Ching-I Hung
Chang Gung University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Ching-I Hung.
Cephalalgia | 2006
Ching-I Hung; Chia-Yin Liu; Jong-Ling Fuh; Yeong-Yuh Juang; Shuu-Jiun Wang
This study investigated the impact of migraine on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) among patients with major depressive disorder (MDD). We prospectively enrolled 151 consecutive psychiatric out-patients meeting DSM-IV criteria for MDD. Migraine and other headache types were diagnosed based on the International Classification of Headache Disorders, 2nd edition (2004). The Short Form-36 (SF-36) was administered as a generic instrument of HRQoL. Among 151 patients with MDD, migraine (N = 73, 48.3%) was very common. Comorbidity of migraine predicted a significantly negative impact on all physical subscales and vitality but not on the other mental subscales of the SF-36 after controlling for depression, age and gender. The presence of migraine should be considered as an important physical symptom in clinic-based MDD samples. Simultaneous management of depression and severe headaches, especially migraine, might improve HRQoL in patients with MDD.
International Journal of Psychiatry in Clinical Practice | 2012
Ching-I Hung; Chia-Yih Liu; Shuu-Jiun Wang; Yi-Chun Yao; Ching-Hui Yang
Abstract Objective. This study aimed to ascertain the cut-off scores of the Depression and Somatic Symptoms Scale (DSSS) for non-full remission (FR) and a current major depressive episode (MDE) and compare the discriminative abilities of the DSSS and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). Methods. One-hundred and nineteen depressive outpatients who completed a 6-month follow-up were used to ascertain the cut-off scores for non-FR, defined as a Hamilton Depression Rating Scale score ≥ 8; another 214 consecutive outpatients were assessed to identify the cut-off scores for a MDE, as defined by the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV-TR. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to ascertain the cut-off scores. Results. The area under the ROC curve was greatest for the DSSS depression subscale (DS), followed by the HADS depression subscale (HADS-D). The cut-off scores for non-FR were a DS score ≥ 9 (sensitivity and specificity: 88.7 and 71.9%, respectively) and a HADS-D score ≥ 8 (77.4 and 84.2%), and the cut-off scores for a MDE were a DS score ≥ 19 (86.3 and 75.6%) and a HADS-D score ≥ 11 (77.9 and 76.5%). Conclusions. The DSSS and HADS can be used to distinguish different depressive states. The results demonstrated the discriminative validity of the DSSS and the HADS.
Journal of Affective Disorders | 2009
Ching-I Hung; Chia-Yih Liu; Yu-Ting Cheng; Shuu-Jiun Wang
BACKGROUND Research into the role of migraine in somatic symptoms of major depressive disorder (MDD) has long been neglected; hence, the aim of this study was to compare the impact of migraine and anxiety comorbidities on the somatic symptoms of patients with MDD. METHODS Consecutive psychiatric outpatients with MDD in a medical center were enrolled. MDD and anxiety disorders were diagnosed using the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV-TR; migraine was diagnosed according to the International Classification of Headache Disorders, 2nd edition. Four scales were administered and evaluated: the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, the Depression and Somatic Symptoms Scale, the somatization subscale of the Symptom Checklist-90-Revised, and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Multiple linear regressions were used to find the most powerful comorbidities in predicting somatic symptoms. RESULTS One hundred and fifty five patients (106F, 49M) completed the study. Subjects with migraine had higher somatic, depression and anxiety severities. Panic disorder was the most important factor when predicting somatic severity among anxiety comorbidities. Migraine (R(2) change=0.28 to 0.04, p<.01) was the strongest independent factor in predicting somatic severity, even after controlling for anxiety comorbidities and demographic variables. LIMITATIONS This study used certain exclusion criteria when enrolling MDD outpatients, possibly introducing bias. CONCLUSIONS Comorbidity with migraine was found to be associated with more somatic symptoms in patients with MDD, and migraine was a strong and independent predictor for the somatic symptoms of MDD. Future studies on the somatic symptoms of MDD should therefore take migraine into consideration.
Journal of Psychosomatic Research | 2008
Ching-I Hung; Shuu-Jiun Wang; Ching-Hui Yang; Chia-Yih Liu
OBJECTIVE Our purpose was to determine if migraine, anxiety comorbidities, and chronic depression were independently related to health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in outpatients with major depressive disorder (MDD). METHOD Consecutive psychiatric outpatients with MDD in a medical center were enrolled. MDD, chronic depression, and seven anxiety disorders were diagnosed using the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV-TR. Migraine was diagnosed based on the International Classification of Headache Disorders, 2nd edition. The acute version of the Short-Form 36 and the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD) were used to evaluate the HRQoL and the severity of depression, respectively. Multiple linear regressions were used to determine the independent factors related to HRQoL. RESULTS There were 135 participants (34 men, 101 women) with MDD. Subjects with migraine, anxiety comorbidities, or chronic depression had higher HAMD scores and poor HRQoL. Migraine, specific phobia, and panic disorder were important and independent comorbidities predicting HRQoL. The impact of migraine on HRQoL, especially on bodily pain, was not inferior to those of some anxiety comorbidities or chronic depression. CONCLUSION Future studies related to HRQoL of MDD should consider migraine and anxiety comorbidities simultaneously.
Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica | 2005
Ching-I Hung; Shih-Tien Wang; Kuang-Hung Hsu; Yeong-Yuh Juang; Chia-Yin Liu
Objective: This study investigated independent comorbidities and factors associated with migraine and chronic daily headache (CDH) in out‐patients with major depressive disorder (MDD).
Journal of Affective Disorders | 2010
Ching-I Hung; Chia-Yih Liu; Shuu-Jiun Wang; Yeong-Yuh Juang; Ching-Hui Yang
BACKGROUND Few studies have simultaneously compared the ability of depression, anxiety, and somatic symptoms to predict the outcome of major depressive disorder (MDD). This study aimed to compare the MDD outcome predictive ability of depression, anxiety, and somatic severity at 6-month and 2-year follow-ups. METHODS One-hundred and thirty-five outpatients (men/women=34/101) with MDD were enrolled. Depression and anxiety were evaluated by the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, and depression subscale of the Depression and Somatic Symptoms Scale (DSSS). Somatic severity was evaluated by the somatic subscale of the DSSS. Subjects undergoing pharmacotherapy in the follow-up month were categorized into the treatment group; the others were categorized into the no-treatment group. Multiple linear regressions were used to identify the scales most powerful in predicting MDD outcome. RESULTS Among the 135 subjects, 119 and 106 completed the 6-month and 2-year follow-ups, respectively. Somatic severity at baseline was correlated with the outcomes of the three scales at the two follow-ups. After controlling for demographic variables, somatic severity independently predicted most outcomes of the three scales at the two follow-ups in the no-treatment group and the cost of pharmacotherapy and DSSS score at the 6-month follow-up in the treatment group. LIMITATIONS Division of the subjects into treatment and no-treatment groups was not based on randomization and bias might have been introduced. CONCLUSIONS Somatic severity was the most powerful index in predicting MDD outcome. Psychometric scales with appropriate somatic symptom items may be more accurate in predicting MDD outcome.
Biomedical journal | 2012
Chiao-Fan Lin; Yeong-Yuh Juang; Jung-Kwang Wen; Chia-Yih Liu; Ching-I Hung
BACKGROUND The purpose of this study was to investigate the degree of correlation between sexual dysfunction and depression, anxiety, and somatic symptoms among patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) and to identify the dimension most predictive of sexual dysfunction. METHODS One-hundred and thirty-five outpatients with MDD were enrolled and were treated with open-label venlafaxine 75 mg daily for one month. The Arizona Sexual Experience Scale-Chinese Version (ASEX-CV), Depression and Somatic Symptoms Scale (DSSS), Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) were administered at baseline and at one-month follow-up and the improvement percentage (IP) of each scale posttreatment was calculated. Multiple linear regression was used to determine the dimension most predictive of the total ASEX-CV score. RESULTS Seventy subjects (20 men, 50 women) completed the one-month pharmacotherapy and the four scales. The depression subscale of the HADS was most strongly correlated with the ASEX-CV scale and was the only subscale to independently predict the total ASEX-CV score at the two points. However, the somatic subscale of the DSSS was not correlated with any ASEX-CV item. At the endpoint, depression, anxiety, and somatic symptoms were significantly improved (IP 48.5% to 26.0%); however, very little improvement was observed in the total ASEX-CV score (IP -1.6%). CONCLUSION The severity of sexual dysfunction among patients with MDD was most correlated with the severity of the depressive dimension, but not the severity of the somatic dimension. Further studies are indicated to explore the relationships between sexual dysfunction, depression, anxiety, and somatic symptoms.
Comprehensive Psychiatry | 2009
Shih-Chieh Hsu; Shuu-Jiun Wang; Chia-Yih Liu; Yeong-Yuh Juang; Ching-Hui Yang; Ching-I Hung
OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of anxiety disorders and migraine on sleep quality and to find the independent factors that predict sleep quality among patients with major depressive disorder (MDD). METHOD Psychiatric outpatients diagnosed with MDD were enrolled in the study. Major depressive disorder and 7 anxiety disorders were diagnosed using the Structured Clinical Interview for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, Text Revision. Migraine was diagnosed based on the International Classification of Headache Disorders, Second Edition. Headache intensity and frequency were reported by the subjects. The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index and Hamilton Depression Rating Scale were used to evaluate quality of sleep and depression severity, respectively. Multiple linear regressions were used to identify independent factors related to sleep quality. RESULTS One hundred thirty-five subjects (34 men and 101 women) with MDD were enrolled in the study. Subjects with panic disorder and agoraphobia were found to have poorer Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index scores. Subjects with panic disorder, agoraphobia, and migraine had higher scores for items relating to sleep quality in the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale. Headache intensity and frequency correlated with sleep disturbance. Panic disorder was independently predictive of poor sleep quality. Both migraine and panic disorder independently predicted a greater severity of depression. CONCLUSION Our study demonstrates the negative impact of panic disorder and migraine on MDD and some of the interrelations between depression, anxiety, and sleep quality. Future studies should further explore these interactions and consider possible therapeutic interventions.
BMC Psychiatry | 2014
Ching-I Hung; Chia-Yih Liu; Mei-Chun Hsiao; Nan-Wen Yu; Chun-Lin Chu
BackgroundFew studies have simultaneously compared the impacts of pharmacotherapy and mental diagnoses on metabolic syndrome (MetS) among psychiatric outpatients with mood and anxiety disorders. This study aimed to investigate the impacts of pharmacotherapy and mental diagnoses on MetS and the prevalence of MetS among these patients.MethodsTwo-hundred and twenty-nine outpatients (men/women = 85/144) were enrolled from 1147 outpatients with mood and anxiety disorders by systematic sampling. Psychiatric disorders and MetS were diagnosed using the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV-TR and the new International Diabetics Federation definition, respectively. The numbers of antipsychotics, mood stabilizers, and antidepressants being taken were recorded. Logistic regression was used to investigate the impacts of pharmacotherapy and psychiatric diagnoses on MetS.ResultsAmong 229 subjects, 51 (22.3%) fulfilled the criteria for MetS. The prevalence of MetS was highest in the bipolar I disorder (46.7%) patients, followed by bipolar II disorder (25.0%), major depressive disorder (22.0%), anxiety-only disorders (16.7%), and no mood and/or anxiety disorders (14.3%). The percentages of MetS among the five categories were correlated with those of the patients being treated with antipsychotics and mood stabilizers. Use of antipsychotics and/or mood stabilizers independently predicted a higher risk of MetS after controlling for demographic variables and psychiatric diagnoses. When adding body mass index (BMI) as an independent variable in the regression model, BMI became the most significant factor to predict MetS.ConclusionBMI was found to be an important factor related to MetS. Pharmacotherapy might be one of underlying causes of elevated BMI. The interactions among MetS, BMI, pharmacotherapy, and psychiatric diagnoses might need further research.
Journal of Psychosomatic Research | 2008
Ching-I Hung; Chia-Yih Liu; Shuu-Jiun Wang
OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to investigate the common precipitating or aggravating factors for headache among patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) and to compare precipitating or aggravating factors specifically for migraine with those for other headaches. METHODS Consecutive psychiatric outpatients with MDD in a medical center were enrolled. Headaches were diagnosed based on the International Classification of Headache Disorders, 2nd Edition. A 21-item self-report questionnaire was used to identify precipitating or aggravating factors. Subjects were divided into migraine and other-headache groups. RESULTS Of 122 subjects (76% female) with headache, 63 (51.6%) were diagnosed with migraine. Mental stress and depressive symptoms were the most common precipitating or aggravating factors, and 17 factors affected >50% of the subjects. Compared with other-headache groups, the migraine group was more sensitive to emotional and perceptional stimuli and to the stress of daily activities. CONCLUSION Treatment of depression and education of depressed patients about how to cope with mental stress might help to eliminate the negative impact of headache.