Cesar Uribe

Physiological impact of continuous flow on end-organ function: clinical implications in the current era of left ventricular assist devices.

The clinical era of continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices has debunked many myths about the dire need of a pulse for human existence. While this therapy has been documented to provide a clear survival benefit in end-stage heart failure patients, we are now faced with certain morbidity challenges that as of yet have no easy mechanistic physiological explanation. The effect of physiological changes on end-organ function in patients supported by continuous-flow ventricular assist devices may offer insight into some of these morbidities. We therefore present a review of current evidence documenting the impact of continuous flow on end-organ function.

Acquired and Hereditary Hypercoagulable States in Patients with Continuous Flow Left Ventricular Assist Devices: Prevalence and Thrombotic Complications

BACKGROUND Thrombotic events in patients with continuous flow left ventricular assist devices (CF-LVADs) are associated with significant morbidity and mortality. The objective of this study was to delineate the frequency, clinical characteristics, and outcomes of patients with hypercoagulable states who undergo CF-LVAD implantation. METHODS We performed a retrospective review of 168 consecutive patients who underwent CF-LVAD implantation between 2010 and 2013. Chart and laboratory data were reviewed for the presence of a hereditary and/or acquired hypercoagulable state. Adverse outcomes were defined as death, confirmed pump thrombosis, aortic root clot, stroke, deep vein thrombosis, and pulmonary embolism. Fishers exact test and Kaplan-Meier estimate were used to analyze frequency of adverse outcomes and event free survival, respectively. RESULTS A hypercoagulable state was identified in 20 patients (11.9%). There were 18 patients with acquired, 1 with a congenital, and 1 with both congenital and acquired hypercoagulable states. The median follow-up was 429 days and 475 days in patients with and without hypercoagulable states, respectively. During the study period, 15% (3/20) of the patients with a hypercoagulable state had a diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis vs 3% (4/148) of the patients without a hypercoagulable state (P = .030). Only patients with a hypercoagulable state had a subarachnoid hemorrhage (3/20 vs 0/148; P < .01). The event-free survival was lower in the patients with hypercoagulable states (P = .005). CONCLUSION Hypercoagulable states are not uncommon in patients with CF-LVADs and may be associated with increased morbidity. Prospective studies are needed to more accurately identify the incidence, prevalence, and significance of hypercoagulable states in patients being considered for CF-LVAD.