantation in Lyon (France). The allotransplantation of a hand, 54 years after the first kidney transplantation, was considered a landmark accomplishment. While the reconstructive aspects of the procedure were – and are – relatively straightforward, the skin is highly susceptible to immune rejection, and no immunosuppressive regimen prior to 1998 had been efficacious at preventing the rejection of a transplanted hand. Hand transplantation, and recently face transplantation, became possible with the advent of new immunosuppressive regimens, an era inaugurated by the introduction of cyclosporine in 1978. Ultimately, the combination regimen of tacrolimus (also called FK506), mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), and steroids fostered the first successful hand transplantation. In recent years, other immunosuppressive agents acting via different mechanisms have been introduced. While these agents are changing the way CTA recipients are induced or desensitized immediately following transplantation, it is important to point out that the maintenance immunosuppressive regimen following CTA is still roughly the same as it was at the time of the first procedures, when it was first established by Ustuner et al. To understand antibody therapies in CTA, it is important to consider our historical understanding of immune rejection and the difference between immunosuppression and immunomodulation as two different approaches toward preventing it.