Charity D. Scripture

Drug interactions in cancer therapy

Drug interactions in oncology are of particular importance owing to the narrow therapeutic index and the inherent toxicity of anticancer agents. Interactions with other medications can cause small changes in the pharmacokinetics or pharmacodynamics of a chemotherapy agent that could significantly alter its efficacy or toxicity. Improvements in in vitro methods and early clinical testing have made the prediction of potentially clinically significant drug interactions possible. We outline the types of drug interaction that occur in oncology, the mechanisms that underlie these interactions and describe select examples.

A Phase II Clinical Trial of Sorafenib in Androgen-Independent Prostate Cancer

Purpose: To determine if sorafenib is associated with a 4-month probability of progression-free survival, which is consistent with 50%, as determined by clinical, radiographic, and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) criteria in patients with metastatic androgen-independent prostate cancer (AIPC). Experimental Design: Patients with progressive metastatic AIPC were enrolled in an open-label, single-arm phase II study. Sorafenib was given continuously at a dose of 400 mg orally twice daily in 28-day cycles. Clinical assessment and PSA measurement were done every cycle whereas radiographic measurements were carried out every two cycles. Results: Twenty-two patients were enrolled in the study to date, completing a planned first stage of the trial. Baseline patient characteristics included a median age of 63.9 years (range, 50-77 years), Gleason score of 9 (range, 4-9.5), and PSA concentration of 53.3 ng/mL (range, 2-1,905 ng/mL). Fifty-nine percent of patients had received one prior chemotherapy regimenn. Of the 21 patients with progressive disease, 13 progressed only by PSA criteria in the absence of evidence of clinical and radiographic progression. Two patients were found to have dramatic reduction of bone metastatic lesions as shown by bone scan, although they met PSA progression criteria at the time when scans were obtained. Toxicities likely related to treatment included one grade 3 hypertension; one grade 3 hand-foot syndrome; and grade 1/2 toxicities: fatigue, anorexia, hypertension, skin rash, nausea, and diarrhea. Results from in vitro studies suggested that PSA is not a good marker of sorafenib activity. The geometric mean exposure (AUC0-12) and maximum concentration (Cmax) were 9.76 h mg/L and 1.28 mg/L, respectively. The time to maximum concentration (tmax) and accumulation ratio (after second dose) ranged from 2 to 12 h and 0.68 to 6.43, respectively. Conclusions: Sorafenib is relatively well tolerated in AIPC with two patients showing evidence of improved bony metastatic lesions. Interpretation of this study is complicated by discordant radiographic and PSA responses. PSA may not be an adequate biomarker for monitoring sorafenib activity. Based on these observations, further investigation using only clinical and radiographic end points as progression criteria is warranted. Accrual to the second stage of trial is ongoing.

Randomized crossover pharmacokinetic study of solvent-based paclitaxel and nab-paclitaxel

Purpose: Abraxane (ABI-007) is a 130-nm albumin-bound (nab) particle formulation of paclitaxel, devoid of any additional excipients. We hypothesized that this change in formulation alters the systemic disposition of paclitaxel compared with conventional solvent-based formulations (sb-paclitaxel; Taxol), and leads to improved tolerability of the drug. Patients and Methods: Patients with malignant solid tumors were randomized to receive the recommended single-agent dose of nab-paclitaxel (260 mg/m2 as a 30-minute infusion) or sb-paclitaxel (175 mg/m2 as a 3-hour infusion). After cycle 1, patients crossed over to the alternate treatment. Pharmacokinetic studies were carried out for the first cycle of sb-paclitaxel and the first two cycles of nab-paclitaxel. Results: Seventeen patients were treated, with 14 receiving at least one cycle each of nab-paclitaxel and sb-paclitaxel. No change in nab-paclitaxel pharmacokinetics was found between the first and second cycles (P = 0.95), suggesting limited intrasubject variability. Total drug exposure was comparable between the two formulations (P = 0.55) despite the dose difference. However, exposure to unbound paclitaxel was significantly higher after nab-paclitaxel administration, due to the increased free fraction (0.063 ± 0.021 versus 0.024 ± 0.009; P < 0.001). Conclusion: This study shows that paclitaxel disposition is subject to considerable variability depending on the formulation used. Because systemic exposure to unbound paclitaxel is likely a driving force behind tumoral uptake, these findings explain, at least in part, previous observations that the administration of nab-paclitaxel is associated with augmented antitumor efficacy compared with solvent-based paclitaxel.

Peripheral neuropathy induced by paclitaxel: recent insights and future perspectives.

Paclitaxel is an antineoplastic agent derived from the bark of the western yew, Taxus brevifolia, with a broad spectrum of activity. Because paclitaxel promotes microtubule assembly, neurotoxicity is one of its side effects. Clinical use of paclitaxel has led to peripheral neuropathy and this has been demonstrated to be dependent upon the dose administered, the duration of the infusion, and the schedule of administration. Vehicles in the drug formulation, for example Cremophor in Taxol, have been investigated for their potential to induce peripheral neuropathy. A variety of neuroprotective agents have been tested in animal and clinical studies to prevent paclitaxel neurotoxicity. Recently, novel paclitaxel formulations have been developed to minimize toxicities. This review focuses on recent advances in the etiology of paclitaxel-mediated peripheral neurotoxicity, and discusses current and ongoing strategies for amelioration of this side effect.

Modulation of cytochrome P450 activity: implications for cancer therapy

Although metabolism mediated by cytochrome P450 isoenzymes is known to play a major part in the biotransformation of anticancer agents in vivo, few clinical studies have investigated activity of cytochrome P450s and therapeutic outcome in people with cancer. Variability between individuals in the pharmacokinetics of cancer chemotherapy has important consequences in terms of therapeutic efficacy and safety. We discuss here the effect of drug metabolism mediated by cytochrome P450 on therapeutic outcome. As examples, the biotransformation pathways of cyclophosphamide, ifosfamide, tamoxifen, docetaxel, paclitaxel, and irinotecan are discussed. Since most anticancer agents are transformed by enzymes, better knowledge of their metabolic pathways could help improve treatment outcome and safety. Furthermore, a more complete understanding of the metabolism of anticancer agents through phenotyping and genotyping approaches will facilitate the prediction of interactions between drugs. More clinical evidence is needed on the metabolic transformation and drug interactions with these agents to improve cancer therapeutics.

Thalidomide metabolism and hydrolysis: mechanisms and implications.

Despite its controversial past, thalidomide is currently under investigation for the treatment of several disease types, ranging from inflammatory conditions to cancer. The mechanism of action of thalidomide is complex and not yet fully understood, but there is some evidence to suggest that metabolism may play a role. Consequently, there has been a considerable effort to characterize the metabolism of thalidomide in recent years. Thalidomide undergoes biotransformation by non-enzymatic hydrolysis and enzyme-mediated hydroxylation to form a multitude of metabolites. Metabolite identification and reaction phenotyping studies have been performed and will be discussed in this review in addition to interspecies differences in thalidomide metabolism.

Leuprolide acetate given by a subcutaneous extended-release injection: less of a pain?

Androgen deprivation therapy is a mainstay for the treatment of advanced prostate cancer. Hormonal therapy commonly consists of injection of gonadotropin hormone-releasing hormone agonists. Based on the need for improved convenience of administration, a novel formulation of leuprolide acetate (Eligard®; Atrix Laboratories Inc. & Sanofi Aventis) which incorporates a mixture of selected polymers and solvents to achieve sustained drug delivery after subcutaneous injection, was developed. The US Food and Drug Administration has approved 1-, 3-, 4- and 6-month formulations of leuprolide acetate. In clinical trials, leuprolide acetate achieves sustained suppression of serum testosterone to castration levels (≤50 ng/dl). The adverse-event profile is consistent with the effects of testosterone suppression. This novel delivery system in addition to the availability of a 6-month formulation of leuprolide acetate, offers patients the option of a convenient twice-yearly injection schedule.

Comparative in vitro properties and clinical pharmacokinetics of paclitaxel following the administration of taxol® and paxene®

Purpose: Taxol® contains paclitaxel formulated in Cremophor EL-P (CrEL-P) and ethanol. Paxene® is similar to Taxol, except for the use of Cremophor EL (CrEL) and the addition of citric acid. Here, we investigated the physicochemical properties and clinical pharmacokinetics of the two paclitaxel formulations. Experimental Design: The size and modality of distribution of CrEL-P and CrEL micelles was determined by dynamic-light scattering. The effect of vehicle composition on the fraction unbound paclitaxel in vitro was determined by equilibrium dialysis. Paclitaxel pharmacokinetics was studied in 61 cancer patients receiving Taxol and 26 patients receiving Paxene. Comparative pharmacokinetics of CrEL-P and CrEL were obtained in 14 and 6 patients, respectively. Results: The size of micelles present in Taxol was slightly smaller (9 to 13%) than those present in Paxene. Surface tension and critical micellar concentration were also similar for the two formulations, with mean values of 37.0 and 38.1 mN/m and 0.0387 and 0.0307 mg/mL, respectively. The fraction unbound paclitaxel was not significantly different for Taxol and Paxene (P > 0.05). Over the tested dose range, the mean clearance of paclitaxel decreased from 45.1 to 16.9 L/h for Taxol, and from 50.7 to 16.4 L/h for Paxene (P > 0.05). Concentrations of the excipient following the administration of CrEL-P or CrEL were also similar. Conclusion: The differences in formulation between Taxol and Paxene do not significantly affect micelle formation and/or quantitative aspects of the vehicle-paclitaxel interaction in vitro and in vivo.

The role of drug-metabolising enzymes in clinical responses to chemotherapy

Interindividual differences in efficacy and toxicity of cancer chemotherapy are especially important given the narrow therapeutic index of these drugs. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic responses to chemotherapy are difficult to predict in a particular patient as numerous variables (e.g., age, gender, concomitant medications and concomitant illness) can alter drug responses. Inherited variations in genes involved in drug metabolism have also been shown to contribute to altered responses to cancer treatment. There are several clinically relevant examples of genetic polymorphisms in drug-metabolising enzymes that alter outcomes of patients treated with chemotherapy agents. It may be possible to predict a patients response to a particular chemotherapy agent based on knowledge of their genetic composition through invivo phenotyping of drug-metabolising enzymes.

Epidemiology of drug interactions in cancer patients

We appreciate the comments from Riechelmann and Krzyzanowska on our manuscript. Owing to space limitations we were unable to address the epidemiology of drug interactions in patients with cancer, and welcome the addition of their data in the follow-up letter. Clearly this field of research is still in the early stages, and continued investigation is warranted to document the effect of drug interactions on patient safety.