Charles Waiswa
Makerere University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Charles Waiswa.
The Lancet | 2005
Eric M. Fèvre; Kim Picozzi; Jenna Fyfe; Charles Waiswa; Martin Odiit; Paul G. Coleman; Susan C. Welburn
The epidemic of Trypanosoma brucei rhodesiense sleeping sickness in eastern Uganda, which began in 1998 as a result of movements of the livestock reservoir of the parasite, has continued to spread. An additional 133 000 people have been put at risk of infection in Kaberamaido, another newly affected district. The few resources committed to control interventions in Soroti district have failed to contain the epidemic. The high prevalence of the parasite in cattle presents a significant risk for transmission to human beings and further spread of this neglected zoonotic disease. Targeted interventions are urgently needed to control epidemics and reduce the high mortality resulting from sleeping sickness.
Preventive Veterinary Medicine | 2013
A.P.M. Shaw; Stephen J. Torr; Charles Waiswa; Giuliano Cecchi; G.R.W. Wint; Raffaele C. Mattioli; Timothy P. Robinson
Decision-making and financial planning for tsetse control is complex, with a particularly wide range of choices to be made on location, timing, strategy and methods. This paper presents full cost estimates for eliminating or continuously controlling tsetse in a hypothetical area of 10,000km(2) located in south-eastern Uganda. Four tsetse control techniques were analysed: (i) artificial baits (insecticide-treated traps/targets), (ii) insecticide-treated cattle (ITC), (iii) aerial spraying using the sequential aerosol technique (SAT) and (iv) the addition of the sterile insect technique (SIT) to the insecticide-based methods (i-iii). For the creation of fly-free zones and using a 10% discount rate, the field costs per km(2) came to US
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences | 2008
Kohei Makita; Eric M. Fèvre; Charles Waiswa; Winyi Kaboyo; Barend Mark de Clare Bronsvoort; Mark C Eisler; Susan C. Welburn
283 for traps (4 traps per km(2)), US
BMC Veterinary Research | 2011
Kohei Makita; Eric M. Fèvre; Charles Waiswa; Mark C Eisler; Michael Thrusfield; Susan C. Welburn
30 for ITC (5 treated cattle per km(2) using restricted application), US
PLOS ONE | 2010
Kohei Makita; Eric M. Fèvre; Charles Waiswa; Mark C Eisler; Susan C. Welburn
380 for SAT and US
Parasites & Vectors | 2013
Kevin Louis Bardosh; Charles Waiswa; Susan C. Welburn
758 for adding SIT. The inclusion of entomological and other preliminary studies plus administrative overheads adds substantially to the overall cost, so that the total costs become US
Parasites & Vectors | 2013
Richard Selby; Kevin Louis Bardosh; Kim Picozzi; Charles Waiswa; Susan C. Welburn
482 for traps, US
Journal of Parasitology Research | 2009
Charles Waiswa; Eric M. Fèvre; Zachary Nsadha; Chummy Sikalizyo Sikasunge; Arve Lee Willingham
220 for ITC, US
Parasites & Vectors | 2014
Dennis Muhanguzi; Kim Picozzi; Jan Hatendorf; Michael Thrusfield; Susan C. Welburn; John David Kabasa; Charles Waiswa
552 for SAT and US
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases | 2014
Dennis Muhanguzi; Kim Picozzi; Jan Hatendorf; Michael Thrusfield; Susan C. Welburn; John David Kabasa; Charles Waiswa
993 - 1365 if SIT is added following suppression using another method. These basic costs would apply to trouble-free operations dealing with isolated tsetse populations. Estimates were also made for non-isolated populations, allowing for a barrier covering 10% of the intervention area, maintained for 3 years. Where traps were used as a barrier, the total cost of elimination increased by between 29% and 57% and for ITC barriers the increase was between 12% and 30%. In the case of continuous tsetse control operations, costs were estimated over a 20-year period and discounted at 10%. Total costs per km(2) came to US