Chizuru Shikishima
Teikyo University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Chizuru Shikishima.
Archives of Sexual Behavior | 2016
Shoko Sasaki; Koken Ozaki; Shinji Yamagata; Yusuke Takahashi; Chizuru Shikishima; Tamara Kornacki; Koichi Nonaka; Juko Ando
The present study examined: (1) gender and age differences of mean gender identity disorder (GID) trait scores in Japanese twins; (2) the validity of the prenatal hormone transfer theory, which predicts that, in dizygotic (DZ) twin pairs, twins with an opposite-gender co-twin more frequently exhibit GID traits than twins with a same-gender co-twin; and (3) the magnitude of genetic and environmental influences on GID traits as a function of age and gender. Data from 1450 male twin pairs, 1882 female twin pairs, and 1022 DZ male–female pairs ranging from 3 to 26xa0years of age were analyzed. To quantify individual variances in GID traits, each participant completed four questionnaire items based on criteria for GID from the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV-TR). Our most important findings were: (1) Japanese females exhibited GID traits more frequently than males and Japanese children exhibited GID traits less frequently than adolescents and adults (among females, the prevalence was 1.6xa0% in children, 10xa0% in adolescents, and 12xa0% in adults; among males, the prevalence was 0.5, 2, and 3xa0%, respectively); (2) the data did not support the prenatal hormone transfer theory for GID traits; and (3) a large part of the variance for GID traits in children was accounted for by familial factors; however, the magnitude was found to be greater in children than in adolescents or adults, particularly among females. This study suggests that although the prevalence is likely to increase, familial effects are likely to decrease as individuals age.
Twin Research and Human Genetics | 2013
Juko Ando; Keiko K. Fujisawa; Chizuru Shikishima; Kai Hiraishi; Mari Nozaki; Shinji Yamagata; Yusuke Takahashi; Koken Ozaki; Kunitake Suzuki; Minako Deno; Shoko Sasaki; Tatsushi Toda; Kazuhiro Kobayashi; Yutaro Sugimoto; Mitsuhiro Okada; Nobuhiko Kijima; Yutaka Ono; Kimio Yoshimura; Shinichiro Kakihana; Hiroko Maekawa; Toshimitsu Kamakura; Koichi Nonaka; Noriko Kato; Syuichi Ooki
The Keio Twin Research Center has conducted two longitudinal twin cohort projects and has collected three independent and anonymous twin data sets for studies of phenotypes related to psychological, socio-economic, and mental health factors. The Keio Twin Study has examined adolescent and adult cohorts, with a total of over 2,400 pairs of twins and their parents. DNA samples are available for approximately 600 of these twin pairs. The Tokyo Twin Cohort Project has followed a total of 1,600 twin pairs from infancy to early childhood. The large-scale cross-sectional twin study (CROSS) has collected data from over 4,000 twin pairs, from 3 to 26 years of age, and from two high school twin cohorts containing a total of 1,000 pairs of twins. These data sets of anonymous twin studies have mainly targeted academic performance, attitude, and social environment. The present article introduces the research designs and major findings of our center, such as genetic structures of cognitive abilities, personality traits, and academic performances, developmental effects of genes and environment on attitude, socio-cognitive ability and parenting, genes x environment interaction on attitude and conduct problem, and statistical methodological challenges and so on. We discuss the challenges in conducting twin research in Japan.
Frontiers in Psychology | 2015
Kai Hiraishi; Chizuru Shikishima; Shinji Yamagata; Juko Ando
Prosociality is one of the most distinctive features of human beings but there are individual differences in cooperative behavior. Employing the twin method, we examined the heritability of cooperativeness and its outcomes on public goods games using a strategy method. In two experiments (Study 1 and Study 2), twin participants were asked to indicate (1) how much they would contribute to a group when they did not know how much the other group members were contributing, and (2) how much they would contribute if they knew the contributions of others. Overall, the heritability estimates were relatively small for each type of decision, but heritability was greater when participants knew that the others had made larger contributions. Using registered decisions in Study 2, we conducted seven Monte Carlo simulations to examine genetic and environmental influences on the expected game payoffs. For the simulated one-shot game, the heritability estimates were small, comparable to those of game decisions. For the simulated iterated games, we found that the genetic influences first decreased, then increased as the numbers of iterations grew. The implication for the evolution of individual differences in prosociality is discussed.
Frontiers in Psychology | 2015
Chizuru Shikishima; Kai Hiraishi; Shinji Yamagata; Jyuko Ando; Mitsuhiro Okada
Why does decision making differ among individuals? People sometimes make seemingly inconsistent decisions with lower expected (monetary) utility even when objective information of probabilities and reward are provided. It is noteworthy, however, that a certain proportion of people do not provide anomalous responses, choosing the alternatives with higher expected utility, thus appearing to be more “rational.” We investigated the genetic and environmental influences on these types of individual differences in decision making using a classical Allais problem task. Participants were 1,199 Japanese adult twins aged 20–47. Univariate genetic analysis revealed that approximately a third of the Allais problem response variance was explained by genetic factors and the rest by environmental factors unique to individuals and measurement error. The environmental factor shared between families did not contribute to the variance. Subsequent multivariate genetic analysis clarified that decision making using the expected utility theory was associated with general intelligence and that the association was largely mediated by the same genetic factor. We approach the mechanism underlying two types of “rational” decision making from the perspective of genetic correlations with cognitive abilities.
Personality and Individual Differences | 2015
Yulia Kovas; Gabrielle Garon-Carrier; Michel Boivin; Stephen A. Petrill; Robert Plomin; Sergey Malykh; Frank M. Spinath; Kou Murayama; Juko Ando; Olga Y. Bogdanova; Mara Brendgen; Ginette Dionne; Nadine Forget-Dubois; Eduard V. Galajinsky; Juliana Gottschling; Frédéric Guay; Jean-Pascal Lemelin; Jessica A. R. Logan; Shinji Yamagata; Chizuru Shikishima; Birgit Spinath; Lee A. Thompson; Tatiana Tikhomirova; Maria Grazia Tosto; Richard E. Tremblay; Frank Vitaro
Emerging Trends in the Social and Behavioral Sciences: An Interdisciplinary, Searchable, and Linkable Resource | 2015
Christian Kandler; Edward Bell; Chizuru Shikishima; Shinji Yamagata; Rainer Riemann
Archive | 2013
Christian Kandler; Edward Bell; Chizuru Shikishima; Shinji Yamagata; Rainer Riemann
Personality and Individual Differences | 2018
Chizuru Shikishima; Kai Hiraishi; Yusuke Takahashi; Shinji Yamagata; Susumu Yamaguchi; Juko Ando
Archive | 2017
Michio Naoi; Hideo Akabayashi; Ryosuke Nakamura; Kayo Nozaki; Shinpei Sano; Wataru Senoh; Chizuru Shikishima
Educational Studies in Japan: International Yearbook | 2016
Hideo Akabayashi; Ryosuke Nakamura; Michio Naoi; Chizuru Shikishima