Celso A. Reis

Glycosylation in cancer: mechanisms and clinical implications

Despite recent progress in understanding the cancer genome, there is still a relative delay in understanding the full aspects of the glycome and glycoproteome of cancer. Glycobiology has been instrumental in relevant discoveries in various biological and medical fields, and has contributed to the deciphering of several human diseases. Glycans are involved in fundamental molecular and cell biology processes occurring in cancer, such as cell signalling and communication, tumour cell dissociation and invasion, cell–matrix interactions, tumour angiogenesis, immune modulation and metastasis formation. The roles of glycans in cancer have been highlighted by the fact that alterations in glycosylation regulate the development and progression of cancer, serving as important biomarkers and providing a set of specific targets for therapeutic intervention. This Review discusses the role of glycans in fundamental mechanisms controlling cancer development and progression, and their applications in oncology.

Alterations in glycosylation as biomarkers for cancer detection

Glycoconjugates constitute a major class of biomolecules which include glycoproteins, glycosphingolipids and proteoglycans. Glycans are involved in several physiological and pathological conditions, such as host–pathogen interactions, cell differentiation, migration, tumour invasion and metastisation, cell trafficking and signalling. Cancer is associated with glycosylation alterations in glycoproteins and glycolipids. This review describes various aspects of protein glycosylation with the focus on alterations associated with human cancer. The application of these glycosylation modifications as biomarkers for cancer detection in tumour tissues and serological assays is summarised.

Summary Report on the ISOBM TD-4 Workshop: Analysis of 56 Monoclonal Antibodies against the MUC1 Mucin

Sixteen research groups participated in the ISOBM TD-4 Workshop in which the reactivity and specificity of 56 monoclonal antibodies against the MUC1 mucin was investigated using a diverse panel of target antigens and MUC1 mucin- related synthetic peptides and glycopeptides. The majority of antibodies (34/56) defined epitopes located within the 20-amino acid tandem repeat sequence of the MUC1 mucin protein core. Of the remaining 22 antibodies, there was evidence for the involvement of carbohydrate residues in the epitopes for 16 antibodies. There was no obvious relationship between the type of immunogen and the specificity of each antibody. Synthetic peptides and glycopeptides were analyzed for their reactivity with each antibody either by assay of direct binding (e.g. by ELISA or BiaCore) or by determining the capacity of synthetic ligands to inhibit antibody binding interactions. There was good concordance between the research groups in identifying antibodies reactive with peptide epitopes within the MUC1 protein core. Epitope mapping tests were performed using the Pepscan analysis for antibody reactivity against overlapping synthetic peptides, and results were largely consistent between research groups. The dominant feature of epitopes within the MUC1 protein core was the presence, in full or part, of the hydrophilic sequence of PDTRPAP. Carbohydrate epitopes were less easily characterized and the most useful reagents in this respect were defined oligosaccharides, rather than purified mucin preparations enriched in particular carbohydrate moieties. It was evident that carbohydrate residues were involved in many epitopes, by regulating epitope accessibility or masking determinants, or by stabilizing preferred conformations of peptide epitopes within the MUC1 protein core. Overall, the studies highlight concordance between groups rather than exposing inconsistencies which gives added confidence to the results of analyses of the specificity of anti-mucin monoclonal antibodies.

Immunohistochemical study of MUC5AC expression in human gastric carcinomas using a novel monoclonal antibody

In order to investigate the expression of MUC5AC mucin in normal gastric mucosa and gastric carcinomas, we produced 3 monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) using a MUC5AC synthetic peptide. The immunohistochemical study was performed using one of these MAbs (CLH2) which reacted with the different designs of peptides based on the MUC5AC tandem repeat and with native and deglycosylated mucin extracted from gastric tissues. CLH2 immunoreactivity was restricted to foveolar and mucopeptic neck cells in normal gastric mucosa. No reactivity was observed in type‐1 intestinal metaplasia. Out of 66 gastric carcinomas, 42 (63.6%) expressed MUC5AC. Most diffuse carcinomas were positive (83.3%), whereas only 59.3% of intestinal and 40.0% of atypical carcinomas expressed MUC5AC (p < 0.05). Gastric carcinomas with mixed pattern showed immunoreactivity in diffuse areas and decreased immunoreactivity in intestinal areas. Every early gastric carcinoma expressed MUC5AC, in contrast to 58.6% of advanced carcinomas (p < 0.05). A trend toward decreased immunoreactivity was observed in deep areas of advanced carcinomas in comparison with the respective superficial areas. Taking together the specific staining of foveolar and mucopeptic neck cells and the absence of immunoreactivity in intestinal metaplasia, we conclude that MUC5AC expression may be used as a marker of gastric differentiation. This assumption is further supported by the finding of MUC5AC immunoreactivity in most diffuse carcinomas, which usually display morphologic and histochemical signs of gastric differentiation. The expression of MUC5AC in early gastric carcinomas, regardless of their histologic type, suggests that all gastric carcinomas retain at least some cells with a gastric phenotype during the first steps of neoplastic development. Int. J. Cancer 74:112–121.

Gastric carcinoma exhibits distinct types of cell differentiation: an immunohistochemical study of trefoil peptides (TFF1 and TFF2) and mucins (MUC1, MUC2, MUC5AC, and MUC6).

The expression of trefoil peptides (TFF1 and TFF2) and mucins (MUC1, MUC2, MUC5AC, and MUC6) has previously been described in gastric polyps. In the present study, the expression profile of these trefoil peptides and mucins was characterized in 96 gastric carcinomas, in an attempt to further the understanding of the histogenesis and cell differentiation of gastric carcinoma. Taking together the co‐expression of trefoil peptides and mucins, three phenotypes were defined: complete gastric, incomplete gastric, and non‐gastric phenotype. Gastric differentiation (complete and incomplete) was observed in 30 out of 33 (90.9%) diffuse carcinomas and in 38 out of 53 (71.7%) intestinal carcinomas. Non‐gastric differentiation was observed in only three (9.1%) diffuse carcinomas and in 15 (28.3%) intestinal carcinomas. The phenotypes observed in intestinal carcinomas were similar to those previously observed in adenomatous polyps, whereas most diffuse carcinomas mimicked the phenotype of hyperplastic polyps. The percentage of cases displaying a non‐gastric phenotype was higher, though not significantly, in tumours that had invaded the gastric wall than in T1 tumours, regardless of histotype. It is concluded that gastric‐type differentiation is retained in the majority of gastric carcinomas, being more prominent in diffuse than in intestinal carcinomas, and in early than in advanced carcinomas. Copyright

Role of the Human ST6GalNAc-I and ST6GalNAc-II in the Synthesis of the Cancer-Associated Sialyl-Tn Antigen

The Sialyl-Tn antigen (Neu5Acα2–6GalNAc-O-Ser/Thr) is highly expressed in several human carcinomas and is associated with carcinoma aggressiveness and poor prognosis. We characterized two human sialyltransferases, CMP-Neu5Ac:GalNAc-R α2,6-sialyltransferase (ST6GalNAc)-I and ST6GalNAc-II, that are candidate enzymes for Sialyl-Tn synthases. We expressed soluble recombinant hST6GalNAc-I and hST6GalNAc-II and characterized the substrate specificity of both enzymes toward a panel of glycopeptides, glycoproteins, and other synthetic glycoconjugates. The recombinant ST6GalNAc-I and ST6GalNAc-II showed similar substrate specificity toward glycoproteins and GalNAcα-O-Ser/Thr glycopeptides, such as glycopeptides derived from the MUC2 mucin and the HIVgp120. We also observed that the amino acid sequence of the acceptor glycopeptide contributes to the in vitro substrate specificity of both enzymes. We additionally established a gastric cell line, MKN45, stably transfected with the full length of either ST6GalNAc-I or ST6GalNAc-II and evaluated the carbohydrate antigens expression profile induced by each enzyme. MKN45 transfected with ST6GalNAc-I showed high expression of Sialyl-Tn, whereas MKN45 transfected with ST6GalNAc-II showed the biosynthesis of the Sialyl-6T structure [Galβ1–3 (Neu5Acα2–6)GalNAc-O-Ser/Thr]. In conclusion, although both enzymes show similar in vitro activities when Tn antigen alone is available, whenever both Tn and T antigens are present, ST6GalNAc-I acts preferentially on Tn antigen, whereas the ST6GalNAc-II acts preferentially on T antigen. Our results show that ST6GalNAc-I is the major Sialyl-Tn synthase and strongly support the hypothesis that the expression of the Sialyl-Tn antigen in cancer cells is due to ST6GalNAc-I activity.

Immunohistochemical Study of the Expression of MUC6 Mucin and Co-expression of Other Secreted Mucins (MUC5AC and MUC2) in Human Gastric Carcinomas

To investigate the expression of MUC6 mucin in gastric carcinomas, we generated a novel monoclonal antibody (MAb CLH5) using an MUC6 synthetic peptide. MAb CLH5 reacted exclusively with the MUC6 peptide and with native and deglycosylated mucin extracts from gastric tissues. MAb CLH5 immunoreactivity was observed in normal gastric mucosa restricted to pyloric glands of the antrum and mucopeptic cells of the neck zone of the body region. In a series of 104 gastric carcinomas, 31 (29.8%) were immunoreactive for MUC6. The expression of MUC6 was not associated with histomorphological type or with clinicopathological features of the carcinomas. Analysis of the co-expression of MUC6 with other secreted mucins (MUC5AC and MUC2) in 20 gastric carcinomas revealed that different mucin core proteins are co-expressed in 55% of the cases. MUC6 was co-expressed and co-localized with MUC5AC in 45% and with MUC2 in 5% of the cases. Expression of MUC2 alone was observed in 25% of the cases. All carcinomas expressing MUC2 mucin in more than 50% of the cells were of the mucinous type according to the WHO classification. The co-expression of mucins was independent of the histomorphological type and stage of the tumors. In conclusion, we observed, using a novel well-characterized MAb, that MUC6 is a good marker of mucopeptic cell differentiation and is expressed in 30% of gastric carcinomas, independent of the clinicopathological features of the cases. Furthermore, we found that co-expression and co-localization of mucins in gastric carcinomas is independent of histomorphology and staging. Finally, we observed that intestinal mucin MUC2 is expressed as the most prominent mucin of the mucins tested in mucinous-type gastric carcinomas.

Reactivity of natural and induced human antibodies to MUC1 mucin with MUC1 peptides and n‐acetylgalactosamine (GalNAc) peptides

Antibodies (Abs) to MUC1 occur naturally in both healthy subjects and cancer patients and can be induced by MUC1 peptide vaccination. We compared the specificity of natural and induced MUC1 Abs with the objective of defining an effective MUC1 vaccine for active immunotherapy of adenocarcinoma patients. Serum samples, selected out of a screened population of 492 subjects for their high levels of IgG and/or IgM MUC1 Abs, were obtained from 55 control subjects and from 26 breast cancer patients before primary treatment, as well as from 19 breast cancer patients immunized with MUC1 peptides coupled to keyhole limpet hemocyanin (KLH) and mixed with QS‐21. The samples were tested with enzyme‐linked immunoassays for reactivity with (1) overlapping hepta‐ and 20‐mer peptides spanning the MUC1 tandem repeat sequence; (2) two modified 60‐mer peptides with substitutions in the PDTR (PDTA) or in the STAPPA (STAAAA) sequence of each tandem repeat; and (3) four 60‐mer glycopeptides with each 1, 2, 3 and 5 mol N‐acetylgalactosamine (GalNAc) per repeat. More than one minimal epitopic sequence could be defined, indicating that Abs directed to more than one region of the MUC1 peptide core can coexist in one and the same subject. The most frequent minimal epitopic sequence of natural MUC1 IgG and IgM Abs was RPAPGS, followed by PPAHGVT and PDTRP. MUC1 peptide vaccination induced high titers of IgM and IgG Abs predominantly directed, respectively, to the PDTRPAP and the STAPPAHGV sequences of the tandem repeat. Natural MUC1 Abs from breast cancer patients reacted more strongly with the N‐acetylgalactosamine (GalNAc) peptides than with the naked 60‐mer peptide, while reactivity with the GalNAc‐peptides was significantly reduced (2‐tailed p < 0.0001) in the MUC1 IgG and IgM Abs induced by MUC1 peptide vaccination. Whereas in cancer patients glycans appear to participate in epitope conformation, the epitope(s) recognized by MUC1 Abs induced by peptide vaccination are already masked by minimal glycosylation. Therefore, our results indicate that a MUC1 glycopeptide would be a better vaccine than a naked peptide. Int. J. Cancer 86:702–712, 2000.

Epithelial E- and P-cadherins: Role and clinical significance in cancer

E-cadherin and P-cadherin are major contributors to cell-cell adhesion in epithelial tissues, playing pivotal roles in important morphogenetic and differentiation processes during development, and in maintaining integrity and homeostasis in adult tissues. It is now generally accepted that alterations in these two molecules are observed during tumour progression of most carcinomas. Genetic or epigenetic alterations in E- and P-cadherin-encoding genes (CDH1 and CDH3, respectively), or alterations in their proteins expression, often result in tissue disorder, cellular de-differentiation, increased invasiveness of tumour cells and ultimately in metastasis. In this review, we will discuss the major properties of E- and P-cadherin molecules, its regulation in normal tissue, and their alterations and role in cancer, with a specific focus on gastric and breast cancer models.

Human MUC2 Mucin Gene Is Transcriptionally Regulated by Cdx Homeodomain Proteins in Gastrointestinal Carcinoma Cell Lines

In intestinal metaplasia and 30% of gastric carcinomas, MUC2 intestinal mucin and the intestine-specific transcription factors Cdx-1 and Cdx-2 are aberrantly expressed. The involvement of Cdx-1 and Cdx-2 in the intestinal development and their role in transcription of several intestinal genes support the hypothesis that Cdx-1 and/or Cdx-2 play important roles in the aberrant intestinal differentiation program of intestinal metaplasia and gastric carcinoma. To clarify the mechanisms of transcriptional regulation of the MUC2 mucin gene in gastric cells, pGL3 deletion constructs covering 2.6 kb of the human MUC2 promoter were used in transient transfection assays, enabling us to identify a relevant region for MUC2 transcription in all gastric cell lines. To evaluate the role of Cdx-1 and Cdx-2 in MUC2 transcription we performed co-transfection experiments with expression vectors encoding Cdx-1 and Cdx-2. In two of the four gastric carcinoma cell lines and in all colon carcinoma cell lines we observed transactivation of the MUC2 promoter by Cdx-2. Using gel shift assays we identified two Cdx-2 binding sites at –177/–171 and –191/–187. Only simultaneous mutation of the two sites resulted in inhibition of Cdx-2-mediated transactivation of MUC2 promoter, implying that both Cdx-2 sites are active. Finally, stable expression of Cdx-2 in a gastric cell line initially not expressing Cdx-2, led to induction of MUC2 expression. In conclusion, this work demonstrates that Cdx-2 activates the expression of MUC2 mucin gene in gastric cells, inducing an intestinal transdifferentiation phenotype that parallels what is observed both in intestinal metaplasia and some gastric carcinomas.