Charalambos Kouroussis

Subcutaneous Administration of Amifostine During Fractionated Radiotherapy: A Randomized Phase II Study

PURPOSE Amifostine (WR-2721) is an important cytoprotective agent. Although intravenous administration is the standard route, pharmacokinetic studies have shown acceptable plasma levels of the active metabolite of amifostine (WR-1605) after subcutaneous administration. The subcutaneous route, due to its simplicity, presents multiple advantages over the intravenous route when amifostine is used during fractionated radiotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS Sixty patients with thoracic, 40 with head and neck, and 40 with pelvic tumors who were undergoing radical radiotherapy were enrolled onto a randomized phase II trial to assess the feasibility, tolerance, and cytoprotective efficacy of amifostine administered subcutaneously. A flat dose of amifostine 500 mg, diluted in 2.5 mL of normal saline, was injected subcutaneously 20 minutes before each radiotherapy fraction. RESULTS The subcutaneous amifostine regimen was well tolerated by 85% of patients. In approximately 5% of patients, amifostine therapy was interrupted due to cumulative asthenia, and in 10%, due to a fever/rash reaction. Hypotension was never noted, whereas nausea was frequent. A significant reduction of pharyngeal, esophageal, and rectal mucositis was noted in the amifostine arm (P <.04). The delays in radiotherapy because of grade 3 mucositis were significantly longer in the group of patients treated with radiotherapy alone (P <.04). Amifostine significantly reduced the incidence of acute perineal skin and bladder toxicity (P <.0006). CONCLUSION Subcutaneous administration of amifostine is well tolerated, effectively reduces radiotherapys early toxicity, and prevents delays in radiotherapy. The subcutaneous route is much simpler and saves time compared with the intravenous route of administration and can be safely and effectively applied in the daily, busy radiotherapy practice.

Vinorelbine Plus Cisplatin Versus Docetaxel Plus Gemcitabine in Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Phase III Randomized Trial

PURPOSE To compare the activity and tolerability of docetaxel/gemcitabine (DG) and vinorelbine/cisplatin (VC) combinations in chemotherapy-naive non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with advanced NSCLC were randomly assigned to receive either DG (gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m(2) [days 1 and 8] plus docetaxel 100 mg/m(2) [day 8]) or VC (vinorelbine 30 mg/m(2) [days 1 and 8] plus cisplatin 80 mg/m(2) [day 8]) and prophylactic recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (150 microg/m(2) subcutaneously [day 9 through 15]) every 3 weeks. Results A total of 413 randomly assigned patients were analyzed for response and toxicity (DG, n = 197; VC, n = 192). Median survival was 9.0 and 9.7 months (P = .965) for DG and VC arms, respectively; the corresponding 1-year survival rates were 34.3% and 40.8%, respectively. Overall response rate was 30% (95% CI, 23.9% to 36.3%) and 39.2% (95% CI, 32.5% to 45.9%; P = .053) for DG and VC, respectively. Toxicity was as follows (DG v VC): grade 2 to 4 anemia, 34% v 55% (P = .0001); grade 3 to 4 neutropenia, 16% v 37% (P = .0001); febrile neutropenia, 6% v 11% (P = .009); and grade 3 to 4 nausea and vomiting, 1% v 15% (P = .003). Nephrotoxicity occurred in 8% and ototoxicity in 2% of VC-treated patients. There were five and six treatment-related deaths in the DG and VC arms, respectively. Quality of life was improved in DG but not in VC patients. CONCLUSION Although the two regimens produced comparable overall survival, the DG regimen had a better toxicity profile. Therefore, DG could be used in the first-line setting of advanced NSCLC, especially for patients who cannot tolerate cisplatin.

Docetaxel Versus Docetaxel Plus Cisplatin As Front-Line Treatment of Patients With Advanced Non—Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Randomized, Multicenter Phase III Trial

PURPOSE To compare the overall survival (OS) of patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with docetaxel plus cisplatin (DC) or docetaxel (D) alone. PATIENTS AND METHODS Chemotherapy-naïve patients with advanced/metastatic NSCLC were randomly assigned to receive either DC (n = 167; docetaxel 100 mg/m(2) on day 1, cisplatin 80 mg/m(2) on day 2, and recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (rhG-CSF) 150 microg/m(2)/d on days 3 to 9) or D (n = 152; 100 mg/m(2) on day 1 without rhG-CSF) every 3 weeks. RESULTS The overall response rates were 36.5% for DC (three complete responses and 58 partial responses) and 21.7% for D (one complete response and 32 partial responses; P =.004). The median OS was 10.5 months (range, 0.5 to 41 months) and 8.0 months (range, 0.5 to 41 months) for DC and D, respectively (P =.200). The 1- and 2-year survival rates were 44% and 19% for DC and 43% and 15% for D, respectively. Median times to tumor progression were 4.0 and 2.5 months for DC and D, respectively (P =.580). Grade 2/3 anemia was significantly higher with DC than with D (33% v 16%; P =.0001). Fifteen (9%) DC and 12 (8%) D patients developed febrile neutropenia. Grade 3/4 nausea/vomiting (P =.0001), diarrhea (P =.007), neurotoxicity (P =.017), and nephroroxicity (P =.006) were significantly more common with DC than with D. There were five treatment-related deaths in the DC group and one in the D (P =.098). CONCLUSION DC regimen resulted in a higher response rate but without improvement in median time to tumor progression or OS compared with D. D could be a reasonable front-line chemotherapy for patients who cannot tolerate cisplatin.

A multicenter randomized clinical trial comparing paclitaxel-cisplatin-etoposide versus cisplatin-etoposide as first-line treatment in patients with small-cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND Previous phase I-II studies have shown that the combination of paclitaxel-cisplatin-etoposide (TEP) is very active and well tolerated in patients with small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). In order to compare the TEP combination to cisplatin etoposide (EP) regimen as front-line treatment in patients with SCLC, we conducted a randomised multicenter study. PATIENTS AND METHODS One hundred thirty-three chemotherapy-naïve patients with histologically proven limited or extensive stage SCLC were randomised to receive either paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 i.v. three-hour infusion on day 1 and cisplatin 80 mg/m2 i.v. on day 2 and etoposide 80 mg/m2 i.v. on days 2-4 with G-CSF support (5 mcg/kg s.c. days 5-15) or cisplatin 80 mg/m2 i.v. on day 1 and etoposide 120 mg/m2 i.v. on days 1-3 in cycles every twenty-eight days. RESULTS Due to excessive toxicity and mortality observed in the TEP arm, an early interim analysis was performed and the study was closed. Sixty-two patients received two hundred sixty-one cycles of TEP and seventy-one patients three hundred twenty-three cycles of EP The two patient groups were well balanced for age, sex, performance status, stage of disease and the presence of abnormal LDH at diagnosis. In an intention-to-treat overall analysis both regimens were equally active with a complete and partial response rate of 50% (95% confidence interval (CI): 37.5%-62.4%) for TEP and 48% (95%) CI: 36.2%-59.5%) for EP (P = 0.8). The median time to disease progression was 11 months for TEP and 9 months for EP (P = 0.02). The duration of response, one-year survival and overall survival were similar in the two arms. Similarly, in an intention-to-treat subgroup analysis of patients with limited or extensive stage disease, there was no difference in the activity between the two regimens except of a longer median time to disease progression in the extensive stage in favour of the TEP regimen, eight versus six months (P = 0.04). However, there were eight toxic deaths in the TEP arm versus none in the EP arm (P = 0.001). Moreover, the TEP regimen was associated with more severe toxicity than the EP regimen in terms of grade 4 neutropenia (P = 0.04), grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia (P = 0.02), febrile neutropenia (P = 0.08), grade 3-4 diarrhea (P = 0.01), grade 3-4 asthenia (P = 0.05) and grade 3 neurotoxicity (P = 0.06). CONCLUSIONS In this early terminated study, the TEP regimen was significantly more toxic than the EP regimen. The TEP regimen is associated with significant toxicity and mortality, and should not be used outside of a protocol setting. For future investigations, dose and schedule modifications are necessary to reduce toxicity.

Treatment of pancreatic cancer with a combination of docetaxel, gemcitabine and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor: A phase II study of the Greek Cooperative Group for Pancreatic Cancer

PURPOSE To evaluate the tolerance and efficacy of front-line docetaxel plus gemcitabine treatment in patients with inoperable pancreatic cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS Fifty-four patients with locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer were enrolled. Gemcitabine (1000 mg/m2) was administered on days 1 and 8 and docetaxel (100 mg/m2) on day 8, every three weeks; rh-G-CSF (150 ig/m2 s.c.) was given prophylactically on days 9-15. RESULTS Seven (13%) patients achieved partial response and 18 (33%) stable disease (intent-to-treat). The median duration of response was 24 weeks, time to tumour progression 32 weeks, and overall survival 26 weeks. Performance status was improved in 33% of patients, pain in 43%, asthenia in 16%, weight gain in 28% and appetite in 27%. Grade 3-4 neutropenia occurred in 17 (31%) patients and grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia in four (4%). Six (11%) patients developed febrile neutropenia and one of them died from sepsis. CONCLUSIONS This combination is a relatively well-tolerated out-patient regimen for patients with inoperable pancreatic cancer.

Combination of Irinotecan (CPT-11) plus 5-Fluorouracil and Leucovorin (FOLFIRI Regimen) as First Line Treatment for Elderly Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Phase II Trial

Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy and tolerance of irinotecan (CPT-11) in combination with bolus and continuous infusion of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and leucovorin (LV) (FOLFIRI regimen) as first-line treatment of elderly patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (MCC). Methods: Thirty consecutive, previously untreated patients with metastatic colorectal cancer, aged (median 76 years; range 70–84) were enrolled. The performance status (WHO) was 0 in 8, 1 in 16 and 2 in 6 patients; 19 (63%) patients had prior surgery and 8 (27%) adjuvant chemotherapy. CPT-11 (180 mg/m2 as a 90 min i.v. infusion) was administered on day 1, LV (200 mg/m2 as a 2-hour i.v. infusion), 5-FU (400 mg/m2/d i.v. bolus followed by 600 mg/m2/d as a 22-hour i.v. continuous infusion) were given on days 1 and 2 every 2 weeks. Results: Complete response was achieved in one (3.3%) patient and partial response in 10 (33.3%) (overall response rate: 36.6%; 95% C.I.: 26.6–48.4%); 11 (36.6%) patients had stable disease and, 8 (26.6%) disease progression. The median duration of response was 7.5 months and the median time to disease progression 7.0 months. After a median follow-up period of 17 months, the median overall survival was 14.5 months. Main toxicities were: grade 3–4 neutropenia (n = 6; 20%), grade 3 thrombocytopenia (n = 1; 3.3%), grade 2 anemia (n = 9; 30%), grade 3–4 diarrhea (n = 5; 17%) and grade 3 asthenia (n = 3; 10%). There was one treatment-related death due to neutropenic sepsis. Conclusions: The FOLFIRI combination is an active regimen with manageable toxicity as front-line treatment in patients above 70 years of age.

Salvage treatment with paclitaxel and gemcitabine for patients with non-small-cell lung cancer after cisplatin- or docetaxel-based chemotherapy: A multicenter phase II study

BACKGROUND To evaluate the tolerance and efficacy of the combination of paclitaxel and gemcitabine as salvage treatment in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS Forty-nine patients with measurable NSCLC (PS 0-1: 80%; stage IV: 84%) who progressed or failed first-line chemotherapy were enrolled. Prior chemotherapy was cisplatin-based with (n = 20) or without (n = 22) docetaxel and docetaxel-vinorelbine (n = 7). Patients received gemcitabine (900 mg/m2 i.v.; days 1 and 8) and paclitaxel (175 mg/m2; day 8) every three weeks: G-CSF (150 micrograms/m2/day s.c.; days 9-15) was given prophylactically to all patients. RESULTS One (2%) complete and eight (16%) partial responses were achieved (overall response 18%; 95% CI: 4%-24%); 14 patients (29%) had stable disease and 26 (53%) progressive disease. Six responses were observed in 17 patients who responded to first-line chemotherapy. The median duration of response was seven months, the median TTP eight months and the median survival 11 months. The one-year survival rate was 37%. Grade 3-4 neutropenia occured in six (12%) patients, grade 2-3 neurotoxicity in 16 (32%) and grade 2-3 asthenia in 25 (51%). Other toxicities were mild. CONCLUSIONS The paclitaxel-gemcitabine combination is a well-tolerated and relatively active salvage regimen in patients with NSCLC and it merits further investigation.

Successful conservative treatment of neutropenic enterocolitis complicating taxane-based chemotherapy : a report of five cases

Five cases of acute neutropenic enterocolitis complicating taxane-based chemotherapy are described. During a 34-month period, our department administered 4,600 courses of taxane-based (paclitaxel and docetaxel) chemotherapy to 800 cancer patients. Seven to 10 days postchemotherapy in five patients (0.1% of the given courses), neutropenic fever, abdominal pain, rebound tenderness, and grade II-IV diarrhea (bloody in two cases) developed. Two patients had oral candidiasis, and in two others septic shock developed. Computed tomography scans of the abdomen revealed in all patients thickening of the colon wall and pericolic edema, and a pericolic abscess was revealed in three of them. Both clinical and radiologic findings supported the diagnosis of acute neutropenic enterocolitis. All patients were successfully treated with broad-spectrum antibiotics and recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor. In conclusion, acute neutropenic enterocolitis is a severe complication of taxane-based chemotherapy. Early diagnosis and appropriate conservative treatment leads to complete recovery. Although rare, this infection is less often associated with other chemotherapeutic regimens.

Docetaxel and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer previously treated with platinum-based chemotherapy: a multicenter phase II trial.

Purpose: To investigate the activity of docetaxel and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor support (G-CSF) in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) previously treated with cisplatin. Patients and methods: A total of 60 patients with locoregional and metastatic NSCLC who had relapsed or progressed after first-line treatment with cisplatin-based regimens were enrolled into the trial. Docetaxel at 100 mg/m2 was given as a 1-h infusion with G-CSF (rhG-CSF given s.c. at 150 μg/m2) support from day 2 to day 8 every 3 weeks; all patients received premedication with corticosteroids. Results: In all, 1 (1.6%) and 14 (23.3%) patients achieved a complete response (CR) and a partial response (PR), respectively, for an overall response rate of 25% (95% CI 14.0–35.9%); stable disease (SD) and progressive disease (PD) were documented in 18 (30%) and 27 (45%) patients, respectively. The median duration of response was 20 weeks and the median time to tumor progression was 28 weeks. The median overall survival was 32 weeks and the 1-year survival rate was 23%. A total of 263 courses were given at a median of 3 cycles/patient. Grade 3 and 4 neutropenia occurred in 11 (18%) and 14 (23%) patients, respectively, with 18 (30%) patients requiring hospitalization for neutropenic fever; 1 patient died of sepsis. Grade 2 peripheral neuropathy occurred in 9 patients (15%) and grade 3 asthenia, in 4 (7%). Other toxicities were mild. Conclusions: Docetaxel has considerable single-agent activity in patients with NSCLC who have relapsed or progressed after first-line chemotherapy with cisplatin-based regimens.

Assessment of highly angiogenic and disseminated in the peripheral blood disease in breast cancer patients predicts for resistance to adjuvant chemotherapy and early relapse.

The assessment of tumor molecular features in combination with the detection of occult malignant cells may provide important clinical information, beyond the standard staging of breast cancer. Using a nested RT‐PCR technique, we assessed prospectively the presence of cytokeratin‐19 (CK19) mRNA positive cells in the blood of 100 operated patients with breast cancer before the initiation of adjuvant chemotherapy and local radiotherapy. Tissue samples were prospectively collected and analyzed for estrogen (ER) and progesterone (PgR) receptor, c‐erbB‐2 overexpression, mutant‐p53 and bcl‐2 protein accumulation, proliferation index and microvessel density (MVD). CK‐19 mRNA‐positive cells were detected in the peripheral blood of 33% of patients. Simultaneous display of high intratumoral MVD and of CK‐19 mRNA‐positive cells, which characterized highly angiogenic and disseminated in the peripheral blood (HAD) disease was noted in 25% of patients. Detection of CK‐19 positive cells was significantly associated with increased MVD (p = 0.002). In univariate analysis (median follow‐up 30 months) CK19 mRNA detection and MVD were the most significant factors related to a short relapse‐free survival (RFS), (p < 0.0001). In multivariate analysis, CK19 positivity, high MVD and c‐erbB‐2 overexpression were the only significant and independent variables associated with relapse (p = 0.0005, 0.03 and 0.04, respectively). Patients with HAD had an expected relapse rate close to 70% vs. <5% in the remaining patients irrespectively of the used chemotherapy regimen. The simultaneous presence of high MVD and CK19‐positive cells in the blood of patients with early breast is linked with poor prognosis, which cannot be improved with standard chemotherapy regimens.