Cheryl Lassen

Once-daily indacaterol versus twice-daily salmeterol for COPD: a placebo-controlled comparison

Indacaterol is a novel, inhaled, once-daily, ultra-long-acting &bgr;2-agonist bronchodilator recently approved in Europe for the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The aim of the present study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of indacaterol compared with placebo and the twice-daily &bgr;2-agonist, salmeterol, as an active control. Patients with moderate-to-severe COPD were randomised to 6 months double-blind treatment with indacaterol (150 &mgr;g once daily), salmeterol (50 &mgr;g twice daily) or placebo. The primary efficacy end-point was trough (24 h post-dose) forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) after 12 weeks. 1,002 patients were randomised and 838 (84%) completed the study. Indacaterol increased trough FEV1 at week 12 by 170 mL over placebo (p<0.001) and by 60 mL over salmeterol (p<0.001). Both active treatments improved health status (St Georges Respiratory Questionnaire) and dyspnoea (transition dyspnoea index) compared with placebo, with differences between them favouring indacaterol. Safety profiles were similar across the treatment groups, and both indacaterol and salmeterol were well tolerated. Once-daily treatment with 150 &mgr;g indacaterol had a significant and clinically relevant bronchodilator effect over 24 h post-dose and improved health status and dyspnoea to a greater extent than twice-daily 50 &mgr;g salmeterol. Indacaterol should prove a useful additional treatment for patients with COPD.

Concurrent use of indacaterol plus tiotropium in patients with COPD provides superior bronchodilation compared with tiotropium alone: a randomised, double-blind comparison

Background Current guidelines recommend treatment with one or more long-acting bronchodilators for patients with moderate or more severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The authors investigated the approach of dual bronchodilation using indacaterol, a once-daily long-acting β2 agonist, and the long-acting muscarinic antagonist tiotropium, compared with tiotropium alone. Methods In two identically designed, double-blind, 12-week studies, patients with moderate to severe COPD were randomised to indacaterol 150 μg once daily or matching placebo. All patients concurrently received open-label tiotropium 18 μg once daily. The primary outcome was standardised area under the curve of forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) from 5 min to 8 h post dose at week 12. The key secondary outcome was 24 h post-dose (‘trough’) FEV1 at week 12. Resting inspiratory capacity (IC) was measured in a subgroup. Results 1134 and 1142 patients were randomised in studies 1 and 2; 94% and 94% completed. Compared with monotherapy, concurrent therapy increased FEV1 (area under the curve by 130 and 120 ml, trough by 80 and 70 ml; all p<0.001) and trough IC (by 130 and 100 ml, p<0.01). Cough was more common with indacaterol plus tiotropium (10% and 9%) than with tiotropium alone (4% and 4%). Most cases (∼90%) of cough were mild. Other adverse events were similar for the treatment groups. Conclusions Compared with tiotropium monotherapy, indacaterol plus tiotropium provided greater bronchodilation and lung deflation (reflected by increased resting IC). Adverse events were similar between treatments apart from mild cough being more common with indacaterol plus tiotropium. These results support COPD guideline recommendations to combine bronchodilators with different mechanisms of action. Trial registration numbers NCT00846586 and NCT00877383.

Blinded 12-week comparison of once-daily indacaterol and tiotropium in COPD

Two, once daily (q.d.) inhaled bronchodilators are available for the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD): the &bgr;2-agonist indacaterol and the anticholinergic tiotropium. This blinded study compared the efficacy of these two agents and assessed their safety and tolerability. Patients with moderate-to-severe COPD were randomised to treatment with indacaterol 150 μg q.d. (n=797) or tiotropium 18 μg q.d. (n=801) for 12 weeks. After 12 weeks, the two treatments had similar overall effects on “trough” (24 h post-dose) forced expiratory volume in 1 s. Indacaterol-treated patients had greater improvements in transition dyspnoea index (TDI) total score (least squares means 2.01 versus 1.43; p<0.001) and St George’s Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) total score (least squares means 37.1 versus 39.2; p<0.001; raw mean change from baseline -5.1 versus -3.0), and were significantly more likely to achieve clinically relevant improvements in these end-points (indacaterol versus tiotropium odds ratios of 1.49 for TDI and 1.43 for SGRQ, both p<0.001). Adverse events were recorded for 39.7% and 37.2% of patients in the indacaterol and tiotropium treatment groups, respectively. The most frequent adverse events were COPD worsening, cough and nasopharyngitis. Both bronchodilators demonstrated spirometric efficacy. The two treatments were well tolerated with similar adverse event profiles. Compared with tiotropium, indacaterol provided significantly greater improvements in clinical outcomes.

Long-term Safety and Efficacy of Indacaterol, a Long-Acting β2-Agonist, in Subjects With COPD: A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Study

BACKGROUND Indacaterol is an inhaled, long-acting β(2)-agonist providing 24-h bronchodilation with once-daily dosing in patients with COPD. METHODS Subjects with moderate to severe COPD who completed a 26-week, randomized, double-blind study were eligible for enrollment in an extension, during which treatment with double-blind indacaterol, 150 or 300 μg once daily, or placebo was continued for a further 26 weeks. The primary objective was to evaluate the long-term safety of indacaterol. Efficacy end points included trough (24 h postdose) FEV(1) at 52 weeks, exacerbations, and health status (St. George Respiratory Questionnaire [SGRQ]). RESULTS Four hundred fifteen subjects participated in the extension. Adverse events, mostly mild or moderate, occurred in 76%, 77%, and 68% of subjects receiving indacaterol, 150 μg; indacaterol, 300 μg; and placebo, respectively. Serious adverse events occurred in 10.4%, 12.3%, and 10.5%, respectively. Indacaterol had no clinically significant effects on ECG findings (corrected QT interval) or on serum potassium or plasma glucose levels. Indacaterol increased trough FEV(1) relative to placebo throughout the study (difference of ≥ 170 mL at week 52). No tolerance to its bronchodilator effect was detected. Indacaterol treatment was accompanied by significant reductions in COPD exacerbations (rate ratios compared with placebo, 0.62-0.64; P < .05) and as-needed albuterol use (1.2-1.4 puffs/d decrease, P < .001 compared with placebo). Health status improved with indacaterol treatment, with decreases from baseline in mean total SGRQ score generally > 4 units. CONCLUSIONS During 1 year of treatment, indacaterol was well tolerated and provided significant and well-maintained bronchodilation that was accompanied by improved clinical outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRY ClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT00677807; URL: www.clinicaltrials.gov.Background Indacaterol is an inhaled, long-acting β 2 -agonist providing 24-h bronchodilation with once-daily dosing in patients with COPD. Methods Subjects with moderate to severe COPD who completed a 26-week, randomized, double-blind study were eligible for enrollment in an extension, during which treatment with double-blind indacaterol, 150 or 300 μg once daily, or placebo was continued for a further 26 weeks. The primary objective was to evaluate the long-term safety of indacaterol. Efficacy end points included trough (24 h postdose) FEV 1 at 52 weeks, exacerbations, and health status (St. George Respiratory Questionnaire [SGRQ]). Results Four hundred fifteen subjects participated in the extension. Adverse events, mostly mild or moderate, occurred in 76%, 77%, and 68% of subjects receiving indacaterol, 150 μg; indacaterol, 300 μg; and placebo, respectively. Serious adverse events occurred in 10.4%, 12.3%, and 10.5%, respectively. Indacaterol had no clinically significant effects on ECG findings (corrected QT interval) or on serum potassium or plasma glucose levels. Indacaterol increased trough FEV 1 relative to placebo throughout the study (difference of ≥ 170 mL at week 52). No tolerance to its bronchodilator effect was detected. Indacaterol treatment was accompanied by significant reductions in COPD exacerbations (rate ratios compared with placebo, 0.62-0.64; P P 4 units. Conclusions During 1 year of treatment, indacaterol was well tolerated and provided significant and well-maintained bronchodilation that was accompanied by improved clinical outcomes. Trial registry ClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT00677807; URL: www.clinicaltrials.gov

Indacaterol once-daily provides superior efficacy to salmeterol twice-daily in COPD: a 12-week study.

BACKGROUND Indacaterol is a novel, inhaled once-daily ultra-long-acting β(2)-agonist for the treatment of COPD. METHODS This 12-week randomised, parallel-group study compared the efficacy of indacaterol 150 μg once-daily to salmeterol 50 μg twice-daily in patients with moderate-to-severe COPD. Assessments included FEV(1) standardised area under curve (AUC) from 5 min to 11 h 45 min at Week 12 (primary endpoint), 24-h trough FEV(1) (mean of 23 h 10 min and 23 h 45 min post-dose) at Week 12 (key secondary endpoint), FEV(1) and FVC measured over 24-h, transition dyspnoea index (TDI) and rescue medication use. RESULTS Of 1123 patients randomised 92.1% completed. Mean ± SD age was 62.8±8.78 years, post-bronchodilator FEV(1) 51.8±12.32% predicted, FEV(1)/FVC 50.6±9.54%. At Week 12, FEV(1) AUC(5 min-11 h 45 min) for indacaterol was statistically superior (p<0.001) to salmeterol (adjusted mean difference [95% CI] 57 [35, 79] mL), as was 24-h trough FEV(1) (60 [37, 83] mL, p<0.001). Indacaterol also showed statistical superiority over salmeterol in terms of FEV(1) and FVC measured over 24-h at Week 12. For TDI at Week 12, the mean total score was statistically superior for indacaterol versus salmeterol (difference 0.63 [0.30, 0.97], p<0.001), as was the percentage of patients with a clinically relevant (i.e., ≥1 point) change from baseline (69.4% vs 62.7%, p<0.05). For rescue medication, patients on indacaterol used fewer puffs/day (difference -0.18 [-0.36, 0.00] puffs/day, p<0.05) and had a greater percentage of days with no rescue use (difference 4.4 [0.6, 8.2], p<0.05). CONCLUSION Once-daily indacaterol provided statistically superior bronchodilation with an improvement in breathlessness and rescue use compared with twice-daily salmeterol. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00821093.

Original ResearchCOPDLong-term Safety and Efficacy of Indacaterol, a Long-Acting β2-Agonist, in Subjects With COPD: A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Study

BACKGROUND Indacaterol is an inhaled, long-acting β(2)-agonist providing 24-h bronchodilation with once-daily dosing in patients with COPD. METHODS Subjects with moderate to severe COPD who completed a 26-week, randomized, double-blind study were eligible for enrollment in an extension, during which treatment with double-blind indacaterol, 150 or 300 μg once daily, or placebo was continued for a further 26 weeks. The primary objective was to evaluate the long-term safety of indacaterol. Efficacy end points included trough (24 h postdose) FEV(1) at 52 weeks, exacerbations, and health status (St. George Respiratory Questionnaire [SGRQ]). RESULTS Four hundred fifteen subjects participated in the extension. Adverse events, mostly mild or moderate, occurred in 76%, 77%, and 68% of subjects receiving indacaterol, 150 μg; indacaterol, 300 μg; and placebo, respectively. Serious adverse events occurred in 10.4%, 12.3%, and 10.5%, respectively. Indacaterol had no clinically significant effects on ECG findings (corrected QT interval) or on serum potassium or plasma glucose levels. Indacaterol increased trough FEV(1) relative to placebo throughout the study (difference of ≥ 170 mL at week 52). No tolerance to its bronchodilator effect was detected. Indacaterol treatment was accompanied by significant reductions in COPD exacerbations (rate ratios compared with placebo, 0.62-0.64; P < .05) and as-needed albuterol use (1.2-1.4 puffs/d decrease, P < .001 compared with placebo). Health status improved with indacaterol treatment, with decreases from baseline in mean total SGRQ score generally > 4 units. CONCLUSIONS During 1 year of treatment, indacaterol was well tolerated and provided significant and well-maintained bronchodilation that was accompanied by improved clinical outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRY ClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT00677807; URL: www.clinicaltrials.gov.Background Indacaterol is an inhaled, long-acting β 2 -agonist providing 24-h bronchodilation with once-daily dosing in patients with COPD. Methods Subjects with moderate to severe COPD who completed a 26-week, randomized, double-blind study were eligible for enrollment in an extension, during which treatment with double-blind indacaterol, 150 or 300 μg once daily, or placebo was continued for a further 26 weeks. The primary objective was to evaluate the long-term safety of indacaterol. Efficacy end points included trough (24 h postdose) FEV 1 at 52 weeks, exacerbations, and health status (St. George Respiratory Questionnaire [SGRQ]). Results Four hundred fifteen subjects participated in the extension. Adverse events, mostly mild or moderate, occurred in 76%, 77%, and 68% of subjects receiving indacaterol, 150 μg; indacaterol, 300 μg; and placebo, respectively. Serious adverse events occurred in 10.4%, 12.3%, and 10.5%, respectively. Indacaterol had no clinically significant effects on ECG findings (corrected QT interval) or on serum potassium or plasma glucose levels. Indacaterol increased trough FEV 1 relative to placebo throughout the study (difference of ≥ 170 mL at week 52). No tolerance to its bronchodilator effect was detected. Indacaterol treatment was accompanied by significant reductions in COPD exacerbations (rate ratios compared with placebo, 0.62-0.64; P P 4 units. Conclusions During 1 year of treatment, indacaterol was well tolerated and provided significant and well-maintained bronchodilation that was accompanied by improved clinical outcomes. Trial registry ClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT00677807; URL: www.clinicaltrials.gov

Delivery characteristics and patients’ handling of two single-dose dry-powder inhalers used in COPD

For optimal efficacy, an inhaler should deliver doses consistently and be easy for patients to use with minimal instruction. The delivery characteristics, patients’ correct use, and preference of two single-dose dry powder inhalers (Breezhaler and HandiHaler) were evaluated in two complementary studies. The first study examined aerodynamic particle size distribution, using inhalation profiles of seven patients with moderate to very severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The second was an open-label, two-period, 7-day crossover study, evaluating use of the inhalers with placebo capsules by 82 patients with mild to severe COPD. Patients’ correct use of the inhalers was assessed after reading written instructions on Day 1, and after training and 7 days of daily use. Patients’ preference was assessed after completion of both study periods. Patient inhalation profiles showed average peak inspiratory flows of 72 L/minute through Breezhaler and 36 L/minute through HandiHaler. For Breezhaler and HandiHaler, fine particle fractions were 27% and 10%, respectively. In the second study, correct use of Breezhaler and HandiHaler was achieved by >77% of patients for any step after 7 days; 61% of patients showed an overall preference for Breezhaler and 31% for HandiHaler (P = 0.01). Breezhaler is a low-resistance inhaler suitable for use by patients with a range of disease severities. Most patients used both inhalers correctly after 7 days, but more patients showed an overall preference for the Breezhaler compared with the HandiHaler. These are important factors for optimum dose delivery and successful COPD management.

Safety of indacaterol in the treatment of patients with COPD

Purpose Pooled data were analyzed to evaluate the safety and tolerability of indacaterol, a once-daily inhaled long-acting β2-agonist for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Patients and methods Data were pooled from clinical studies of 3–12 months’ duration in patients with moderate-to-severe COPD receiving double-blind indacaterol 75 μg (n = 449), 150 μg (n = 2611), 300 μg (n = 1157), or 600 μg once daily (n = 547); formoterol 12 μg twice daily (n = 556); salmeterol 50 μg twice daily (n = 895); placebo (n = 2012); or tiotropium 18 μg once daily, given open label or blinded (n = 1214). Outcomes were adverse events, serious adverse events and deaths, plasma potassium, blood glucose, and QTc interval and vital signs. Results The commonest adverse events with indacaterol were COPD worsening, nasopharyngitis, and headache; most cases were mild or moderate and incidence was generally similar to placebo and other active treatments. The risk of acute respiratory serious adverse events (leading to hospitalization, intubation, or death) was not significantly increased with any of the active treatments compared with placebo. COPD exacerbation rates (analyzed in the intent-to-treat population) were significantly reduced with all active treatments versus placebo. Hazard ratios versus placebo for major cardiovascular adverse events were <1 for all indacaterol doses. Notable values for vital signs and measures of systemic β2-adrenoceptor activity were rare with indacaterol. The number of deaths adjusted per patient-year was lower with indacaterol (all doses combined) than with placebo (relative risk 0.21 [95% confidence interval 0.07–0.660], P = 0.008). Conclusion Indacaterol has a good profile of safety and tolerability that is appropriate for the maintenance treatment of patients with COPD.

Correlating changes in lung function with patient outcomes in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a pooled analysis

BackgroundRelationships between improvements in lung function and other clinical outcomes in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are not documented extensively. We examined whether changes in trough forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) are correlated with changes in patient-reported outcomes.MethodsPooled data from three indacaterol studies (n = 3313) were analysed. Means and responder rates for outcomes including change from baseline in Transition Dyspnoea Index (TDI), St. Georges Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) scores (at 12, 26 and 52 weeks), and COPD exacerbation frequency (rate/year) were tabulated across categories of ΔFEV1. Also, generalised linear modelling was performed adjusting for covariates such as baseline severity and inhaled corticosteroid use.ResultsWith increasing positive ΔFEV1, TDI and ΔSGRQ improved at all timepoints, exacerbation rate over the study duration declined (P < 0.001). Individual-level correlations were 0.03-0.18, but cohort-level correlations were 0.79-0.95. At 26 weeks, a 100 ml increase in FEV1 was associated with improved TDI (0.46 units), ΔSGRQ (1.3-1.9 points) and exacerbation rate (12% decrease). Overall, adjustments for baseline covariates had little impact on the relationship between ΔFEV1 and outcomes.ConclusionsThese results suggest that larger improvements in FEV1 are likely to be associated with larger patient-reported benefits across a range of clinical outcomes.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT00393458, NCT00463567, and NCT00624286

Efficacy of Indacaterol 75 μg Once-Daily on Dyspnea and Health Status: Results of Two Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled 12-Week Studies

Abstract Indacaterol is an inhaled, once-daily, long-acting ®2-agonist for the treatment of COPD. Most previous studies were conducted with doses of 150 and/or 300 μg once-daily, and data with the 75 μg dose are limited. Two identically designed studies were, therefore, conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the 75 μg once-daily dose. In two double-blind studies conducted in the USA, patients with moderate-to-severe COPD were randomized to treatment with indacaterol 75 μg once-daily (n = 163 and 159) or matching placebo (n = 160 and 159) for 12 weeks. The primary variable was forced expiratory volume in 1 s measured 24 h post-dose after 12 weeks (reported elsewhere). This report describes secondary efficacy endpoints, including transition dyspnea index (TDI) and St Georges Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) total scores, and the percentages of patients with improvements of or above the minimal clinically important difference (MCID; ≥1 in TDI score and ≥4 in SGRQ score). Differences between indacaterol and placebo for TDI total score at week 12 were 1.23 (p < 0.001) and 0.45 (p = 0.16), with odds ratios for achieving the MCID of 2.19 (p = 0.002) and 1.58 (p = 0.065). SGRQ total score decreased (improved) from baseline by 5.8 and 4.9 units with indacaterol at week 12 (2.0 and 0.9 with placebo), with odds ratios for achieving the MCID of 1.80 (p = 0.024) and 1.71 (p = 0.031). Patients receiving indacaterol had statistically significant or numerical improvements in diary-derived symptom variables compared with placebo. Treatment with indacaterol 75 μg may provide useful improvements in patient-reported outcomes in patients with moderate-to-severe COPD.