Chiun Hsu

Nivolumab in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (CheckMate 040): an open-label, non-comparative, phase 1/2 dose escalation and expansion trial

BACKGROUND For patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma, sorafenib is the only approved drug worldwide, and outcomes remain poor. We aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of nivolumab, a programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) immune checkpoint inhibitor, in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma with or without chronic viral hepatitis. METHODS We did a phase 1/2, open-label, non-comparative, dose escalation and expansion trial (CheckMate 040) of nivolumab in adults (≥18 years) with histologically confirmed advanced hepatocellular carcinoma with or without hepatitis C or B (HCV or HBV) infection. Previous sorafenib treatment was allowed. A dose-escalation phase was conducted at seven hospitals or academic centres in four countries or territories (USA, Spain, Hong Kong, and Singapore) and a dose-expansion phase was conducted at an additional 39 sites in 11 countries (Canada, UK, Germany, Italy, Japan, South Korea, Taiwan). At screening, eligible patients had Child-Pugh scores of 7 or less (Child-Pugh A or B7) for the dose-escalation phase and 6 or less (Child-Pugh A) for the dose-expansion phase, and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 1 or less. Patients with HBV infection had to be receiving effective antiviral therapy (viral load <100 IU/mL); antiviral therapy was not required for patients with HCV infection. We excluded patients previously treated with an agent targeting T-cell costimulation or checkpoint pathways. Patients received intravenous nivolumab 0·1-10 mg/kg every 2 weeks in the dose-escalation phase (3+3 design). Nivolumab 3 mg/kg was given every 2 weeks in the dose-expansion phase to patients in four cohorts: sorafenib untreated or intolerant without viral hepatitis, sorafenib progressor without viral hepatitis, HCV infected, and HBV infected. Primary endpoints were safety and tolerability for the escalation phase and objective response rate (Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors version 1.1) for the expansion phase. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01658878. FINDINGS Between Nov 26, 2012, and Aug 8, 2016, 262 eligible patients were treated (48 patients in the dose-escalation phase and 214 in the dose-expansion phase). 202 (77%) of 262 patients have completed treatment and follow-up is ongoing. During dose escalation, nivolumab showed a manageable safety profile, including acceptable tolerability. In this phase, 46 (96%) of 48 patients discontinued treatment, 42 (88%) due to disease progression. Incidence of treatment-related adverse events did not seem to be associated with dose and no maximum tolerated dose was reached. 12 (25%) of 48 patients had grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events. Three (6%) patients had treatment-related serious adverse events (pemphigoid, adrenal insufficiency, liver disorder). 30 (63%) of 48 patients in the dose-escalation phase died (not determined to be related to nivolumab therapy). Nivolumab 3 mg/kg was chosen for dose expansion. The objective response rate was 20% (95% CI 15-26) in patients treated with nivolumab 3 mg/kg in the dose-expansion phase and 15% (95% CI 6-28) in the dose-escalation phase. INTERPRETATION Nivolumab had a manageable safety profile and no new signals were observed in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. Durable objective responses show the potential of nivolumab for treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. FUNDING Bristol-Myers Squibb.

A revisit of prophylactic lamivudine for chemotherapy‐associated hepatitis B reactivation in non‐Hodgkin's lymphoma: A randomized trial

Lamivudine is effective to control hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation in HBV‐carrying cancer patients who undergo chemotherapy, but the optimal treatment protocol remains undetermined. In this study, HBV carriers with newly diagnosed non‐Hodgkins lymphoma (NHL) who underwent chemotherapy were randomized to either prophylactic (P) or therapeutic (T) lamivudine treatment groups. Group P patients started lamivudine from day 1 of the first course of chemotherapy and continued treatment until 2 months after completion of chemotherapy. Group T patients received chemotherapy alone and started lamivudine treatment only if serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels elevated to greater than 1.5‐fold of the upper normal limit (ULN). The primary endpoint was incidence of HBV reactivation during the 12 months after starting chemotherapy. During chemotherapy, fewer group P patients had HBV reactivation (11.5% versus 56%, P = 0.001), HBV‐related hepatitis (7.7% versus 48%, P = 0.001), or severe hepatitis (ALT more than 10‐fold ULN) (0 versus 36%, P < 0.001). No hepatitis‐related deaths occurred during protocol treatment. Prophylactic lamivudine use was the only independent predictor of HBV reactivation. After completion of chemotherapy, the incidence of HBV reactivation did not differ between the 2 groups. Two patients, both in group P, died of HBV reactivation–related hepatitis, 173 and 182 days, respectively, after completion of protocol treatment. When compared with an equivalent group of lamivudine‐naïve lymphoma patients who underwent chemotherapy, therapeutic use of lamivudine neither reduced the severity of HBV‐related hepatitis nor changed the patterns of HBV reactivation. Conclusion: Prophylactic lamivudine use, but not therapeutic use, reduces the incidence and severity of chemotherapy‐related HBV reactivation in NHL patients. (HEPATOLOGY 2008;47:844–853.)

Chemotherapy‐induced hepatitis B reactivation in lymphoma patients with resolved HBV infection: A prospective study

Fatal hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation in lymphoma patients with “resolved” HBV infection (hepatitis B surface antigen [HBsAg] negative and hepatitis B core antibody [anti‐HBc] positive) can occur, but the true incidence and severity remain unclear. From June 2009 to December 2011, 150 newly diagnosed lymphoma patients with resolved HBV infection who were to receive rituximab‐CHOP (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisolone)‐based chemotherapy were prospectively followed. HBV DNA was checked at baseline, at the start of each cycle of chemotherapy, and every 4 weeks for 1 year after completion of rituximab‐CHOP chemotherapy. Patients with documented HBV reactivation were treated with entecavir at a dosage of 0.5 mg/day for 48 weeks. HBV reactivation was defined as a greater than 10‐fold increase in HBV DNA, compared with previous nadir levels, and hepatitis flare was defined as a greater than 3‐fold increase in alanine aminotransferase (ALT) that exceeded 100 IU/L. Incidence of HBV reactivation and HBV‐related hepatitis flares was 10.4 and 6.4 per 100 person‐year, respectively. Severe HBV‐related hepatitis (ALT >10‐fold of upper limit of normal) occurred in 4 patients, despite entecavir treatment. Patients with hepatitis flare exhibited significantly higher incidence of reappearance of HBsAg after HBV reactivation (100% vs. 28.5%; P = 0.003). Conclusion: In lymphoma patients with resolved HBV infections, chemotherapy‐induced HBV reactivation is not uncommon, but can be managed with regular monitoring of HBV DNA and prompt antiviral therapy. Serological breakthrough (i.e., reappearance of HBsAg) is the most important predictor of HBV‐related hepatitis flare. (Hepatology 2014;59:2092–2100)

Phase Ii Study of Combining Sorafenib with Metronomic Tegafur/Uracil for Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma

BACKGROUND & AIMS Sorafenib, a multi-kinase inhibitor with anti-angiogenic activity, was recently approved for the treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Metronomic chemotherapy using tegafur/uracil (4:1 molar ratio), an oral fluoropyrimidine, has been shown to enhance the anti-tumor effect of anti-angiogenic agents in preclinical models. This phase II study evaluated the efficacy and safety of combining metronomic tegafur/uracil with sorafenib in patients with advanced HCC. METHODS Patients with histologically- or cytologically-proven HCC and Child-Pugh class A liver function were treated with sorafenib (400mg twice daily) and tegafur/uracil (125 mg/m(2) based on tegafur twice daily) continuously as first-line therapy for metastatic or locally advanced disease that could not be treated by loco-regional therapies. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS The study enrolled 53 patients. Thirty-eight patients (72%) were hepatitis B surface antigen-positive. The median PFS was 3.7 months (95% C.I., 1.9-5.5) and the median overall survival was 7.4 months (95% C.I., 3.4-11.4). According to RECIST criteria, 4 patients (8%) had a partial response and 26 patients (49%) had a stable disease. Major grade 3/4 toxicities included fatigue (15%), abnormal liver function (13%), elevated serum lipase (10%) hand-foot skin reaction (HFSR) (9%), and bleeding (8%). HFSR was the major adverse event resulting in dose reduction (19%) or treatment delay (21%). CONCLUSIONS Metronomic chemotherapy with tegafur/uracil can be safely combined with sorafenib and shows preliminary activity to improve the efficacy of sorafenib in advanced HCC patients.

Significant Difference in the Trends of Female Breast Cancer Incidence Between Taiwanese and Caucasian Americans: Implications from Age-Period-Cohort Analysis

Female invasive breast cancer (FIBC) in Taiwan is characterized by a striking recent increase of incidence and a relatively young median age (45-49 years) at diagnosis. The Westernization of lifestyle that is increasingly affecting younger generations of Taiwanese may have an important impact on this change. We compared epidemiologic data on FIBC in Taiwanese obtained from the Taiwan Cancer Registry with data for Caucasian Americans obtained from the database of the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program for the period from 1980 to 1999. Age-specific incidence rates of FIBC were plotted by calendar year at diagnosis and by birth cohort for both populations. The individual effects of time period and birth cohort on the incidence trends of FIBC in both populations were evaluated using the age-period-cohort analysis. The incidence rate of FIBC was continuously increased in Taiwanese throughout the past 2 decades, whereas the increase of incidence was slowing down in Caucasian Americans. The incidence rates in Taiwanese women born after the 1960s were approaching that of Caucasian Americans. The age-period-cohort analysis showed a much stronger birth cohort effect on the incidence trend of FIBC in Taiwanese than in Caucasian Americans. This strong birth cohort effect corresponded to the Westernization of lifestyle in Taiwan since 1960. These findings indicate that a continued shift in the incidence and age distribution pattern of FIBC in Taiwanese toward that of Caucasian Americans should be anticipated.

Early Alpha-Fetoprotein Response Predicts Treatment Efficacy of Antiangiogenic Systemic Therapy in Patients With Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Antiangiogenic therapy has become the most important treatment modality for patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). In this study, the authors investigated levels of alpha‐fetoprotein (AFP) as a potential biomarker for treatment efficacy of antiangiogenic therapy.

Adjuvant interferon therapy after curative therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC): A meta-regression approach

BACKGROUND & AIMS Adjuvant anti-viral therapy after curative therapy for HCC has been studied extensively but the true clinical benefit and the predictors of efficacy remain unclear. METHODS MEDLINE, PubMed, and the Cochrane library were searched until December 2008, plus the meeting abstracts of the American Association for the Study of Liver Disease 2005-2008. Randomized trials and cohort studies were included if the studies (1) enrolled HCC patients who had underlying chronic viral hepatitis B or C and had undergone curative surgery or ablation therapy; (2) consisted of one or more treatment arms with interferon-based therapy and a control arm of no anti-viral therapy; and (3) included recurrence-free survival of HCC as an endpoint. Meta-analysis and meta-regression were done according to the Cochrane guidelines. RESULTS Thirteen studies (9 randomized trials and 4 cohort studies, totally 1180 patients) were eligible for meta-analysis. Surgery and ablation therapy were used in 9 and 8 studies, respectively. All studies used conventional interferon (natural or recombinant) as anti-viral therapy. Overall, interferon improved the 1-year, 2-year, and 3-year recurrence-free survival by 7.8% (95% CI 3.7-11.8%), 35.4% (95% CI 30.7-40.0%), and 14.0% (95% CI 8.6-19.4%), respectively (all p<0.01). Lower percentage of patients with multiple tumors and use of ablation therapy were independent predictors for better treatment efficacy. CONCLUSION The quantitative estimation of treatment efficacy and the identification of predictive factors in this study will help design future clinical trials of adjuvant therapy for HCC.

Bortezomib Overcomes Tumor Necrosis Factor-related Apoptosis-inducing Ligand Resistance in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Cells in Part through the Inhibition of the Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinase/Akt Pathway

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most common and aggressive human malignancies. Recombinant tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) is a promising anti-tumor agent. However, many HCC cells show resistance to TRAIL-induced apoptosis. In this study, we showed that bortezomib, a proteasome inhibitor, overcame TRAIL resistance in HCC cells, including Huh-7, Hep3B, and Sk-Hep1. The combination of bortezomib and TRAIL restored the sensitivity of HCC cells to TRAIL-induced apoptosis. Comparing the molecular change in HCC cells treated with these agents, we found that down-regulation of phospho-Akt (P-Akt) played a key role in mediating TRAIL sensitization of bortezomib. The first evidence was that bortezomib down-regulated P-Akt in a dose- and time-dependent manner in TRAIL-treated HCC cells. Second, LY294002, a PI3K inhibitor, also sensitized resistant HCC cells to TRAIL-induced apoptosis. Third, knocking down Akt1 by small interference RNA also enhanced TRAIL-induced apoptosis in Huh-7 cells. Finally, ectopic expression of mutant Akt (constitutive active) in HCC cells abolished TRAIL sensitization effect of bortezomib. Moreover, okadaic acid, a protein phosphatase 2A (PP2A) inhibitor, reversed down-regulation of P-Akt in bortezomib-treated cells, and PP2A knockdown by small interference RNA also reduced apoptosis induced by the combination of TRAIL and bortezomib, indicating that PP2A may be important in mediating the effect of bortezomib on TRAIL sensitization. Together, bortezomib overcame TRAIL resistance at clinically achievable concentrations in hepatocellular carcinoma cells, and this effect is mediated at least partly via inhibition of the PI3K/Akt pathway.

Low-Dose Thalidomide Treatment for Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Objective: To analyze the efficacy of oral thalidomide in the treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Methods: Sixty-eight patients with unresectable and nonembolizable HCC were consecutively enrolled in a compassionate treatment program of oral thalidomide. Tumor response and treatment-related toxicity were prospectively followed. Thalidomide was given at a starting dose of 200 mg per day. The dose was gradually escalated in 100-mg steps up to 600 mg per day if no limiting toxicities developed. Results: Sixty-three patients were evaluable for response. One complete and 3 partial responses, defined by World Health Organization criteria, were seen, with a response rate of 6.3% (95% CI 0–12.5). The duration of response was 50+, 24.6, 11.6+ and 8.7+ weeks, respectively. All 4 responders had a dramatic decrease in α-fetoprotein (α-FP) levels. Another 6 of the 42 patients with elevated α-FP levels before treatment had a more than 50% decrease in their α-FP levels after thalidomide treatment. Totally 10 patients had an objective response to thalidomide. The median overall survival for all of the 68 patients was 18.7 weeks (95% CI 11.8– 25.6) with a 1-year survival rate of 27.6%. The median overall survival of the 10 patients with an objective response to thalidomide was 62.4 weeks (95% CI 31.2–93.6 weeks). All responders responded at a dose equal to or less than 300 mg per day. Toxicities of thalidomide were generally manageable, and only 16, 6, and 0 patients developed grade 2, 3, and 4 toxicities, respectively. Conclusion: Low-dose thalidomide is safe and induces unequivocal tumor response in a minority of patients with advanced HCC.

Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging biomarkers predict survival and response in hepatocellular carcinoma patients treated with sorafenib and metronomic tegafur/uracil

BACKGROUND & AIMS Sorafenib plus metronomic tegafur/uracil therapy can induce tumor stabilization in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients. This study evaluated the correlation of vascular response measured by dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) and the clinical outcome. METHODS DCE-MRI was performed in advanced HCC patients treated with sorafenib (800 mg/d) plus tegafur/uracil (250 mg/m(2)/d based on tegafur) at baseline and after 14 days of treatment. An operator-defined region of interest was placed in the most strongly enhanced area of the tumor to measure the pharmacokinetic parameter K(trans). Changes in K(trans) after treatment were correlated with the best tumor response and survival. RESULTS Thirty-one patients were evaluable. There were one partial response (PR), 18 stable disease (SD), and 12 progressive disease (PD) according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST). Baseline K(trans) was higher in patients with PR or SD (median 1215.2 × 10(-3)/min, range 582.5-4555.3 × 10(-3)/min) than patients with PD (median 702.0 × 10(-3)/min, range 375.2-1938.0 × 10(-3)/min, p = 0.008). After 14 days of study treatment, the median K(trans) change was -47.1% (range -87.0 to -18.0%) in patients with PR or SD, and 9.6% (range -44.8 to +81%) in those with PD (p<0.001). A vascular response, defined by a 40% or greater decrease in K(trans) after 14 days of study treatment, correlated with longer progression-free survival (median 29.1 vs. 8.7 weeks, p = 0.033) and overall survival (median 53.0 vs. 14.9 weeks, p = 0.016). Percentage of K(trans) change after treatment is an independent predictor of tumor response, progression-free survival, and overall survival. CONCLUSIONS K(trans) measured by DCE-MRI correlated well with tumor response and survival in HCC patients who received sorafenib plus metronomic tegafur/uracil therapy.