Chirag Savani
New York Medical College
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Chirag Savani.
Progress in Cardiovascular Diseases | 2015
Azfar Sheikh; Nileshkumar J. Patel; Nikhil Nalluri; Kanishk Agnihotri; Jonathan Spagnola; Aashay Patel; Deepak Asti; Ritesh Kanotra; Hafiz Khan; Chirag Savani; Shilpkumar Arora; Nilay Patel; Badal Thakkar; Neil Patel; Dhaval Pau; Apurva Badheka; Abhishek Deshmukh; Marcin Kowalski; Juan F. Viles-Gonzalez; Hakan Paydak
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most prevalent arrhythmia worldwide and the most common arrhythmia leading to hospitalization. Due to a substantial increase in incidence and prevalence of AF over the past few decades, it attributes to an extensive economic and public health burden. The increasing number of hospitalizations, aging population, anticoagulation management, and increasing trend for disposition to a skilled facility are drivers of the increasing cost associated with AF. There has been significant progress in AF management with the release of new oral anticoagulants, use of left atrial catheter ablation, and novel techniques for left atrial appendage closure. In this article, we aim to review the trends in epidemiology, hospitalization, and cost of AF along with its future implications on public health.
Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions | 2015
Nish Patel; Nileshkumar J. Patel; Kanishk Agnihotri; Sidakpal S. Panaich; Badal Thakkar; Achint Patel; Chirag Savani; Nilay Patel; Shilpkumar Arora; Abhishek Deshmukh; Parth Bhatt; Carlos Alfonso; Mauricio G. Cohen; Alfonso Tafur; Mahir Elder; Tamam Mohamed; Ramak R. Attaran; Theodore Schreiber; Cindy L. Grines; Apurva Badheka
The aim of the study was to assess the utilization of catheter‐directed thrombolysis (CDT) and its comparative effectiveness against systemic thrombolysis in acute pulmonary embolism (PE).
American Journal of Cardiology | 2015
Vikas Singh; Samir V. Patel; Chirag Savani; Nileshkumar J. Patel; Nilay Patel; Shilpkumar Arora; Sidakpal S. Panaich; Abhishek Deshmukh; Michael W. Cleman; Abeel A. Mangi; John K. Forrest; Apurva Badheka
High-risk surgical patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) represent an emerging population, which may benefit from short-term use of mechanical circulatory support (MCS) devices. The aim of this study was to determine the practice and inhospital outcomes of MCS utilization in patients undergoing TAVI. We analyzed data from Nationwide Inpatient Sample (2011 and 2012) using the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification procedure codes. A total of 1,794 TAVI procedures (375 hospitals in the United States) were identified of which 190 (10.6%) used an MCS device (MCS group) and 1,604 (89.4%) did not (non-MCS group). The use of MCS devices with TAVI was associated with significant increase in the inhospital mortality (14.9% vs 3.5%, p <0.01). The mean length (11.8 ± 0.8 vs 8.1 ± 0.2 days, p <0.01) and cost (
American Journal of Cardiology | 2015
Apurva Badheka; Vikas Singh; Nileshkumar J. Patel; Shilpkumar Arora; Nilay Patel; Badal Thakkar; Sunny Jhamnani; Sadip Pant; Ankit Chothani; Conrad Macon; Sidakpal S. Panaich; Jay Patel; Sohilkumar Manvar; Chirag Savani; Parth Bhatt; Vinaykumar Panchal; Neil Patel; Achint Patel; Darshan Patel; Sopan Lahewala; Abhishek Deshmukh; Tamam Mohamad; Abeel A. Mangi; Michael W. Cleman; John K. Forrest
68,997 ± 3,656 vs
American Journal of Cardiology | 2014
Apurva Badheka; Ankit Chothani; Sidakpal S. Panaich; Kathan Mehta; Nileshkumar J. Patel; Abhishek Deshmukh; Vikas Singh; Shilpkumar Arora; Nilay Patel; Peeyush Grover; Neeraj Shah; Chirag Savani; Achint Patel; Vinaykumar Panchal; Michael Brown; Amir Kaki; Ashok Kondur; Tamam Mohamad; Mahir Elder; Cindy L. Grines; Theodore Schreiber
55,878 ± 653, p = 0.03) of hospitalization were also significantly greater in the MCS group. Ventricular fibrillation arrest, transapical access for TAVI, and cardiogenic shock were the most significant predictors of MCS use during TAVI. In the multivariate model, use of any MCS device was found to be an independent predictor of increased mortality (odds ratio 3.5, 95% confidence interval 2.6 to 4.6, p <0.0001) and complications (odds ratio 3.3, 95% confidence interval 2.8 to 3.9, p <0.0001). The propensity score-matched analysis also showed a similar result. In conclusion, the unacceptably high rates of mortality and complications coupled with a significant increase in the length and cost of hospitalization should raise concerns about utility of MCS devices during TAVI in this prohibitive surgical risk population.
Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions | 2016
Badal Thakkar; Aashay Patel; Bashar Mohamad; Nileshkumar J. Patel; Parth Bhatt; Ronak Bhimani; Achint Patel; Shilpkumar Arora; Chirag Savani; Shantanu Solanki; Rajesh Sonani; Samir Patel; Nilay Patel; Abhishek Deshmukh; Tamam Mohamad; Cindy L. Grines; Michael W. Cleman; Abeel A. Mangi; John K. Forrest; Apurva Badheka
In recent years, there has been an increased emphasis on the diagnosis and treatment of valvular heart disease and, in particular, aortic stenosis. This has been driven in part by the development of innovative therapeutic options and by an aging patient population. We hypothesized an increase in the number of hospitalizations and the economic burden associated with aortic valve disease (AVD). Using Nationwide Inpatient Sample from 2000 to 2012, AVD-related hospitalizations were identified using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification, code 424.1, as the principal discharge diagnosis. Overall AVD hospitalizations increased by 59% from 2000 to 2012. This increase was most significant in patients >80 years and those with higher burden of co-morbidities. The most frequent coexisting conditions were hypertension, heart failure, renal failure, anemia, and diabetes. Overall inhospital mortality of patients hospitalized for AVD was 3.8%, which significantly decreased from 4.5% in 2000 to 3.5% in 2012 (p <0.001). The largest decrease in mortality was seen in the subgroup of patients who had heart failure (62% reduction), higher burden of co-morbidities (58% reduction), and who were >80 years (53% reduction). There was a substantial increase in the cost of hospitalization in the last decade from
American Journal of Cardiology | 2016
Sidakpal S. Panaich; Shilpkumar Arora; Nilay Patel; Nileshkumar J. Patel; Samir V. Patel; Chirag Savani; Vikas Singh; Sunny Jhamnani; Rajesh Sonani; Sopan Lahewala; Badal Thakkar; Achint Patel; Abhishek Dave; Harshil Shah; Parth Bhatt; Radhika Jaiswal; Abhijit Ghatak; Vishal Gupta; Abhishek Deshmukh; Ashok Kondur; Theodore Schreiber; Cindy L. Grines; Apurva Badheka
31,909 to
Clinical Cardiology | 2016
Nileshkumar J. Patel; Sushruth Edla; Abhishek Deshmukh; Nikhil Nalluri; Nilay Patel; Kanishk Agnihotri; Achint Patel; Chirag Savani; Nish Patel; Ronak Bhimani; Badal Thakkar; Shilpkumar Arora; Deepak Asti; Apurva Badheka; Valay Parikh; Raul D. Mitrani; Peter A. Noseworthy; Hakan Paydak; Juan F. Viles-Gonzalez; Paul A. Friedman; Marcin Kowalski
38,172 (p <0.001). The total annual cost for AVD hospitalization in the United States increased from
American Journal of Cardiology | 2016
Shilpkumar Arora; Sidakpal S. Panaich; Nilay Patel; Nileshkumar J. Patel; Chirag Savani; Samir V. Patel; Badal Thakkar; Rajesh Sonani; Sunny Jhamnani; Vikas Singh; Sopan Lahewala; Achint Patel; Parth Bhatt; Harshil Shah; Radhika Jaiswal; Vishal Gupta; Abhishek Deshmukh; Ashok Kondur; Theodore Schreiber; Apurva Badheka; Cindy L. Grines
1.3 billion in 2001 to
Journal of Interventional Cardiology | 2015
Nileshkumar J. Patel; Vikas Singh; Samir V. Patel; Chirag Savani; Nilay Patel; Sidakpal S. Panaich; Shilpkumar Arora; Mauricio G. Cohen; Cindy L. Grines; Apurva Badheka
2.1 billion in 2011 and is expected to increase to nearly 3 billion by 2020. The last decade has witnessed a significant increase in hospitalizations for AVD in the United States. The associated decrease in inhospital mortality and increase in the cost of hospitalization have considerably increased the economic burden on the public health system.