Chrishan Thakar
Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Chrishan Thakar.
Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-british Volume | 2016
W. Thompson; Chrishan Thakar; D. J. Rolton; James Wilson-MacDonald; Colin Nnadi
AIMS We undertook a prospective non-randomised radiological study to evaluate the preliminary results of using magnetically-controlled growing rods (MAGEC System, Ellipse technology) to treat children with early-onset scoliosis. PATIENTS AND METHODS Between January 2011 and January 2015, 19 children were treated with magnetically-controlled growing rods (MCGRs) and underwent distraction at three-monthly intervals. The mean age of our cohort was 9.1 years (4 to 14) and the mean follow-up 22.4 months (5.1 to 35.2). Of the 19 children, eight underwent conversion from traditional growing rods. Whole spine radiographs were carried out pre- and post-operatively: image intensification was used during each lengthening in the outpatient department. The measurements evaluated were Cobb angle, thoracic kyphosis, proximal junctional kyphosis and spinal growth from T1 to S1. RESULTS The mean pre-, post-operative and latest follow-up Cobb angles were 62° (37.4 to 95.8), 45.1° (16.6 to 96.2) and 43.2° (11.9 to 90.5), respectively (p < 0.05). The mean pre-, post-operative and latest follow-up T1-S1 lengths were 288.1 mm (223.2 to 351.7), 298.8 mm (251 to 355.7) and 331.1 mm (275 to 391.9), respectively (p < 0.05). In all, three patients developed proximal pull-out of their fixation and required revision surgery: there were no subsequent complications. There were no complications of outpatient distraction. CONCLUSIONS Our study shows that MCGRs provide stable correction of the deformity in early-onset scoliosis in both primary and revision procedures. They have the potential to reduce the need for multiple operations and thereby minimise the potential complications associated with traditional growing rod systems. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2016;98-B:1240-47.
Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-british Volume | 2018
Colin Nnadi; Chrishan Thakar; James Wilson-MacDonald; P. Milner; Abhay Rao; D. Mayers; Jeremy Fairbank; Thejasvi Subramanian
Aims The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the performance and safety of magnetically controlled growth rods in the treatment of early onset scoliosis. Secondary aims were to evaluate the clinical outcome, the rate of further surgery, the rate of complications, and the durability of correction. Patients and Methods We undertook an observational prospective cohort study of children with early onset scoliosis, who were recruited over a one‐year period and followed up for a minimum of two years. Magnetically controlled rods were introduced in a standardized manner with distractions performed three‐monthly thereafter. Adverse events which were both related and unrelated to the device were recorded. Ten children, for whom relevant key data points (such as demographic information, growth parameters, Cobb angles, and functional outcomes) were available, were recruited and followed up over the period of the study. There were five boys and five girls. Their mean age was 6.2 years (2.5 to 10). Results The mean coronal Cobb angle improved from 57.6° (40° to 81°) preoperatively, 32.8° (28° to 46°) postoperatively, and 41° (19° to 57°) at two years. Five children had an adverse event, with four requiring return to theatre, but none were related to the device. There were no neurological complications or infections. No devices failed. One child developed a proximal junctional kyphosis. The mean gain in spinal column height from T1 to S1 was 45.4 mm (24 to 81) over the period of the study. Conclusion Magnetically controlled growth rods provide an alternative solution to traditional growing rods in the surgical management of children with early onset scoliosis, supporting growth of the spine while controlling curve progression. Their use has clear psychosocial and economic benefits, with the reduction of the need for repeat surgery as required with traditional growing rods.
The Spine Journal | 2016
Colin Nnadi; Pooria Hosseini; Ľuboš Rehák; Martin Repko; Michael P. Grevitt; Ufuk Aydinli; Allen L. Carl; Jeff Pawelek; Dennis G. Crandall; Behrooz A. Akbarnia; Pavlos Panteliadis; Chrishan Thakar
The Spine Journal | 2016
Behrooz A. Akbarnia; Kenneth M.C. Cheung; Kenny Kwan; D Samartzis; Ahmet Alanay; John Ferguson; Chrishan Thakar; Pavlos Panteliadis; Colin Nnadi; Ilkka Helenius; Muharrem Yazici; Gokhan Demirkiran
European Spine Journal | 2018
Chrishan Thakar; David C. Kieser; Mihai Mardare; Shahnawaz Haleem; Jeremy Fairbank; Colin Nnadi
The Spine Journal | 2016
Behrooz A. Akbarnia; Kenneth M.C. Cheung; Kenny Kwan; D Samartzis; John Ferguson; Chrishan Thakar; Pavlos Panteliadis; Colin Nnadi; Ilkka Helenius; Muharrem Yazici; Gokhan Demirkiran; Ahmet Alanay
Spine | 2018
Chrishan Thakar; Colin Nnadi; Mihai Mardare; Shahnawaz Haleem; David C. Kieser; Thejasvi Subramanian; Adil Ahmad; James Wilson-MacDonald
Archive | 2018
Chrishan Thakar; Elaine Buchanan, Nasir A. Quraishi, Chris Lavy; Jeremy Fairbank
The Spine Journal | 2017
Colin Nnadi; Chrishan Thakar; James Wilson-MacDonald; Peter Milner; Abhay Rao; David Mayers; Jeremy Fairbank; Thejasvi Subramanian
The Spine Journal | 2016
Colin Nnadi; Chrishan Thakar; Dan Rolton; Praveen Inaparthy; Shaneil Sonecha; Thejasvi Subramanian; James Wilson-MacDonald