Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Cheryl Fairfield Estill is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Cheryl Fairfield Estill.


Applied and Environmental Microbiology | 2009

Recovery Efficiency and Limit of Detection of Aerosolized Bacillus anthracis Sterne from Environmental Surface Samples

Cheryl Fairfield Estill; Paul A. Baron; Jeremy K. Beard; Misty J. Hein; Lloyd D. Larsen; Laura J. Rose; Frank W. Schaefer; Judith Noble-Wang; Lisa Hodges; H. D. Alan Lindquist; Gregory J. Deye; Matthew J. Arduino

ABSTRACT After the 2001 anthrax incidents, surface sampling techniques for biological agents were found to be inadequately validated, especially at low surface loadings. We aerosolized Bacillus anthracis Sterne spores within a chamber to achieve very low surface loading (ca. 3, 30, and 200 CFU per 100 cm2). Steel and carpet coupons seeded in the chamber were sampled with swab (103 cm2) or wipe or vacuum (929 cm2) surface sampling methods and analyzed at three laboratories. Agar settle plates (60 cm2) were the reference for determining recovery efficiency (RE). The minimum estimated surface concentrations to achieve a 95% response rate based on probit regression were 190, 15, and 44 CFU/100 cm2 for sampling steel surfaces and 40, 9.2, and 28 CFU/100 cm2 for sampling carpet surfaces with swab, wipe, and vacuum methods, respectively; however, these results should be cautiously interpreted because of high observed variability. Mean REs at the highest surface loading were 5.0%, 18%, and 3.7% on steel and 12%, 23%, and 4.7% on carpet for the swab, wipe, and vacuum methods, respectively. Precision (coefficient of variation) was poor at the lower surface concentrations but improved with increasing surface concentration. The best precision was obtained with wipe samples on carpet, achieving 38% at the highest surface concentration. The wipe sampling method detected B. anthracis at lower estimated surface concentrations and had higher RE and better precision than the other methods. These results may guide investigators to more meaningfully conduct environmental sampling, quantify contamination levels, and conduct risk assessment for humans.


Ergonomics | 2000

Use of accelerometers as an ergonomic assessment method for arm acceleration a large-scale field trial

Cheryl Fairfield Estill; Leslie A. MacDonald; Thurman B. Wenzl; Martin R. Petersen

Ergonomists need easy-to-use, quantitative job evaluation methods to assess risk factors for upper extremity work-related musculoskeletal disorders in field-based epidemiology studies. One device that may provide an objective measure of exposure to arm acceleration is a wrist-worn accelerometer or activity monitor. A field trial was conducted to evaluate the performance of a single-axis accelerometer using an industrial population (n= 158) known to have diverse upper limb motion characteristics. The second phase of the field trial involved an examination of the relationship between more traditional observation-based ergonomic exposure measures and the monitor output among a group of assembly-line production employees (n= 48) performing work tasks with highly stereotypic upper limb motion patterns. As expected, the linear acceleration data obtained from the activity monitor showed statistically significant differences between three occupational groups known observationally to have different upper limb motion requirements. Among the assembly-line production employees who performed different short-cycle assembly work tasks, statistically significant differences were also observed. Several observation-based ergonomic exposure measures were found to explain differences in the acceleration measure among the production employees who performed different jobs: hand and arm motion speed, use of the hand as a hammer, and, negatively, resisting forearm rotation from the torque of a power tool. The activity monitors were found to be easy to use and non-intrusive, and to be able to distinguish arm acceleration among groups with diverse upper limb motion characteristics as well as between different assembly job tasks where arm monitors were performed repeatedly at a fixed rate.


Annals of Occupational Hygiene | 2009

Agreement between Task-Based Estimates of the Full-Shift Noise Exposure and the Full-Shift Noise Dosimetry

M. Abbas Virji; Susan R. Woskie; Martha A. Waters; Scott E. Brueck; Daniel Stancescu; Rebecca Gore; Cheryl Fairfield Estill; Mary M. Prince

Noise assessments have been conducted using full-shift dosimetry and short-term task-based measurements. Advantages of the task-based method include the opportunity to directly identify high-noise exposure tasks and to target control measures, as well as obtain estimates of task-based full-shift exposures; however, there is little empirical evidence comparing the two methods. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health assessed noise exposures at three industrial facilities using dosimetry and task-based methods with the objective of comparing the two strategies and assessing the degree of agreement and causes of disagreement. Eight indices of task-based full-shift exposures were created from task-based sampling using three methods to assess time-at-task (direct observation by industrial hygienist, end-of-shift worker estimates and supervisor estimates) and three methods to assign noise levels to tasks [direct measurement, arithmetic mean (AM) and geometric mean (GM)]. We assessed aspects of agreement (precision, bias and absolute agreement) using Bland-Altman plots and concordance correlation coefficient (CCC). Overall, the task-based methods worked fairly well, with mean biases less than +/-2.8 dBA and precision ranges of 3.3-4.4 dBA. By all measures, task-based full-shift estimates based on supervisor assessment of time-at-task agreed most poorly with the dosimetry data. The task-based full-shift estimates based on worker estimates of time-at-task generally agreed as well as those based on direct observation. For task noise level, task-based full-shift estimates based on directly measured task agreed the best with dosimetry data, while agreement for task-based indices based on task AM or GM was variable. Overall, the task-based full-shift estimates based on direct observation task and direct measured task noise level achieved the best agreement with the dosimetry data (CCC 0.84) with 95% of their differences being within 7.4 dBA and 56% of the differences <3 dBA. For this index, a high degree of accuracy was observed (accuracy coefficient = 0.96) with major cause of disagreement arising from a lack of precision (precision coefficient = 0.88). When the measurements were classified by job characteristics, significant improvements in the degree of agreement were observed in the low job mobility, low job complexity and low job variability categories. Our data suggest that a high degree of absolute agreement can be achieved between the task-based and dosimetry-based estimates of full-shift exposures. The task-based approach that uses worker reports combined with task AM or GM levels is similar to the more time-intensive direct observation method to estimate full-shift exposures.


Letters in Applied Microbiology | 2007

Bacterial endospore inactivation caused by outgassing of vapourous hydrogen peroxide from polymethyl methacrylate (Plexiglas

Paul A. Baron; Cheryl Fairfield Estill; J.K. Beard; Misty J. Hein; L. Larsen

Aims:  To investigate the cause and to eliminate the inactivation of Bacillus anthracis strain Sterne spores settled onto agar and stainless steel surfaces in plastic holders.


American Journal of Industrial Medicine | 2008

Proportionate mortality study of the united association of Journeymen and Apprentices of the plumbing and pipe fitting industry

Everett J. Lehman; Misty J. Hein; Cheryl Fairfield Estill

BACKGROUND This study examined causes of deaths among unionized plumbers, pipefitters and allied trades. METHODS Deaths of union members from the years 1971, 1979, 1987, and 1995 were selected as a representative sample from a computer file provided by the union. These years provided 15,411 deaths for proportionate mortality ratio (PMR) analysis. RESULTS PMRs for lung cancer and asbestosis were significantly elevated compared to U.S. white males. PMRs for chronic disease of the endocardium and cardiomyopathy were also elevated. Elevations were not observed in other a priori causes: laryngeal cancer, lymphatic cancer, and neurological disorders. PMRs for transportation accidents for pipe/steam-fitters were elevated in 1971 and 1979, but not in 1987 or 1995. CONCLUSION Despite the limitations of a PMR analysis, study results indicate mortality related to asbestos exposure is, and will continue to be, an area of concern for members of the union.


Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene | 2011

Comparison of Air Sampling Methods for Aerosolized Spores of B. anthracis Sterne

Cheryl Fairfield Estill; Paul A. Baron; Jeremy K. Beard; Misty J. Hein; Lloyd D. Larsen; Gregory J. Deye; Laura J. Rose; Lisa Hodges

Bacillus anthracis Sterne spores were aerosolized within a chamber at concentrations ranging from 1×103 to 1.7×104 spores per cubic meter of air (particles (p)/m3) to compare three different sampling methods: Andersen samplers, gelatin filters, and polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) membrane filters. Three samples of each type were collected during each of 19 chamber runs. Chamber concentration was determined by an aerodynamic particle sizer (APS) for the size range of 1.114–1.596 μm. Runs were categorized (low, medium, and high) based on tertiles of the APS estimated air concentrations. Measured air concentrations and recovery efficiency [ratio of the measured (colony forming units (CFU)/m3) to the APS estimated (particles/m3) air concentrations] for the sampling methods were compared using mixed-effects regression models. Limits of detection for each method were estimated based on estimated recovery efficiencies. Mean APS estimated air concentrations were 1600 particles/m3, 4100 particles/m3, and 9100 particles/m3 at the low, medium, and high tertiles, respectively; coefficient of variation (CV) ranged from 25 to 40%. Statistically significant differences were not observed among the three sampling methods. At the high and medium tertiles, estimated correlations of measured air concentration (CFU/m3) among samples collected from the same run of the same type were high (0.73 to 0.93). Among samples collected from the same run but of different types, correlations were moderate to high (0.45 to 0.85); however, correlations were somewhat lower at the low tertile (–0.31 to 0.75). Estimated mean recovery efficiencies ranged from 0.22 to 0.25 CFU/particle with total CVs of approximately 84 to 97%. Estimated detection limits ranged from 35 to 39 particles/m3. These results will enable investigators to conduct environmental sampling, quantify contamination levels, and conduct risk assessments of B. anthracis.


Journal of Safety Research | 2017

Noise and neurotoxic chemical exposure relationship to workplace traumatic injuries: A review☆

Cheryl Fairfield Estill; Carol Rice; Thais C. Morata; Amit Bhattacharya

INTRODUCTION More than 5,000 fatalities and eight million injuries occurred in the workplace in 2007 at a cost of


Annals of Occupational Hygiene | 2013

Noise Exposure Reconstruction and Evaluation of Exposure Trends in Two Large Automotive Plants

Scott E. Brueck; Mary Prince Panaccio; Daniel Stancescu; Susan R. Woskie; Cheryl Fairfield Estill; Martha A. Waters

6 billion and


Applied Occupational and Environmental Hygiene | 2002

Ergonomic Intervention: A Case Study in a Mass Production Environment

Cheryl Fairfield Estill; Leslie A. MacDonald

186 billion, respectively. Neurotoxic chemicals are known to affect central nervous system functions among workers, which include balance and hearing disorders. However, it is not known if there is an association between exposure to noise and solvents and acute injuries. METHOD A thorough review was conducted of the literature on the relationship between noise or solvent exposures and hearing loss with various health outcomes. RESULTS The search resulted in 41 studies. Health outcomes included: hearing loss, workplace injuries, absence from work due to sickness, fatalities, hospital admissions due to workplace accidents, traffic accidents, hypertension, balance, slip, trips, or falls, cognitive measures, or disability retirement. Important covariates in these studies were age of employee, type of industry or occupation, or length of employment. DISCUSSION Most authors that evaluated noise exposure concluded that higher exposure to noise resulted in more of the chosen health effect but the relationship is not well understood. Studies that evaluated hearing loss found that hearing loss was related to occupational injury, disability retirement, or traffic accidents. Studies that assessed both noise exposure and hearing loss as risk factors for occupational injuries reported that hearing loss was related to occupational injuries as much or more than noise exposure. Evidence suggests that solvent exposure is likely to be related to accidents or other health consequences such balance disorders. CONCLUSIONS Many authors reported that noise exposures and hearing loss, respectively, are likely to be related to occupational accidents. Practical applications: The potential significance of the study is that findings could be used by managers to reduce injuries and the costs associated with those injures.


Applied Occupational and Environmental Hygiene | 2002

The Impact of Maintenance and Design for Ventilation Systems

Cheryl Fairfield Estill; Daniel S. Watkins; Ronald M. Hall; Dennis M. O'brien; Stanley A. Shulman

This study used a task-based approach to reconstruct employee noise exposures at two large automotive manufacturing plants for the period 1970-1989, utilizing historic noise measurement data, work history records, documented changes in plant operations, focus group discussions, structured interviews with long-tenure employees, and task-based job profiles. Task-based job noise exposure profiles were developed in the 1990s when the plants conducted task-based noise monitoring. Under the assumption that tasks and time-at-task profile within jobs did not change over time, these profiles were applied to historic jobs. By linking historic noise exposure measurements to job tasks, this approach allowed task-based reconstructed noise exposure profiles to capture variability of daily noise exposures. Reconstructed noise exposures, along with task-based noise exposure measurements collected at each plant during the 1990s, were analyzed to examine time trends in workplace noise levels and worker noise exposure. Our analysis of noise exposure trends revealed that noise levels for many jobs declined by ≥3 dBA from 1970 to 1998 as operational and equipment changes occurred in the plants and some noise control measures were implemented, but for some jobs, noise levels increased in the mid- to late 1990s, most likely because of an increase in production at that time. Overall, the percentage of workers exposed to noise levels >90 dBA decreased from 95% in 1970 to 54% in 1998 at one of the plants and decreased from 36% in 1970 to ~5% in 1999 at the other plant. These reductions indicate a degree of success for the hearing conservation program. However, the actual number of employees with noise exposure >90 dBA increased because of a substantial increase in the number of production employees, particularly in jobs with high noise levels, which shows a hearing conservation program challenge that companies face during periods of increased production. Future analysis of hearing levels in these plant populations will help determine whether noise level reduction translates into decreased hearing loss at these plants.

Collaboration


Dive into the Cheryl Fairfield Estill's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Misty J. Hein

National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Leslie A. MacDonald

National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Paul A. Baron

National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Daniel S. Watkins

National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Daniel Stancescu

National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Gregory J. Deye

National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Laura J. Rose

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Lisa Hodges

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Martha A. Waters

National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Scott E. Brueck

National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge