Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Christian Hogrefe is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Christian Hogrefe.


American Journal of Public Health | 2007

Projecting Heat-Related Mortality Impacts Under a Changing Climate in the New York City Region

Kim Knowlton; Barry H. Lynn; Richard Goldberg; Cynthia Rosenzweig; Christian Hogrefe; Joyce Rosenthal; Patrick L. Kinney

OBJECTIVES We sought to project future impacts of climate change on summer heat-related premature deaths in the New York City metropolitan region. METHODS Current and future climates were simulated over the northeastern United States with a global-to-regional climate modeling system. Summer heat-related premature deaths in the 1990s and 2050s were estimated by using a range of scenarios and approaches to modeling acclimatization (e.g., increased use of air conditioning, gradual physiological adaptation). RESULTS Projected regional increases in heat-related premature mortality by the 2050s ranged from 47% to 95%, with a mean 70% increase compared with the 1990s. Acclimatization effects reduced regional increases in summer heat-related premature mortality by about 25%. Local impacts varied considerably across the region, with urban counties showing greater numbers of deaths and smaller percentage increases than less-urbanized counties. CONCLUSIONS Although considerable uncertainty exists in climate forecasts and future health vulnerability, the range of projections we developed suggests that by midcentury, acclimatization may not completely mitigate the effects of climate change in the New York City metropolitan region, which would result in an overall net increase in heat-related premature mortality.


Environmental Health Perspectives | 2004

Assessing Ozone-Related Health Impacts under a Changing Climate

Kim Knowlton; J. Rosenthal; Christian Hogrefe; Barry H. Lynn; Stuart R. Gaffin; Richard Goldberg; Cynthia Rosenzweig; Kevin Civerolo; Jia-Yeong Ku; Patrick L. Kinney

Climate change may increase the frequency and intensity of ozone episodes in future summers in the United States. However, only recently have models become available that can assess the impact of climate change on O3 concentrations and health effects at regional and local scales that are relevant to adaptive planning. We developed and applied an integrated modeling framework to assess potential O3-related health impacts in future decades under a changing climate. The National Aeronautics and Space Administration–Goddard Institute for Space Studies global climate model at 4° × 5° resolution was linked to the Penn State/National Center for Atmospheric Research Mesoscale Model 5 and the Community Multiscale Air Quality atmospheric chemistry model at 36 km horizontal grid resolution to simulate hourly regional meteorology and O3 in five summers of the 2050s decade across the 31-county New York metropolitan region. We assessed changes in O3-related impacts on summer mortality resulting from climate change alone and with climate change superimposed on changes in O3 precursor emissions and population growth. Considering climate change alone, there was a median 4.5% increase in O3-related acute mortality across the 31 counties. Incorporating O3 precursor emission increases along with climate change yielded similar results. When population growth was factored into the projections, absolute impacts increased substantially. Counties with the highest percent increases in projected O3 mortality spread beyond the urban core into less densely populated suburban counties. This modeling framework provides a potentially useful new tool for assessing the health risks of climate change.


Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society | 2009

A preliminary synthesis of modeled climate change impacts on U.S. regional ozone concentrations.

Christopher P. Weaver; Xin-Zhong Liang; Jinhong Zhu; P. J. Adams; P. Amar; J. Avise; Michael Caughey; Jack Chen; R. C. Cohen; E. Cooter; J. P. Dawson; Robert C. Gilliam; Alice B. Gilliland; Allen H. Goldstein; A. Grambsch; D. Grano; Alex Guenther; W. I. Gustafson; Robert A. Harley; Sheng He; B. Hemming; Christian Hogrefe; Ho Chun Huang; Sherri W. Hunt; Daniel J. Jacob; Patrick L. Kinney; Kenneth E. Kunkel; Jean-Francois Lamarque; Brian K. Lamb; Narasimhan K. Larkin

This paper provides a synthesis of results that have emerged from recent modeling studies of the potential sensitivity of U.S. regional ozone (O3) concentrations to global climate change (ca. 2050). This research has been carried out under the auspices of an ongoing U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) assessment effort to increase scientific understanding of the multiple complex interactions among climate, emissions, atmospheric chemistry, and air quality. The ultimate goal is to enhance the ability of air quality managers to consider global change in their decisions through improved characterization of the potential effects of global change on air quality, including O3 The results discussed here are interim, representing the first phase of the EPA assessment. The aim in this first phase was to consider the effects of climate change alone on air quality, without accompanying changes in anthropogenic emissions of precursor pollutants. Across all of the modeling experiments carried out by the differe...


Atmospheric Environment | 2001

Evaluating the performance of regional-scale photochemical modeling systems: Part I—meteorological predictions

Christian Hogrefe; S. Trivikrama Rao; Prasad S. Kasibhatla; George Kallos; Craig J. Tremback; Winston Hao; Don Olerud; Aijun Xiu; John N. McHenry; Kiran Alapaty

In this study, the concept of scale analysis is applied to evaluate two state-of-science meteorological models, namely MM5 and RAMS3b, currently being used to drive regional-scale air quality models. To this end, seasonal time series of observations and predictions for temperature, water vapor, and wind speed were spectrally decomposed into fluctuations operating on the intra-day, diurnal, synoptic and longer-term time scales. Traditional model evaluation statistics are also presented to illustrate how the method of spectral decomposition can help provide additional insight into the models’ performance. The results indicate that both meteorological models under-represent the variance of fluctuations on the intra-day time scale. Correlations between model predictions and observations for temperature and wind speed are insignificant on the intra-day time scale, high for the diurnal component because of the inherent diurnal cycle but low for the amplitude of the diurnal component, and highest for the synoptic and longer-term components. This better model performance on longer time scales suggests that current regional-scale models are most skillful for characterizing average patterns over extended periods. The implications of these results to using meteorological models to drive photochemical models are discussed. r 2001 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.


Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society | 2000

Interpreting the Information in Ozone Observations and Model Predictions Relevant to Regulatory Policies in the Eastern United States

Christian Hogrefe; S. Trivikrama Rao; Igor G. Zurbenko; P. Steven Porter

Abstract To study the underlying forcing mechanisms that distinguish the days with high ozone concentrations from average or nonepisodic days, the observed and model–predicted ozone time series are spectrally decomposed into different temporal components; the modeled values are based on the results of a three–month simulation with the Urban Airshed Model–Variable Grid Version photochemical modeling system. The ozone power spectrum is represented as the sum of four temporal components, ranging from the intraday timescale to the multiweek timescale. The results reveal that only those components that contain fluctuations with periods equal to or greater than one day carry the information that distinguishes ozone episode days from nonepisodic days. Which of the longer–term fluctuations is dominant in a particular episode varies from episode to episode. However, the magnitude of the intraday fluctuations is nearly invariant in time. The promulgation of the 8–h standard for ozone further emphasizes the importan...


Journal of The Air & Waste Management Association | 2011

Impact of Biogenic Emission Uncertainties on the Simulated Response of Ozone and Fine Particulate Matter to Anthropogenic Emission Reductions

Christian Hogrefe; Sastry Isukapalli; Xiaogang Tang; Panos G. Georgopoulos; Shan He; Eric Zalewsky; Winston Hao; Jia-Yeong Ku; Tonalee Key; Gopal Sistla

ABSTRACT The role of emissions of volatile organic compounds and nitric oxide from biogenic sources is becoming increasingly important in regulatory air quality modeling as levels of anthropogenic emissions continue to decrease and stricter health-based air quality standards are being adopted. However, considerable uncertainties still exist in the current estimation methodologies for biogenic emissions. The impact of these uncertainties on ozone and fine particulate matter (PM2.5) levels for the eastern United States was studied, focusing on biogenic emissions estimates from two commonly used biogenic emission models, the Model of Emissions of Gases and Aerosols from Nature (MEGAN) and the Biogenic Emissions Inventory System (BEIS). Photochemical grid modeling simulations were performed for two scenarios: one reflecting present day conditions and the other reflecting a hypothetical future year with reductions in emissions of anthropogenic oxides of nitrogen (NOx). For ozone, the use of MEGAN emissions resulted in a higher ozone response to hypothetical anthropogenic NOx emission reductions compared with BEIS. Applying the current U.S. Environmental Protection Agency guidance on regulatory air quality modeling in conjunction with typical maximum ozone concentrations, the differences in estimated future year ozone design values (DVF) stemming from differences in biogenic emissions estimates were on the order of 4 parts per billion (ppb), corresponding to approximately 5% of the daily maximum 8-hr ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) of 75 ppb. For PM2.5, the differences were 0.1–0.25 μg/m3 in the summer total organic mass component of DVFs, corresponding to approximately 1–2% of the value of the annual PM2.5 NAAQS of 15 μg/m3. Spatial variations in the ozone and PM2.5 differences also reveal that the impacts of different biogenic emission estimates on ozone and PM2.5 levels are dependent on ambient levels of anthropogenic emissions. IMPLICATIONS The findings presented in this study demonstrate that uncertainties in biogenic emission estimates due to different emission models can have a significant effect on the model estimates of ozone and PM2.5 concentrations; specifically, the changes in these concentrations due to reductions in anthropogenic emissions considered in regulatory modeling scenarios. These results point to the need for further research aimed at improving biogenic emission estimates as well as better characterizing their dependency on environmental factors and the fate of these emissions once released into the atmosphere.


Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology | 2007

Daily Simulation of Ozone and Fine Particulates over New York State: Findings and Challenges

Christian Hogrefe; Winston Hao; Kevin Civerolo; Jia-Yeong Ku; Gopal Sistla; R. S. Gaza; L. Sedefian; Kenneth L. Schere; Alice B. Gilliland; Rohit Mathur

Abstract This study investigates the potential utility of the application of a photochemical modeling system in providing simultaneous forecasts of ozone (O3) and fine particulate matter (PM2.5) over New York State. To this end, daily simulations from the Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) model for three extended time periods during 2004 and 2005 have been performed, and predictions were compared with observations of ozone and total and speciated PM2.5. Model performance for 8-h daily maximum O3 was found to be similar to other forecasting systems and to be better than that for the 24-h-averaged total PM2.5. Both pollutants exhibited no seasonal differences in model performance. CMAQ simulations successfully captured the urban–rural and seasonal differences evident in observed total and speciated PM2.5 concentrations. However, total PM2.5 mass was strongly overestimated in the New York City metropolitan area, and further analysis of speciated observations and model predictions showed that most of th...


Geoscientific Model Development | 2017

Description and evaluation of the Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) modeling system version 5.1

K. Wyat Appel; Sergey L. Napelenok; Kristen M. Foley; Havala O. T. Pye; Christian Hogrefe; Deborah Luecken; Jesse O. Bash; Shawn J. Roselle; Jonathan E. Pleim; Hosein Foroutan; William T. Hutzell; George Pouliot; Golam Sarwar; Kathleen M. Fahey; Brett Gantt; Robert C. Gilliam; Nicholas Heath; Daiwen Kang; Rohit Mathur; Donna B. Schwede; Tanya L. Spero; David C. Wong; Jeffrey Young

The Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) model is a comprehensive multipollutant air quality modeling system developed and maintained by the US Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) Office of Research and Development (ORD). Recently, version 5.1 of the CMAQ model (v5.1) was released to the public, incorporating a large number of science updates and extended capabilities over the previous release version of the model (v5.0.2). These updates include the following: improvements in the meteorological calculations in both CMAQ and the Weather Research and Forecast (WRF) model used to provide meteorological fields to CMAQ, updates to the gas and aerosol chemistry, revisions to the calculations of clouds and photolysis, and improvements to the dry and wet deposition in the model. Sensitivity simulations isolating several of the major updates to the modeling system show that changes to the meteorological calculations result in enhanced afternoon and early evening mixing in the model, periods when the model historically underestimates mixing. This enhanced mixing results in higher ozone (O3) mixing ratios on average due to reduced NO titration, and lower fine particulate matter (PM2.5) concentrations due to greater dilution of primary pollutants (e.g., elemental and organic carbon). Updates to the clouds and photolysis calculations greatly improve consistency between the WRF and CMAQ models and result in generally higher O3 mixing ratios, primarily due to reduced cloudiness and attenuation of photolysis in the model. Updates to the aerosol chemistry result in higher secondary organic aerosol (SOA) concentrations in the summer, thereby reducing summertime PM2.5 bias (PM2.5 is typically underestimated by CMAQ in the summer), while updates to the gas chemistry result in slightly higher O3 and PM2.5 on average in January and July. Overall, the seasonal variation in simulated PM2.5 generally improves in CMAQv5.1 (when considering all model updates), as simulated PM2.5 concentrations decrease in the winter (when PM2.5 is generally overestimated by CMAQ) and increase in the summer (when PM2.5 is generally underestimated by CMAQ). Ozone mixing ratios are higher on average with v5.1 vs. v5.0.2, resulting in higher O3 mean bias, as O3 tends to be overestimated by CMAQ throughout most of the year (especially at locations where the observed O3 is low); however, O3 correlation is largely improved with v5.1. Sensitivity simulations for several hypothetical emission reduction scenarios show that v5.1 tends to be slightly more responsive to reductions in NOx (NO + NO2), VOC and SOx (SO2 + SO4) emissions than v5.0.2, representing an improvement as previous studies have shown CMAQ to underestimate the observed reduction in O3 due to large, widespread reductions in observed emissions.


Journal of The Air & Waste Management Association | 2008

Modeling analyses of the effects of changes in nitrogen oxides emissions from the electric power sector on ozone levels in the eastern United States.

Edith Gégo; Alice B. Gilliland; James M. Godowitch; S. Trivikrama Rao; P. Steven Porter; Christian Hogrefe

Abstract In this paper, we examine the changes in ambient ozone concentrations simulated by the Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) model for summer 2002 under three different nitrogen oxides (NOx) emission scenarios. Two emission scenarios represent best estimates of 2002 and 2004 emissions; they allow assessment of the impact of the NOx emissions reductions imposed on the utility sector by the NOx State Implementation Plan (SIP) Call. The third scenario represents a hypothetical rendering of what NOx emissions would have been in 2002 if no emission controls had been imposed on the utility sector. Examination of the modeled median and 95th percentile daily maximum 8-hr average ozone concentrations reveals that median ozone levels estimated for the 2004 emission scenario were less than those modeled for 2002 in the region most affected by the NOx SIP Call. Comparison of the “no-control” with the “2002” scenario revealed that ozone concentrations would have been much higher in much of the eastern United States if the utility sector had not implemented NOx emission controls; exceptions occurred in the immediate vicinity of major point sources where increased NO titration tends to lower ozone levels.


Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics | 2017

Technical note: Coordination and harmonization of the multi-scale, multi-model activities HTAP2, AQMEII3, and MICS-Asia3: simulations, emission inventories, boundary conditions, and model output formats

Stefano Galmarini; Brigitte Koffi; Efisio Solazzo; Terry Keating; Christian Hogrefe; Michael Schulz; Anna Benedictow; Jan Griesfeller; Greet Janssens-Maenhout; G. R. Carmichael; Joshua S. Fu; Frank Dentener

We present an overview of the coordinated global numerical modelling experiments performed during 2012–2016 by the Task Force on Hemispheric Transport of Air Pollution (TF HTAP), the regional experiments by the Air Quality Model Evaluation International Initiative (AQMEII) over Europe and North America, and the Model Intercomparison Study for Asia (MICS-Asia). To improve model estimates of the impacts of intercontinental transport of air pollution on climate, ecosystems, and human health and to answer a set of policy-relevant questions, these three initiatives performed emission perturbation modelling experiments consistent across the global, hemispheric, and continental/regional scales. In all three initiatives, model results are extensively compared against monitoring data for a range of variables (meteorological, trace gas concentrations, and aerosol mass and composition) from different measurement platforms (ground measurements, vertical profiles, airborne measurements) collected from a number of sources. Approximately 10 to 25 modelling groups have contributed to each initiative, and model results have been managed centrally through three data hubs maintained by each initiative. Given the organizational complexity of bringing together these three initiatives to address a common set of policy-relevant questions, this publication provides the motivation for the modelling activity, the rationale for specific choices made in the model experiments, and an overview of the organizational structures for both the modelling and the measurements used and analysed in a number of modelling studies in this special issue.

Collaboration


Dive into the Christian Hogrefe's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Rohit Mathur

United States Environmental Protection Agency

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Cynthia Rosenzweig

Goddard Institute for Space Studies

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

S. Trivikrama Rao

United States Environmental Protection Agency

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Kevin Civerolo

New York State Department of Environmental Conservation

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Barry H. Lynn

Goddard Institute for Space Studies

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jia-Yeong Ku

New York State Department of Environmental Conservation

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Kim Knowlton

Natural Resources Defense Council

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Gopal Sistla

New York State Department of Environmental Conservation

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Winston Hao

New York State Department of Environmental Conservation

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge