Chikara Mori

Effects of Add-on Therapy Consisting of a Selective Mineralocorticoid Receptor Blocker on Arterial Stiffness in Patients with Uncontrolled Hypertension

OBJECTIVE Aldosterone plays an important role in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis; however, the significance of mineralocorticoid receptor blockade for atherosclerosis has not been fully elucidated. In this study, the effect of add-on eplerenone on the degree of arterial stiffness was examined in patients with uncontrolled hypertension. METHODS Forty-seven uncontrolled hypertensive patients who had previously been treated with anti-hypertensive drugs were examined retrospectively. Thirty-two patients received add-on therapy consisting of eplerenone (Group E) and 15 patients received add-on therapy with a Calcium channel blocker (CCB) or an increased dose of CCB (Group C) in addition to their baseline medications. Both the systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) values were significantly decreased at two and 12 months in Group C. In contrast, neither the SBP nor DBP values were significantly changed at two months and eventually decreased at 12 months in Group E. The degree of arterial stiffness, as evaluated according to the cardio-ankle vascular index (CAVI), did not improve at either two or 12 months in Group C, whereas the CAVI values improved as early as at two months and the improvement was sustained at 12 months in Group E. The extent of change in the CAVI was not associated with the level of changes in the SBP or DBP values in Group E. CONCLUSION Treatment with eplerenone added to the patients baseline medications improves the degree of arterial stiffness as early as at two months after the beginning of treatment, independent of the blood pressure-lowering actions of these drugs in patients with uncontrolled hypertension.

Propensity-Score Matched Comparison of Midterm Angiographic Outcomes of Sirolimus- Versus Everolimus- and Biolimus-Eluting Stents for De Novo Coronary Stenosis

We conducted propensity-score matched comparisons of midterm angiographic outcomes of sirolimus (SES) versus either everolimus- (EES) or biolimus- (BES) eluting stents after placements for coronary stenosis in a daily practice environment since previous randomized trials did not demonstrate the superiority of EES and BES over SES in terms of midterm angiographic outcomes.The present study was a non-randomized, retrospective, and lesion-based study, recruiting angiographically followed-up lesions within 550 days after successful and elective SES (n = 1793), EES (n = 1303), or BES (n = 324) placement for de novo native coronary stenosis during the period from August 2004 to January 2014 at 6 institutes. The endpoint, as an angiographic surrogate marker of clinical efficacy, was the distribution of in-stent follow-up percent diameter stenosis (%DS) which comprised the percentages of 1) follow-up %DS < 20 and 2) follow-up %DS > 50. Propensityscore matched analyses were conducted to adjust 21 baselines.In 1215 baseline adjusted lesions, the endpoints in the EES group [1) 74.1%, and 2) 4.6%] were significantly different from those in the SES group [57.9%; P < 0.001, 7.2%; P = 0.006, respectively). In 307 baseline adjusted lesions, the endpoints in the BES group [1) 80.5%, 2) 2.0%] were significantly different from those in the SES group [59.3%; P < 0.001, 2) 8.1%; P = 0.001, respectively].The present study is the first to confirm the superiority of midterm angiographic outcomes after the placement of EES and BES over SES for de novo coronary stenosis in a clinical setting.