Chris Blundell

Complications of Suture Button Ankle Syndesmosis Stabilization with Modifications of Surgical Technique

Background: The TightRope® is a relatively new device designed to stabilize ankle syndesmotic injuries. There are no studies evaluating the clinical effectiveness of this technique and few reports addressing complications and potential modifications to the surgical technique reported in this article. Materials and Methods: A retrospective review of 102 cases of traumatic ankle syndesmotic stabilization using the TightRope device is presented. Patients were followed up for a median of 85 days after surgery. Results: Eight patients subsequently had the TightRope removed. This was performed for four reasons: osteomyelitis surrounding the implant, painful aseptic osteolysis surrounding the implant, failed stabilization of the syndesmosis, and unexplained pain. Conclusions: On the basis of experience, the authors recommend meticulous attention during the surgical technique. To prevent skin irritation and stitch abscess formation leading to osteomyelitis, the FiberWire loop is best cut with a knife at least 1 cm beyond the knot, allowing the sharp end of the FiberWire to lay flat adjacent to the fibula. Painful aseptic osteolytic reaction to the TightRope necessitates removal. To prevent rediastasis, a small medial incision is recommended for endobutton positioning directly abutting the tibial cortex without soft tissue interposition. Inserting the TightRope through a fibula plate prevents lateral button pull-through and rediastasis. Level of Evidence: IV, Retrospective Case Series

Assessment of a Three-Grade Classification of Complications in Total Ankle Replacement

Background: Prompted by the success of hip and knee arthroplasty, total ankle replacement (TAR) has become increasingly popular as a treatment for end stage arthritis of the ankle. A 3-grade classification of complications to assist in prediction of early implant failure has been proposed. We have compared the experience of a tertiary referral center in the United Kingdom to the proposed system. Methods: A retrospective review of the Sheffield Foot and Ankle Unit TAR database was performed from 1995 to 2010. All complications were recorded and categorized using Glazebrook et al’s proposed system of increasing severity. Low-grade complications including postoperative bone fracture, intraoperative bone fracture, and wound healing problems rarely lead to revision. Medium-grade complications, technical error and subsidence, lead to failure <50% of the time. High-grade complications—deep infection, aseptic loosening, and implant failure—lead to revision >50% of the time. In our center, 217 TAR were implanted in 198 patients with a minimum follow-up of 30 months. Results: The complication rate was 23%, with a revision rate of 17%. All complications recorded in our study except intraoperative bone fracture and wound healing had a failure rate of at least 50%. Conclusion: Unfortunately most complications associated with TAR have a significant impact on the life span of a TAR. Glazebrook et al’s proposed 3-tier system did not reliably reflect our experience. Hence, we would categorize complications as either high or low risk for early failure of TAR. Level of Evidence: Level IV, case series.

Prospective, Randomized, Multi-centered Clinical Trial Assessing Safety and Efficacy of a Synthetic Cartilage Implant Versus First Metatarsophalangeal Arthrodesis in Advanced Hallux Rigidus

Background: Although a variety of great toe implants have been tried in an attempt to maintain toe motion, the majority have failed with loosening, malalignment/dislocation, implant fragmentation and bone loss. In these cases, salvage to arthrodesis is more complicated and results in shortening of the ray or requires structural bone graft to reestablish length. This prospective study compared the efficacy and safety of this small (8/10 mm) hydrogel implant to the gold standard of a great toe arthrodesis for advanced-stage hallux rigidus. Methods: In this prospective, randomized non-inferiority study, patients from 12 centers in Canada and the United Kingdom were randomized (2:1) to a synthetic cartilage implant or first metatarsophalangeal (MTP) joint arthrodesis. VAS pain scale, validated outcome measures (Foot and Ankle Ability Measure [FAAM] sport scale), great toe active dorsiflexion motion, secondary procedures, radiographic assessment, and safety parameters were evaluated. Analysis was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) and modified ITT (mITT) methodology. The primary endpoint for the study consisted of a single composite endpoint using the 3 primary study outcomes (pain, function, and safety). The individual subject’s outcome was considered a success if all of the following criteria were met: (1) improvement (decrease) from baseline in VAS pain of ≥30% at 12 months; (2) maintenance of function from baseline in FAAM sports subscore at 12 months; and (3) absence of major safety events at 2 years. The proportion of successes in each group was determined and 1-sided 95% confidence interval for the difference between treatment groups was calculated. Noninferiority of the implant to arthrodesis was considered statistically significant if the 1-sided 95% lower confidence interval was greater than the equivalence limit (<15%). A total of 236 patients were initially enrolled; 17 patients withdrew prior to randomization, 17 patients withdrew after randomization, and 22 were nonrandomized training patients, leaving 152 implant and 50 arthrodesis patients. Standard demographics and baseline outcomes were similar for both groups. Results: VAS pain scores decreased significantly in both the implant and arthrodesis groups from baseline at 12 and 24 months. Similarly, the FAAM sports and activity of daily living subscores improved significantly at 12 and 24 months in both groups. First MTP active dorsiflexion motion improvement was 6.2 degrees (27.3%) after implant placement and was maintained at 24 months. Subsequent secondary surgeries occurred in 17 (11.2%) implant patients (17 procedures) and 6 (12.0%) arthrodesis patients (7 procedures). Fourteen (9.2%) implants were removed and converted to arthrodesis, and 6 (12.0%) arthrodesis patients (7 procedures [14%]) had isolated screws or plate and screw removal. There were no cases of implant fragmentation, wear, or bone loss. When analyzing the ITT and mITT population for the primary composite outcome of VAS pain, function (FAAM sports), and safety, there was statistical equivalence between the implant and arthrodesis groups. Conclusion: A prospective, randomized (2:1), controlled, noninferiority clinical trial was performed to compare the safety and efficacy of a small synthetic cartilage bone implant to first MTP arthrodesis in patients with advanced-stage hallux rigidus. This study showed equivalent pain relief and functional outcomes. The synthetic implant was an excellent alternative to arthrodesis in patients who wished to maintain first MTP motion. The percentage of secondary surgical procedures was similar between groups. Less than 10% of the implant group required revision to arthrodesis at 2 years. Level of Evidence: Level I, prospective randomized study.

Complex Primary Arthrodesis of the First Metatarsophalangeal Joint After Bone Loss

Background: Complications associated with a failed Keller procedure or joint replacement include bone loss and shortening of the first ray. We treated failed Keller resection arthroplasty and joint replacement arthroplasty cases with metatarsophalangeal joint arthrodesis, using an interpositional tricortical autograft from the iliac crest and a low-profile titanium plate. Methods: This was a retrospective case note review of the patients treated by four consultant surgeons in a university teaching hospital. A Keller procedure was considered to have failed when patients presented with a short, painful great toe with valgus cock-up deformity. Prosthetic joint replacements were considered to have failed based on the clinico-radiological loosening with associated pain. Metatarsophalangeal joint arthrodesis was carried out using an interpositional tricortical bone autograft and a titanium plate. Patients were assessed for resolution of pain, clinical and radiological evidence of fusion and complications. Ten operated feet in nine female patients, with a mean age of 55.9 (range, 37.8 to 80.2) years were followed for a mean of 12.6 (range, 6 to 26) months. Six patients presented with failed prosthetic joint replacements and four with failed Keller arthroplasty. Results: Full clinico-radiological union was achieved in nine of the ten patients as judged by an independent consultant musculo-skeletal radiologist. Four patients needed removal of implants, one for infection, two for prominent hardware and one for implant failure. Eight of the ten patients were satisfied with the relief of pain. Conclusion: Failed arthroplasty or Keller procedure is a difficult problem to manage. We recommend complex primary arthrodesis with an interpositional iliac crest autograft and a low profile plate as a salvage procedure. Level of Evidence: IV, Retrospective Case Series

Outcome of Minimally Invasive Distal Metatarsal Metaphyseal Osteotomy (DMMO) for Lesser Toe Metatarsalgia

Background: As in all fields of surgery, advances in orthopaedic surgery develop toward less invasive surgical techniques. The advantages of smaller incisions include minimal soft tissue dissection allowing procedures to be performed as outpatient surgery. There is the assumption that this leads to a quicker recovery time permitting an earlier return to work. As with any new surgical technique, there is an associated learning curve. This study looked into the outcome of minimally invasive distal metatarsal metaphyseal osteotomy (DMMO) performed at a University Hospital. Methods: Thirty patients underwent minimally invasive surgery for DMMO. There were 13 males and 17 females with an average age of 60 years. More than one metatarsal osteotomy was done in all cases to facilitate the moulding of the metatarsal head to the correct alignment with full weight bearing. The outcome was measured with the Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOXFQ), patient-reported outcome (PRO), and visual analog scale (VAS) pain score. Minimum follow up was 1 year. Results: At the final review, the average MOXFQ score was an excellent 31. Average improvement in VAS score was 3.5, which ranged from 10 to -7. The VAS was affected by 2 patients whose pain worsened after the operation. There were 4 complications, one each of nonunion, malunion, transfer metatarsalgia, and soft tissue ossification. Conclusion: The 3 most common complications of foot and ankle surgery are infection, wound dehiscence, and skin ulcer or blister. Intra-articular metatarsal osteotomies are commonly associated with stiffness due to scarring and consequently hammertoes. By reducing the soft tissue injury in minimally invasive surgery, these risks can be potentially minimized. Minimally invasive DMMO produced good patient satisfaction, functional improvement, and low complication rates in most cases. Level of Evidence: Level IV, retrospective case series.

Variability of joint communications in the foot and ankle demonstrated by contrast-enhanced diagnostic injections.

Background: The history and physical examination will usually direct a surgeon to the correct site of joint pathology. Imaging with plain radiographs and diagnostic injections help localize joint pathology more precisely. The presence of accessory communications between adjacent joints may reduce the sensitivity of these investigations. Material and Methods: We report on the findings of 389 arthrograms of the midfoot, hindfoot and ankle that were performed by a single radiologist over a 7-year period. Fluoroscopic guidance with radioopaque dye was used to confirm needle position before local anesthetic was injected. Images were closely studied to identify any communication between adjacent joints. Results: The passage of contrast into adjacent joints confirmed the presence of an additional communication. In 13.9% of cases there was a communication between the ankle and subtalar joint. A communication between the talonavicular and the calcaneocuboid joint was observed in 42.3% of local injections. We identified previously unreported communications between the anterior subtalar and the naviculocunieform joints (8%), the anterior subtalar and the calcaneocuboid joints (9%) and the naviculocunieform and tarsometatarsal joints (1.1%). Conclusion: This study reinforces the typical incidence of known joint communications, describes previously unreported communications and highlights the importance of these communications particularly with the small joints of the midfoot. The possible presence of accessory communications must always be considered when performing isolated midfoot fusions relying upon diagnostic local anesthetic injections.

Three-Dimensional Analysis of Different First Metatarsal Osteotomies in a Hallux Valgus Model

Background: This study evaluates and compares three-dimensional (3-D) changes in geometry of the first metatarsal (MT1) independent of soft tissue corrections of 5 common osteotomies: three distal (Chevron, Mitchell, and Wilson), one proximal (Stephens basal), and one combined proximal/distal (Scarf), using standardized synthetic bone models. Materials and Methods: A digitizing system was used to measure and record points on the synthetic bone models in 3-D space. Computer vector analysis calculated 3-D rotations and translations of the MT1 head plus the conventional intermetatarsal angle (IMA) and distal metatarsal articular angle (DMAA). Results: The Wilson and Mitchells osteotomies produced significant shortening (p < 0.001) in contrast to the three other osteotomies. All the osteotomies produced a reduction in the 3-D IMA. The Scarf and Stephens basal osteotomies reduced the DMAA. All of the osteotomies resulted in lateral translations and depression of the MT1 head. While there were no significant (p > 0.05) translational differences between the Scarf and Stephens basal osteotomies, there were rotational differences, with the Stephens basal producing significantly more plantar flexion (p = 0.000) and pronation (p < 0.001) than the Scarf. Conclusion: This geometric study indicated many of the MT1 head changes following metatarsal osteotomy to be out-of-plane translational and multiplanar rotations which cannot be determined using AP radiographs alone. Clinical Relevance: We advocate judicious choice of osteotomy to achieve the desired correction of hallux valgus in each individual.

The Distance between the Sural Nerve and Ideal Portal Placements in Lateral Subtalar Arthroscopy: A Cadaveric Study

Background: There have been limited studies assessing the relative safety of lateral portals for subtalar arthroscopy in terms of their distance from the sural nerve and its branches. The aim of this cadaveric study was to assess and compare the distance of lateral subtalar arthroscopy portal sites to the sural nerve and its branches. Materials and Methods: Twenty embalmed cadaveric lower limbs were dissected exposing the nerves and tendons and subtalar arthroscopy portals were replicated using pins. The anatomically important distances were measured with a digital caliper. Statistical analysis of the data was performed using SPSS for Windows 11.5 (SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL) using Friedman Tests and Wilcoxon Signed Ranks tests. Results: The median distance of the anterior and middle subtalar portals to the nearest nerve was 21.3 mm and 20.9 mm, respectively, and 11.4 mm for the posterior portal. There was no statistically significant difference between anterior and middle portals (p = 0.87) but there was statistically significant difference between anterior versus posterior and middle versus posterior portals (p = 0.001 in each comparison). Conclusion: The anterior and middle subtalar portals were both less likely to damage important structures than the posterior subtalar portal. Clinical Relevance: The results of this study can be of value to the surgeon when planning arthroscopic procedures to the subtalar joint from the lateral approach.

A unique orthogeriatric model: a step forward in improving the quality of care for hip fracture patients.

BACKGROUND In August 2010, a unique model of shared care for hip fracture patients was implemented in our hospital. In this model, patients are allocated to an orthogeriatric team within 48 h of surgery, who review patients daily to manage medical complications and coordinate multidisciplinary rehabilitation, with orthopaedic input if necessary. AIM To compare the new model to the previous model of care as perceived by members of staff and compare clinical outcomes. METHODS Prospective data were collected using questionnaires given to medical, nursing and allied health professionals. Their opinions were rated using the Likert scaling system and analysed with the Mann Whitney U-test. Clinical outcomes were obtained from the hip fracture database and subsequently analysed. RESULTS 59 responses (100%); 21 doctors and 38 allied health professionals. The majority of staff believed that quality of patient care was better in the newer model and preferred to work in this model. The median length of stay in the previous model (274 patients) was 25 days compared to 19.5 days in the new model (249 patients) (p = 0.22). 56.8% patients returned to their source of admission in the previous model compared to 72.7% in the new model (p = 0.00007). The inpatient mortality rates improved from 12.4% in the previous model to 8.4% in the new model (p = 0.26). CONCLUSION This unique model improved care for hip fracture patients and was cost effective. Furthermore, it highlighted excellent staff satisfaction. This can pioneer a change in the management of hip fracture patients nationally and internationally.

Symptomatic treatment or cast immobilisation for avulsion fractures of the base of the fifth metatarsal: a prospective, randomised, single-blinded non-inferiority controlled trial

AIMS The purpose of this study was to compare symptomatic treatment of a fracture of the base of the fifth metatarsal with immobilisation in a cast. Our null hypothesis was that immobilisation gave better patient reported outcome measures (PROMs). The alternative hypothesis was that symptomatic treatment was not inferior. PATIENTS AND METHODS A total of 60 patients were randomised to receive four weeks of treatment, 36 in a double elasticated bandage (symptomatic treatment group) and 24 in a below-knee walking cast (immobilisation group). The primary outcome measure used was the validated Visual Analogue Scale Foot and Ankle (VAS-FA) Score. Data were analysed by a clinician, blinded to the form of treatment, at presentation and at four weeks, three months and six months after injury. Loss to follow-up was 43% at six months. Multiple imputations missing data analysis was performed. RESULTS At four weeks and six months, symptomatic treatment proved non-inferior in terms of primary outcome. TAKE HOME MESSAGE Immobilisation is no better than symptomatic treatment in the management of a fracture of the base of the fifth metatarsal when judged by PROMs. Significant loss to follow-up with this injury could be expected in longer term. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2016;98-B:806-11.