Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Charles J. Fox is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Charles J. Fox.


Journal of Trauma-injury Infection and Critical Care | 2016

Multicenter evaluation of temporary intravascular shunt use in vascular trauma.

Kenji Inaba; Hande Aksoy; Mark J. Seamon; Joshua A. Marks; Juan C. Duchesne; Rebecca Schroll; Charles J. Fox; Fredric M. Pieracci; Ernest E. Moore; Bellal Joseph; Ansab A. Haider; John A. Harvin; Ryan A. Lawless; Jeremy W. Cannon; Seth R. Holland; Demetrios Demetriades

BACKGROUND The indications and outcomes associated with temporary intravascular shunting (TIVS) for vascular trauma in the civilian sector are poorly understood. The objective of this study was to perform a contemporary multicenter review of TIVS use and outcomes. METHODS Patients sustaining vascular trauma, requiring TIVS insertion (January 2005 to December 2013), were retrospectively identified at seven Level I trauma centers. Clinical demographics, operative details, and outcomes were abstracted. RESULTS A total of 213 injuries (2.7%; 94.8% arterial) requiring TIVS were identified in 7,385 patients with vascular injuries. Median age was 27.0 years (range, 4–89 years), 91.0% were male, Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score was 15.0 (interquartile range, 4.0), Injury Severity Score (ISS) was 16.0 (interquartile range, 15.0), 26.0% had an ISS of 25 or greater, and 71.1% had penetrating injuries. The most common mechanism was gunshot wound (62.7%), followed by auto versus pedestrian (11.4%) and motor vehicle collision (6.5%). Shunts were placed for damage control in 63.4%, staged repair for combined orthopedic and vascular injuries in 36.1%, and for insufficient surgeon skill set in 0.5%. The most common vessel shunted was the superficial femoral artery (23.9%), followed by popliteal artery (18.8%) and brachial artery (13.2%). An argyle shunt (81.2%) was the most common conduit, followed by Pruitt-Inahara (9.4%). Dwell time was less than 6 hours in 61.4%, 24 hours in 86.5%, 48 hours in 95.9%, with only 4.1% remaining in place for more than 48 hours. Of the patients, 81.6% survived to definitive repair, and 79.6% survived overall. Complications included shunt thrombosis (5.6%) and dislodgment (1.4%). There was no association between dwell time and shunt thrombosis. The use of a noncommercial shunt (chest tube/feeding tube) did not impact shunt thrombosis but was an independent risk factor for subsequent graft failure. The limb salvage rate was 96.3%. No deaths could be attributed to a shunt complication. CONCLUSION In the largest civilian TIVS experience insertion to date, both damage control and staged orthopedic vascular injuries were common indications for shunting. With an acceptable complication burden and no associated mortality attributed to this technique, shunting should be considered a viable treatment option. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Therapeutic study, level V.


Journal of Vascular Surgery | 2014

Comparison of military and civilian popliteal artery trauma outcomes

Anahita Dua; Bhavin Patel; Sapan S. Desai; John B. Holcomb; Charles E. Wade; Sheila M. Coogan; Charles J. Fox

OBJECTIVE Popliteal artery injury has historically led to high amputation rates in both the military and civilian setting. Military and civilian popliteal injury patterns differ in mechanism and severity of injury, prompting us to compare modern management and report differences in outcomes between these two patient groups. We hypothesized that whereas amputation rates may be higher in the military, this would correlate with worse overall injury severity. METHODS Military casualties from 2003-2007 with a popliteal artery injury identified from the Joint Theater Trauma Registry were compared retrospectively with civilian patients presenting to a single level I institution from 2002-2009 with popliteal arterial injury. Demographics, mechanism of injury, coinjuries, Injury Severity Score (ISS), Mangled Extremity Severity Scores (MESS), interventions, and secondary amputation rates were reviewed. Descriptive statistics and unpaired t-tests were used to compare data. Statistical significance was P < .05. RESULTS The study group of 110 patients consisted of 46 (41.8%) military and 64 (58.2%) civilians with 48 and 64 popliteal artery injuries, respectively. The military population was younger (28 vs 35 years; P < .004), entirely male (46 [100%] vs 51 [80%]; P < .0001), and had more penetrating injuries (44 [96%] vs 19 [30%]; P < .0001). ISS (18.7 vs 13.9; P < .005) and MESS (7.3 vs 5.1; P < .0001) were higher in the military group. Limb revascularizations in both military and civilian populations were mostly by autogenous bypass (65% vs 77%) followed by primary repair (26% vs 16%), covered stent (0% vs 6%), or other procedure (ligation and/or thrombectomy) (9% vs 1%). Fasciotomy (20 [42%] vs 37 [58%]; P = .14), compartment syndrome (10 [21%] vs 15 [23%]; P = .84), and concomitant venous repair rates (14 [29%] vs 15 [23%]; P = .42) were not different between cohorts. There was no difference in the fracture rate (26 [54%] vs 41 [64%]; P = .43), but the civilian group had a higher rate of dislocation (1 [2%] vs 19 [30%]; P < .0001). Secondary amputation rates were significantly higher in the military (14 [29%] vs 8 [13%]; P < .03). CONCLUSIONS Although both civilian and military cohorts have high amputation rates for popliteal arterial injury, the rate of amputation appears to be higher in the military and is associated with a penetrating mechanism of injury primarily from improvised explosive devices resulting in a higher MESS and ISS.


Journal of The American College of Surgeons | 2016

Establishing Benchmarks for Resuscitation of Traumatic Circulatory Arrest: Success-to-Rescue and Survival among 1,708 Patients

Hunter B. Moore; Ernest E. Moore; Clay C. Burlew; Walter L. Biffl; Fredric M. Pieracci; Carlton C. Barnett; Denis D. Bensard; Gregory J. Jurkovich; Charles J. Fox; Angela Sauaia

BACKGROUND Attempts are made with emergency department thoracotomy (EDT) to salvage trauma patients who present to the hospital in extremis. The EDT allows for relief of cardiac tamponade, internal cardiac massage, and proximal hemorrhage control. Minimally invasive techniques, such as endovascular hemorrhage control (EHC) are available, but their noninferiority to EDT remains unproven. Before adopting EHC, it is important to evaluate the current outcomes of EDT. We hypothesized that EDT survival has improved during the last 4 decades, and outcomes stratified by pre-hospital CPR and injury patterns will provide benchmarks for success-to-rescue and survival outcomes for patients in extremis. STUDY DESIGN Consecutive trauma patients undergoing EDT from 1975 to 2014 were prospectively observed as part of quality improvement. Predicted probabilities of survival were adjusted for pre-hospital CPR, mechanism of injury, injury pattern, patient demographics, and time period of EDT using logistic regression. Success-to-rescue was defined as return of spontaneous circulation with blood pressure permissive for transfer to the operating room. RESULTS There were 1,708 EDTs included, with an overall 419 (24%) success-to-rescue patients and 106 survivors (6%), and 1,394 (79%) of these patients had pre-hospital CPR and 900 (54%) had penetrating wounds. The most common injury patterns were chest (29%), multisystem with head (27%), and multisystem without head (21%). Penetrating injury was associated with higher survival than blunt trauma (9% vs 3% p < 0.001). Success-to-rescue increased from 22% in 1975 to 1979 to 35% over the final 5 years (p < 0.001); survival increased from 5% to 14% (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Outcomes of EDT have improved over the past 40 years. In the last 5 years, STR was 35% and overall survival was 14%. These prospective observational data provide benchmarks to define the role of EHC as an alternative approach for patients arriving in extremis.


Annals of Vascular Surgery | 2016

The Impact of Geniculate Artery Collateral Circulation on Lower Limb Salvage Rates in Injured Patients.

Anahita Dua; Sapan S. Desai; Sean Johnston; Naga R. Chinapuvvula; Charles E. Wade; Charles J. Fox; John B. Holcomb; Sheila M. Coogan

BACKGROUND This study aimed to determine the association between geniculate artery flow on admission computed tomography (CT) angiography and limb salvage outcomes in patients with lower extremity arterial injury. METHODS All injured patients at a level I trauma center with CT angiogram (CTA) confirmed limited or no flow to the tibial vessels were included. Demographics, injury severity score (ISS), mechanism of injury, physiological parameters, the presence of geniculate artery collateral circulation (superior medial, superior lateral, medial, inferior medial, inferior lateral), and 30-day limb salvage outcome were recorded. Statistical analysis was completed using descriptive statistics and the chi-squared tests. RESULTS From 2009 to 2012, a total of 84 patients with lower extremity arterial injury underwent diagnostic evaluation with CTA on admission that confirmed limited or no flow to the tibial vessels. A total of 10 patients (12%) underwent amputation. Primary amputation was performed in 3 (4%) patients, and secondary amputation was performed in 7 (8%) patients. There was no difference in age, gender, ISS, extremity abbreviated injury score, mechanism of injury, admission systolic blood pressure, heart rate, respiratory rate, transfusion volume, or type of vascular interventions between patients who had successful limb salvage and those who received an amputation. The number of patent geniculate arterial vessels was inversely associated with amputation with 3.3 patent geniculate arteries in the limb salvage group compared to 2.1 in the amputation group (P < 0.05). The 2 geniculate artery vessels that were significantly associated with limb salvage were the superior lateral geniculate and the inferior medial geniculate arteries (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS Geniculate collateral circulation may have an important role in limb salvage after lower extremity vascular injury. The geniculate arteries that are associated with the highest rates of limb salvage appear to be the superior lateral geniculate and the inferior medical geniculate artery.


Vascular | 2015

Observation may be an inadequate approach for injured extremities with single tibial vessel run-off.

Anahita Dua; Sapan S. Desai; Sean Johnston; Naga R. Chinapuvvula; Joseph DuBose; Kristofer M. Charlton-Ouw; Ali Azizzadeh; Andrew R. Burgess; Charles E. Wade; Charles J. Fox; John B. Holcomb

Introduction Trauma patients with sudden loss of distal perfusion due to tibial injuries are frequently not offered vascular interventions if a single vessel retains patency. We hypothesized that sudden loss of either all or some tibial vasculature would result in increased non-operative failure and higher amputation rates. Methods In this retrospective observational study, all traumatically injured patients from 2009 to 2012 with CT-angiogram–confirmed anterior tibial, posterior tibial, or peroneal artery injuries were included. Results From 2009 to 2012, 437 patients were admitted with arterial extremity injury of which 234 (53%) were lower extremity. From this group, 84 (36%) patients were identified with CT-angiogram–confirmed limited or no flow in the tibial arteries. A total of 44% (4/9) with 0 or 1 tibial vessel failed observation while only 8% (2/27) failed if they had 2 or 3 patent vessels (p < 0.05). Amputation rate was inversely related the number of open tibial vessels. There were 2.7 open tibial vessels in the limb salvage group compared to 1.1 in the amputation group (p < 0.05). Conclusion Patients who failed an initial trial of observation were significantly more likely to have 0 or 1 tibial vessels patent. The number of open tibial vessels is significantly associated with limb salvage.


Journal of Vascular Surgery | 2018

Isolated iliac vascular injuries and outcome of repair versus ligation of isolated iliac vein injury

Gregory A. Magee; Jayun Cho; Kazuhide Matsushima; Aaron Strumwasser; Kenji Inaba; Omid Jazaeri; Charles J. Fox; Demetrios Demetriades

Objective The incidence of morbidity and mortality for iliac vascular injuries in the literature are likely overestimated owing to associated injuries. Data for isolated iliac vascular injuries are very limited. No large studies have reported the incidence of morbidity for repair versus ligation of isolated iliac vein injuries. Methods Patients in the National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB; 2007‐2012) with at least one iliac vascular injury were analyzed. Isolated iliac vessels were defined as cases with Abbreviated Injury Scale severity score of greater than 3 for extraabdominal injuries and an Organ Injury Scale grade of greater than 3 for intraabdominal injuries. Results Overall, 6262 iliac vascular injuries (2809 penetrating, 3453 blunt) were identified in 271,076 patients with abdominal trauma (2.3%). There were 3379 patients (1841 penetrating, 1538 blunt) with isolated iliac vascular injuries (1.2%) and 557 patients (514 penetrating, 43 blunt) with combined iliac artery and vein injuries (0.2%). The 30‐day mortality rate was 16.5% for isolated iliac vein injury, 19.3% for isolated iliac artery injury, and 48.7% for combined isolated iliac artery and vein injury. The 30‐day mortality rate was 23.4% for isolated iliac vascular injuries compared with 39.0% for nonisolated iliac vascular injuries (P < .001). Patients with isolated iliac vein injuries had morbidity rates of deep venous thrombosis (repair, 14.6%; ligation, 14.1%; P = .875), pulmonary embolism (repair, 1.8%; ligation, 0.5%; P = .38), fasciotomy (repair, 9.3%; ligation, 14.6%; P = .094), amputation (repair, 1.8%; ligation, 2.6%; P = .738), acute kidney injury (repair, 5.8%; ligation, 4.7%; P = .627). Multivariate logistic regression demonstrated that ligation of isolated iliac vein injuries had an odds ratio of 2.2 for mortality compared with repair (95% confidence interval, 1.08‐4.66). Conclusions Isolated iliac vascular injuries are associated with a high incidence of mortality, especially for combined venous and arterial injury, but mortality is significantly lower than in patients with nonisolated iliac vascular injuries. In patients with isolated iliac vein injuries, mortality was higher in patients who underwent ligation compared with repair; however, the rates of deep venous thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, fasciotomy, amputation, and acute kidney injury were not different between the treatment groups. These data lend credence to the assessment that repair of iliac vein injuries is preferable to ligation whenever feasible.


International Journal of Surgery Case Reports | 2018

Amyand’s hernia with acute gangrenous appendicitis and cecal perforation: A case report and review of the literature

William Kromka; Aline S. Rau; Charles J. Fox

Highlights • Presentation of a rare case of an Amyand’s hernia containing acute appendicitis and a perforated cecum.• Diagnosis was intraoperative and an ileocecectomy followed by Bassini hernia repair produced a favorable patient outcome.• Amyand’s hernias can contain a diverse range of features and presentations that can complicate diagnosis and treatment.• Our case underscores the importance of considering an Amyand’s and individualizing treatment based on operative findings.


International Orthopaedics | 2017

Fat emboli syndrome and the orthopaedic trauma surgeon: lessons learned and clinical recommendations

Robin Hall Dunn; Trevor Jackson; Clay Cothren Burlew; Fredric M. Pieracci; Charles J. Fox; Mitchell J. Cohen; Eric M. Campion; Ryan A. Lawless; Cyril Mauffrey

PurposeFat emboli syndrome is a rare but well-described complication of long-bone fractures classically characterised by a triad of respiratory failure, mental status changes and petechial rash. In this paper, we present the case of a patient who sustained bilateral femoral fractures and subsequently developed FES. Our aim was to review and summarise the current literature regarding the pathophysiology and management of fat emboli syndrome (FES) and propose an algorithm for treating patients with bilateral femoral fractures to reduce the risk of FES.MethodsA literature analysis was performed to determine implications in the clinical setting.ResultsCurrently, there exists little high-quality evidence to guide the orthopaedic surgeon in identifying patients at highest risk of FES or in preventing FES in patients with multiple long-bone fractures. However, the literature does suggest that the risk is directly related to the volume of marrow displaced and inversely related to both the time to fracture stabilisation and the respiratory reserve of the patient. Based on these correlations, we propose an algorithm for treating patients with bilateral femoral fractures, taking into consideration haemodynamic and pulmonary stability.ConclusionsOur algorithm for managing bilateral femoral fractures prioritises early stabilisation with external fixation, staged intramedullary nailing and conversion to plate fixation if FES develops. This protocol is meant to be the basis of future investigations of optimal treatment strategies.


American Journal of Surgery | 2017

Preperitoneal pelvic packing is effective for hemorrhage control in open pelvic fractures

Eliza E. Moskowitz; Clay Cothren Burlew; Ernest E. Moore; Fredric M. Pieracci; Charles J. Fox; Eric M. Campion; Ryan A. Lawless; Mitchell J. Cohen

BACKGROUND Open pelvic fractures are life-threatening injuries. Preperitoneal pelvic packing (PPP) has been suggested to be ineffective for hemorrhage control in open pelvic fractures. We hypothesize that PPP is effective at hemorrhage control in patients with open pelvic fractures and reduces mortality. METHODS Patients undergoing PPP from 2005 to 2015 were analyzed. Patients with open pelvic fractures were defined as direct communication of the bony injury with overlying soft tissue, vagina, or rectum. RESULTS During the 10-year study, 126 patients underwent PPP; 14 (11%) sustained an open pelvic fracture. After PPP, 1 patient (7%) underwent angioembolization with a documented arterial blush. PPP controlled pelvic hemorrhage in all patients. Overall mortality rate was 7% with one death due to traumatic brain injury. CONCLUSIONS PPP is effective for hemorrhage control in patients with open pelvic fractures. PPP should be used in a standard protocol for hemodynamically unstable patients with pelvic fractures regardless of associated perineal injuries.


Archive | 2018

Pelvic Trauma Hemorrhage: How Do We Stop Bleeding in that Space?

Clay Cothren Burlew; Charles J. Fox; Ernest E. Moore

Patients with pelvic fractures who are hemodynamically unstable represent a unique challenge for the trauma team. Mortality in this severely injured cohort of patients exceeds 30–40% in modern series. Control of life-threatening hemorrhage should be prompt utilizing a combination of pelvic stabilization, goal-directed hemostasis with early blood components, resuscitative endovascular aortic balloon occlusion, and peritoneal pelvic packing. Adjunctive angioembolization may be necessary following external fixation and pelvic packing in patients with ongoing transfusion requirements.

Collaboration


Dive into the Charles J. Fox's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Ernest E. Moore

University of Colorado Denver

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Clay Cothren Burlew

University of Colorado Denver

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Fredric M. Pieracci

University of Colorado Denver

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Anahita Dua

Medical College of Wisconsin

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

John B. Holcomb

University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Charles E. Wade

University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Demetrios Demetriades

University of Southern California

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Kenji Inaba

University of Southern California

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Ryan A. Lawless

University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Sapan S. Desai

Southern Illinois University Carbondale

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge