Chris Saigal

Overall Survival Advantage with Partial Nephrectomy: A Bias of Observational Data?

Partial nephrectomy (PN) and radical nephrectomy (RN) are standard treatments for a small renal mass. Retrospective studies suggest an overall survival (OS) advantage, however a randomized phase 3 trial suggests otherwise. The effects of both surgical modalities on OS were evaluated compared with controls.

Neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy leads to immediate impairment of vitality/hormonal and sexual quality of life: results of a multicenter prospective study.

OBJECTIVE To evaluate the immediate effects of neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy (NADT) on health-related quality of life (HRQOL) among patients undergoing radiation therapy (RT) for newly diagnosed prostate cancer. METHODS The Prostate Cancer Outcomes and Satisfaction with Treatment Quality Assessment Consortium is a prospective multi-institutional study. HRQOL is measured with the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite-26 questionnaire. Differences in patient-reported HRQOL were observed between pretreatment and 2 months after NADT start (and before definitive RT) with significant differences evaluated by paired t test. RESULTS From among 450 patients who completed the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite-26 before and 2 months after NADT start, 71 received NADT before proceeding with definitive RT. Patients receiving NADT experienced significant impairment in vitality/hormonal (P <.0001) and sexual (P <.0001) HRQOL after NADT initiation. The mean ± standard deviation vitality/hormonal score fell from an average of 94.1 ± 9.7 before NADT to 78.7 ± 16.3 two months after NADT initiation; and sexual HRQOL fell from a mean of 51.7 ± 31.1 pretreatment to 32.3 ± 26.1 after NADT initiation. Both these HRQOL domain changes exceeded the thresholds for clinical significance. Patients receiving NADT also experienced a significant impairment in urinary continence (P = .024), although this difference did not meet the criteria for clinical significance. CONCLUSION In this analysis, patients receiving NADT experience significant impairment in sexual and vitality/hormonal HRQOL even before starting definitive RT. The significant effect of this therapy on HRQOL needs to be considered before initiating NADT in men where there is no clear evidence of clinical benefit.

Medicare Payments for Outpatient Urological Surgery by Location of Care

PURPOSE The cost implications associated with offloading outpatient surgery from hospitals to ambulatory surgery centers and the physician office remain poorly defined. Therefore, we determined whether payments for outpatient surgery vary by location of care. MATERIALS AND METHODS Using national Medicare claims from 1998 to 2006, we identified elderly patients who underwent 1 of 22 common outpatient urological procedures. For each procedure we measured all relevant payments (in United States dollars) made during the 30-day claims window that encompassed the procedure date. We then categorized payment types (hospital, physician and outpatient facility). Finally, we used multivariable regression to compare price standardized payments across hospitals, ambulatory surgery centers and the physician office. RESULTS Average total payments for outpatient surgery episodes varied widely from

Quality of pathological reporting for renal cell cancer: implications for systemic therapy, prognostication and surveillance

200 for urethral dilation in the physician office to

Patterns and Predictors of Urodynamics Use in the United States

5,688 for hospital based shock wave lithotripsy. For all but 2 procedure groups, ambulatory surgery centers and physician offices were associated with lower overall episode payments than hospitals. For instance, average total payments for urodynamic procedures performed at ambulatory surgery centers were less than a third of those done at hospitals (p <0.001). Compared to hospitals, office based prostate biopsies were nearly 75% less costly (p <0.001). Outpatient facility payments were the biggest driver of these differences. CONCLUSIONS These data support policies that encourage the provision of outpatient surgery in less resource intensive settings.

Relief of Urinary Symptom Burden after Primary Prostate Cancer Treatment

Study Type – Prognosis (retrospective cohort)

Minimally important difference for the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite Short Form.

PURPOSE Due to the paucity of data on urodynamics on the national level, we assessed the use of urodynamics in a large sample of individuals in the United States and identified predictors of increased complexity of urodynamic procedures. MATERIALS AND METHODS Using administrative health care claims for adults enrolled in private insurance plans in the United States from 2002 to 2007, we identified those who underwent cystometrogram and abstracted relevant demographic and clinical data. We used logistic regression to identify predictors of higher urodynamic complexity over basic cystometrogram, specifically cystometrogram plus pressure flow study and videourodynamics. RESULTS We identified 16,574 urodynamic studies, of which 23% were cystometrograms, 71% were cystometrograms plus pressure flow studies and 6% were videourodynamics. Stress incontinence was the most common clinical condition for all studies (33.7%), cystometrogram (30.8%), cystometrogram plus pressure flow study (35.4%) and videourodynamics (24.4%). Urologists performed 59.8% of all urodynamics and gynecologists performed 35.5%. Providers with 14 or more urodynamic studies during the study period performed 75% of all urodynamics and were more likely to perform cystometrogram plus pressure flow study and videourodynamics. On regression analysis the most consistent predictors of cystometrogram plus pressure flow study and/or videourodynamics over cystometrogram were specialty (urologist) and the number of urodynamic tests performed by the provider. CONCLUSIONS Most urodynamics in this series consisted of cystometrogram plus pressure flow study with stress incontinence the most common diagnosis. However, regardless of diagnosis, urologists and providers who performed more urodynamics were more likely to perform pressure flow study and/or videourodynamics in addition to cystometrogram. Further research is needed to determine whether these differences reflect gaps in the consistency or appropriateness of using urodynamics.

Discord Among Radiation Oncologists and Urologists in the Postoperative Management of High-Risk Prostate Cancer: Results of an International Patterns of Care Survey

Purpose: Harms of prostate cancer treatment on urinary health related quality of life have been thoroughly studied. In this study we evaluated not only the harms but also the potential benefits of prostate cancer treatment in relieving the pretreatment urinary symptom burden. Materials and Methods: In American (1,021) and Spanish (539) multicenter prospective cohorts of men with localized prostate cancer we evaluated the effects of radical prostatectomy, external radiotherapy or brachytherapy in relieving pretreatment urinary symptoms and in inducing urinary symptoms de novo, measured by changes in urinary medication use and patient reported urinary bother. Results: Urinary symptom burden improved in 23% and worsened in 28% of subjects after prostate cancer treatment in the American cohort. Urinary medication use rates before treatment and 2 years after treatment were 15% and 6% with radical prostatectomy, 22% and 26% with external radiotherapy, and 19% and 46% with brachytherapy, respectively. Pretreatment urinary medication use (OR 1.4, 95% CI 1.0–2.0, p = 0.04) and pretreatment moderate lower urinary tract symptoms (OR 2.8, 95% CI 2.2–3.6) predicted prostate cancer treatment associated relief of baseline urinary symptom burden. Subjects with pretreatment lower urinary tract symptoms who underwent radical prostatectomy experienced the greatest relief of pretreatment symptoms (OR 4.3, 95% CI 3.0–6.1), despite the development of deleterious de novo urinary incontinence in some men. The magnitude of pretreatment urinary symptom burden and beneficial effect of cancer treatment on those symptoms were verified in the Spanish cohort. Conclusions: Men with pretreatment lower urinary tract symptoms may experience benefit rather than harm in overall urinary outcome from primary prostate cancer treatment. Practitioners should consider the full spectrum of urinary symptom burden evident before prostate cancer treatment in treatment decisions.