Charles C. Finley

Models of Neural Responsiveness to Electrical Stimulation

In principle, electrical stimulation of the cochlea is a simple process. Intracochlear electrodes, when stimulated, create electrical field patterns within the cochlea. In the vicinity of the neural elements, these fields appear as extracellular voltage gradients or profiles that are continuous along the entire length of the neurons. These extracellular voltage fields produce current flow into and out of the neural elements depending on the local impedances of the neural membranes. If the neural elements are sufficiently depolarized, action potentials are generated that propagate along each cell’s axon to the cochlear nucleus. Globally these events occur simultaneously, but in varying degree, across a population of nerve cells, producing a group or ensemble of neural responses to the stimulation.

Behavioral and electrophysiological responses to electrical stimulation in the cat ☆: I. Absolute thresholds

Estimates of electrical auditory brainstem response (EABR) thresholds are compared with behavioral thresholds for electrical stimulation in the same subject using identical stimuli and electrode configurations. Four cats were behaviorally trained to measure acoustic auditory thresholds using food as a reward in an operant reinforcement paradigm. One of the animals was then implanted, in an otherwise normal ear, with a scaled-UCSF multi-contact electrode array containing four intracochlear electrodes. Three animals were implanted with an electrode array containing eight intracochlear contacts and one extracochlear contact under the temporalis muscle following unilateral cochlear perfusion with 10% neomycin solution. Stimuli for the behavioral studies were single presentations of 200 us/phase biphasic current pulses. For the EABR studies, the same stimulus was presented at a rate of 32/s. In general, for the animal with the four-contact array and two of the three subjects with the eight-contact implant, changes in electrode configuration produced well-differentiated changes in threshold. For these three subjects, comparisons of behavioral and EABR thresholds for the majority of monopolar and bipolar electrode configurations tested showed excellent agreement (r2 = 0.88). Correlations between behavioral and EABR measures in these animals were comparable for bipolar and monopolar arrangements (r2 = 0.88 for bipolar and 0.87 for monopolar). For one subject with the eight-contact electrode, who showed similar monopolar and bipolar electrode behavioral thresholds for all tested electrode spacings or configurations, most EABR thresholds were substantially higher than, and poorly correlated with, behavioral thresholds (r2 = 0.15; r2 = 0.28 for monopolar arrangements, and r2 = 0.12 for bipolar arrangements).

Effects of electrode configuration on psychophysical strength-duration functions for single biphasic electrical stimuli in cats

The interface between electrode and neural target tissue is thought to influence certain characteristics of neural and behavioral responses to electrical stimulation of the auditory system. At present, the biophysical properties of this interface are not well understood. Here the effects of biphasic phase duration and electrode configuration on psychophysical threshold in response to electrical stimulation in cats are described. Five cats were trained to respond to acoustic stimuli using food as a reward in an operant reinforcement paradigm. After training, the animals were unilaterally deafened and implanted with a multicontact intracochlear electrode array. Thresholds for single presentations of biphasic current pulses were measured as a function of phase duration and electrode arrangement. Statistical analyses of the data indicated that strength-duration function slopes between 200 and 1600 microseconds/phase were significantly different for the different electrode configurations and, overall, were unrelated to the absolute level of the strength-duration function (i.e., were independent of absolute threshold). For all subjects, the slope of this function for intermediate pulse durations was dependent on electrode configuration and most shallow for radial-bipolar configurations (-3.4 dB/doubling), was steepest for monopolar arrangements (-5.9 dB/doubling), and was intermediate for longitudinal-bipolar pairings. (-4.4 dB/doubling). Slopes for both shorter and longer phase duration stimuli were not significantly different. The underlying mechanisms for these effects may include, or be a combination of altered electrical field patterns, integrated activity across multiple fibers, and stochastic behavior of individual auditory neurons to electrical stimulation.

Representations of Speech Features with Cochlear Implants

The development and application of cochlear prostheses have improved the quality of life for many deaf individuals. Much work remains to be done, however, in order to achieve high levels of speech recognition in a majority of patients. In particular, we do not fully understand how different speech processor and implanted electrode designs affect the perception of speech and other sounds. Also, we have only fragmentary and primitive knowledge of how various differences among patients affect their outcomes.