Charles L. Backus

Initial results with an electrothermal bipolar vessel sealer

BackgroundAn electrothermal bipolar vessel sealer (EBVS; Ligasure, Valleylab, Boulder, CO, USA) was developed as an alternative to suture ligatures, hemoclips, staplers, and ultrasonic coagulators for ligating vessels and tissue bundles. The EBVS seals vessels up to 7 mm in diameter by denaturing collagen and elastin within the vessel wall and surrounding connective tissue. This study is the first to determine the clinical efficacy and safety of this instrument and delineate its potential timesavings in both experimental (animal) and clinical scenarios.MethodsA prospective review of the author’s clinical experience with the EBVS in laparoscopic and open operations from October 1998 to March 2000 was performed. In addition, five Yorkshire domestic pigs underwent 150-cm small intestine resections (n=10) using the EBVS (n=5) and suture ligatures (n=5). Measurements included time to complete intestinal resection, the number of applications per minute for each method, and the presence of postapplication bleeding. Statistical analysis was performed using Student’s t-test.ResultsThe EBVS was used in 98 cases (46 laparoscopic and 52 open) with a mean of 43 applications (range, 10–150 applications) per case. The operations included 53 colon and/or small bowel resections (54.1%), 24 fundoplications (24.5%), 12 gastric resections (12.2%), 3 splenectomies, 2 pancreatectomies, 1 adrenalectomy, 1 bilateral salpingooopherectomy, 1 pancreatic cyst-jejunostomy, and 1 vagotomy with gastrojejunostomy. In all these cases, the EBVS was intended to be the only means of vessel ligation. An alternative ligation technique was required for bleeding in only 13 (0.3%) of more than 4,200 applications of the EBVS. No postoperative hemorrhagic complications occurred. There was an estimated mean reduction in operative time of 39 min per open procedure, and a mean prolongation in operative time of 8 min per laparoscopic procedure when the EBVS was used in lieu of suture ligatures, hemoclips, staplers, or ultrasonic coagulators. In the animal model, the mean time for completion of the intestinal resection was 251.9 s for the EBVS and 702.0 s for ligatures (p<0.001). The mean number of applications per minute was 7.6 for the EBVS and 1.8 for ligatures (p<0.001). No postapplication bleeding was seen.ConclusionsInitial clinical results from the use of EBVS in laparoscopic and open procedures demonstrate it to be safe and effective, reducing operative time in open procedures. Suture ligatures, ties, hemoclips, and other ligating techniques were used rarely (0.3%) after an application of the EBVS. In an experimental animal model, the EBVS was significantly faster and more efficient (more applications per minute) than ligatures for intestinal resection.

Assessment of Adhesion Formation to Intra-Abdominal Polypropylene Mesh and Polytetrafluoroethylene Mesh

BACKGROUND The development of intra-abdominal adhesions, bowel obstruction, and enterocutaneous fistulas are potentially severe complications related to the intraperitoneal placement of prosthetic biomaterials. The purpose of this study was to determine the natural history of adhesion formation to polypropylene mesh and two types of polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE) mesh when placed intraperitoneally in a rabbit model that simulates laparoscopic ventral hernia repair. MATERIALS AND METHODS Thirty New Zealand white rabbits were used for this study. A 10-cm midline incision was performed for intra-abdominal access and a 2 cm x 2 cm piece of mesh (n = 60) was sewn to an intact peritoneum on each side of the midline. Two types of ePTFE mesh (Dual Mesh and modified Dual Mesh, W.L. Gore & Assoc., Flagstaff, AZ) and polypropylene mesh were compared. The rate of adhesion formation was evaluated by direct visualization using microlaparoscopy (2-mm endoscope/trocar) at 7 days, 3 weeks, 9 weeks, and 16 weeks after mesh implantation. Adhesions to the prosthetic mesh were scored for extent (%) using the Modified Diamond Scale (0 = 0%, 1 <or= 25%, 2 = 25-50%, 3 > 50%). At necropsy the mesh was excised en bloc with the anterior abdominal wall for histological evaluation of mesothelial layer growth. RESULTS The mean adhesion score for the polypropylene mesh was significantly greater (P < 0.05) than Dual Mesh at 9 weeks and 16 weeks and modified Dual Mesh at 7 days, 9 weeks, and 16 weeks. Fifty-five percent (n = 11) of the polypropylene mesh had adhesions to small intestine or omentum at necropsy compared to 30% (n = 6) of the Dual Mesh and 20% (n = 4) of the modified Dual Mesh. There was a significantly greater percentage (P < 0.003) of ePTFE mesh mesothelialized at explant (modified Dual Mesh 44.2%; Dual Mesh 55.8%) compared to the polypropylene mesh (12.9%). CONCLUSIONS Serial microlaparoscopic evaluation of intraperitoneally implanted polypropylene mesh and ePTFE mesh in a rabbit model revealed a progression of adhesions to polypropylene mesh over a 16 week period. The pore size of mesh is critical in the development and maintenance of abdominal adhesions and tissue ingrowth. The macroporous polypropylene mesh promoted adhesion formation, while the microporous nature of the visceral side of the ePTFE served as a barrier to adhesions.

Laparoscopic splenectomy for massive splenomegaly

BACKGROUND Laparoscopic splenectomy (LS) is the preferred operative approach for diseases involving normal-sized spleens. Our experience with laparoscopic splenectomy in the setting of massive splenomegaly is presented. METHODS A prospective review of patients undergoing LS for massive splenomegaly was conducted. Massive splenomegaly (MS) in adults was defined as a craniocaudal length >or=17 cm or a morcellated weight >or=600 g. In children, spleens measuring fourfold larger than normal for age were considered massive. RESULTS Forty-nine patients with MS were treated with LS. The most common primary diagnoses were lymphoma and leukemia. Mean splenic length was 20 cm (15 to 27 cm), with weights ranging from 600 to 4,750 g. Twelve patients with supermassive splenomegaly (length >22 cm) required a hand-assisted laparoscopic approach. There were no conversions to open surgery. Mean operating time was 171 minutes (90 to 369). Mean blood loss was 114 cc (<30 to 600 cc). Average length of stay was 2.3 days (1 to 16). Minor postoperative complications occurred in 3 patients. CONCLUSIONS Laparoscopic splenectomy in the setting of splenomegaly is safe and appears to minimize perioperative morbidity. In patients with supermassive splenomegaly, a hand-assisted laparoscopic approach may be required.

Prospective randomized evaluation of surgical resident proficiency with laparoscopic suturing after course instruction.

Background: Laparoscopic suturing is required to develop competency in advanced laparoscopy. Methods: Manuals detailing laparoscopic suturing were give to 17 Surgery residents. One week later they performed a suture on a training model. Time (s), accuracy (mm), and knot strength (lb) were recorded. The residents were blindly randomized to intervention (n = 9) and control (n = 8) groups. The intervention residents attended a 60-min course with lecture, video, and individual proctoring. Two weeks later they performed a stitch with standard laparoscopic instruments and a stitch with a suturing assist device. Statistical analysis included a Wilcoxon rank-sum test. Results: The intervention residents decreased their suturing time from the first to the second stitich (732.4–257.6s), the control and residents decreased their time from 500.2 s to 421.8 s. The time required to perform the second stitch showed no significant difference between the two groups (p = 0.46), but the difference in reduced time between the first and second stitch was significant (p = 0.001). Using the suturing assist device for the third suture, the intervention and control groups both decreased their times significantly. The control residents performed almost as quickly as the intervention residents with the suturing; device (p = 0.11). Accuracy and knot strength were not different in any test. Conclusions: Residents can improve suturing skill with a short didactic course and individual proctoring. A suturing assist device decreases time required by inexperienced surgeons to device perform an intracorporeal tie.

Optimal teaching environment for laparoscopic ventral herniorrhaphy.

Abstract. The introduction of laparoscopic techniques after residency training has created a new paradigm dependent on laparoscopic workshops. This study tested the benefit of an animate course and evaluated the role of proctoring in learning to perform laparoscopic ventral hernia repair (LVHR). Surgeons who had taken a 1-day LVHR course (n=59) were polled to determine previous experience with laparoscopic procedures and experience with LVHR after the course. Forty-eight (81%) surgeons completing the course responded. Thirty-two (67%) surgeons had performed 179 LVHRS (mean 5.6) since the course. There were no statistically significant differences between the groups performing and not performing LVHR regarding academic/private practice (P=0.8) or opportunities to perform a ventral herniorrhaphy (P=0.6). Fifteen (31%) surgeons were precepted in their hospital operating room by the lead author. Thirteen (87%) of precepted surgeons had performed a LVHR compared with 19 (58%) of the 33 surgeons taking the course without a precepted intervention (P=0.05). Surgeons with experience performing laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair, Nissen fundoplication, and common bile duct exploration were more likely to perform LVHR (P=0.0001). Surgeons performing only laparoscopic cholecystectomy tended to be less likely to perform LVHR, nearing statistical significance (P=0.08). Surgeons with prior advanced laparoscopic surgery experience are thus more likely to perform LVHR after participating in a 1-day course. Surgeons precepted in their hospital operating room were also more likely to perform LVHR. Participation in an animate laboratory and a precepted experience can impact the future performance of advanced laparoscopic surgery.