Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Cheryl K. Stenmark is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Cheryl K. Stenmark.


Ethics & Behavior | 2010

Strategies in Forecasting Outcomes in Ethical Decision-making: Identifying and Analyzing the Causes of the Problem.

Cheryl K. Stenmark; Alison L. Antes; Xiaoqian Wang; Jared J. Caughron; Chase E. Thiel; Michael D. Mumford

This study examined the role of key causal analysis strategies in forecasting and ethical decision-making. Undergraduate participants took on the role of the key actor in several ethical problems and were asked to identify and analyze the causes, forecast potential outcomes, and make a decision about each problem. Time pressure and analytic mindset were manipulated while participants worked through these problems. The results indicated that forecast quality was associated with decision ethicality, and the identification of the critical causes of the problem was associated with both higher quality forecasts and higher ethicality of decisions. Neither time pressure nor analytic mindset impacted forecasts or ethicality of decisions. Theoretical and practical implications of these findings are discussed.


Ethics & Behavior | 2011

Sensemaking Strategies for Ethical Decision-making.

Jay J. Caughron; Alison L. Antes; Cheryl K. Stenmark; Chase E. Thiel; Xiaoqian Wang; Michael D. Mumford

The current study uses a sensemaking model and thinking strategies identified in earlier research to examine ethical decision making. Using a sample of 163 undergraduates, a low-fidelity simulation approach is used to study the effects personal involvement (in causing the problem and personal involvement in experiencing the outcomes of the problem) could have on the use of cognitive reasoning strategies that have been shown to promote ethical decision making. A mediated model is presented which suggests that environmental factors influence reasoning strategies, reasoning strategies influence sensemaking, and sensemaking in turn influences ethical decision making. Findings were mixed but generally supported the hypothesized model. It is interesting to note that framing the outcomes of ethically charged situations in terms of more global organizational outcomes rather than personal outcomes was found to promote the use of pro-ethical cognitive reasoning strategies.


Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics | 2011

Consequences identification in forecasting and ethical decision-making.

Cheryl K. Stenmark; Alison L. Antes; Chase E. Thiel; Jared J. Caughron; Xiaoqian Wang; Michael D. Mumford

Forecasting involves predicting outcomes based on observations of the situation at hand. We examined the impact of the number and types of consequences considered on the quality of ethical decision-making. Undergraduates role-played several ethical problems in which they forecast potential outcomes and made decisions. Performance pressure (difficult demands placed on the situation) and interpersonal conflict (clashes among people in the problem situation) were manipulated within each problem scenario. The results indicated that the identification of potential consequences was positively associated with both higher quality forecasts and more ethical decisions. Neither performance pressure nor interpersonal conflict affected the quality of forecasts or decisions. Theoretical and practical implications of these findings and the use of this research approach are discussed.


Ethics & Behavior | 2011

The Influence of Temporal Orientation and Affective Frame on use of Ethical Decision-Making Strategies.

Laura E. Martin; Cheryl K. Stenmark; Chase E. Thiel; Alison L. Antes; Michael D. Mumford; Shane Connelly; Lynn D. Devenport

This study examined the role of temporal orientation and affective frame in the execution of ethical decision-making strategies. In reflecting on a past experience or imagining a future experience, participants thought about experiences that they considered either positive or negative. The participants recorded their thinking about that experience by responding to several questions, and their responses were content-analyzed for the use of ethical decision-making strategies. The findings indicated that a future temporal orientation was associated with greater strategy use. Likewise, a positive affective frame was associated with greater strategy use. Future orientation may permit better strategy execution than a past orientation because it facilitates more objective, balanced contemplation of the reflected-upon situation and minimizes potential self-threat associated with past behavior. A positive affective frame likely improves strategy execution because it facilitates active analysis of the experience. Future directions and implications of these findings are discussed.


Ethics & Behavior | 2012

Applying Cases to Solve Ethical Problems: The Significance of Positive and Process-Oriented Reflection

Alison L. Antes; Chase E. Thiel; Laura E. Martin; Cheryl K. Stenmark; Shane Connelly; Lynn D. Devenport; Michael D. Mumford

This study examined the role of reflection on personal cases for making ethical decisions with regard to new ethical problems. Participants assumed the position of a business manager in a hypothetical organization and solved ethical problems that might be encountered. Prior to making a decision for the business problems, participants reflected on a relevant ethical experience. The findings revealed that application of material garnered from reflection on a personal experience was associated with decisions of higher ethicality. However, whether the case was viewed as positive or negative, and whether the outcomes, processes, or outcomes and processes embedded in the experience were examined, influenced the application of case material to the new problem. As expected, examining positive experiences and the processes involved in those positive experiences resulted in greater application of case material to new problems. Future directions and implications for understanding ethical decision making are discussed.


Ethics & Behavior | 2013

Forecasting and Ethical Decision Making: What Matters?

Cheryl K. Stenmark

This study examined how the number and types of consequences considered are related to forecasting and ethical decision making. Undergraduate participants took on the role of the key actor in several ethical problems and were asked to forecast potential outcomes and make a decision about each problem. Performance pressure was manipulated by ostensibly making rewards contingent on good problem-solving performance. The results indicated that forecast quality was associated with decision ethicality, and the identification of the critical consequences of the problem and consequences for others were associated with both higher quality forecasts and more ethical decisions. In addition, the identification of a larger number of consequences was negatively associated with ethical decision making. Performance pressure did not impact forecast quality or ethicality of decisions. Theoretical and practical implications of these findings are discussed.


Journal of Moral Education | 2014

ACED IT: A tool for improved ethical and moral decision-making

Crystal M. Kreitler; Cheryl K. Stenmark; Allen M. Rodarte; Rebecca Piñón DuMond

Numerous examples of unethical organizational decision-making highlighted in the media have led many to question the general moral perception and ethical judgments of individuals. The present study examined two forms of a straightforward ethical decision-making (EDM) tool (ACED IT cognitive map) that could be a relatively simple instrument for organizations to improve the moral and EDM of its members. Results revealed that participants utilizing either form of ACED IT were more likely to identify a moral dilemma than were control participants. Additionally, participants in the modified condition responded differently to the situation. Implications and other findings are discussed.


Journal of Psychology Research | 2017

No Longer Silenced: What Learning Resources Do Child Abuse Survivors Want?

Nicolette Winn; Cheryl K. Stenmark

Much attention has been paid to the adverse effects of maltreatment during childhood. Many researchers have examined the effects of child abuse, but much less attention has been paid to determining what resources may be useful in aiding child abuse survivors in achieving successful lives as adults. Thus, the present study extends previous research by exploring what learning resources are reported as being most desired by child abuse survivors and non-abused individuals. Child abuse survivors reported the greatest desire in utilizing learning resources related to interpersonal skills, finding a job, and keeping a job. Non-abused individuals reported the greatest desire in utilizing learning resources related to finding a job, work ethic, and interpersonal skills. Data from this study will be used in the creation and implementation of programs aimed at helping child abuse survivors succeed in independent adult living via the philanthropic movement, No Longer Silenced Movement (NLSM).


Ethics & Behavior | 2017

A Cognitive Tool for Ethical Decision Making: A Case for ACED IT

Cheryl K. Stenmark; Crystal M. Kreitler

The present study examined two forms of a cognitive tool (ACED IT map), which is designed to facilitate ethical decision making, along with expressive writing. Results demonstrated that participants completing the original ACED IT were more likely to identify (a) more steps to implementing a solution, (b) more barriers to solution implementation, and (c) more solutions to those barriers than participants who completed the modified ACED IT, those who engaged in expressive writing, and those in the control group. These findings suggest that cognitive tools such as ACED IT may be of considerable value for individuals who are presented with ethical dilemmas.


Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts | 2011

Managing the innovative process: The dynamic role of leaders.

Cheryl K. Stenmark; Amanda S. Shipman; Michael D. Mumford

Collaboration


Dive into the Cheryl K. Stenmark's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Laura E. Martin

College of Business Administration

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge