Charles H. Large
GlaxoSmithKline
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Charles H. Large.
Brain Stimulation | 2008
Walter Paulus; Joseph Classen; Leonardo G. Cohen; Charles H. Large; Vincenzo Di Lazzaro; Michael A. Nitsche; Alvaro Pascual-Leone; Felix Rosenow; John C. Rothwell; Ulf Ziemann
The combination of brain stimulation techniques like transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) with CNS active drugs in humans now offers a unique opportunity to explore the physiologic effects of these substances in vivo in the human brain. Motor threshold, motor evoked potential size, motor evoked potential intensity curves, cortical silent period, short-interval intracortical inhibition, intracortical facilitation, short-interval intracortical facilitation, long-interval intracortical inhibition and short latency afferent inhibition represent the repertoire for investigating drug effects on motor cortical excitability by TMS. Here we present an updated overview on the pharmacophysiologic mechanisms with special emphasis on methodologic pitfalls and possible future developments or requirements.
Epilepsia | 2012
Martin J. Gunthorpe; Charles H. Large; Raman Sankar
The pharmacologic profile of retigabine [RTG (international nonproprietary name); ezogabine, EZG (U.S. adopted name)], is different from all currently approved antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). Its primary mechanism of action (MoA) as a positive allosteric modulator of KCNQ2–5 (Kv7.2–7.5) ion channels defines RTG/EZG as the first neuronal potassium (K+) channel opener for the treatment of epilepsy. KCNQ2–5 channels are predominantly expressed in neurons and are important determinants of cellular excitability, as indicated by the occurrence of human genetic mutations in KCNQ channels that underlie inheritable disorders including, in the case of KCNQ2/3, the syndrome of benign familial neonatal convulsions. In vitro pharmacologic studies demonstrate that the most potent action of RTG/EZG is at KCNQ2–5 channels, particularly heteromeric KCNQ2/3. Furthermore, mutagenesis and modeling studies have pinpointed the RTG/EZG binding site to a hydrophobic pocket near the channel gate, indicating how RTG/EZG can stabilize the open form of KCNQ2–5 channels; the absence of this site in KCNQ1 also provides a clear explanation for the inbuilt selectivity RTG/EZG has for potassium channels other than the KCNQ cardiac channel. KCNQ channels are active at the normal cell resting membrane potential (RMP) and contribute a continual hyperpolarizing influence that stabilizes cellular excitability. The MoA of RTG/EZG increases the number of KCNQ channels that are open at rest and also primes the cell to retort with a larger, more rapid, and more prolonged response to membrane depolarization or increased neuronal excitability. In this way, RTG/EZG amplifies this natural inhibitory force in the brain, acting like a brake to prevent the high levels of neuronal action potential burst firing (epileptiform activity) that may accompany sustained depolarizations associated with the initiation and propagation of seizures. This action to restore physiologic levels of neuronal activity is thought to underlie the efficacy of RTG/EZG as an anticonvulsant in a broad spectrum of preclinical seizure models and in placebo‐controlled trials in patients with partial epilepsy. In this article, we consider the pharmacologic characteristics of RTG/EZG at the receptor, cellular, and network levels as a means of understanding the novel and efficacious MoA of this new AED as defined in both preclinical and clinical research.
Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology | 2007
Donald C. Goff; Richard S.E. Keefe; Leslie Citrome; Katherine Davy; John H. Krystal; Charles H. Large; Thomas R. Thompson; Jan Volavka; Elizabeth L. Webster
Objective: Lamotrigine previously was found to attenuate ketamine-induced behavioral changes and, in 2 placebo-controlled trials, to improve psychosis when added to antipsychotic medication. We sought to evaluate the potential role of lamotrigine augmentation in schizophrenia patients resistant to atypical antipsychotic medication. Methods: Two multicenter, randomized, double-blind, 12-week, parallel-group trials were conducted to compare flexibly dosed lamotrigine (100-400 mg/d) with placebo as add-on treatment in schizophrenia patients with stable, residual psychotic symptoms. The primary end point was changed in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale total score at week 12. Results: Two hundred seventeen patients were enrolled in study 1 and 212 in study 2; completion rates in the intent-to-treat samples were 71% and 74%, respectively, and did not differ between treatment groups. Overall, mean Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale total scores improved in both studies and did not differ between treatment groups. In study 1, the Scale for Assessment of Negative Symptoms total score and Clinical Global Impression improved more with placebo than with lamotrigine; in study 2, the cognitive composite score improved more with lamotrigine than with placebo. Conclusions: Results from these 2 studies do not support the use of lamotrigine as an adjunct to atypical antipsychotics in patients with refractory psychosis. It is unclear why positive results from previous lamotrigine trials were not replicated. The positive effect of lamotrigine on cognition in one trial, while of uncertain significance, may merit further study.
Journal of Psychopharmacology | 2007
Charles H. Large
N-methyL-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonists, such as ketamine and phencyclidine, induce perceptual abnormalities, psychosis-like symptoms, and mood changes in healthy humans and patients with schizophrenia. The similarity between NMDA receptor antagonist-induced psychosis and schizophrenia has led to the widespread use of the drugs to provide models to aid the development of novel treatments for the disorder. This review investigates the predictive validity of NMDA receptor antagonist models based on a range of novel treatments that have now reached clinical trials. Furthermore, it considers the extent to which the different hypotheses that have been proposed to account for the psychotomimetic effects of NMDA receptor antagonist have been validated by the results of these trials. Finally, the review discusses some of the caveats associated with use of the models and some suggestions as to how a greater use of translational markers might ensure progress in understanding the relationship between the models and schizophrenia.
Neuropsychopharmacology | 2008
Alessandro Gozzi; Charles H. Large; Adam J. Schwarz; Simone Bertani; Valerio Crestan; Angelo Bifone
Acute administration of NMDA receptor (NMDAR) antagonists such as phencyclidine (PCP) or ketamine induces symptoms that closely resemble those of schizophrenia in humans, a finding that has led to the hypothesis that a decreased NMDAR function may be a predisposing or even causative factor in schizophrenia. However, the precise neuropharmacological mechanisms underlying these effects remain to be fully elucidated. Here, we applied pharmacological MRI (phMRI) to examine the brain circuitry underlying the psychotomimetic action of PCP in the anesthetized rat, and investigated how these functional changes are modulated by drugs that possess distinct pharmacological mechanisms. Acute administration of PCP (0.5 mg/kg i.v.) produced robust and sustained positive relative cerebral blood volume (rCBV) changes in discrete cortico-limbo-thalamic regions. Pretreatment with the selective D2 dopamine antagonist raclopride (0.3 mg/kg i.p.) did not significantly affect the rCBV response to PCP, while the atypical antipsychotic clozapine (5 mg/kg i.p.) produced region-dependent effects, with complete suppression of the rCBV response in the thalamus, and weaker attenuation of the response in cortical and hippocampal structures. The response to PCP was strongly suppressed in all regions by pretreatment with two drugs that can inhibit aberrant glutamatergic activity: the anticonvulsant lamotrigine (10 mg/kg i.p.) and the mGluR2/3 agonist LY354740 (10 mg/kg i.p.). Taken together, our findings corroborate the pivotal role of dysfunctional glutamatergic neurotransmission in the functional response elicited by PCP, while the lack of effect of raclopride argues against a primary role of dopamine D2 receptor activation in this process. Finally, the thalamic effect of clozapine could be key to elucidating the functional basis of its pharmacological action.
Behavioural Brain Research | 2005
Roberto Arban; Gabriella Maraia; Kim Brackenborough; Lisa Winyard; Alex W. Wilson; Philip Gerrard; Charles H. Large
Bipolar disorder is a psychiatric condition characterised by episodes of mania, depression, and underlying mood instability. Anticonvulsant drugs have an established place in the treatment of the disorder, but identifying novel drugs in this class is complicated by the absence of validated animal models. We have evaluated the efficacy of three anticonvulsant mood stabilising drugs (lamotrigine, valproate, and carbamazepine) in a model of mania, in which hyperactivity is induced by the combination of D-amphetamine and chlordiazepoxide. All three drugs were effective at preventing the hyperactivity. Lower doses of valproate and carbamazepine were required to prevent hyperactivity compared to doses required to block tonic-clonic seizures induced by pentylenetetrazole. Lamotrigine was equipotent in the two models. However, the complex pharmacology of the D-amphetamine/chlordiazepoxide model means that there may be several mechanisms by which hyperactivity can be reduced, and these may have more or less relevance to the treatment of bipolar disorder. To address this issue, we also evaluated effects of the three anticonvulsants on baseline locomotion, on activity in the presence of chlordiazepoxide alone, or on activity induced by D-amphetamine alone. Based on the results, we propose that hyperactivity induced by D-amphetamine/chlordiazepoxide may arise through dopaminergic drive coupled with disinhibition caused by low doses of the benzodiazepine. The efficacy of lamotrigine may then arise through a reduction in neuronal excitability or increased glutamate transmission, these latter a consequence of the disinhibition. Carbamazepine may also reduce excitability and glutamate release, but its broader pharmacology, manifested by sedation at higher doses complicates interpretation of its efficacy and reflects its poorer tolerability in the clinic. Valproate may be effective, at least in part, through an enhancement of GABAergic transmission. The predictive validity of the D-amphetamine/chlordiazepoxide model for efficacy in bipolar disorder remains to be established, and research with a wider range of clinically tested drugs is warranted to help validate the model further. In the meantime, the model may be useful for distinguishing novel anticonvulsant drugs with different mechanisms of action.
Epilepsy Research | 2003
Sharon C. Stratton; Charles H. Large; Brian Cox; Gary Davies; Russell Michael Hagan
In kindling models of epilepsy, the period during which repeated stimulation evokes intensifying seizures is attributed to an underlying epileptogenic process, and the point at which class 5 kindled seizures occur is considered the established epileptic state. Previous studies have indicated that a separation can occur between drug effects on these two components. For example, carbamazepine and phenytoin inhibit kindled seizures but have no effect on seizure development, whereas levetiracetam inhibits both components. We have investigated the profile of lamotrigine in the amygdala kindling model, including levetiracetam for comparison. As expected, both treatments dose-dependently inhibited class 5 kindled seizures. In a separate study, daily administration of either lamotrigine (20mgkg(-1) i.p.) or levetiracetam (50mgkg(-1) i.p.) demonstrated antiepileptogenic-like effects by blocking seizure development during the treatment period. Following cessation of drug treatment, further daily stimulation resulted in kindled seizure development, though there was a significant increase with both treatment groups, relative to the control group, in the total number of stimulations required to produce classes 3 and 5 seizures. In addition, prior levetiracetam treatment appeared to delay or prevent the expected increase in after-discharge duration (ADD). These results suggest that lamotrigine, like levetiracetam, possesses the ability to counteract kindling acquisition, which differentiates it from other drugs with sodium channel blocking activity.
Neuropsychopharmacology | 2004
Xingbao Li; Charlotte C. Teneback; Ziad Nahas; F. Andrew Kozel; Charles H. Large; Jeffrey Cohn; Daryl E. Bohning; Mark S. George
Little is known about how lamotrigine (LTG) works within brain circuits to achieve its clinical effects. We wished to determine whether the new technique of interleaved transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS)/functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) could be used to assess the effects of LTG on activated motor or prefrontal/limbic circuits. We carried out a randomized, double-blind, crossover trial involving two visits 1 week apart with TMS measures of cortical excitability and blood oxygen level-dependent TMS/fMRI. Subjects received either a single oral dose of 325 mg of LTG or placebo on each visit. In all, 10 subjects provided a complete data set that included interleaved TMS/fMRI measures and resting motor threshold (rMT) determinations under both placebo and LTG conditions. A further two subjects provided only rMT data under the two drug conditions. LTG caused a 14.9±9.6% (mean±SD) increase in rMT 3 h after the drug, compared with a 0.6±10.9% increase 3 h after placebo (t=3.41, df =11, p<0.01). fMRI scans showed that LTG diffusely inhibited cortical activation induced by TMS applied over the motor cortex. In contrast, when TMS was applied over the prefrontal cortex, LTG increased the TMS-induced activation of limbic regions, notably the orbitofrontal cortex and hippocampus. These results suggest that LTG, at clinically relevant serum concentrations, has a general inhibitory effect on cortical neuronal excitability, but may have a more complex effect on limbic circuits. Furthermore, the interleaved TMS/fMRI technique may be a useful tool for investigating regional brain effects of psychoactive compounds.
Psychopharmacology | 2005
Charles H. Large; Elizabeth L. Webster; Donald C. Goff
RationaleAtypical antipsychotic drugs are the drugs of choice for the treatment of schizophrenia. However, despite advances, no treatments have been established for patients who fail to improve with the most effective of these, clozapine. The inhibition of dopamine transmission through blockade of dopamine D2 receptors is considered to be essential for antipsychotic efficacy, but it is postulated that modulation of glutamate transmission may be equally important. In support of this, symptoms similar to schizophrenia can be induced in healthy volunteers using N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) antagonist drugs that are also known to enhance glutamate transmission. Furthermore, lamotrigine, which can modulate glutamate release, may add to or synergise with atypical antipsychotic drugs, some of which may themselves modulate glutamate transmission.ObjectivesWe examine the evidence for the efficacy of lamotrigine. We consider how this fits with a glutamate neuron dysregulation hypothesis of the disorder. We discuss mechanisms by which lamotrigine might influence neuronal activity and glutamate transmission, and possible ways in which the drug might interact with antipsychotic medications.ResultsData from four clinical studies support the efficacy of adjunctive lamotrigine in the treatment of schizophrenia. In addition, and consistent with a glutamate neuron dysregulation hypothesis of schizophrenia, lamotrigine can prevent the psychotic symptoms or behavioural disruption induced by NMDA receptor antagonists in healthy volunteers or rodents.ConclusionsThe efficacy of lamotrigine is most likely explained within the framework of a glutamate neuron dysregulation hypothesis, and may arise primarily through the drugs ability to influence glutamate transmission and neural activity in the cortex. The drug is likely to act through inhibition of voltage-gated sodium channels, though other molecular interactions cannot be ruled out. Lamotrigine may add to or synergise with some atypical antipsychotic drugs acting on glutamate transmission; alternatively, they may act independently on glutamate and dopamine systems to bring about a combined therapeutic effect. We propose new strategies for the treatment of schizophrenia using a combination of anti-dopaminergic and anti-glutamatergic drugs.
European Journal of Neuroscience | 2008
Carmen Sandi; M. Isabel Cordero; Annarosa Ugolini; Emilio Varea; Laura Caberlotto; Charles H. Large
The basolateral nucleus of the amygdala (BLA) plays a key role in emotional arousal and anxiety, and expresses high levels of corticotropin‐releasing factor receptor (CRFR)1. In rat brain slices, we have recently shown that afferent activation of the BLA is increased following application of exogenous corticotropin‐releasing factor (CRF). Here we examined the impact of chronic unpredictable stress (CUS) on this effect of CRF and whether blockade of CRFR1 could prevent stress‐induced changes in the electrophysiological response, the animal’s behavior and in cell proliferation in the hippocampus. The behavior of the rats was monitored via a series of tests that formed part of the CUS. Electrophysiological measures of the BLA response to CRF, cell proliferation in the dentate gyrus and the expression of CRF and CRFR1 mRNA in amygdaloid nuclei were determined ex vivo after completion of the CUS. CRF‐induced potentiation of afferent activation of the BLA was reduced in rats exposed to CUS, an effect that was inhibited by chronic antagonism of CRFR1. Furthermore, the reduction in BLA response to CRF was correlated with the anxiety trait of the animals, determined prior to initiation of the CUS. These results implicate CRFR1 in chronic stress‐induced alterations in amygdala function and behavior. Furthermore, they show that CRFR1 antagonists can prevent changes induced by chronic stress, in particular in those animals that are highly anxious.