Chiara Rosci

Apraxia is not associated to a disproportionate naming impairment for manipulable objects

The relevance of gesture knowledge for the semantic representation of manipulable objects was investigated in a series of 15 patients with a focal left-hemisphere lesion. The patients were classified according to the presence/absence of ideomotor and ideational apraxia. We investigated picture naming and word-picture matching (pointing to a picture on verbal command) with stimuli including items from three categories: manipulable objects, non-manipulable objects, and animals. The analysis was performed at group level and at single-patient level. Nine patients were affected by ideational apraxia and nine by ideomotor apraxia: two cases presented ideomotor but not ideational apraxia, and two cases presented the opposite dissociation. Patients affected by ideational apraxia were more severely impaired in all tasks, but did not show a disproportionate impairment with the category of manipulable objects in contrast to the other categories. The presence of ideomotor apraxia did not cause a greater impairment in any task or category. Finally, we observed a patient with ideational apraxia who performed flawlessly in naming and word-picture matching for all the stimuli, including manipulable objects. In conclusion, we did not find a relationship between ideational apraxia and a disproportionate impairment of the semantic knowledge of manipulable objects.

Mirror asymmetry of Category and Letter fluency in traumatic brain injury and Alzheimer's patients

In this study we contrasted the Category fluency and Letter fluency performance of 198 normal subjects, 57 Alzheimers patients and 57 patients affected by traumatic brain injury (TBI). The aim was to check whether, besides the prevalence of Category fluency deficit often reported among Alzheimers patients, the TBI group presented the opposite dissociation. According to some recent claims, in fact, the deficit of TBI would be equally severe for both fluency types. The inquiry followed different approaches for data analysis, including the evaluation of a unique index (Fluency Type Index or FTI), independent of the overall fluency and aimed at expressing at individual subject level the relationship between Category and Letter fluency. The results confirmed that Alzheimers patients are more defective on Category than Letter fluency, and also clearly indicated that an opposite pattern applies to TBI patients. TBI seems to cause a relatively more severe impairment of Letter than Category fluency, probably due to its impact on the frontal lobe structures. We discuss whether, on the basis of the statistical distribution of our data, it is worth considering as homogeneous populations broadly defined groups as Alzheimers or TBI patients.

Different variables predict anomia in different subjects: a longitudinal study of two Alzheimer's patients.

Two Alzheimers patients participated in a longitudinal study of picture naming aimed at analysing the effect of lexical frequency, age of acquisition, stimulus familiarity, word length, name imageability, visual complexity and semantic category membership on naming success. The results were analysed with a new method [Capitani, E., & Laiacona, M. (2004). A method for studying the evolution of naming error types in the recovery of acute aphasia: A single-patient and single-stimulus approach. Neuropsychologia, 42, 613-623] that allows us to consider the consistency of responses to stimuli over repeated testing within clinical stages. The experiment was carried out as a longitudinal study of single cases, and the effect of each variable was estimated after removing the overlap with the other predictors. The semantic category of stimuli was not an influential factor for either patient. Other findings sharply distinguished between the two patients. In one case, disease-related decline consistently affected mainly late acquired names, whereas in the other case the decline affected names corresponding to low-familiarity items. To interpret this contrast, we further analysed the quality of the errors produced by each patient. This study shows that the psycholinguistic characteristics of a stimulus may exert varying influence in different patients, warranting further development of this line of inquiry.

Mild brain injury and anticoagulants: Less is enough

Background: Despite the higher theoretical risk of traumatic intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) in anticoagulated patients with mild head injury, the value of sequential head CT scans to identify bleeding remains controversial. This study evaluated the utility of 2 sequential CT scans at a 48-hour interval (CT1 and CT2) in patients with mild head trauma (Glasgow Coma Scale 13–15) taking oral anticoagulants. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated the clinical records of all patients on chronic anticoagulation treatment admitted to the emergency department for mild head injury. Results: A total of 344 patients were included, and 337 (97.9%) had a negative CT1. CT2 was performed on 284 of the 337 patients with a negative CT1 and was positive in 4 patients (1.4%), but none of the patients developed concomitant neurologic worsening or required neurosurgery. Conclusions: Systematic routine use of a second CT scan in mild head trauma in patients taking anticoagulants is expensive and clinically unnecessary.

Interpretation of a complex picture and its sensitivity to frontal damage: a reappraisal.

A. R. Luria introduced the interpretation of a meaningful picture as a tool for assessing pre-frontal impairment. We gave this test to 196 normal adults, who were asked to communicate what was happening in the portrayed scene (a boy chases a mouse hidden under a cupboard, while three frightened girls assist). The same subjects were given two other frontal tests (verbal fluency on phonemic cue and Trail Making Test (TMT)) and Raven’s Matrices. Twenty-three normal subjects (12%) failed to correctly interpret the picture. We also examined 20 patients whose brain lesion encroached upon pre-frontal areas, in order to check if this version of the test could be easily administered to this type of patient, and if its difficulty level was appropriate for avoiding ceiling and floor effects. Twelve patients were unable to interpret the picture (60%). A similar failure rate was observed with the same subjects on verbal fluency and TMT, while Raven’s Matrices were less impaired (35%). Some dissociation was found between Picture Interpretation and the TMT. The Italian version of the Picture Interpretation Test is suitable for the examination of pre-frontal patients.

Modelling picture naming in aphasia: The relationship between consistency and predictability of responses.

Objective: Two aspects of aphasic picture naming were examined: response consistency, that is, the extent to which the accuracy of the response to the same stimulus is replicated in a successive examination, and response predictability, that is, the extent to which accuracy depends on the characteristics of each stimulus. Methods: Thirty-eight aphasic participants were examined twice. The response pattern was the same across the 2 presentations (response stability) for 36 participants, who were classified into 3 groups according to the prevailing error-type (lexical-semantic, phonological, or a balance between the two error-types): Their item-consistency was quantified with Cohen’s kappa. In each case the roles played by lexical frequency, precocity of acquisition and length of the target word, and visual complexity and image agreement of the stimulus picture were examined; the ability to predict response accuracy of a model simultaneously including these 5 variables was quantified by means of the McFadden index. Finally, the relationship between predictability (McFadden index) and consistency (Cohen’s kappa) was analyzed. Results: For 34 of 36 participants, consistency was higher than chance. Consistency was directly correlated to the prevalence of lexical-semantic errors. On regression analysis, the relationship between consistency and predictability was significant. Conclusions: Response consistency reflects the existence of a clear difficulty gradient within the items of a battery. The significant relationship between consistency and error type suggests that, in principle, lexical-semantic errors might be more predictable than phonological errors based on the characteristics of each stimulus.