Chih-Hsien Wang

Cardiopulmonary resuscitation with assisted extracorporeal life-support versus conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation in adults with in-hospital cardiac arrest: an observational study and propensity analysis

BACKGROUND Extracorporeal life-support as an adjunct to cardiac resuscitation has shown encouraging outcomes in patients with cardiac arrest. However, there is little evidence about the benefit of the procedure compared with conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), especially when continued for more than 10 min. We aimed to assess whether extracorporeal CPR was better than conventional CPR for patients with in-hospital cardiac arrest of cardiac origin. METHODS We did a 3-year prospective observational study on the use of extracorporeal life-support for patients aged 18-75 years with witnessed in-hospital cardiac arrest of cardiac origin undergoing CPR of more than 10 min compared with patients receiving conventional CPR. A matching process based on propensity-score was done to equalise potential prognostic factors in both groups, and to formulate a balanced 1:1 matched cohort study. The primary endpoint was survival to hospital discharge, and analysis was by intention to treat. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00173615. FINDINGS Of the 975 patients with in-hospital cardiac arrest events who underwent CPR for longer than 10 min, 113 were enrolled in the conventional CPR group and 59 were enrolled in the extracorporeal CPR group. Unmatched patients who underwent extracorporeal CPR had a higher survival rate to discharge (log-rank p<0.0001) and a better 1-year survival than those who received conventional CPR (log rank p=0.007). Between the propensity-score matched groups, there was still a significant difference in survival to discharge (hazard ratio [HR] 0.51, 95% CI 0.35-0.74, p<0.0001), 30-day survival (HR 0.47, 95% CI 0.28-0.77, p=0.003), and 1-year survival (HR 0.53, 95% CI 0.33-0.83, p=0.006) favouring extracorporeal CPR over conventional CPR. INTERPRETATION Extracorporeal CPR had a short-term and long-term survival benefit over conventional CPR in patients with in-hospital cardiac arrest of cardiac origin.

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support can extend the duration of cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

Objectives:To evaluate the use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in prolonged cardiopulmonary resuscitation and to estimate how long cardiopulmonary resuscitation can be extended with acceptable results. Design:Review of consecutive adult in-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation patients without return of spontaneous circulation in 10 mins and with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation rescue, and analysis of the relationship between outcome and cardiopulmonary resuscitation duration and possible etiologies. The data were collected following the Utstein style guidelines on in-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Two organ dysfunction scores were incorporated into the analysis for outcome prediction. Setting:A university-affiliated tertiary referral medical center and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation center. Patients:An observational cohort study in 135 consecutive adult in-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation patients without return of spontaneous circulation who received extracorporeal membrane oxygenation during cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Main Results:The average cardiopulmonary resuscitation duration was 55.7 ± 27.0 mins and 56.3% of patients received subsequent interventions to treat underlying etiologies. The successful weaning rate was 58.5% and the survival-to-discharge rate was 34.1%. The majority of survivors (89%) had an acceptable neurologic status on discharge. Risk factors for hospital mortality included longer cardiopulmonary resuscitation duration, etiology of acute coronary syndrome, and a higher organ dysfunction score in the first 24 hrs. Logistic regression analysis revealed the probability of survival was approximately 0.5, 0.3, or 0.1 when the duration of cardiopulmonary resuscitation was 30, 60, or 90 mins, respectively. Conclusion:Assisted circulation might extend the presently accepted duration of cardiopulmonary resuscitation in adult in-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation patients.

Improved outcome of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest--a comparison with that for extracorporeal rescue for in-hospital cardiac arrest.

PURPOSE The aim was to investigate the effects of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) and compare the results with those of in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA). METHODS We analyzed our extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) results for patients who received ECPR for OHCA or IHCA in the last 5 years. Pre-arrest, resuscitation, and post-resuscitative data were evaluated. RESULTS In the last 5 years, ECPR was used 230 times for OHCA (n=31) and IHCA (n=199). The basic demographic data showed significant differences in age, cardiomyopathy, and location of the initial CPR. Duration of ischemia was shorter in the IHCA group (44.4±24.7 min vs. 67.5±30.6 min, p<0.05). About 50% of each group underwent a further intervention to treat the underlying etiology. ECMO was maintained for a shorter duration in the OHCA patients (61±48 h vs. 94±122 h, p<0.05). Survival to discharge was similar in the two groups (38.7% for OHCA vs. 31.2% for IHCA, p>0.05), as was the favorable outcome rate (25.5% for OHCA vs. 25.1% for IHCA, p>0.05). Survival was acceptable (about 33%) in both groups when the duration of ischemia was no longer than 75 min. CONCLUSIONS In addition to having a beneficial effect in IHCA, ECPR can lead to survival and a positive neurological outcome in selected OHCA patients after prolonged resuscitation. Our results suggest that further investigation of the use of ECMO in OHCA is warranted.

Comparing the survival between extracorporeal rescue and conventional resuscitation in adult in-hospital cardiac arrests: Propensity analysis of three-year data

AIM Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) has been shown to have survival benefit over conventional CPR (CCPR) in patients with in-hospital cardiac arrest of cardiac origin. We compared the survival of patients who had return of spontaneous beating (ROSB) after ECPR with the survival of those who had return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) after conventional CPR. METHODS Propensity score-matched cohort of adults with in-hospital prolonged CPR (>10min) of cardiac origin in a university-affiliated tertiary extracorporeal resuscitation center were included in this study. Fifty-nine patients with ROSB after ECPR and 63 patients with sustained ROSC by CCPR were analyzed. Main outcome measures were survival at hospital discharge, 30 days, 6 months, and one year, and neurological outcome. RESULTS There was no statistical difference in survival to discharge (29.1% of ECPR responders vs. 22.2% of CCPR responders, p=0.394) and neurological outcome at discharge and one year later. In the propensity score-matched groups, 9 out of 27 ECPR patients survived to one month (33.3%) and 7 out of 27 CCPR patients survived (25.9%). Survival analysis showed no survival difference (HR: 0.856, p=0.634, 95% CI: 0.453-1.620) between the groups, either at 30 days or at the end of one year (HR: 0.602, p=0.093, 95% CI: 0.333-1.088). CONCLUSIONS This study failed to demonstrate a survival difference between patients who had ROSB after institution of ECMO and those who had ROSC after conventional CPR. Further studies evaluating the role of ECMO in conventional CPR rescued patients are warranted.

Extracorporeal membranous oxygenation support for acute fulminant myocarditis: analysis of a single center's experience.

OBJECTIVES Acute fulminant myocarditis (AFM) is a disease category that is easily neglected. Circulatory mechanical support is sometimes required for this devastating condition. We analyzed our experience in managing AFM with mechanical circulatory support. METHODS We applied extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) as a first-line rescue for AFM. The diagnosis was mainly derived from clinical results and biopsy. RESULTS Seventy-five patients were enrolled in the age range of 29.6 ± 18.6 years and the pediatric group (< 18 years) comprised 32% (n = 24) of our patient group. Thirty-five patients (47%) underwent cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) before ECMO. The indication for ECMO included high inotropic support 69% (n = 54) and continuous CPR at ECMO setup 31% (n = 23). The ECMO duration was 171 ± 121 h. Survival to discharge was 64% (n = 48), 61% in adult group, and 70.8% in pediatric group. Six patients were later bridged to ventricular assist device use (5 left ventricular assist device (LVAD) and 1 bi-ventricular assist device (BVAD)) but three died of multiple-organ failure. Three patients (4%) underwent heart transplantation and all of them survived to discharge. Resuscitation did not have a significant factor for survival. Only two patients (3%) developed late mortality due to a cardiac event. CONCLUSIONS AFM still carries high mortality rates in spite of advanced mechanical support. Most of the survivors did not require transplantation and could return to good lifestyle. Due to its simplicity and effectiveness, ECMO can be a first-line tool to rescue this group of patients.

Sustained low-efficiency dialysis versus continuous veno-venous hemofiltration for postsurgical acute renal failure

BACKGROUND In postsurgical acute renal failure patients with moderate unstable hemodynamics or fluid overload, the choice of dialysis modality is difficult. This study was performed to compare the outcomes between the sustained low-efficiency dialysis (SLED) and continuous veno-venous hemofiltration (CVVH) in these patients. METHODS Sequential postsurgical acute renal failure patients undergoing acute dialysis with CVVH (2002-2003), or SLED (2004-2005) as a result of severe fluid overload or moderately unstable hemodynamics were analyzed. Multivariate analyses of comorbidity, disease severity before initiating dialysis, biochemical measurements, and hemodynamic parameters for 3 days after the first dialysis session were performed by fitting multiple logistic regression models to predict patients 30-day after hospital discharge (AHD) mortality. RESULTS Among the 101 recruited patients, 38 received SLED and the rest received CVVH. The 30-day AHD mortality was 62.4%. The independent risk factors of 30-day AHD mortality included older age (P = .008), lower first postdialysis mean arterial pressure (MAP) (P = .021), higher first postdialysis blood urea nitrogen level (P = .009), and absence of a history of hypertension (P = .002). A further linear regression analysis found that dialysis using SLED was associated with higher first postdialysis MAP (P = .003). CONCLUSIONS Among the postsurgical patients requiring acute dialysis with severe fluid overload or moderately unstable hemodynamics, the patients treated with SLED had a higher first postdialysis MAP than those treated with CVVH, which led to lower mortality. Further multicenter randomized clinical trials of larger sample size are needed to compare the effects of SLED and CVVH on the outcomes of postsurgical acute dialysis patients.

Ruptured cervical disc after spinal manipulation therapy: report of two cases.

Study Design. Case reports of ruptured cervical disc after spinal manipulation therapy. Objectives. To present the rare cases of ruptured cervical disc temporally related to spinal manipulation therapy. Summary of Background Data. The complication of ruptured cervical disc was rare in the literature. Methods. Two patients developed cervical myelopathy or radiculopathy after spinal manipulation therapy, and magnetic resonance imaging showed herniated cervical discs at C4–C5 and C6–C7, respectively. Results. Anterior cervical discectomy was performed, and ruptured disc fragments were removed in these two patients. Both patients had good neurologic recovery after operation, and no neurologic deficits were noted after 15 and 6 months of follow-up, respectively. Conclusions. The experience of these two patients reminds us that cervical disc rupture can occur during a course of cervical spinal manipulation. Full neurologic recovery is achievable if accurate diagnosis and prompt surgical treatment are done.

An observational study of extracorporeal CPR for in-hospital cardiac arrest secondary to myocardial infarction

Objective To determine the effects of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) in patients with in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) due to acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Methods IHCA patients due to AMI undergoing CPR between 1 January 2006 and 1 July 2010 were analysed retrospectively. We compared the survival outcome of 43 patients who received ECPR with that of 23 patients who underwent conventional CPR. Results The survival rate was 34.9% for patients who received ECPR and 21.8% for those who received conventional CPR (p=0.4). Increased survival rates to hospital discharge were seen in patients with ST segment elevation (p<0.01), or had initial rhythm of ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation (VT/VF) during resuscitation (p=0.031). Conclusions ECPR may improve survival in cardiac arrest patients who have a ST segment elevation or initial rhythm of VT/VF myocardial infarction.

Induction Immunosuppression With Basiliximab in Heart Transplantation

After clinical heart transplantation (HT), it is crucial to use appropriate immunosuppressive agents to prevent rejection. The use of basiliximab or rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin (RATG) for induction therapy has significantly reduced the incidence of acute rejection episodes after kidney transplantation. In this study we sought to examine the effects of basiliximab after HT. From June 2006 to July 2007, we performed 43 HT including patients 18-65 years old undergoing primary HT who were included in this study of basiliximab induction (20 mg intravenous [iv] on days 0 and 4). Cyclosporine and everolimus were given with basiliximab induction. All others received RATG induction (1.5-2.5 mg/kg iv infusion on days 0, 1, and 2) followed by cyclosporine or tacrolimus combined with mycophenolate mofetil. All patients underwent the same operative procedure, steroid-tapering protocol, and postoperative care with protocol endomyocardial biopsy. Basiliximab was well-tolerated and easy to use. There was only 1 operative mortality; the patient died of sepsis due to Enterobacter cloacae. All others survived the operation and are alive and in good health with a 2-year survival rate of 92.86%. No severe adverse events were noted during the first postoperative month. No acute rejection > or = grade 2R or rejection associated with hemodynamic compromise was noted during the whole course. Basiliximab as induction immunosuppressant was simple, safe, and effective after HT.

Rescue a drowning patient by prolonged extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support for 117 days.

Drowning is one of the most common causes of accidental events. Here we report a drowning patient who experienced acute respiratory distress syndrome after hospitalization. Although the compliance of lung was as poor less as 5 mL/cm H2O, this patient was eventually rescued and recovered by extraprolonged extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support for 117 days.