Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Charles R. Clark is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Charles R. Clark.


Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health | 2011

Chronic Carcinogenicity Study of Gasoline Vapor Condensate (GVC) and GVC Containing Methyl Tertiary-Butyl Ether in F344 Rats

Janet M. Benson; Andrew P. Gigliotti; Thomas H. March; Edward B. Barr; Brad M. Tibbetts; Betty Skipper; Charles R. Clark; Lorraine Twerdok

Chronic inhalation studies were conducted to compare the toxicity and potential carcinogenicity of evaporative emissions from unleaded gasoline (GVC) and gasoline containing the oxygenate methyl tertiary-butyl ether (MTBE; GMVC). The test materials were manufactured to mimic vapors people would be exposed to during refueling at gas stations. Fifty F344 rats per gender per exposure level per test article were exposed 6 h/d, 5 d/wk for 104 wk in whole body chambers. Target total vapor concentrations were 0, 2, 10, or 20 g/m3 for the control, low-, mid-, and high-level exposures, respectively. Endpoints included survival, body weights, clinical observations, organs weights, and histopathology. GVC and GMVC exerted no marked effects on survival or clinical observations and few effects on organ weights. Terminal body weights were reduced in all mid- and high-level GVC groups and high-level GMVC groups. The major proliferative lesions attributable to gasoline exposure with or without MTBE were renal tubule adenomas and carcinomas in male rats. GMV exposure led to elevated testicular mesothelioma incidence and an increased trend for thyroid carcinomas in males. GVMC inhalation caused an increased trend for testicular tumors with exposure concentration. Mid- and high-level exposures of GVC and GMVC led to elevated incidences of nasal respiratory epithelial degeneration. Overall, in these chronic studies conducted under identical conditions, the health effects in F344 rats following 2 yr of GVC or GMVC exposure were comparable in the production of renal adenomas and carcinomas in male rats and similar in other endpoints.


Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology | 2011

Asphalt fume dermal carcinogenicity potential: I. dermal carcinogenicity evaluation of asphalt (bitumen) fume condensates

Charles R. Clark; Donald M. Burnett; Craig M. Parker; Earl W. Arp; Mark S. Swanson; Gary Minsavage; Anthony J. Kriech; Linda V. Osborn; James J. Freeman; Robert A. Barter; Paul E. Newton; Shelley L. Beazley; Christopher W. Stewart

Asphalt (bitumen) fume condensates collected from the headspace above paving and Type III built up roofing asphalt (BURA) tanks were evaluated in two-year dermal carcinogenicity assays in male C3H/HeNCrl mice. A third sample was generated from the BURA using a NIOSH laboratory generation method. Similar to earlier NIOSH studies, the BURA fume condensates were applied dermally in mineral oil twice per week; the paving sample was applied 7 days/week for a total weekly dose of 50 mg/wk in both studies. A single benign papilloma was observed in a group of 80 mice exposed to paving fume condensate at the end of the two-year study and only mild skin irritation was observed. The lab generated BURA fume condensate resulted in statistically significant (P<0.0001) increases in squamous cell carcinomas (35 animals or 55% of animals at risk). The field-matched BURA condensate showed a weaker but significant (P=0.0063) increase (8 carcinomas or 13% of animals) and a longer average latency (90 weeks vs. 76 for the lab fume). Significant irritation was observed in both BURA condensates. It is concluded that the paving fume condensate was not carcinogenic under the test conditions and that the field-matched BURA fume condensate produced a weak tumor response compared to the lab generated sample.


Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology | 2011

Asphalt fume dermal carcinogenicity potential: II. Initiation-promotion assay of Type III built-up roofing asphalt.

James J. Freeman; Ceinwen A. Schreiner; S. Beazley; Donald M. Burnett; Charles R. Clark; Suneeta Mahagaokar; Craig M. Parker; Christopher W. Stewart; Mark S. Swanson; Earl W. Arp

Clark et al. (accepted for publication) reported that a sample of field-matched fume condensate from a Type III built-up roofing asphalt (BURA) resulted in a carcinogenic response in a mouse skin bioassay, with relatively few tumor-bearing animals, long tumor latency and chronic skin irritation. This mouse skin initiation/promotion study was conducted to assess possible mechanisms, i.e., genotoxic initiation vs. tumor promotion subsequent to repeated skin injury and repair. The same Type III BURA fume condensate sample was evaluated in groups of 30 male Crl:CD1® mice by skin application twice per week (total dose of 50 mg/week) for 2 weeks during the initiation phase and for 26 weeks during the promotion phase. Positive control substances were 7,12-dimethylbenz(a)anthracene (DMBA, 50 μg applied once) as an initiator and 12-O-tetradecanoyl-13-acetate (TPA, 5 μg, applied twice weekly) during the promotion phase. During the 6 months of study with the asphalt fume condensate, eight skin masses were observed when tested for initiation, five of which were confirmed microscopically to be benign squamous cell papillomas. Only two papillomas were observed when tested for promotion. There was no apparent relationship between skin irritation and tumor development in this study. These results are more indicative of genotoxicity rather than a non-genotoxic mode of action.


Journal of Petroleum Technology | 1982

The replacement of hydrocarbon diluent with surfactant and water for the production of heavy, viscous crude oil

Gifford G. McClaflin; Charles R. Clark; Thomas R. Sifferman

Viscous crudes often are produced by means of a low viscosity hydrocarbon diluent to decrease viscosity of the produced fluid in the tubing and the flowlines. Rodpump difficulties may result from the slow fall of the rod string caused by high fluid viscosity. The use of a diluent reduces these rod-fall and associated flow problems. The authors goal was to replace the diluent completely with a water/surfactant system without increasing the flowline pressures. This was accomplished with a produced water/surfactant mixture. However, in one field we found that using a combination of diluent, surfactant, and water was the most economical way to produce the crude. The crude is dispersed in a water-external system so that the viscosity is decreased appreciably. The authors initially evaluated different chemicals in the laboratory. Later tests were on individual wells, a 6-well pilot, and finally a 15-well pilot. Economics of the new system are projected to be more favorable than those of using diluent alone. This system can be used not only for heavy crudes but also for waxy crudes that have high pour points and are thus difficult to produce. It allows a lower pumping cost because of reduced viscous drag and can bemorexa0» more economical than some diluent systems.«xa0less


Archive | 1989

Process for the preparation of fluid loss additive and gel breaker

Burton M. Casad; Charles R. Clark; Lisa A. Cantu; D. Philip Cords; Edward F. McBride


Archive | 1988

Inhibition of hydrate formation

Robert R. Matthews; Charles R. Clark


SAE 2003 World Congress & Exhibition | 2003

Comparison of Exhaust Emissions, Including Toxic Air Contaminants, from School Buses in Compressed Natural Gas, Low Emitting Diesel, and Conventional Diesel Engine Configurations

Terry L. Ullman; Lawrence R. Smith; Joseph W. Anthony; Warren J. Slodowske; Bill Trestrail; Angelita L. Cook; William B. Bunn; Charles A. Lapin; Kenneth J. Wright; Charles R. Clark


Journal of Petroleum Technology | 1973

Mud Displacement with Cement Slurries

Charles R. Clark; Greg L. Carter


Archive | 1992

Emulsion breaking using alkylphenol-polyethylene oxide-acrylate polymer coated coalescer material

Patrick H. Fitzgerald; Nicholas O. Wolf; Charles R. Clark; D. Philip Cords


Archive | 1974

Method using overbased branched-chain alkylaromatic sulfonates as waterflood additives

Oliver C. Kerfoot; Charles R. Clark; Carl D. Kennedy

Collaboration


Dive into the Charles R. Clark's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Andrew P. Gigliotti

Lovelace Respiratory Research Institute

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Betty Skipper

University of New Mexico

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Brad M. Tibbetts

Lovelace Respiratory Research Institute

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge