Chris Zahm
University of Texas at Austin
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Chris Zahm.
AAPG Bulletin | 2012
Peter H. Hennings; Patricia F. Allwardt; Pijush K. Paul; Chris Zahm; Ray Reid; Hugh Alley; Roland Kirschner; Bob Lee; Elliott Hough
It is becoming widely recognized that a relationship exists between stress, stress heterogeneity, and the permeability of subsurface fractures and faults. We present an analysis of the South Sumatra Suban gas field, developed mainly in fractured carbonate and crystalline basement, where active deformation has partitioned the reservoir into distinct structural and stress domains. These domains have differing geomechanical and structural attributes that control the permeability architecture of the field. The field is a composite of Paleogene extensional elements that have been modified by Neogene contraction to produce basement-rooted forced folds and neoformed thrusts. Reservoir-scale faults were interpreted in detail along the western flank of the field and reveal a classic oblique-compressional geometry. Bulk reservoir performance is governed by the local stress architecture that acts on existing faults and their fracture damage zones to alter their permeability and, hence, their access to distributed gas. Reservoir potential is most enhanced in areas that have large numbers of fractures with high ratios of shear to normal stress. This occurs in areas of the field that are in a strike-slip stress style. Comparatively, reservoir potential is lower in areas of the field that are in a thrust-fault stress style where fewer fractures with high shear-to-normal stress ratios exist. Achieving the highest well productivity relies on tapping into critically stressed faults and their associated fracture damage zones. Two wellbores have been drilled based on this concept, and each shows a three- to seven-fold improvement in flow potential.
AAPG Bulletin | 2009
Chris Zahm; Peter H. Hennings
Fracture prediction in subsurface reservoirs is critical for exploration through exploitation of hydrocarbons. Methods of predicting fractures commonly neglect to include the stratigraphic architecture as part of the prediction or characterization process. This omission is a critical mistake. We have documented a complex heterogeneous fracture development within the eolian Tensleep Sandstone in Wyoming, which arguably is one of the least complex reservoir facies. Fractures develop at four scales of observation: lamina-bound, facies-bound, sequence-bound, and throughgoing fractures that span the formation. We documented a detailed facies and fracture-intensity model using LIDAR-scanned outcrops located at the Alcova anticline in central Wyoming. Through this characterization, we reveal the existence of a striking variability in fracture intensity caused by original depositional architecture, overall structural deformation, and diagenetic alteration of the host rock.
AAPG Bulletin | 2017
Charles Kerans; Chris Zahm; Beatriz Garcia-Fresca; Paul M. Harris
The carbonate and siliciclastic outcrops of the Guadalupe Mountains in the Permian Basin of West Texas and New Mexico have provided a rich set of basic and advanced conceptual models for geologists across the entire spectrum of experience for carbonate-ramp and steep-rimmed–platform settings as well as the adjacent deep-water siliciclastics not dealt with here. Fundamental questions regarding the scale and continuity of reservoir pay facies, the depositional patterns and profiles of shelf-to-slope clinoforms, the width of facies tracts on ramps and rimmed platforms, the distribution and internal composition of reef complexes, the link between reef development and slope depositional patterns, styles of early and late diagenesis including dolomitization and karstification, and structural patterns can all be addressed in the Guadalupe Mountains exposures.
Journal of Structural Geology | 2010
Chris Zahm; Laura C. Zahm; Jerome A. Bellian
Energy Procedia | 2011
Laura Chiaramonte; Mark D. Zoback; Julio Friedmann; Vicki Stamp; Chris Zahm
Geosphere | 2009
Daniel Kurtzman; Joseph A. El Azzi; F. Jerry Lucia; Jerome A. Bellian; Chris Zahm; Xavier Janson
Geophysics | 2013
Reinaldo J. Michelena; Kevin S. Godbey; Huabing Wang; James R. Gilman; Chris Zahm
Seg Technical Program Expanded Abstracts | 2018
Reinaldo J. Michelena; James R. Gilman; Chris Zahm
Journal of Structural Geology | 2018
Andrea Nolting; Chris Zahm; Charles Kerans; Maria A. Nikolinakou
50th U.S. Rock Mechanics/Geomechanics Symposium | 2016
Andrea Nolting; Chris Zahm; Charles Kerans; Donald L. Brooks