Chiun-Ku Lin

Eradication of Helicobacter pylori prevents ulcer development in patients with ulcer-like functional dyspepsia

Although the eradication of Helicobacter pylori infection benefits patients with gastric or duodenal ulcers, the value of eradicating the infection in the patients with functional dyspepsia (FD) remains controversial.

Improved survival in patients receiving medical therapy as compared with banding ligation for the prevention of esophageal variceal rebleeding

Both medical therapy and endoscopic variceal ligation (EVL) have proven to be comparable in the prevention of variceal rebleeding. However, the long‐term results are still lacking. Our previous study enrolled 121 patients with history of esophageal variceal bleeding and randomized to receive EVL (EVL group, 60 patients) or drug therapy, nadolol plus isosorbide‐5‐mononitrate (N+I) (N+I group, 61 patients) to prevent variceal rebleeding. The EVL group received ligation regularly until variceal obliteration. The N+I group received N+I during the study period. Patients were followed for up to 8 years. After a median follow‐up of 82 months, recurrent upper gastrointestinal bleeding developed in 28 patients (47%) in the EVL group and 49 patients (80%) in the N+I group (P = 0.001). Recurrent bleeding from esophageal varices occurred in 18 patients (30%) in the EVL group and 39 patients (64%) in the N+I group. The actuarial probability of rebleeding from esophageal varices was lower in the EVL group (P = 0.001). A total of 42 patients of the EVL group and 30 patients of the N+I group died (P = 0.013). The multivariate Cox analysis indicated that age, serum albumin, presence of encephalopathy, and treatment were the factors predictive of mortality. Conclusion: Our long‐term follow‐up study showed that combination of N+I therapy was inferior to banding ligation in the reduction of variceal rebleeding, but with enhanced survival. (HEPATOLOGY 2008;48:580–587.)

Prophylactic banding ligation of high-risk esophageal varices in patients with cirrhosis: a prospective, randomized trial

BACKGROUND/AIMS Injection sclerotherapy has been used to prevent the first episode of variceal hemorrhage, but the results are controversial. The value of banding ligation in the prophylaxis of the first episode of variceal bleeding has not yet been completely evaluated. This study was conducted to determine whether prophylactic banding ligation is beneficial for cirrhotic patients with high-risk esophageal varices. METHODS A total of 127 cirrhotic patients with endoscopically-assessed high-risk esophageal varices but no history of bleeding were randomized to undergo banding ligation (64 patients) or to serve as controls (63 patients). Ligation was performed at 3-week intervals until variceal obliteration was obtained. RESULTS During a median follow-up of 29 months, 14 patients (21.8%) in the ligation group and 22 patients (34.9%) in the control group experienced upper gastrointestinal bleeding (p = 0.15). Variceal bleeding occurred in eight patients (12.5%) in the ligation group and 14 patients (22.2%) in the control group (p = 0.22). Blood transfusion requirements were fewer in the EVL group than in the control group (0.6+/-0.4 units vs. 1.2+/-0.8 units, p<0.001). Furthermore, variceal bleeding was significantly reduced in Child-Pugh class B patients treated with ligation compared with the control group (p<0.05). Sixteen patients (25%) in the ligation group and 23 patients (36.5%) in the control group died. Comparison of Kaplan-Meier estimates of time to death for the two groups did not show significant differences (p = 0.19). More patients died of uncontrollable variceal bleeding in the control group (7 patients, 11%) than in the ligation group (3 patients, 4.7%) (p = 0.15). CONCLUSIONS Although prophylactic ligation did not significantly reduce the first episode of bleeding from esophageal varices in cirrhotic patients with high-risk esophageal varices, a subgroup of patients (Child-Pugh class B) had a reduced frequency of the first episode of esophageal variceal bleeding after prophylactic banding ligation. Furthermore, there was a trend of reducing mortality from variceal bleeding in patients receiving prophylactic ligation. Prophylactic ligation is a promising treatment, but requires further investigation.

A Prospective Randomized Trial of Esomeprazole- versus Pantoprazole-Based Triple Therapy for Helicobacter pylori Eradication

OBJECTIVE:This prospective, randomized, controlled, head-to-head study was conducted to compare the efficacies of esomeprazole- and pantoprazole-based triple therapies for Helicobacter pylori eradication.METHODS:From January 2002 to October 2003, 200 H. pylori-infected patients were randomly assigned to undergo twice daily treatment with esomeprazole 40 mg (n = 100) or pantoprazole 40 mg (n = 100) combined with clarithromycin 500 mg and amoxicillin 1 g for 1 wk (ECA and PCA groups, respectively). Follow-up endoscopy was performed at 8 wks after the end of treatment to assess the treatment response.RESULTS:Intention-to-treat analysis demonstrated a significantly higher eradication rate for the ECA group than for the PCA group (94% vs 82%, respectively, p = 0.009). Per-protocol analysis also showed similar results (97% vs 84%, p = 0.003). Both groups had similar frequencies of adverse events (15% vs 24%) and drug compliance (97% vs 96%). Multivariate analysis disclosed that the use of esomeprazole (OR: 1.56, 95% CI, 1.11–2.19) and good compliance 7.39 (95% CI, 1.27–42.95) were independent predictors of treatment success. Alcohol drinking was an independent predictor of eradication failure (OR: 0.18; 95% CI, 0.06–0.54).CONCLUSION:Esomeprazole-based triple therapy demonstrated a higher eradication rate than pantoprazole-based regimen. The differences in eradiation efficacies between the two study groups may be related to the more powerful acid inhibition effect and stronger anti-H. pylori activity of esomeprazole compared to pantoprazole.

When to discharge patients with bleeding peptic ulcers : a prospective study of residual risk of rebleeding

BACKGROUND From January 1993 to December 1994, we conducted a prospective study to investigate the evolutionary change of rebleeding risk in bleeding peptic ulcers. To obviate possible confounding factors that would influence decision making for discharge of patients, subjects with coexistent acute illnesses, systemic bleeding disorders, alcoholism, and use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs were excluded. METHODS Emergency endoscopies were performed in patients with hematemesis or a melena within 24 hours of admission. Ulcer lesions were divided into six categories according to endoscopic findings. The residual risks of rebleeding of each type of ulcers were calculated for 10 days, and the critical point of acceptable rebleeding risk after discharge was set at 3%. RESULTS Three hundred ninety-two patients with bleeding peptic ulcers completed the study. The ulcers, characterized by clean bases, red or black spots, adherent clots, nonbleeding visible vessels without local therapy, nonbleeding visible vessels with local therapy, and bleeding visible vessels with local therapy took 0, 3, 3, 4, 4, and 3 days, respectively, to decrease rebleeding risk to below the critical point. All episodes of fatal rebleeding (n = 4) occurred within 24 hours after admission. CONCLUSIONS Patients with clean-based ulcers can be discharged in the first day of admission. The optimal duration required for hospitalization of patients with ulcers characterized by nonbleeding visible vessels at initial endoscopy is 4 days. The remaining patients with ulcers marked by other bleeding stigmata may be discharged after a 3-day observation.

Risks of interleukin-1 genetic polymorphisms and Helicobacter pylori infection in the development of gastric cancer

Background : The host genetic factors that determine the clinical outcomes of Helicobacter pylori‐infected individuals remain unclear.

Effect of intravenous albumin on endotoxin removal, cytokines, and nitric oxide production in patients with cirrhosis and spontaneous bacterial peritonitis.

Objective. In patients with cirrhosis and spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP), the use of intravenous albumin has been shown to prevent deterioration of renal function and to decrease the mortality rate, but the mechanisms remain unclear. The purpose of this study was to characterize the mechanisms of action of albumin with the focus on endotoxin and cytokines. Material and methods. Thirty patients with SBP were divided into two groups. Group 1 received antibiotics and albumin infusion (20% 50 cc every day for 3 days) and Group 2 received antibiotic treatment only. Twenty-four cirrhotic patients with sterile ascites were enrolled in Group 3 and received albumin infusion (20% 50 cc every day for 3 days). Plasma and ascitic fluid concentrations of endotoxin, nitric oxide products (NOx), tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, and interleukin (IL)-6 were analyzed before and after treatments, respectively. Results. Combination therapy of albumin and antibiotics can significantly (p<0.01) reduce plasma levels of TNF-α and IL-6, and ascitic fluid levels of endotoxin, TNF-α and IL-6 in cirrhotic patients with SBP. Without the addition of albumin to an antibiotic regimen, the plasma and ascitic fluid levels of NOx increased significantly in patients with SBP (p=0.005 and p=0.004, respectively). Conclusions. The results confirm that the beneficial effects of albumin are related to the reduction of the levels of TNF-α and NOx in both plasma and ascitic fluid. The infusion of albumin continuously for 3 days in addition to antibiotic treatment at the time of SBP detection is recommended as an effective therapy for patients with cirrhosis and SBP.

Does cholecystectomy after endoscopic sphincterotomy prevent the recurrence of biliary complications

BACKGROUND The intact gallbladder after endoscopic sphincterotomy is thought to be a potential risk factor for recurrent biliary complications. The aim of this non-randomized prospective study was to investigate whether cholecystectomy soon after endoscopic sphincterotomy could prevent the recurrence of biliary complications. METHODS From January 1991 to October 1995, 140 patients with intact gallbladder underwent endoscopic sphincterotomy for clearance of stones in the bile duct. Of the 140 patients, 46 underwent elective cholecystectomy soon after sphincterotomy (group A) and 94 did not (group B). All 140 patients had quantitative cholescintigraphy after normalization of liver function and were followed on a regular basis with liver biochemistry, sonography, and/or computed tomography. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiography was also performed if a recurrent biliary problem was suspected. RESULTS After a median 43 months (range 23 to 80) of follow-up, 5 patients in group A developed bile duct stones whereas 12 patients in group B had recurrent stones; 4 patients in group A versus 6 patients in group B had recurrent biliary symptoms. One patient in group A and 5 patients in group B with recurrent biliary stones were without symptoms. In group B, the age, gender, diameter of the bile duct, preexisting cholelithiasis, abnormal filling of the gallbladder on quantitative cholescintigraphy, and presence of juxtapapillary diverticulum were not found to be the significant factors affecting the recurrence of biliary symptoms or stones. Endoscopic removal of recurrent biliary stones was successful in all patients. Three patients in group B underwent cholecystectomy after abatement of symptoms. CONCLUSION Elective cholecystectomy after endoscopic sphincterotomy does not reduce the incidence of recurrent biliary complications.

Endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation alone without sphincterotomy for the treatment of large common bile duct stones

BackgroundLethal pancreatitis has been reported after treatment for common bile duct stones using small endoscopic papillary balloon dilation.MethodsWe retrospectively evaluated the safety and efficacy of using large balloon dilation alone without the use of sphincterotomy for the treatment of large common bile duct stones in Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital. Success rate of stone clearance, procedure-related adverse events and incidents, frequency of mechanical lithotripsy use, and recurrent stones were recorded.ResultsA total of 247 patients were reviewed in the current study. The mean age of the patients was 71.2 years. Most of them had comorbidities. Mean stone size was 16.4 mm. Among the patients, 132 (53.4%) had an intact gallbladder and 121 (49%) had a juxtapapillary diverticulum. The mean size of dilating balloon used was 13.2 mm. The mean duration of the dilating procedure was 4.7 min. There were 39 (15.8%) patients required the help of mechanical lithotripsy while retrieving the stones. The final success rate of complete retrieval of stones was 92.7%. The rate of pancreatic duct enhancement was 26.7% (66/247). There were 3 (1.2%) adverse events and 6 (2.4%) intra-procedure bleeding incidents. All patients recovered completely after conservative and endoscopic treatment respectively, and no procedure-related mortality was noted. 172 patients had a follow-up duration of more than 6 months and among these, 25 patients had recurrent common bile duct stones. It was significantly correlated to the common bile duct size (p = 0.036)ConclusionsEndoscopic papillary large balloon dilation alone is simple, safe, and effective in dealing with large common bile duct stones in relatively aged and debilitated patients.

The impact of endoscopic variceal ligation on the pressure of the portal venous system

BACKGROUND/AIMS Endoscopic variceal ligation is a viable substitute for injection sclerotherapy. It is still not known how endoscopic variceal ligation may influence the portal venous system. To clarify this issue we investigated the impact of endoscopic variceal ligation on the pressure of the portal venous system. METHODS Twenty-nine patients with a history of esophageal variceal bleeding but without ascites were enrolled. All had cirrhosis; 63% of them were post-hepatitic. Ligation was performed at intervals of 2-3 weeks until all the varices were obliterated. Portal venograms were performed before institution of ligation and after variceal obliteration to assess venographic findings and pressure changes. The pressures of the main portal vein, splenic vein and superior mesenteric vein were recorded. RESULTS Twenty-five patients completed the study. A mean of 4.4 sessions (range: 2-7) of ligation over a period of 2 months was needed. Seventeen (68%) patients experienced elevated pressure and eight (32%) patients reduced pressure after ligation. Mean (median) pressure changes were as follows: portal venous pressure, 26.5 +/- 4.7 (25.0) mmHg vs. 28.2 +/- 7.2 (28.0) mmHg (p > 0.05); splenic venous pressure, 28.2 +/- 4.9 (26.0) mmHg vs. 29.0 +/- 6.8 (29.0) mmHg (p > 0.05); superior mesenteric venous pressure, 28.4 +/- 6.0 (27.0) mmHg vs. 29.5 +/- 7.0 (29.0) mmHg (p > 0.05). Five patients (20%) experienced rebleeding before variceal obliteration; all of them presented elevated portal pressures after variceal obliteration. Among the eight patients with decreased portal pressure, seven (87%) had other major collaterals apart from esophageal varices, compared to three out of the 17 (18%) patients with elevated portal pressure who had other major collaterals (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS Among patients receiving endoscopic variceal ligation, 68% experienced elevated portal pressure, while 32% had decreased portal pressure. Elevation of portal pressure after variceal ligation may be an important factor in variceal rebleeding. The presence of other major collaterals apart from esophageal varices may be responsible for the decrease in portal pressure after obliteration of esophagel varices.