Charles O. Finne

Accuracy of Endorectal Ultrasonography in Preoperative Staging of Rectal Tumors

PURPOSE: Preoperative staging of rectal tumors is considered essential to tailor treatment for individual patients. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the accuracy of endorectal ultrasonography in preoperative staging of rectal tumors. METHODS: Eleven hundred eighty-four patients with rectal adenocarcinoma or villous adenoma underwent endorectal ultrasonography evaluation at a single institution during a ten-year period. We compared the endorectal ultrasonography staging with the pathology findings based on the surgical specimens in 545 patients who had surgery (307 by transanal excision, 238 by radical proctectomy) without adjuvant preoperative chemoradiation. Comparisons between groups were performed using chi-squared tests and logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Overall accuracy in assessing the level of rectal wall invasion was 69 percent, with 18 percent of the tumors overstaged and 13 percent understaged. Accuracy depended on the tumor stage and on the ultrasonographer. Overall accuracy in assessing nodal involvement in the 238 patients treated with radical surgery was 64 percent, with 25 percent overstaged and 11 percent understaged. CONCLUSION: The accuracy of endorectal ultrasonography in assessing the depth of tumor invasion, particularly for early cancers, is lower than previously reported. The technique is more precise in distinguishing between benign tumors and invasive cancers and between tumors localized to the rectal wall and tumors with transmural invasion. Differences in image interpretation may in part explain discrepancies in accuracy between studies.

Transanal endoscopic microsurgery versus conventional transanal excision for patients with early rectal cancer.

Objective:To compare transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEMS) with conventional transanal excision (TAE) in terms of the quality of resection, local recurrence, and survival rates in patients with stage I rectal cancer. Background:Although TEMS is often considered a superior surgical technique to TAE, it is poorly suited for excising tumors in the lower third of the rectum. Such tumors may confer a worse prognosis. Methods:We retrospectively reviewed information on all patients with stage pT1 and pT2 rectal adenocarcinoma who underwent local excision from 1997 through mid-2006. We excluded patients with node-positive, metastatic, recurrent, previously irradiated, or snare-excised tumors. Results:Our study included 42 TEMS and 129 TAE patients. We found no significant differences in patient characteristics, adjuvant therapy, tumor stage, or adverse histopathologic features. In the TAE group, 52 (40%) of tumors were <5 cm from the anal verge (AV); in the TEMS group, only 1 (2%) (P = 0.0001). Surgical margins were less often positive in the TEMS group (2%) than in the TAE group (16%) (P = 0.017). For patients with tumors ≥5 cm from the AV, the estimated 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) rate was similar between the TEMS group (84.1%) and the TAE group (76.1%) (P = 0.651). But within the TAE group, the estimated 5-year DFS rate was better for patients with tumors ≥5 cm from the AV (76.1%) vs. <5 cm from the AV (60.5%) (P = 0.029). In our multivariate analysis, the tumor distance from the anal verge, the resection margin status, the T stage, and the use of adjuvant therapy—but not the surgical technique (i.e., TEMS or TAE) itself—were independent predictors of local recurrence and DFS. Conclusions:The quality of resection is better with TEMS than with TAE. However, the apparently better oncologic outcomes with TEMS can be partly explained by case selection of lower-risk tumors of the upper rectum.

Transanal endoscopic microsurgery resection of rectal tumors: Outcomes and recommendations

PURPOSE: Transanal endoscopic microsurgery provides a minimally invasive alternative to radical surgery for excision of benign and malignant rectal tumors. The purpose of this study was to review our experience with transanal endoscopic microsurgery to clarify its role in the treatment of different types of rectal pathology. METHODS: A prospective database documented all patients undergoing transanal endoscopic microsurgery from October 1996 through June 2008. We analyzed patient and operative factors, complications, and tumor recurrence. For recurrence analysis, we excluded patients with fewer than 6 months of follow-up, previous excisions, known metastases at initial presentation, and those who underwent immediate radical resection following transanal endoscopic microsurgery. RESULTS: Two hundred sixty-nine patients underwent transanal endoscopic microsurgery for benign (n = 158) and malignant (n = 111) tumors. Procedure-related complications (21%) included urinary retention (10.8%), fecal incontinence (4.1%), fever (3.8%), suture line dehiscence (1.5%), and bleeding (1.5%). Local recurrence rates for 121 benign and 83 malignant tumors were 5% for adenomas, 9.8% for T1 adenocarcinoma, 23.5% for T2 adenocarcinoma, 100% for T3 adenocarcinoma, and 0% for carcinoid tumors. All 6 (100%) recurrent adenomas were retreated with endoscopic techniques, and 8 of 17 (47%) recurrent adenocarcinomas underwent salvage procedures with curative intent. CONCLUSIONS: Transanal endoscopic microsurgery is a safe and effective method for excision of benign and malignant rectal tumors. Transanal endoscopic microsurgery can be offered for (1) curative resection of benign tumors, carcinoid tumors, and select T1 adenocarcinomas, (2) histopathologic staging in indeterminate cases, and (3) palliative resection in patients medically unfit or unwilling to undergo radical resection.

Anal sphincter integrity and function influences outcome in rectovaginal fistula repair

PURPOSE: Traumatic sphincter disruption frequently is associated with a rectovaginal fistula, but the effect of a persistent sphincter defect on the outcome of rectovaginal fistula repair is poorly documented. We analyzed the outcome of rectovaginal fistula repairs based on preoperative sphincter status. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We identified 52 women who underwent 62 repairs of simple obstetrical rectovaginal fistulas between 1992 and 1995. Fourteen patients (27 percent) had preoperative endoanal ultrasound studies and 25 (48 percent) had anal manometry studies. Follow-up was by mailed questionnaire in 36 patients (69 percent) and by telephone interview in 12 (23 percent), for a total response rate of 92 percent. Median age was 30.5 (range, 18–70) years, and median follow-up was 15 (range, 0.5–123) months. Twenty-five patients (48 percent) complained of varying degrees of fecal incontinence before surgery. There were 27 endorectal advancement flaps and 35 sphincteroplasties (28 with and 8 without levatoroplasty). RESULTS: Success rates were 41 percent with endorectal advancement flaps and 80 percent with sphincteroplasties (96 percent success with and 33 percent without levatoroplasty;P=0.0001). Endorectal advancement flap was successful in 50 percent of patients with normal sphincter function but in only 33 percent of patients with abnormal sphincter function(P=not significant). For sphincteroplasties, success rates were 73vs. 84 percent for normal and abnormal sphincter function, respectively (P=not significant). Results were better after sphincteroplastiesvs. endorectal advancement flaps in patients with sphincter defects identified by endoanal ultrasound (88vs. 33 percent;P=not significant) and by manometry (86vs. 33 percent;P = not significant). Poor results correlated with prior surgery in patients undergoing endorectal advancement flaps (45 percentvs. 25 percent;P = not significant) but not sphincteroplasties (80vs. 75 percent;P = not significant). CONCLUSIONS: All patients with rectovaginal fistula should undergo preoperative evaluation for occult sphincter defects by endoanal ultrasound or anal manometry or both procedures. Local tissues are inadequate for endorectal advancement flap repairs in patients with sphincter defects and a history of previous repairs. Patients with clinical or anatomic sphincter defects should be treated by sphincteroplasty with levatoroplasty.

The surgisis® AFP™ anal fistula plug: Report of a consensus conference

A Consensus Conference was held in Chicago on 27th May 2007 at the Illinois Airport Hilton Hotel to develop uniformity of opinion from surgeons with considerable experience in the use of the Anal Fistula Plug. Of the 15 surgeons in attendance, five had performed 50 or more Anal Fistula Plug procedures. Success rates with this approach have been reported to be as high as 85% [1]. Anecdotal communications have however suggested lower rates of success. Concerns have been expressed over plug extrusion and inadequacy of long-term followup. It was thought prudent to hold this conference because, despite a number of publications attesting to the safety and efficacy of the procedure, to date there has not been uniformity of opinion regarding indications and technique, nor has there been level I evidence of any actual benefit.

The Effect of Circumferential Tumor Location in Clinical Outcomes of Rectal Cancer Patients Treated With Total Mesorectal Excision

PURPOSEA positive circumferential resection margin is associated with a high risk of local recurrence and distant metastasis after total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. The mesorectum is thinner anteriorly than posteriorly, and the risk of a positive resection margin may be higher for anterior than for posterior tumors. We sought to determine the effect of the tumors position in the circumference of the rectum on the treatment and outcomes of rectal cancer patients treated by total mesorectal excision.METHODSWe retrospectively analyzed 401 patients with rectal cancer staged by preoperative endorectal ultrasound and treated by sharp mesorectal excision with or without neoadjuvant therapy. Tumors were classified into four groups (anterior, posterior, lateral, and circumferential) according to the location of deepest point of penetration on endorectal ultrasound. Differences in recurrence and survival rates were analyzed with logistic regression analysis.RESULTSOf the 401 tumors, 27 percent were anterior, 26 percent posterior, 32 percent lateral, and 15 percent circumferential. The groups did not differ in age, gender, tumor distance from the anal verge, or tumor grade. The ultrasound and pathology stages were more advanced in the circumferential group, and the proportion of uT4 tumors was higher in the anterior group. Circumferential and anterior tumors were more likely to receive preoperative adjuvant radiation. After an average follow-up of 44 months, 20 percent of patients had developed recurrence (13 percent distant, 6 percent local, and 1 percent distant and local). Recurrence was associated with advanced tumor stage, tumor proximity to the anal verge, and no preoperative adjuvant therapy. Early tumor stage and preoperative chemoradiation were associated with lower recurrence and improved survival. When tumor stage was controlled for, patients with poor or undifferentiated tumors and male patients with anterior tumors were shown to have a higher risk of recurrence or death. The estimated five-year disease-free survival for the entire group was 73 percent.CONCLUSIONSTumor stage is the main criterion to estimate prognosis in rectal cancer patients. The position of the tumor within the circumference of the rectum may provide valuable clinical information. Anterior tumors tend to be more advanced and, at least in male patients, has a higher risk of recurrence and death than tumors in other locations.

Endorectal Ultrasound in the Follow-Up of Rectal Cancer Patients Treated by Local Excision or Radical Surgery

PURPOSE:This study was designed to investigate the role of a scheduled follow-up protocol using endorectal ultrasonography for the diagnosis of local recurrence after local excision and radical surgery for rectal cancer.METHODS:A selected group of 275 patients with invasive rectal cancer followed prospectively by endorectal ultrasonography after curative-intent local excision (n = 108) or radical surgery (n = 167) was reviewed. For the radical-surgery group, results were compared with a group of 176 rectal cancer patients who had similar operations during the same period of time and were not entered in follow-up protocol. Excluded were patients with invasive cancers removed by snare excision, male patients treated by abdominoperineal resection, and patients treated by endocavitary radiation. Student’s unpaired t-test was used to compare tumor and patient characteristics. Survival curves were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log-rank test.RESULTS:In the local-excision group, 32 patients developed local recurrence, 26 (81 percent) were asymptomatic, and 10 of them (31 percent) were diagnosed only by endorectal ultrasound. We found no difference in the rates of salvage surgery or survival between patients diagnosed of recurrence by ultrasound or other methods. In the radical-surgery group, 12 patients developed local recurrence, 5 (42 percent) were asymptomatic, and 4 of them (33 percent) were diagnosed only by endorectal ultrasound. More patients with isolated local recurrence in the follow-up group underwent salvage surgery (4/9 patients; 44 percent) compared with patients without follow-up (3/13 patients; 23 percent), but the differences were not significant.CONCLUSIONS:Endorectal ultrasound identifies one-third of asymptomatic local recurrences that were missed by digital examination or proctoscopic examination. However, the impact of the earlier diagnosis in patient survival can only be determined by a larger, prospective, randomized trial.

Meta-analysis of Histopathological Features of Primary Colorectal Cancers that Predict Lymph Node Metastases

BackgroundTreatment decisions for colorectal cancer vary based on lymph node status. While some histopathological features of the primary tumor correlate with lymph node spread, the relative influences of these risk factors are not well quantified.ObjectiveThis study aims to systematically review published studies relating histopathological features of primary colorectal cancer to the presence of lymph node metastases and to determine how reliable certain factors might be at predicting nodal metastasis when only the primary lesion is available for study.Data SourcesInclusive literature search using EMBASE and Ovid MEDLINE databases plus manual reference checks of all articles correlating lymphatic spread with colorectal cancer (any T stage) from 1984 to mid-2008 was performed.Study SelectionThis search generated two levels of screening utilized on 602 citations, yielding 123 articles for full review. Data reported from 76 articles were chosen.Main Outcome MeasuresThe relative influence of each histopathological feature on the likelihood of lymphatic metastases was determined. Fixed-effects meta-analysis was performed, and results were reported as Mantel–Haenszel odds ratios (OR).ResultsOf 42 histopathological features analyzed, only 40.4% were reported in >2 articles. The positive predictive values for the top quartile of most frequently reported risk factors were 25.5–86.4%. Among the commonly reported histopathological findings, lymphatic invasion (OR, 8.62) significantly outperformed tumor depth (T2 vs. T1; OR, 2.62) and overall differentiation (OR, 2.38) in predicting nodal spread. For the rectal cancer subset, risk factors differed from the overall colorectal group in predictive ability; poor differentiation at the invasive front (OR, 6.08) and tumor budding (OR, 5.82) were the most predictive.LimitationsThis literature search is limited by the small number of studies examining only rectal cancers and the potential changes in histological and/or surgical techniques over the study period.ConclusionsNo single histopathological feature of colorectal cancer reliably predicted lymph node metastases. Several risk factors that correlate highly with nodal disease are not routine components of standard pathology reports. Until further research establishes histopathological or molecular patterns for predicting lymph node spread, caution should be exercised when basing treatment decisions solely on these factors.

Fistula-associated anal adenocarcinoma: good results with aggressive therapy.

PurposeTo evaluate the clinical features, pathology, treatment, and outcome of patients with fistula-associated anal adenocarcinoma.MethodsWe identified 14 patients with histologically proven fistula-associated anal adenocarcinoma. We reviewed their medical records and pathology specimens to characterize their presentation, treatment, and clinical outcome.ResultsNine patients presented with a persistent fistula, 3 with a perianal mass, 1 with pain and drainage, and 1 with a recurrent perianal abscess. The average age at time of diagnosis was 59 (range, 37–76) years. Eleven patients had preexisting chronic anal fistulas. Ten had Crohn’s disease, and 1 had previously received pelvic radiation therapy. The diagnosis of cancer was suspected during physical examination in 6 of the 14 patients (43 percent). Twelve patients had extensive local disease at presentation. Primary abdominoperineal resection was performed in 11 patients, 7 following neoadjuvant chemoradiation. Six patients received postoperative chemotherapy, and 2 received postoperative radiation. Four patients died with metastatic disease. The remaining 10 patients are alive without evidence of disease at a mean follow-up of 64.3 (range, 14–149) months.ConclusionsThe diagnosis of fistula-associated anal adenocarcinoma is often unsuspected. Most patients can be cured with aggressive surgical and adjuvant chemoradiotherapy.

Transrectal drainage of pelvic abscesses

In the past 20 years few reports of transrectal drainage of pelvic abscesses have been published in the English language other than brief discussions in standard textbooks. During the past five years nine patients with pelvic abscesses have been treated successfully by this method. There were no deaths and morbidity was minimal. These cases are reviewed and the indications and techniques of operation discussed.