Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Charlotte Koster is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Charlotte Koster.


Linguistics | 1986

What can we learn from children’s errors in understanding anaphora?

Werner Deutsch; Charlotte Koster; Jan Koster

Sur des enfants neerlandais de six a dix ans, les AA. montrent une acquisition plus rapide des anaphoriques reflechis que des non reflechis, ce qui suggererait une explication en termes configurationnels


Language, cognition and neuroscience | 2014

Referential choice across the lifespan: why children and elderly adults produce ambiguous pronouns.

Petra Hendriks; Charlotte Koster; John Hoeks

In this study, children, young adults and elderly adults were tested in production and comprehension tasks assessing referential choice. Our aims were (1) to determine whether speakers egocentrically base their referential choice on the preceding linguistic discourse or also take into account the perspective of a hypothetical listener and (2) whether the possible impact of perspective taking on referential choice changes with increasing age, with its associated changes in cognitive capacity. In the production task, participants described picture-based stories featuring two characters of the same gender, making it necessary to use unambiguous forms; in the comprehension task, participants interpreted potentially ambiguous pronouns at the end of similar orally presented stories. Young adults (aged 18–35) were highly sensitive to the informational needs of hypothetical conversational partners in their production and comprehension of referring expressions. In contrast, children (aged 4–7) did not take into account possible conversational partners and tended to use pronouns for all given referents, leading to the production of ambiguous pronouns that are unrecoverable for a listener. This was mirrored in the outcome of the comprehension task, where children were insensitive to the shift of discourse topic marked by the speaker. The elderly adults (aged 69–87) behaved differently from both young adults and children. They showed a clear sensitivity to the other persons perspective in both production and comprehension, but appeared to lack the necessary cognitive capacities to keep track of the prominence of discourse referents, producing more potentially ambiguous pronouns than young adults, though fewer than children. In conclusion then, referential choice seems to depend on perspective taking in language, which develops with increasing linguistic experience and cognitive capacity, but also on the ability to keep track of the prominence of discourse referents, which is gradually lost with older age.


Language | 1994

Acquisition of negative polarity items

Charlotte Koster; Sjoukje Van Der Wal

here. First, SLI subjects used a greater number of verbs without internal arguments than their normal counterparts. We also found differences in the use of verbs with both an object NP and a locative PP, where the language normals’ frequency of use was greater than the SLIs’. In addition we found a difference in preferred complementation type for verbs which allow the causative/inchoative alternation, where LIs are


Frontiers in Psychology | 2017

Individualized early prediction of familial risk of dyslexia : A study of infant vocabulary development

Ao Chen; Frank Wijnen; Charlotte Koster; Hugo G. Schnack

We examined early vocabulary development in children at familial risk (FR) of dyslexia and typically developing (TD) children between 17 and 35 months of age. We trained a support vector machine to classify TD and FR using these vocabulary data at the individual level. The Dutch version of the McArthur-Bates Communicative Development Inventory (Words and Sentences) (N-CDI) was used to measure vocabulary development. We analyzed group-level differences for both total vocabulary as well as lexical classes: common nouns, predicates, and closed class words. The generalizability of the classification model was tested using cross-validation. At the group level, for both total vocabulary and the composites, the difference between TD and FR was most pronounced at 19–20 months, with FRs having lower scores. For the individual prediction, highest cross-validation accuracy (68%) was obtained at 19–20 months, with sensitivity (correctly classified FR) being 70% and specificity (correctly classified TD) being 67%. There is a sensitive window in which the difference between FR and TD is most evident. Machine learning methods are promising techniques for separating FR and TD children at an early age, before they start reading.


Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research | 2005

Differences at 17 months : Productive language patterns in infants at familial risk for dyslexia and typically developing infants

Charlotte Koster; P. Been; Evelien M. Krikhaar; Frans Zwarts; Heidi D. Diepstra; Theo van Leeuwen


Journal of Memory and Language | 1993

Integrative processes in utterance resolution

William D. Marslen-Wilson; Lorraine K. Tyler; Charlotte Koster


Archive | 1993

Errors in anaphora acquisition

Charlotte Koster


Lingua | 2010

Production/comprehension asymmetries in language acquisition

Petra Hendriks; Charlotte Koster


Journal of Neurolinguistics | 2004

Sensitivity to subject -verb agreement in spoken language in children with developmental dyslexia

Judith Rispens; Susan Roeleven; Charlotte Koster


Proceedings of the 3rd Conference on Generative Approaches to Language Acquisition North America (GALANA 2008) | 2009

Tell me a story! Children's capacity for topic shift

Ellis Wubs; Petra Hendriks; John Hoeks; Charlotte Koster

Collaboration


Dive into the Charlotte Koster's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Frans Zwarts

University of Groningen

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

John Hoeks

University of Groningen

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

P. Been

University of Groningen

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Ellis Wubs

University of Groningen

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge