Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Christian J. Streck is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Christian J. Streck.


Archives of Surgery | 2011

Early vs interval appendectomy for children with perforated appendicitis.

Martin L. Blakely; Regan F. Williams; Melvin S. Dassinger; James W. Eubanks; Peter E. Fischer; Eunice Y. Huang; Elizabeth Paton; Barbara Culbreath; Allison Hester; Christian J. Streck; S. Douglas Hixson; Max R. Langham

OBJECTIVE To compare the effectiveness and adverse event rates of early vs interval appendectomy in children with perforated appendicitis. DESIGN Nonblinded randomized trial. SETTING A tertiary-referral urban childrens hospital. PATIENTS A total of 131 patients younger than 18 years with a preoperative diagnosis of perforated appendicitis. INTERVENTIONS Early appendectomy (within 24 hours of admission) vs interval appendectomy (6-8 weeks after diagnosis). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Time away from normal activities (days). Secondary outcomes included the overall adverse event rates and the rate of predefined specific adverse events (eg, intra-abdominal abscess, surgical site infection, unplanned readmission). RESULTS Early appendectomy, compared with interval appendectomy, significantly reduced the time away from normal activities (mean, 13.8 vs 19.4 days; P < .001). The overall adverse event rate was 30% for early appendectomy vs 55% for interval appendectomy (relative risk with interval appendectomy, 1.86; 95% confidence interval, 1.21-2.87; P = .003). Of the patients randomized to interval appendectomy, 23 (34%) had an appendectomy earlier than planned owing to failure to improve (n = 17), recurrent appendicitis (n = 5), or other reasons (n = 1). CONCLUSIONS Early appendectomy significantly reduced the time away from normal activities. The overall adverse event rate after early appendectomy was significantly lower compared with interval appendectomy. TRIAL REGISTRATION clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00435032.


Journal of The American College of Surgeons | 2009

Diagnosing ruptured appendicitis preoperatively in pediatric patients.

Regan F. Williams; Martin L. Blakely; Peter E. Fischer; Christian J. Streck; Melvin S. Dassinger; Himesh Gupta; Elizabeth Renaud; James W. Eubanks; Eunice Y. Huang; S. Douglas Hixson; Max R. Langham

BACKGROUND Over the past decade, pediatric patients with ruptured appendicitis (RA) have been successfully treated with IV antibiotics and an interval appendectomy. Because the treatment of acute appendicitis (AA) and RA in children is now diverging, distinguishing between these two conditions preoperatively is critical. STUDY DESIGN A prospective cohort study was conducted. Clinical data were collected, and the attending surgeons preoperative diagnosis was recorded. Accuracy of the pediatric surgeons diagnosis was determined. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression were then used to determine independent clinical predictors of RA. Using the relative beta coefficients of these predictors, a scoring system was constructed to aid in the diagnosis of RA. RESULTS Two hundred forty-seven patients were evaluated: 98 AA (40%), 53 RA (21%), and 97 not appendicitis (39%). Median age was 10 years old. The overall accuracy of the pediatric surgeons preoperative diagnosis was 92%. Sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of RA were 96% and 83%, respectively. Multivariable regression analysis identified generalized tenderness on examination, duration of symptoms longer than 48 hours, WBC>19,400 cells/microL, abscess, and fecalith on CT scan as independent predictors for RA. A novel scoring system was developed with these variables, and, when applied to the study population, the specificity for the diagnosis of RA improved to 98%. CONCLUSIONS Pediatric surgeons differentiate AA from RA and not appendicitis preoperatively with high accuracy and sensitivity, but the specificity for diagnosing ruptured appendicitis is lower. The scoring system improved the specificity of the preoperative diagnosis. The validity and utility of this scoring system should be examined in future studies in larger patient populations.


Journal of Trauma-injury Infection and Critical Care | 2012

Evaluation for intra-abdominal injury in children after blunt torso trauma: can we reduce unnecessary abdominal computed tomography by utilizing a clinical prediction model?

Christian J. Streck; Brent Jewett; Amy H. Wahlquist; Peter S. Gutierrez; W. Scott Russell

BACKGROUND Blunt trauma is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in children. Despite the potential for malignancy, increased cost, limited small bowel injury detection sensitivity, and the low incidence of injury requiring operative intervention, the use of computed tomographic (CT) scan in pediatric blunt trauma evaluation remains common. Previous studies suggest that a clinical model using examination and laboratory data may help predict intra-abdominal injuries (IAIs) and potentially limit unnecessary CT scans in children. METHODS A retrospective chart review of all blunt “trauma alerts” for patients younger than 16 years during an 18-month period was performed at a Level I trauma center. Clinical factors, which might predict blunt IAI (hemodynamics, abdominal examination, serology, and plain radiographs), and potential limitations to performing a reliable abdominal examination (altered mental status, young age) were reviewed. A previously defined clinical prediction model based on six high-risk clinical variables for blunt IAI (hypotension, abnormal abdominal examination, elevated aspartate aminotransferase, elevated amylase, low hematocrit, and heme-positive urinalysis) was applied to each patient. RESULTS Of the 125 “trauma alert” patients who sustained blunt trauma during the study period, 97 underwent abdominal CT scan, with only 15 identified as IAI. Our prediction rule would have identified 16 of 17 patients with IAI (SE, 94%) as high-risk and missed only 1 patient (grade I spleen laceration, which did not require operation) (negative predictive value, 99%). Of the 83 patients with no risk factors for IAI based on the prediction rule, 54 underwent a negative abdominal CT scan. Of these 54 patients, only 22 had a potential limitation to a reliable abdominal examination. Application of our prediction rule could have prevented unnecessary CT scan in at least 32 patients (33%) during an 18-month period. CONCLUSION Use of a prediction model based on high-risk variables for IAI may decrease cost and radiation exposure by reducing the number of abdominal CT scans in children being evaluated for blunt abdominal trauma. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Prognostic study, level II.


Journal of Pediatric Surgery | 2011

Effectiveness of Biobrane for treatment of partial-thickness burns in children.

Aaron Lesher; Ryan H. Curry; Jill Evans; Valerie A. Smith; Michael T. Fitzgerald; Robert A. Cina; Christian J. Streck; Andre Hebra

PURPOSE Wound care for partial-thickness burns should alleviate pain, decrease hospital length of stay, and be readily applied to a variety of wounds. The effectiveness of Biobrane (UDL Laboratories, Rockford, IL) is compared with that of Beta Glucan Collagen (BGC; Brennan Medical, St. Paul, MN) in a retrospective cohort study. METHODS A retrospective chart review of all children treated at a tertiary care pediatric hospital between 2003 and 2009 identified patients with partial-thickness burns treated with Biobrane. These patients were compared with historical controls treated with BGC. RESULTS A total of 235 children between the ages of 4 weeks and 18 years with an average of 6.0% body surface area partial-thickness burns were treated with Biobrane. In a multivariate statistical analysis, patients treated with Biobrane healed significantly faster than those treated with BGC (Biobrane vs BGC: median, 9 vs 13 days; P = .019; hazard ratio, 1.68). In addition, patients who required inpatient treatment trended toward having shorter length of hospital stay in the Biobrane group (2.6 vs 4.1 days, P = .079). CONCLUSION Partial-thickness burn care consists of early debridement and application of a burn wound dressing. Biobrane dressings result in faster healing compared with BGC and may decrease hospital length of stay for patients requiring inpatient admission.


Journal of Pediatric Surgery | 2013

Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in the pediatric trauma population

A. Jill Thompson; S. David McSwain; Sally A. Webb; Melanie A. Stroud; Christian J. Streck

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE The aim of this study was to review evidence-based literature addressing pertinent questions about venous thromboembolism (VTE) after traumatic injury in children. METHODS Data were obtained from English-language articles identified through Pubmed published from 1995 until November 2012, and from bibliographies of relevant articles. Studies were included if they contributed evidence to one of the following questions. In the pediatric traumatic injury population: (1) What is the overall incidence of VTE? (2) Is age (adolescence versus pre-adolescence) associated with higher VTE incidence? (3) Which risk factors are associated with higher VTE incidence? (4) Does mechanical and/or pharmacological prophylaxis impact outcomes? RESULTS Eighteen articles were included in this systematic review. The evidence regarding each question was evaluated, graded by author consensus, and summarized. CONCLUSIONS The overall incidence of VTE is low. Older (>13years) and more severely injured patients are at higher VTE risk. Additional factors including injury type or presence of a central venous catheter also place a patient at higher VTE risk. Implementation of a risk-based clinical practice guideline for VTE prophylaxis has been associated with reduced symptomatic VTE at one institution. Randomized, prospective trials analyzing outcomes of VTE prophylaxis in pediatric trauma victims are needed.


Journal of The American College of Surgeons | 2015

Surgical wound misclassification: A multicenter evaluation

Shauna M. Levy; Kevin P. Lally; Martin L. Blakely; Casey M. Calkins; Melvin S. Dassinger; Eileen M. Duggan; Eunice Y. Huang; Akemi L. Kawaguchi; Monica E. Lopez; Robert T. Russell; Shawn D. St. Peter; Christian J. Streck; Adam M. Vogel; KuoJen Tsao

BACKGROUND Surgical wound classification (SWC) is used by hospitals, quality collaboratives, and Centers for Medicare and Medicaid to stratify patients for their risk for surgical site infection. Although these data can be used to compare centers, the validity and reliability of SWC as currently practiced has not been well studied. Our objective was to assess the reliability of SWC in a multicenter fashion. We hypothesized that the concordance rates between SWC in the electronic medical record and SWC determined from the operative note review is low and varies by institution and operation. STUDY DESIGN Surgical wound classification concordance was assessed at 11 participating institutions between SWC from the electronic medical record and SWC from operative note review for 8 common pediatric surgical operations. Cases with concurrent procedures were excluded. A maximum of 25 consecutive cases were selected per operation from each institution. A designated surgeon reviewed the included operative notes from his/her own institution to determine SWC based on a predetermined algorithm. RESULTS In all, 2,034 cases were reviewed. Overall SWC concordance was 56%, ranging from 47% to 66% across institutions. Inguinal hernia repair had the highest overall median concordance (92%) and appendectomy had the lowest (12%). Electronic medical records and reviewer SWC differed by up to 3 classes for certain cases. CONCLUSIONS Surgical site infection risk stratification by SWC, as currently practiced, is an unreliable methodology to compare patients and institutions. Surgical wound classification should not be used for quality benchmarking. If SWC continues to be used, individual institutions should evaluate their process of assigning SWC to ensure its accuracy and reliability.


Journal of Pediatric Surgery | 2010

Anti-N-methyL-D-aspartate receptor encephalitis associated with an ovarian teratoma in an adolescent female

Aaron Lesher; Thomas J. Myers; Fred Tecklenburg; Christian J. Streck

Anti-N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) receptor encephalitis is a recently described paraneoplastic syndrome with prominent neuropsychiatric symptoms. We report a case of NMDA receptor encephalitis in a 15-year-old female related to the development of NMDA receptor autoantibodies triggered by an ovarian teratoma. Removal of the mature teratoma proved curative with eventual resolution of the paraneoplastic disease process and associated psychiatric symptoms. Increasingly, reports of anti-NMDA receptor encephalitis associated with ovarian teratomas in pediatric patients, as well as a novel assay to measure these antibodies, suggest an etiology for this disease process that may be amenable to prompt surgical excision. The clinical presentation, diagnosis, and surgical management of the disease, as well as a review of the literature, are included.


Journal of Pediatric Surgery | 2015

Use of real-time ultrasound during central venous catheter placement: Results of an APSA survey

Melvin S. Dassinger; Elizabeth Renaud; Adam B. Goldin; Eunice Y. Huang; Robert T. Russell; Christian J. Streck; Xinyu Tang; Martin L. Blakely

PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to document the attitudes and practice patterns of pediatric surgeons regarding use of RTUS with CVC placement. METHODS An analytic survey composed of 20 questions was sent via APSA headquarters to all practicing members. Answers were summarized as frequency and percentage. Distributions of answers were compared using the chi-square tests. P-values ≤0.05 were considered statistically significant. RESULTS 361 of 1072 members chose to participate for a response rate of 34%. Most placed CVCs into the subclavian veins (SCV) of patients without coagulopathy, with the left SCV chosen approximately four times more often than the right. Conversely, RTUS use at the internal jugular vein (IJV) was significantly greater than that for the SCV (p<0.001). Coagulopathy, multiple previous catheters, and morbid obesity were identified as patient characteristics that would encourage RTUS use. The most commonly cited potential barriers to RTUS use were lack of formal ultrasound training and the belief that ultrasound is not necessary. CONCLUSIONS Variability exists among pediatric surgeons regarding use of RTUS during CVC placement. Additional studies are needed to document actual frequency of use, how RTUS is implemented, and its efficacy of preventing adverse events in children.


American Journal of Surgery | 2012

The role of sentinel lymph node biopsy in select sarcoma patients: a meta-analysis.

Sharee Wright; Kent Armeson; Elizabeth G. Hill; Christian J. Streck; Lee R. Leddy; David J. Cole; Nestor F. Esnaola; E. Ramsay Camp

BACKGROUND Sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy is a staging technique for occult lymph node disease. SLN biopsy has been applied to select patients with sarcoma, although the clinical utility remains uncertain. METHODS A PubMed/MEDLINE literature search was performed, and SLN biopsy outcomes were analyzed using a Bayesian meta-analytic approach to obtain point and interval estimates of rates of interest. RESULTS Sixteen studies involving SLN biopsy in patients with sarcoma were identified. Of 114 patients reported, 14 patients had positive SLNs (crude estimate, 12%; meta-analysis estimate, 17%). The meta-analysis false-negative rate was 29% (95% credible interval, 5%-59%). Recurrence and death rates in the SLN-positive group were higher than in the SLN-negative group. CONCLUSIONS This investigation highlights the current role of SLN biopsy in select patients with sarcoma for tumor staging. Questions regarding the high false-negative rate and management of micrometastatic lymphatic disease in patients with sarcoma still exist.


Journal of Pediatric Surgery | 2016

A multicenter, pediatric quality improvement initiative improves surgical wound class assignment, but is it enough? ☆ ☆☆ ★

Luke R. Putnam; Shauna M. Levy; Martin L. Blakely; Kevin P. Lally; Deidre L. Wyrick; Melvin S. Dassinger; Robert T. Russell; Eunice Y. Huang; Adam M. Vogel; Christian J. Streck; Akemi L. Kawaguchi; Casey M. Calkins; Shawn D. St. Peter; Paulette I. Abbas; Monica E. Lopez; KuoJen Tsao

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE Surgical wound classification (SWC) is widely utilized for surgical site infection (SSI) risk stratification and hospital comparisons. We previously demonstrated that nearly half of common pediatric operations are incorrectly classified in eleven hospitals. We aimed to improve multicenter, intraoperative SWC assignment through targeted quality improvement (QI) interventions. METHODS A before-and-after study from 2011-2014 at eleven childrens hospitals was conducted. The SWC recorded in the hospitals intraoperative record (hospital-based SWC) was compared to the SWC assigned by a surgeon reviewer utilizing a standardized algorithm. Study centers independently performed QI interventions. Agreement between the hospital-based and surgeon SWC was analyzed with Cohens weighted kappa and chi square. RESULTS Surgeons reviewed 2034 cases from 2011 (Period 1) and 1998 cases from 2013 (Period 2). Overall SWC agreement improved from 56% to 76% (p<0.01) and weighted kappa from 0.45 (95% CI 0.42-0.48) to 0.73 (95% CI 0.70-0.75). Median (range) improvement per institution was 23% (7-35%). A dose-response-like pattern was found between the number of interventions implemented and the amount of improvement in SWC agreement at each institution. CONCLUSIONS Intraoperative SWC assignment significantly improved after resource-intensive, multifaceted interventions. However, inaccurate wound classification still commonly occurred. SWC used in SSI risk-stratification models for hospital comparisons should be carefully evaluated.

Collaboration


Dive into the Christian J. Streck's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Martin L. Blakely

University of Tennessee Health Science Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Eunice Y. Huang

University of Tennessee Health Science Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Melvin S. Dassinger

University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Robert T. Russell

University of Alabama at Birmingham

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Adam M. Vogel

Washington University in St. Louis

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

KuoJen Tsao

University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Bennett W. Calder

Medical University of South Carolina

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Elizabeth Renaud

University of Tennessee Health Science Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jeffrey H. Haynes

Virginia Commonwealth University

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge