Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Charlotte E. Rees is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Charlotte E. Rees.


Medical Teacher | 2011

Assessment of professionalism: Recommendations from the Ottawa 2010 Conference

Brian Hodges; Shiphra Ginsburg; Richard L. Cruess; Sylvia R. Cruess; Rhena Delport; Fred Hafferty; Ming-Jung Ho; Eric S. Holmboe; Matthew C. Holtman; Sadayoshi Ohbu; Charlotte E. Rees; Olle ten Cate; Yusuke Tsugawa; Walther N. K. A. van Mook; Val Wass; Tim Wilkinson; Winnie Wade

Over the past 25 years, professionalism has emerged as a substantive and sustained theme, the operationalization and measurement of which has become a major concern for those involved in medical education. However, how to go about establishing the elements that constitute appropriate professionalism in order to assess them is difficult. Using a discourse analysis approach, the International Ottawa Conference Working Group on Professionalism studied some of the dominant notions of professionalism, and in particular the implications for its assessment. The results presented here reveal different ways of thinking about professionalism that can lead towards a multi-dimensional, multi-paradigmatic approach to assessing professionalism at different levels: individual, inter-personal, societal–institutional. Recommendations for research about professionalism assessment are also presented.


Patient Education and Counseling | 2003

Evaluating the reliability and validity of three tools to assess the quality of health information on the Internet

Gbogboade Ademiluyi; Charlotte E. Rees; Charlotte Sheard

The quality of Internet information needs to be evaluated and several tools exist for this purpose. However, none have demonstrated reliability and validity. This study tested the internal consistency and validity of the information quality tool (IQT), quality scale (QS) and DISCERN using 89 web sites discussing smoking cessation. The inter-rater reliability of the tools was established by exploring the agreement between two independent raters for 22 (25%) of the sites. The IQT and DISCERN possessed satisfactory internal consistency (as measured by Cronbachs alpha). The IQT, QS and DISCERN showed satisfactory inter-rater reliability (as measured by kappa and intraclass correlations). The IQT, QS and DISCERN correlated positively with each other, supporting the convergent validity of the tools. This study provides some evidence for the reliability and validity of the IQT, QS and DISCERN, although this needs testing in further research with different types of Internet information and larger sample sizes.


Medical Education | 2011

Differences in medical students' explicit discourses of professionalism: acting, representing, becoming

Lynn V Monrouxe; Charlotte E. Rees; Wendy Hu

Medical Education 2011; 45: 585–602


Medical Education | 2008

Is it me or is it them? Factors that influence the passing of underperforming students.

Jennifer Cleland; Lynn V Knight; Charlotte E. Rees; Susan Tracey; Christine Bond

Context  Research has found that clinical assessments do not always accurately reflect medical student performance. Barriers to failing underperformance in students have been identified in other vocational settings. Is ‘failure to fail’ an issue for medical educators in the UK, and, if so, what are its determinants?


Patient Education and Counseling | 2002

Evaluating the reliability of DISCERN: a tool for assessing the quality of written patient information on treatment choices

Charlotte E. Rees; Jillyan E Ford; Charlotte Sheard

Patients require good quality, evidence based information so that they can participate actively in the decision making process. The DISCERN instrument has been developed to help patients rate the quality of written information materials about treatment choices. This study evaluated the reliability of DISCERN using 31 information leaflets discussing treatment options for prostate cancer. The index of agreement between two independent raters was substantial for the overall quality rating (kappa=0.65, 95% confidence interval 0.49, 0.82), indicating that the instrument could be used to discriminate reliably between low and high quality prostate cancer publications. Healthcare professionals should inform patients of the availability of the instrument and encourage its use by patients who regularly attend to written sources of information on treatment choices. Early indications show that DISCERN could enable both patients and healthcare professionals to discriminate between the plethora of variable quality information currently available.


Medical Education | 2004

The problem with outcomes‐based curricula in medical education: insights from educational theory

Charlotte E. Rees

Background  Educators across the world are charged with the responsibility of producing core learning outcomes for medical curricula. However, much educational theory exists which deliberates the value of learning outcomes in education.


Medical Education | 2013

Narrative, emotion and action: analysing ‘most memorable’ professionalism dilemmas

Charlotte E. Rees; Lynn V Monrouxe; Laura A. McDonald

OBJECTIVES  Although previous studies have explored medical learners’‘most memorable’ experiences, these have typically focused on patient deaths or mistakes. Drawing on multiple theoretical perspectives to understand the interplay between narrative, emotion and action, this paper aims to explore the whats and hows of written narratives of most memorable professionalism dilemmas: what types of dilemma are most memorable? When and where do they take place? How do students act? What characteristics relate to these dilemmas? How are dilemmas narrated?


Medical Education | 2004

The reliability of assessment criteria for undergraduate medical students' communication skills portfolios: the Nottingham experience.

Charlotte E. Rees; Charlotte Sheard

Introduction  Some educators have argued that portfolios should not be assessed summatively because there is little evidence supporting the reliability of their assessment. This study aims to determine the reliability of assessment criteria used for a portfolio at the University of Nottingham.


Medical Education | 2017

Shedding the cobra effect: problematising thematic emergence, triangulation, saturation and member checking

Lara Varpio; Rola Ajjawi; Lynn V Monrouxe; Bridget O'Brien; Charlotte E. Rees

Qualitative research is widely accepted as a legitimate approach to inquiry in health professions education (HPE). To secure this status, qualitative researchers have developed a variety of strategies (e.g. reliance on post‐positivist qualitative methodologies, use of different rhetorical techniques, etc.) to facilitate the acceptance of their research methodologies and methods by the HPE community. Although these strategies have supported the acceptance of qualitative research in HPE, they have also brought about some unintended consequences. One of these consequences is that some HPE scholars have begun to use terms in qualitative publications without critically reflecting on: (i) their ontological and epistemological roots; (ii) their definitions, or (iii) their implications.


Medical Education | 2010

Theory in medical education research: how do we get there?

Charlotte E. Rees; Lynn V Monrouxe

1 Bamm EL, Rosenbaum P. Familycentred theory: origins, development, barriers, and supports to implementation in rehabilitation medicine. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2008;8:1618–24. 2 Pols J. Professional Training: Exploratory Studies of Undergraduate Medical Education in Relation to Chronically Ill Patients. Groningen: University of Groningen. PhD Thesis [in Dutch] 2003. 3 Hammond M, McLean E. What parents and carers think medical students should be learning about communication with children and families. Patient Educ Couns. 2009;76:368–75. 4 Visser-Meily JMA, Post MWM, van de Port IGL, van Heugten CM, van de Bos GAM. Psychosocial functioning of spouses in the chronic phase after stroke: improvement or deterioration between 1 and 3 years after stroke? Patient Educ Couns. 2008;73:153–8. 5 Schulz R, Beach SR. Caregiving as a risk factor for mortality: the Caregiver Health Effects Study. JAMA 1999;282:2215–9. 6 Rentinck ICM, Ketelaar M, Jongmans MJ, Gorter JW. Parents of children with cerebral palsy: a review of factors related to the process of adaptation. Child Care Health Dev 2007;33:161–9. 7 Rochette A, Korner-Bitensky N, Desrosiers J. Actual vs best practice for families post-stroke according to three rehabilitation disciplines. J Rehabil Med 2007;39:513–9. 8 World Health Organization. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Geneva: WHO 2001. 9 Graham CL, Brown RS, Zhen H, McDermott S. Teaching medical students about disability in family medicine. Fam Med 2009;41:542–4. 10 Kuyvenhoven MM, Eijzenbach V, ten Cate OT. The students follow patients programme: students attending patients with chronic disease in their homes. Acad Med 2001;76:567. 11 Bautista MK, Meuleman JR, Shorr RI, Beyth RJ. Description and students’ perceptions of a required geriatric clerkship in post-acute rehabilitative care. J Am Geriatr Soc 2009;57:1685–91. 12 Bergeson SC, Dean JD. A systems approach to patient-centred care. JAMA 2006;296:2848–51. 13 Stevens DP, Wagner EH. Transform residency training in chronic illness care – now. Acad Med 2006;81:685– 7.

Collaboration


Dive into the Charlotte E. Rees's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Lynn V Monrouxe

Memorial Hospital of South Bend

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Andy Wearn

University of Auckland

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge