Cheng-Le Zhuang

Impact of different sarcopenia stages on the postoperative outcomes after radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer

Background. The association between sarcopenia and postoperative outcomes has been well reported. However, the impact of different sarcopenia stages on postoperative outcomes has never been investigated. Methods. We conducted a large, prospective study of patients who underwent radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer from August 2014 to December 2015. Sarcopenia was staged as “presarcopenia,” “sarcopenia,” and “severe sarcopenia” according to the definition of the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People. Univariate and multivariate analyses evaluating the risk factors for total, surgical, and medical complications were performed. Results. A total of 470 patients were included, in which 20.6%, 10%, and 6.8% of the patients were identified as having “presarcopenia,” “sarcopenia,” and “severe sarcopenia,” respectively. Postoperative complications, duration of hospital stays, and costs increased with advancing sarcopenia stages. Severe sarcopenia, visceral fat area to total abdominal muscle area ratio, American Society of Anesthesiologists grade III, and tumor located at the cardia were independent risk factors for total complications. Visceral fat area to total abdominal muscle area ratio and tumor located at the cardia were independent risk factors for operative complications. Presarcopenia, sarcopenia, and severe sarcopenia were all identified as independent risk factors for medical complications, as well as age ≥75 years and Charlson Comorbidity Index. Conclusion. Patients had worse postoperative outcomes after gastric cancer operation with advancing sarcopenia stages. Severe sarcopenia, but not presarcopenia or sarcopenia, was an independent risk factor for total postoperative complications. The 3 sarcopenia stages independently influence medical but not surgical complications. Recognizing sarcopenia stages is important for preoperative risk stratification.

Impact of visceral fat on surgical complications and long-term survival of patients with gastric cancer after radical gastrectomy

Background/objectivesThe aim of this study was to examine the impact of visceral fat on surgical complications and long-term survival for patients undergoing radical gastrectomy.Subjects/methodsFrom 2009 to 2013, 859 patients who underwent curative resection for gastric cancer were enrolled from a prospectively maintained database. Visceral fat area (VFA) was assessed by preoperative CT scans. Patients were divided into two groups by VFA. Perioperative variables and postoperative outcomes were compared between the high VFA group and low VFA group. Univariable and multivariable analysis were performed to investigate independent risk factors of postoperative complications and survival.ResultsSome 859 patients were included in the study, 308 of whom were classified as high VFA. High VFA was correlated with advance age (P = 0.020), higher albumin levels (P = 0.001), hemoglobin levels (P < 0.05), ASA grade (P = 0.043) and Charlson Comorbidity Index (P = 0.004). Relative to patients with low VFA, those with high VFA had longer surgical durations (P = 0.004), higher rate of postoperative complications (P = 0.004), and longer hospital stays (P = 0.004). High VFA was identified as the only determinant for surgical complications by logistic regression analysis (OR, 2.236, 95% CI, 1.537–3.254; P < 0.001). Cox proportional hazards regression revealed no correlation between VFA and overall survival (OS) or disease-free survival (DFS).ConclusionsIncreased VFA independently predicts surgical complications in patients after gastrectomy. However, VFA is not a prognostic biomarker of OS or DFS in patients with gastric cancer.

Impact of sarcopenia on clinical outcomes after radical gastrectomy for patients without nutritional risk

OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to investigate the prevalence of sarcopenia in patients without nutritional risk and the association between sarcopenia and postoperative outcomes after radical gastrectomy in these patients. METHOD We conducted a study of non-nutritional risk patients with gastric cancer who underwent gastrectomy from August 2014 to December 2017 in two centers. Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 (NRS 2002) was used to evaluate the nutritional risk. Patients who with NRS 2002 score <3 were classified as having no nutritional risk and were included in the study. Demographic and perioperative data were gathered. Sarcopenia was diagnosed based on the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People criteria. Univariate and multivariate analysis were performed to determine the association between preoperative risk factors and postoperative complications. RESULTS In all, 545 patients were included, in which the prevalence of sarcopenia and postoperative complications was 7.3% and 21.1%, respectively. Sarcopenia was significantly associated with higher age, lower body mass index, lower handgrip strength, lower usual walking speed, longer postoperative hospital length of stay, and higher costs. Multivariate analysis of prognostic factors revealed that sarcopenia was an independent predictor (odds ratio, 2.330; 95% confidence interval, 1.132-4.796; P = 0.022] for postoperative complications. Male sex, diabetes, and preoperative anemia also were risk factors for postoperative complications. CONCLUSION Sarcopenia was a significant independent risk factor for postoperative complications after gastrectomy in patients without nutritional risk. Preoperative assessment and management of sarcopenia should be helpful for improving clinical outcomes for patients without nutritional risk.

Effect of nutritional risk on short-term outcomes after laparoscopic-assisted gastrectomy: a prospective study from two centers

Background/aim The aim of this prospective double-center study was to explore the effect of nutritional risk on short-term outcomes in the patients who had gastric cancer and underwent a laparoscopic-assisted gastrectomy. Patients and methods We conducted a study of patients who underwent laparoscopic-assisted gastrectomy in two large centers between June 2014 and April 2017. Patients’ demographic and clinical characteristics and postoperative short-term outcomes were prospectively analyzed. Patients were divided into two groups depend on the preoperative presence of nutritional risk. Clinical variables were compared. Univariate analyses and multivariate logistic regression analyses evaluating the risk factors for postoperative complications were performed. Results A total of 256 patients, comprising 187 males and 69 females, met the inclusion criteria and were included in this study. The mean age was 61.81 years, the average BMI was 22.44 kg/m2, and the average preoperative serum albumin was 39.42 g/l. Older age (P=0.001), higher tumor stage (P=0.047), lower BMI (P<0.001), lower preoperative serum albumin (P=0.005), and lower hemoglobin (P=0.013) were more common in the nutritional risk group. There were no significant differences in the short-term postoperative outcomes between nutritional risk and non-nutritional risk groups. Advanced age (P=0.024) and hypoalbuminemia (P=0.004) were independent risk factors for postoperative complications after laparoscopic-assisted gastrectomy. Conclusion Nutritional risk may not be a clinical predictor of short-term outcomes after laparoscopic-assisted gastrectomy. Advanced age and preoperative hypoalbuminemia were independent risk factors for grade II or more postoperative complications.

Comparison of three common nutritional screening tools with the new European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism (ESPEN) criteria for malnutrition among patients with geriatric gastrointestinal cancer: a prospective study in China

Objective The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare three common nutritional screening tools with the new European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism (ESPEN) diagnostic criteria for malnutrition among elderly patients with gastrointestinal cancer. Research methodsandprocedures Nutritional screening tools, including the Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 (NRS 2002), the Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool (MUST) and the Short Form of Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA-SF), were applied to 255 patients with gastrointestinal cancer. We compared the diagnostic values of these tools for malnutrition, using the new ESPEN diagnostic criteria for malnutrition as the ‘gold standards’. Results According to the new ESPEN diagnostic criteria for malnutrition, 20% of the patients were diagnosed as malnourished. With the use of NRS 2002, 52.2% of the patients were found to be at high risk of malnutrition; with the use of MUST, 37.6% of the patients were found to be at moderate/high risk of malnutrition; and according to MNA-SF, 47.8% of the patients were found to be at nutritional risk. MUST was best correlated with the ESPEN diagnostic criteria (К=0.530, p<0.001) compared with NRS 2002 (К=0.312, p<0.001) and MNA-SF (К=0.380, p<0.001). The receiver operating characteristic curve of MUST had the highest area under the curve (AUC) compared with NRS 2002 and MNA-SF. Conclusions Among the tools, MUST was found to perform the best in identifyingmalnourished elderly patients with gastrointestinal cancer distinguished by the new ESPEN diagnostic criteria for malnutrition. Nevertheless, further studies are needed to verify our findings. Trial registration number ChiCTR-RRC-16009831; Pre-results.