Cheryl H. Dean

Protective Immunization against Inhalational Anthrax: A Comparison of Minimally Invasive Delivery Platforms

A new anthrax vaccine under clinical investigation is based on recombinant Bacillus anthracis protective antigen (rPA). Here, we investigated microneedle-based cutaneous and nasal mucosal delivery of rPA in mice and rabbits. In mice, intradermal (id) delivery achieved up to 90% seroconversion after a single dose, compared with 20% after intramuscular (im) injection. Intranasal (inl) delivery of a liquid formulation required 3 doses to achieve responses that were comparable with those achieved via the id or im routes. In rabbits, id delivery provided complete protection against aerosol challenge with anthrax spores; in addition, novel powder formulations administered inl provided complete protection, whereas a liquid formulation provided only partial protection. These results demonstrate, for the first time, that cutaneous or nasal mucosal administration of rPA provides complete protection against inhalational anthrax in rabbits. The novel vaccine/device combinations described here have the potential to improve the efficacy of rPA and other biodefense vaccines.

Microneedle-Based Intradermal Delivery of the Anthrax Recombinant Protective Antigen Vaccine

ABSTRACT The recombinant protective antigen (rPA) of Bacillus anthracis is a promising anthrax vaccine. We compared serum immunoglobulin G levels and toxin-neutralizing antibody titers in rabbits following delivery of various doses of vaccine by microneedle-based intradermal (i.d.) delivery or intramuscular (i.m.) injection using conventional needles. Intradermal delivery required less antigen to induce levels of antibody similar to those produced via i.m. injection during the first 2 weeks following primary and booster inoculation. This dose-sparing effect was less evident at the later stages of the immune response. Rabbits immunized i.d. with 10 μg of rPA displayed 100% protection from aerosol spore challenge, while i.m. injection of the same dose provided slightly lower protection (71%). Groups immunized with lower antigen doses were partially protected (13 to 29%) regardless of the mode of administration. Overall, our results suggest rPA formulated with aluminum adjuvant and administered to the skin by a microneedle-based device is as efficacious as i.m. vaccination.

Cutaneous Delivery of a Live, Attenuated Chimeric Flavivirus Vaccines against Japanese Encephalitis (ChimeriVaxTM-JE) in Non-Human Primates

Flaviviral diseases such as yellow fever, Japanese encephalitis (JE) and dengue hemorrhagic fever cause enormous morbidity and mortality worldwide. There is an urgent need for alternative technologies for mass vaccination against these and other diseases, particularly in the developing world. Here, we administered a live attenuated, chimeric JE vaccine (ChimeriVaxTM-JE) to non-human primates by skin microabrasion and intradermal delivery using microneedles. Both cutaneous delivery methods induced mild viremia similar in magnitude to that observed following subcutaneous (SC) injection. The duration of viremia induced by cutaneous delivery (5-7 days), however, was substantially longer than via SC (0-3 days). In addition, mean neutralizing antibody titers in cutaneous delivery groups were up to 7-fold greater than via SC injection. There were no safety issues identified and both cutaneous delivery methods appeared to be well tolerated. Thus, cutaneous delivery may represent a minimally-invasive alternative approach for flavivirus vaccines that more closely resembles the natural route of viral infection.