Chong Soo Kim

Axillary approach versus the infraclavicular approach in ultrasound-guided brachial plexus block: comparison of anesthetic time.

Background With ultrasound guidance, the success rate of brachial plexus block (BPB) is 95-100% and the anesthetic time has become a more important factor than before. Many investigators have compared ultrasound guidance with the nerve stimulation technique, but there are few studies comparing different approaches via the same ultrasound guidance. We compared the axillary BPB with the infraclavicular BPB under ultrasound guidance. Methods Twenty-two ASA physical status I-II patients presenting with elective forearm surgery were prospectively randomized to receive an axillary BPB (group AX) or an infraclavicular BPB (group IC) with ultrasound guidance. Both groups received a total of 20 ml of 1.5% lidocaine with 5 µg/ml epinephrine and 0.1 mEq/ml sodium bicarbonate. Patients were then evaluated for block onset and block performance time was also recorded. Results Group IC demonstrated a reduction in performance time vs. group AX (622 ± 139 sec vs. 789 ± 131 sec, P < 0.05). But, the onset time was longer in group IC than in group AX (7.7 ± 8.8 min vs. 1.4 ± 2.3 min, P < 0.05). All blocks were successful in both groups. Conclusions Under ultrasound guidance, infraclavicular BPB was faster to perform than the axillary approach. But the block onset was slower with the infraclavicular approach.

The effect of low fresh gas flow rate on sevoflurane consumption

Background In an era of medical cost containment, cost-effectiveness has become a major focus in healthcare. The effect of a new policy on the use of low fresh gas flow during maintenance of general anesthesia with volatile anesthetics was evaluated. Methods The numbers and duration of general anesthesia cases using sevoflurane 5 weeks prior to and 15 weeks after policy implementation were retrieved from the electronic medical records database. The number of sevoflurane bottles consumed was also assessed. The anesthesia hours per bottle of sevoflurane were compared before and after policy implementation. Results The number of anesthesia hours performed per bottle of sevoflurane increased by 38.3%. The effect varied over time and tended to fade with time. Conclusions The implementation of a low fresh gas flow rate policy effectively reduces the amount of sevoflurane consumed for the same duration of anesthesia.

Intravenous, Oral, and the Combination of Intravenous and Oral Ramosetron for the Prevention of Nausea and Vomiting After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND Patients undergoing general anesthesia for laparoscopic cholecystectomy have a high risk of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) with incidences up to 75%. Ramosetron, a serotonin subtype 3 (5-HT(3)) antagonist, has been shown to be effective as an antiemetic after chemotherapy and surgery. Consensus guidelines recommend a combination of antiemetic therapies in high-risk groups. Until now, no published data have been available on the use of combination oral plus intravenous ramosetron. OBJECTIVE The goal of this prospective, randomized, double-blind study was to compare the efficacy and tolerability of intravenous, oral, and the combination of oral and intravenous ramosetron for PONV prophylaxis in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. METHODS Patients scheduled for laparoscopic cholecystectomy were double-randomly allocated to 1 of 3 groups. Patients were randomly allocated to receive either 0.3 mg of intravenous ramosetron (group A), 0.1 mg of oral ramosetron (group B), or the combination of 0.1 mg of oral ramosetron and 0.3 mg of intravenous ramosetron (group C). All patients received standardized balanced anesthesia with desflurane and remifentanil. Postoperative nausea, retching, vomiting, pain, and adverse effects were assessed at 0 to 2, 2 to 24, and 24 to 48 hours after surgery. RESULTS A total of 124 Korean patients (67 women, 57 men; age range, 25-65 years) were randomized to 1 of 3 study groups (42 in group A [mean age, 49.8 years], 41 in group B [mean age, 47.4 years], and 41 in group C [mean age, 48.9 years]). No statistical differences were observed among the 3 groups with regard to patient characteristics and information on surgery and anesthesia. During postoperative period 0 to 2 hours, complete response occurred in 31 (74%) patients in group A, 27 (66%) in group B, and 37 (90%) in group C. During the postoperative period of 2 to 24 hours, complete response was observed in 36 (86%), 33 (80%), and 40 (98%) patients in groups A, B, and C, respectively; there was a statistically significant difference in group C compared with group A or group B. During the postoperative period of 0 to 48 hours, incidences of rescue antiemetic use were 13 (31%), 14 (34%), and 3 (7%) in groups A, B and C, respectively. Common adverse effects (headache, dizziness, and drowsiness) were observed, but there was no significant difference in the incidences of adverse effects among the 3 groups (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS The combination of 0.1-mg oral and 0.3-mg intravenous ramosetron was more effective than either 0.3-mg intravenous ramosetron or 0.1-mg oral ramosetron alone for the prophylaxis of nausea and vomiting after laparoscopic cholecystectomy during the first 24 hours after surgery. In addition, differences did not reach the level of statistical significance between 0.1 mg of oral ramosetron and 0.3 mg of intravenous ramosetron for the prevention of PONV in this patient population. Oral, intravenous, and combined oral and intravenous ramosetron appears well tolerated in the population studied. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT 01041183.

A portable inhalational induction device provides co-operative induction of anaesthesia in preanaesthetic area for children.

Background We introduce a new, simple portable inhalational induction device (PD) that provides co-operative inhalational induction of anaesthesia using N2O and subsequent sevoflurane in the preanaesthetic induction area in children. Methods Forty-five children (30 to 94 months old age, <35 kg) who were scheduled to undergo simple operations were assigned randomly to one of three regimens. Patients were encouraged by their parents to inhale N2O followed by sevoflurane (PD N2O-sevo group) or sevoflurane (PD sevo group) using a portable inhalational induction device in the preanaesthetic induction area until they were unable to respond to their names. They were then transferred to the operating room while maintaining inhalation of sevoflurane via the device. The control group underwent conventional inhalational induction in the operating room with the parents in attendance. Results Patients in the PD N2O-sevo group had a higher co-operative inhalation frequency than the patients in the PD sevo or the control group. Anaesthesia induction in the PD N2O-sevo and the PD sevo groups were faster than in the control group. Parent satisfaction score (0-100) was higher for the PD N2O-sevo group than for the control group. Conclusions A new portable inhalational induction device allows faster induction in co-operation with parents present in the preanaesthetic induction area compared to conventional inhalational induction in the unfamiliar operating room with the parents in attendance.

Comparison of airwayscope to direct laryngoscope and lightwand for cardiovascular response in patients with difficult airway

BACKGROUND Airwayscope (AWS), which has been used successfully for difficult airway in general anesthesia, has been anticipated that hemodynamic response to tracheal intubation in the difficult airway may be attenuated. Also, there is a series of reports demonstrating the successful use of lightwand to open the difficult airway. Thus, we decided to conduct a survey to compare AWS to lightwand and to direct laryngoscopy of cardiovascular response to tracheal intubation. METHODS Of 64 healthy patients without cardiovascular disease, 22, 21, 21 patients were randomly assigned to AWS group, lightwand group and direct laryngoscope group. After induction of general anesthesia, intubation was performed with manual in-line neck stabilization. During laryngoscopy, a modified Cormack-Lehane grade was assessed and time to intubation was measured. Systolic arterial pressure (SAP) and heart rate (HR) were recorded at the following timepoints: baseline, just before intubation, 1 min, 2 min, 3 min, 4 min and 5 min after intubation. RESULTS There were no significant differences between the 3 groups in SAP, HR (P > 0.05). However modified Cormack-Lehane grade of all patients in the AWS group was I, while that in direct laryngoscope group was IIB or III. In addition, the mean time to intubation of the direct laryngoscope group was significantly longer than that of the AWS and lightwand (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS In the difficult airway, AWS was very effective in improving laryngeal view and decreasing time to intubation compared to direct laryngoscopey. In addition, lightwand reduced the time to intubation. However we could not find any significant difference in hemodynamic response to tracheal intubation among the 3 groups.