Chandrasekhar Bhaskaran Nair
VIT University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Chandrasekhar Bhaskaran Nair.
PLOS ONE | 2016
Chandrasekhar Bhaskaran Nair; Jagannath Manjula; Pradeep Annamalai Subramani; Prakash B. Nagendrappa; Mulakkapurath Narayanan Manoj; Sukriti Malpani; Phani Kumar Pullela; Pillarisetti Venkata Subbarao; Siva Ramamoorthy; Susanta K. Ghosh
Background Sensitive and specific detection of malarial parasites is crucial in controlling the significant malaria burden in the developing world. Also important is being able to identify life threatening Plasmodium falciparum malaria quickly and accurately to reduce malaria related mortality. Existing methods such as microscopy and rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) have major shortcomings. Here, we describe a new real-time PCR-based diagnostic test device at point-of-care service for resource-limited settings. Methods Truenat® Malaria, a chip-based microPCR test, was developed by bigtec Labs, Bangalore, India, for differential identification of Plasmodium falciparum and Plasmodium vivax parasites. The Truenat Malaria tests runs on bigtec’s Truelab Uno® microPCR device, a handheld, battery operated, and easy-to-use real-time microPCR device. The performance of Truenat® Malaria was evaluated versus the WHO nested PCR protocol. The Truenat® Malaria was further evaluated in a triple-blinded study design using a sample panel of 281 specimens created from the clinical samples characterized by expert microscopy and a rapid diagnostic test kit by the National Institute of Malaria Research (NIMR). A comparative evaluation was done on the Truelab Uno® and a commercial real-time PCR system. Results The limit of detection of the Truenat Malaria assay was found to be <5 parasites/μl for both P. falciparum and P. vivax. The Truenat® Malaria test was found to have sensitivity and specificity of 100% each, compared to the WHO nested PCR protocol based on the evaluation of 100 samples. The sensitivity using expert microscopy as the reference standard was determined to be around 99.3% (95% CI: 95.5–99.9) at the species level. Mixed infections were identified more accurately by Truenat Malaria (32 samples identified as mixed) versus expert microscopy and RDTs which detected 4 and 5 mixed samples, respectively. Conclusion The Truenat® Malaria microPCR test is a valuable diagnostic tool and implementation should be considered not only for malaria diagnosis but also for active surveillance and epidemiological intervention.
Advances and Applications in Bioinformatics and Chemistry | 2013
Manoj Mulakkapurath Narayanan; Chandrasekhar Bhaskaran Nair; Shilpa Kammaradi Sanjeeva; P. S. V. Subba Rao; Phani Kumar Pullela; Colin J. Barrow
Viral neuraminidase inhibitors such as oseltamivir and zanamivir prevent early virus multiplication by blocking sialic acid cleavage on host cells. These drugs are effective for the treatment of a variety of influenza subtypes, including swine flu (H1N1). The binding site for these drugs is well established and they were designed based on computational docking studies. We show here that some common natural products have moderate inhibitory activity for H1N1 neuraminidase under docking studies. Significantly, docking studies using AutoDock for biligand and triligand forms of these compounds (camphor, menthol, and methyl salicylate linked via methylene bridges) indicate that they may bind in combination with high affinity to the H1N1 neuraminidase active site. These results also indicate that chemically linked biligands and triligands of these natural products could provide a new class of drug leads for the prevention and treatment of influenza. This study also highlights the need for a multiligand docking algorithm to understand better the mode of action of natural products, wherein multiple active ingredients are present.
Archive | 2008
Kishore Krishna Kumar; Raviprakash Jayaraman; Sankaranand Kaipa Narasimha; Renjith Mahiladevi Radhakrishnan; Sathyadeep Viswanaihan; Chandrasekhar Bhaskaran Nair; Pillarisetti Venkata Subbarao; Manjula Jagannath; Shilpa Chennakrishnaiah; Sudip Mondal; V. Venkataraman
Archive | 2008
Chandrasekhar Bhaskaran Nair; Pillarisetti Venkata Subbarao; Phani Kumar Pullela; Gopalakrishna Mangalore Kini
Archive | 2010
Mulakkapurath Narayanan Manoj; Venkata Ramachandra Rao Vasamsetty; Madhuri Baliga; Kirubakaran Naveen Kumar; Chandrasekhar Bhaskaran Nair; Pillarisetti Venkata Subbarao
Renewable Energy | 2014
Shilpa Kammaradi Sanjeeva; Mitchell Preetham Pinto; Manoj Mulakkapurath Narayanan; Gopalakrishna Mangalore Kini; Chandrasekhar Bhaskaran Nair; Pillarisetti Venkata Subbarao; Phani Kumar Pullela; Siva Ramamoorthy; Colin J. Barrow
Archive | 2008
Jagannath Manjula; Chandrasekhar Bhaskaran Nair; Pillarisetti Venkata Subbarao
Archive | 2011
Swetha Chandra; Sudip Mondal; Venkataraman Venkatakrishnan; Sathyadeep Viswanathan; Renjith Mahiladevi Radhakrishnan; Raviprakash Jayaraman; Chandrasekhar Bhaskaran Nair; Pillarisetti Venkata Subbarao
Archive | 2011
Manjula Jagannath; Manoj Mulakkapurath Narayanan; Chandrasekhar Bhaskaran Nair; Pillarisetti Venkata Subbarao
Renewable Energy Focus | 2018
Swathi Korrapati; Shilpa Kammaradi Sanjeeva; M. Chandrappa; Chandrasekhar Bhaskaran Nair; Gopalakrishna Mangalore Kini; P.V. Subba Rao; Siva Ramamoorthy; Colin J. Barrow; Uthirapathy Vijayalakshmi; Phani Kumar Pullela