Christian Hillert

Portal Vein Embolization vs. Portal Vein Ligation for Induction of Hypertrophy of the Future Liver Remnant

The objective of this study was to assess the efficacy of right portal vein embolization (PVE) vs. right portal vein ligation (PVL) for induction of hypertrophy of the left lateral liver lobe before extended right hepatectomy. Thirty-four patients with primary or secondary liver tumors and estimated remnant functional liver parenchyma of less than 0.5% of body weight underwent either right PVE (transcutaneous, n= 10; transileocolic, n =7) or right PVL (n=17). Liver volume was assessed by CT scan before occlusion of the right portal vein and prior to resection. There were no deaths. The morbidity rate in each group was 5.8% (PVE, 1 abscess; PVL, 1 bile leak). The increase in liver volume was significantly higher after PVE compared with PVL (188±81 ml vs. 123±58 ml) (P= 0.012). Postoperative hospital stay was significantly shorter after PVE in comparison to PVL (4±2.9 days vs. 8.1±5.1 days;P<0.01). Curative liver resection was performed in 10 of 17 patients after PVE and 11 of 17 patients after PVL. PVE and PVL were found to be feasible and safe methods of increasing the remnant functional liver volume and achieving resectability for extended liver tumors. PVE results in a significantly more efficient increase in liver volume and a shorter hospital stay.

Evolution of Donor Morbidity in Living Related Liver Transplantation: A Single-Center Analysis of 165 Cases

Objective:During the last 14 years, living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) has evolved to an indispensable surgical strategy to minimize mortality of adult and pediatric patients awaiting transplantation. The crucial prerequisite to performing this procedure is a minimal morbidity and mortality risk to the healthy living donor. Little is known about the learning curve involved with this type of surgery. Patients and Methods:From January 1991 to August 2003, a total of 165 LDLTs were performed in our center. Of these, 135 were donations of the left-lateral lobe (LL, segments II and III), 3 were of the left lobe (L, segments II–IV), 3 were full-left lobes (FL, segments I–IV), and 24 were of the full-right lobe (FR, segments V–VIII). We divided the procedures into 3 periods: period 1 included the years 1991 to 1995 (LL, n = 49; L, n = 2; FR, n = 1), period 2 covered 1996 to 2000 (LL, n = 47), and period 3 covered 2001 to August 2003 (LL, n = 39; FR, n = 23; FL, n = 3; L, n = 1). Perioperative mortality and morbidity were assessed using a standardized classification. Length of stay in intensive care unit, postoperative hospital stay, laboratory results (bilirubin, INR, and LFTs), morbidity, and the different types of grafts in the 3 different periods were compared. Results:One early donor death was observed in period 1 (03/07/93, case 30; total mortality, 0.61.%). Since 1991, the perioperative morbidity has continually declined (53.8% vs. 23.4% vs. 9.2%). In period 1, 28 patients had 40 complications. In period 2, 11 patients had 12 complications, and in period 3, 6 patients had 9 complications. Within the first period, 1 donor underwent relaparotomy because of bile leakage. Postoperative hospital stay was 10 days, 7 days, and 6 days, respectively. Donation of the full right lobe, in comparison with that of the left lateral lobe, resulted in a significantly diminished liver function (bilirubin and INR) during the first 5 days after donation but did not increase morbidity. One donor from period 1 experienced late death caused by amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Conclusions:In a single center, morbidity after living liver donation strongly correlates to center experience. Despite the additional risks associated with temporary reduction of liver function, this experience enabled the team to bypass part of the learning curve when starting right lobe donation. Specific training of the surgical team and coaching by an experienced center should be implemented for centers offering this procedure to avoid the learning curve.

Liver Transplantation for Hereditary Hemorrhagic Telangiectasia: Report of the European Liver Transplant Registry

Background:Hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia (HHT) or Rendu-Osler-Weber disease is a rare disease characterized by the presence of arteriovenous malformations. Hepatic involvement can lead to life-threatening conditions. Material and Methods:Forty patients, reported to the European Liver Transplant Registry, were analyzed to define the role of liver transplantation in the treatment of the hepatic disease form. Indications for transplantation were classified according to Garcia-Tsao: cardiac failure (14 patients), biliary necrosis causing hepatic failure (12 patients), severe portal hypertension (5 patients), cardiac failure and biliary necrosis (6 patients), cardiac failure and portal hypertension (2 patients), and cardiac failure associated with biliary necrosis and portal hypertension (1 patient). Eighteen (81%) of 22 patients had pulmonary artery hypertension. Twelve (30%) patients had pretransplant hepatic interventions. Follow-up was complete for all patients with a mean of 69 months (range, 0–230 months). Results:One-, 5- and 10-year actuarial patient and graft survival rates are 82.5%. Six of the 7 pretransplant procedures performed on the hepatic artery were severely complicated. Cardiovascular function documented in 24 patients improved in 18 patients and remained stable in 5 patients; 1 patient died perioperatively of acute heart failure. Twenty-four (60%) patients had post-transplant complications, all but one occurring within the first 4 posttransplant months. Seven (17.5%) patients died perioperatively, 6 of them due to bleeding and 1 due to cardiac failure; 1 (2.5%) patient died late due to chronic rejection. There were 2 possible recurrences. Quality of life markedly improved in all 32 surviving patients. Conclusion:The results of the largest reported transplant series in the treatment of hepatic-based HHT are excellent. Elimination of hepatobiliary sepsis and reversal of cardiopulmonary changes dramatically improve quality of life of the recipients. LT should be proposed earlier in the course of symptomatic hepatic HHT presenting with life-threatening conditions. Palliative interventions, especially on the hepatic artery, should be avoided in view of their high (infectious) complication rate.

Is There Still a Need for Living-related Liver Transplantation in Children?

ObjectiveTo assess and compare the value of split-liver transplantation (SLT) and living-related liver transplantation (LRT). Summary Background DataThe concept of SLT results from the development of reduced-size transplantation. A further development of SLT, the in situ split technique, is derived from LRT, which itself marks the optimized outcome in terms of postoperative graft function and survival. The combination of SLT and LRT has abolished deaths on the waiting list, thus raising the question whether living donor liver transplantation is still necessary. MethodsOutcomes and postoperative liver function of 43 primary LRT patients were compared with those of 49 primary SLT patients (14 ex situ, 35 in situ) with known graft weight performed between April 1996 and December 2000. Survival rates were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method. ResultsAfter a median follow-up of 35 months, actual patient survival rates were 82% in the SLT group and 88% in the LRT group. Actual graft survival rates were 76% and 81%, respectively. The incidence of primary nonfunction was 12% in the SLT group and 2.3% in the LRT group. Liver function parameters (prothrombin time, factor V, bilirubin clearance) and surgical complication rates did not differ significantly. In the SLT group, mean cold ischemic time was longer than in the LRT group. Serum values of alanine aminotransferase during the first postoperative week were significantly higher in the SLT group. In the LRT group, there were more grafts with signs of fatty degeneration than in the SLT group. ConclusionsThe short- and long-term outcomes after LRT and SLT did not differ significantly. To avoid the risk for the donor in LRT, SLT represents the first-line therapy in pediatric liver transplantation in countries where cadaveric organs are available. LRT provides a solution for urgent cases in which a cadaveric graft cannot be found in time or if the choice of the optimal time point for transplantation is vital.

One Hundred Thirty-Two Consecutive Pediatric Liver Transplants Without Hospital Mortality: Lessons Learned and Outlook for the Future

Objective:Orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) has become an established procedure for the treatment of pediatric patients with end-stage liver disease. Since starting our program in 1989, 422 pediatric OLTs have been performed using all techniques presently available. Analyzing our series, we have concluded that the year of transplantation is the most important prognostic factor in patient and graft survival in a multivariate analysis. Methods:From April 2001 to December 1, 2003, 18 whole organs (14%), 17 reduced-size organs (13%), 53 split organs (42%; 46 ex situ, 7 in situ), and 44 organs from living donors (33%) were transplanted into 115 patients (62 male and 53 female). One hundred twelve were primary liver transplants, 18 were retransplants, one third and one fourth liver transplants. Of the 132 OLTs, 26 were highly urgent (19.7%). The outcome of these 132 OLTs was retrospectively analyzed. Results:Of 132 consecutive pediatric liver transplants, no patients died within the 6 months posttransplantation. Overall, 3 recipients (2%) died during further follow-up, 1 child because of severe pneumonia 13 months after transplantation and the second recipient with unknown cause 7 months postoperatively, both with good functioning grafts after uneventful transplantation. The third had a recurrence of an unknown liver disease 9 months after transplantation. The 3-month and actual graft survival rates are 92% and 86%, respectively. Sixteen children (12%) had to undergo retransplantation, the causes of which were chronic rejection (3.8%), primary nonfunction (3.8%), primary poor function (PPF; 1.5%), and arterial thrombosis (3%). The biliary complication rate was 6%; arterial complications occurred in 8.3%; intestinal perforation was observed in 3%; and in 5%, postoperative bleeding required reoperation. The portal vein complication rate was 2%. Conclusions:Progress during the past 15 years has enabled us to perform pediatric liver transplantation with near perfect patient survival. Advances in posttransplant care of the recipients, technical refinements, standardization of surgery and monitoring, and adequate choice of the donor organ and transplantation technique enable these results, which mark a turning point at which immediate survival after transplantation will be considered the norm. The long-term treatment of the transplanted patient, with the aim of avoiding late graft loss and achieving optimal quality of life, will become the center of debate.

Long-term Outcome of Split Liver Transplantation Using Right Extended Grafts in Adulthood: A Matched Pair Analysis

Objective:Shortage of suitable organs led to the development of alternative techniques in liver transplantation. Split liver transplantation (SLT) is well established in pediatric patients. SLT is not completely accepted in adult recipients due to potential increased risk of complications. Despite satisfying results of short-term outcome, there is a leak on information of the long-term outcome. Therefore, we compared the outcome after transplantation of the right extended liver lobe with whole liver transplantation (WLT) using a matched pairs analysis. Patients and Methods:From the period of January 1993 to February 2005, 70 SLT recipients were matched with 70 WLT recipients of whole livers. Matching criteria were: 1) indication for transplantation, 2) United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) status, 3) recipient age, 4) donor age, 5) cold ischemic time, and 6) year of transplantation. The outcome was analyzed retrospectively. Results:Mean follow-up was 36 months. The 2- and 5-year patient survival rates after SLT and WLT were 86.3% and 82.6%, and 78.4% and 75.6%, respectively (log rank, P = 0.2127). Two- and 5-year graft survival rates were 77.3% and 77.3% after SLT and 71.9% and 65.8% after WLT, respectively (log rank, P = 0.3822). The total biliary complication rate was 11.4% in the SLT group versus 10.0% in the WLT group in the short-term course, while it was 8.5% after SLT and 10.0% after WLT in the long-term course. We did not observe significant differences between the groups in term of short- and long-term morbidity. Conclusion:Transplantation of the right extended lobe deriving from left lateral splitting of deceased donor livers is followed by the same long-term patient and graft survival, which is known from WLT. There were no differences in the complication rates even in long-term outcome implementing that SLT does not put the adult recipient to an increased early and late risk. Transplantation of the extended right liver lobe provides a safe and efficient procedure in adult patients to expand the number of available grafts.

Sustained function in atrophying liver tissue after portal branch ligation in the rat

BACKGROUND Preoperative segmental portal vein occlusion has become a common method to prevent liver failure after extended hepatic resection. To date, it is not elucidated whether atrophy by portal deprivation with concomitant contralateral regeneration leads to impaired liver function. We addressed this question by examining the expression of liver function proteins related to glucose homeostasis and acute-phase response in a corresponding animal model. MATERIALS AND METHODS Male Wistar rats were subjected to either portal branch ligation (PBL), partial hepatectomy (PH), or sham operation (SO). The mRNA expression and chronological distribution of glucose-6-phosphatase (G6P), glucagon receptor (GR), glceraldehyd-3-phosphate-dehydrogenase (GAPDH), albumin, fibronectin, and C1-esterase-inhibitor (C1-Inh) genes were examined by Northern-blot hybridizations. Determinations of serum-glucose and glycogen staining by periodic acid and Schiff were performed to analyze changes in glucose mobilization and storage. RESULTS In regenerating liver tissue after PH and PBL, we detected a selective reduction of transcripts encoding G6P during the prereplicative period 6 and 12 h after surgery and a contemporary drop in serum glucose levels. This impairment proved to be more distinct after PH than after PBL. Compared with the residual liver after PH, the level of glycogen disappearance was lower after PBL in the regenerating lobe. In the portal-deprived liver tissue, the expression of genes coding for G6P, GR, GAPDH, albumin, fibronectin, and C1-Inh was not altered compared with the SO group. CONCLUSIONS Overall, portal-deprived liver tissue undergoing atrophy retains its liver-specific differentiation and function and helps to maintain homeostasis during the fast regeneration of the non-occluded liver lobe.

Tumor growth-promoting cellular host response during liver atrophy after portal occlusion

Abstract: Background/Aims: Clinical observations suggest cancer progression after preoperative segmental portal vein occlusion, a procedure to prevent liver failure after major hepatic resections. The aim of this study was to determine whether portal occlusion induces host reactions which promote cancer invasion and angiogenesis.

A Retrospective Study Comparing the Different Surgical Procedures for the Treatment of Hydatid Disease of the Liver

Background/Aims: The purpose of this study was to compare the security and effectiveness of the different surgical procedures used for treatment of the liver infestations with larvae of the dog tapeworm (Echinoocccus granulosus). Methods: 55 patients with echinococcal cysts in the liver were treated surgically at our department between 1987 and 1999. The patients were grouped according to the mode of surgical technique and comprised 16 anatomical liver resections, 26 pericystectomies and 13 endocystectomies. The results of the different procedures have been analyzed statistically. Results: The decision which procedure was to be performed was based on the severity of the disease. Complications requiring relaparotomy occurred in 5% of all cases, not showing any predisposition to a certain technique. Blood loss and duration of hospitalization was lowest in the endocystectomy group; however, the differences were not statistically significant. At a median follow-up period of 84 months, recurrences were noted in 2 cases (4%), 1 after pericystectomy and 1 after resection. Conclusion: There was no substantial evidence that the more radical procedure carries a lower risk of recurrence, and there was convincing evidence that endocystectomy is the most careful procedure in regard to blood loss and duration of hospitalization.

Liver transplantation in patients with liver cirrhosis and esophageal bleeding

BackgroundUncontrolled hemorrhage from esophageal varices is one of the most devastating complications of portal hypertension in patients with advanced cirrhosis.MethodsDrug therapy, endoscopic therapy, transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS), or surgical shunts are used with increasing success in the prevention and treatment of bleeding. However, all these treatment modalities have limitations because they do not treat the liver cirrhosis itself. On the other hand, treatment modalities for variceal bleeding may influence the ease of the feasibility of the transplantation procedure. This is particularly the case for surgical treatments like portosystemic shunts and devascularization operations. For this reason these procedures should be avoided if possible. When positioned correctly, a TIPS provides an elegant way of treating portal hypertension without influencing the course of liver transplantation. Liver transplantation offers a treatment that cures both the portal hypertension and the liver disease. However, the use of this method of treatment is limited by the organ availability and by the organ allocation algorithm, resulting in considerable waiting time.ConclusionIn conclusion, esophageal bleeding should be noticed as an early warning factor, leading the hepatologist to consider liver transplantation and early listing of the patient.