Celia W. G. van Gelder
Radboud University Nijmegen
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Celia W. G. van Gelder.
Nucleic Acids Research | 1994
Celia W. G. van Gelder; J.P.H. Thijssen; Erik C.J. Klaassen; Christine Sturchler; Alain Krol; J. van Walther; Ger J. M. Pruijn
The secondary structures of human hY1 and hY5 RNAs were determined using both chemical modification techniques and enzymatic structure probing. The results indicate that both for hY1 and for hY5 RNA the secondary structure largely corresponds to the structure predicted by sequence alignment and computerized energy-minimization. However, some important deviations were observed. In the case of hY1 RNA, two regions forming a predicted helix appeared to be single-stranded. Furthermore, the pyrimidine-rich region of hY1 RNA appeared to be very resistant to reagents under native conditions, although it was accessible to chemical reagents under semi-denaturing conditions. This may point to yet unidentified tertiary interactions for this region of hY1 RNA. In the case of hY5 RNA, two neighbouring internal loops in the predicted structure appeared to form one large internal loop.
Briefings in Bioinformatics | 2013
Allegra Via; Thomas Blicher; Erik Bongcam-Rudloff; Michelle D. Brazas; Catherine Brooksbank; Aidan Budd; Javier De Las Rivas; Jacqueline Dreyer; Pedro L. Fernandes; Celia W. G. van Gelder; Joachim Jacob; Rafael C. Jimenez; Jane Loveland; Federico Morán; Nicola Mulder; Tommi Nyrönen; Kristian Rother; Maria Victoria Schneider; Teresa K. Attwood
The mountains of data thrusting from the new landscape of modern high-throughput biology are irrevocably changing biomedical research and creating a near-insatiable demand for training in data management and manipulation and data mining and analysis. Among life scientists, from clinicians to environmental researchers, a common theme is the need not just to use, and gain familiarity with, bioinformatics tools and resources but also to understand their underlying fundamental theoretical and practical concepts. Providing bioinformatics training to empower life scientists to handle and analyse their data efficiently, and progress their research, is a challenge across the globe. Delivering good training goes beyond traditional lectures and resource-centric demos, using interactivity, problem-solving exercises and cooperative learning to substantially enhance training quality and learning outcomes. In this context, this article discusses various pragmatic criteria for identifying training needs and learning objectives, for selecting suitable trainees and trainers, for developing and maintaining training skills and evaluating training quality. Adherence to these criteria may help not only to guide course organizers and trainers on the path towards bioinformatics training excellence but, importantly, also to improve the training experience for life scientists.
PLOS Computational Biology | 2015
Teresa K. Atwood; Erik Bongcam-Rudloff; Michelle E. Brazas; Manuel Corpas; Pascale Gaudet; Fran Lewitter; Nicola Mulder; Patricia M. Palagi; Maria Victoria Schneider; Celia W. G. van Gelder
In recent years, high-throughput technologies have brought big data to the life sciences. The march of progress has been rapid, leaving in its wake a demand for courses in data analysis, data stewardship, computing fundamentals, etc., a need that universities have not yet been able to satisfy—paradoxically, many are actually closing “niche” bioinformatics courses at a time of critical need. The impact of this is being felt across continents, as many students and early-stage researchers are being left without appropriate skills to manage, analyse, and interpret their data with confidence. This situation has galvanised a group of scientists to address the problems on an international scale. For the first time, bioinformatics educators and trainers across the globe have come together to address common needs, rising above institutional and international boundaries to cooperate in sharing bioinformatics training expertise, experience, and resources, aiming to put ad hoc training practices on a more professional footing for the benefit of all.
Briefings in Bioinformatics | 2012
Maria Victoria Schneider; Peter Walter; Marie-Claude Blatter; James D. Watson; Michelle D. Brazas; Kristian Rother; Aidan Budd; Allegra Via; Celia W. G. van Gelder; Joachim Jacob; Pedro L. Fernandes; Tommi Nyrönen; Javier De Las Rivas; Thomas Blicher; Rafael C. Jimenez; Jane Loveland; Jennifer McDowall; P. D. Jones; Brendan W. Vaughan; Rodrigo Lopez; Teresa K. Attwood; Catherine Brooksbank
Funding bodies are increasingly recognizing the need to provide graduates and researchers with access to short intensive courses in a variety of disciplines, in order both to improve the general skills base and to provide solid foundations on which researchers may build their careers. In response to the development of ‘high-throughput biology’, the need for training in the field of bioinformatics, in particular, is seeing a resurgence: it has been defined as a key priority by many Institutions and research programmes and is now an important component of many grant proposals. Nevertheless, when it comes to planning and preparing to meet such training needs, tension arises between the reward structures that predominate in the scientific community which compel individuals to publish or perish, and the time that must be devoted to the design, delivery and maintenance of high-quality training materials. Conversely, there is much relevant teaching material and training expertise available worldwide that, were it properly organized, could be exploited by anyone who needs to provide training or needs to set up a new course. To do this, however, the materials would have to be centralized in a database and clearly tagged in relation to target audiences, learning objectives, etc. Ideally, they would also be peer reviewed, and easily and efficiently accessible for downloading. Here, we present the Bioinformatics Training Network (BTN), a new enterprise that has been initiated to address these needs and review it, respectively, to similar initiatives and collections.
Bioinformatics | 2015
Manuel Corpas; Rafael C. Jimenez; Erik Bongcam-Rudloff; Aidan Budd; Michelle D. Brazas; Pedro L. Fernandes; Bruno A. Gaëta; Celia W. G. van Gelder; Eija Korpelainen; Fran Lewitter; Annette McGrath; Daniel MacLean; Patricia M. Palagi; Kristian Rother; Jan Taylor; Allegra Via; Mick Watson; Maria Victoria Schneider; Teresa K. Attwood
Summary: Rapid technological advances have led to an explosion of biomedical data in recent years. The pace of change has inspired new collaborative approaches for sharing materials and resources to help train life scientists both in the use of cutting-edge bioinformatics tools and databases and in how to analyse and interpret large datasets. A prototype platform for sharing such training resources was recently created by the Bioinformatics Training Network (BTN). Building on this work, we have created a centralized portal for sharing training materials and courses, including a catalogue of trainers and course organizers, and an announcement service for training events. For course organizers, the portal provides opportunities to promote their training events; for trainers, the portal offers an environment for sharing materials, for gaining visibility for their work and promoting their skills; for trainees, it offers a convenient one-stop shop for finding suitable training resources and identifying relevant training events and activities locally and worldwide. Availability and implementation: http://mygoblet.org/training-portal Contact: [email protected]
PLOS Computational Biology | 2014
Michelle D. Brazas; Fran Lewitter; Maria Victoria Schneider; Celia W. G. van Gelder; Patricia M. Palagi
Traditionally, bioinformatics tools and training programs have focused on life science audiences. Though heterogeneous, their needs are at least fairly well understood. Driven by the impact of technology in diverse areas, bioinformatics is becoming increasingly interdisciplinary, and, in parallel, so too are the audiences seeking bioinformatics training. Audiences as disparate as physicians and lawyers, industry, and even the general public, previously without real need of bioinformatics skills or awareness, are now pursuing an understanding of and skill sets in bioinformatics. These audiences represent a new and exciting challenge for bioinformatics training programs. A recent workshop at ISMB/ECCB (Intelligent Systems for Molecular Biology/European Conference on Computational Biology) 2013, “Workshop on Education in Bioinformatics 2013” (WEB2013), discussed opportunities and bioinformatics training strategies for emerging clinical and public audiences [1]. The aim of this Quick Guide is to share our guidelines for core bioinformatics skills and training requirements with bioinformatics educators and trainers who are already involved in or are thinking about developing and delivering bioinformatics programs to these audiences.
PLOS Computational Biology | 2015
Teresa K. Attwood; Erik Bongcam-Rudloff; Michelle E. Brazas; Manuel Corpas; Pascale Gaudet; Fran Lewitter; Nicola Mulder; Patricia M. Palagi; Maria Victoria Schneider; Celia W. G. van Gelder
Copyright:
Bioinformatics | 2013
Rafael C. Jimenez; Juan Pablo Albar; Jong Bhak; Marie-Claude Blatter; Thomas Blicher; Michelle D. Brazas; Catherine Brooksbank; Aidan Budd; Javier De Las Rivas; Jacqueline Dreyer; Marc A. van Driel; Michael J. Dunn; Pedro L. Fernandes; Celia W. G. van Gelder; Henning Hermjakob; Vassilios Ioannidis; David Phillip Judge; Pascal Kahlem; Eija Korpelainen; Hans-Joachim Kraus; Jane Loveland; Christine Mayer; Jennifer McDowall; Federico Morán; Nicola Mulder; Tommi Nyrönen; Kristian Rother; Gustavo A. Salazar; Reinhard Schneider; Allegra Via
Summary: We present iAnn, an open source community-driven platform for dissemination of life science events, such as courses, conferences and workshops. iAnn allows automatic visualisation and integration of customised event reports. A central repository lies at the core of the platform: curators add submitted events, and these are subsequently accessed via web services. Thus, once an iAnn widget is incorporated into a website, it permanently shows timely relevant information as if it were native to the remote site. At the same time, announcements submitted to the repository are automatically disseminated to all portals that query the system. To facilitate the visualization of announcements, iAnn provides powerful filtering options and views, integrated in Google Maps and Google Calendar. All iAnn widgets are freely available. Availability: http://iann.pro/iannviewer Contact: [email protected]
F1000Research | 2017
Aleksandra Pawlik; Celia W. G. van Gelder; Aleksandra Nenadic; Patricia M. Palagi; Eija Korpelainen; Philip Lijnzaad; Diana Marek; Susanna-Assunta Sansone; John M. Hancock; Carole A. Goble
Quality training in computational skills for life scientists is essential to allow them to deliver robust, reproducible and cutting-edge research. A pan-European bioinformatics programme, ELIXIR, has adopted a well-established and progressive programme of computational lab and data skills training from Software and Data Carpentry, aimed at increasing the number of skilled life scientists and building a sustainable training community in this field. This article describes the Pilot action, which introduced the Carpentry training model to the ELIXIR community.
Briefings in Bioinformatics | 2017
Celia W. G. van Gelder; Rob W. W. Hooft; Merlijn van Rijswijk; Linda van den Berg; Ruben G. Kok; Marcel J. T. Reinders; Barend Mons; Jaap Heringa
Abstract This review provides a historical overview of the inception and development of bioinformatics research in the Netherlands. Rooted in theoretical biology by foundational figures such as Paulien Hogeweg (at Utrecht University since the 1970s), the developments leading to organizational structures supporting a relatively large Dutch bioinformatics community will be reviewed. We will show that the most valuable resource that we have built over these years is the close-knit national expert community that is well engaged in basic and translational life science research programmes. The Dutch bioinformatics community is accustomed to facing the ever-changing landscape of data challenges and working towards solutions together. In addition, this community is the stable factor on the road towards sustainability, especially in times where existing funding models are challenged and change rapidly.